From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

If you had an idea and installed it in your car, that fixed your aero,
but also intentionally destroyed the aero of a following car, would it
be legal for a team to use it?
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

On 2025-07-25 12:14, Ar wrote:

If you had an idea and installed it in your car, that fixed your aero,
but also intentionally destroyed the aero of a following car, would it
be legal for a team to use it?

If it fit within the design "boxes" of the current formula?

Yes.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

On 26/07/2025 7:14 am, Ar wrote:

If you had an idea and installed it in your car, that fixed your aero, but also intentionally
destroyed the aero of a following car, would it be legal for a team to use it?

As long as it fitted within the prescribed 'boxes' where teams can add aero I guess so.

The question is "intentionally destroyed the aero of a following car". Unless that's stated on the
record the FIA couldn't prove that - as long as there's aero benefit to your car.
--
Shaun.

"Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
in the DSM"
David Melville.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

On 7/25/25 21:14, Ar wrote:

If you had an idea and installed it in your car, that fixed your aero,
but also intentionally destroyed the aero of a following car, would it
be legal for a team to use it?

Depends which team it is :-)
--
-------------

Godspeed for Assange
Amnesty for Snowden
Rehabilitation for heroes

Edmund
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2