Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 26 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 57:15:28 |
Calls: | 632 |
Files: | 1,188 |
D/L today: |
28 files (19,987K bytes) |
Messages: | 179,886 |
As you know by now, Texas national guard troops were sent to my state
to, whatever, and their deployment was blocked by a federal judge for
lack of a lawful reason to deploy. They've been sitting at an Army
Reserve base southwest of Joliet, so they don't even get to eat at
Chicago restaurants.
The funny part of the story was a number of them failed Pete Hegeseth's >intolerance for middle-age sprawl and were sent back to Texas.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/10/14/texas-national-guard-illinois-sent-home/
On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 07:22:17 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
As you know by now, Texas national guard troops were sent to my state
to, whatever, and their deployment was blocked by a federal judge for
lack of a lawful reason to deploy. They've been sitting at an Army
Reserve base southwest of Joliet, so they don't even get to eat at
Chicago restaurants.
The funny part of the story was a number of them failed Pete Hegeseth's
intolerance for middle-age sprawl and were sent back to Texas.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/10/14/texas-national-guard-illinois-sent-home/
How you feeling about your governor and mayor of Chicago refusing to
enforce laws and allowing the criminals to run rampant?
On 10/15/2025 7:40 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 07:22:17 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
As you know by now, Texas national guard troops were sent to my state
to, whatever, and their deployment was blocked by a federal judge for
lack of a lawful reason to deploy. They've been sitting at an Army
Reserve base southwest of Joliet, so they don't even get to eat at
Chicago restaurants.
The funny part of the story was a number of them failed Pete Hegeseth's
intolerance for middle-age sprawl and were sent back to Texas.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/10/14/texas-national-guard-
illinois-sent-home/
How you feeling about your governor and mayor of Chicago refusing to
enforce laws and allowing the criminals to run rampant?
How are you able to see his state better than he can?
On 10/15/2025 7:40 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 07:22:17 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
As you know by now, Texas national guard troops were sent to my state
to, whatever, and their deployment was blocked by a federal judge for
lack of a lawful reason to deploy. They've been sitting at an Army
Reserve base southwest of Joliet, so they don't even get to eat at
Chicago restaurants.
The funny part of the story was a number of them failed Pete Hegeseth's >>> intolerance for middle-age sprawl and were sent back to Texas.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/10/14/texas-national-guard-illinois-sent-home/
How you feeling about your governor and mayor of Chicago refusing to
enforce laws and allowing the criminals to run rampant?
How are you able to see his state better than he can?
Oct 15, 2025 at 8:22:26 AM PDT, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>10/15/2025 7:40 AM, NoBody wrote:
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 07:22:17 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:
As you know by now, Texas national guard troops were sent to my state >>>>to, whatever, and their deployment was blocked by a federal judge for >>>>lack of a lawful reason to deploy. They've been sitting at an Army >>>>Reserve base southwest of Joliet, so they don't even get to eat at >>>>Chicago restaurants.
The funny part of the story was a number of them failed Pete Hegeseth's >>>>intolerance for middle-age sprawl and were sent back to Texas.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/10/14/texas-national-guard-illinois-sent-home/
How you feeling about your governor and mayor of Chicago refusing to >>>enforce laws and allowing the criminals to run rampant?
How are you able to see his state better than he can?
Well, I can see *my* state and city and the deployment of the national guard >to put down our regular bi-monthly riots was both necessary and welcome >because my governor and mayor refuse to enforce laws and allow criminals to >run rampant.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
Oct 15, 2025 at 8:22:26 AM PDT, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>10/15/2025 7:40 AM, NoBody wrote:
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 07:22:17 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:
As you know by now, Texas national guard troops were sent to my state >>>>>to, whatever, and their deployment was blocked by a federal judge for >>>>>lack of a lawful reason to deploy. They've been sitting at an Army >>>>>Reserve base southwest of Joliet, so they don't even get to eat at >>>>>Chicago restaurants.
The funny part of the story was a number of them failed Pete Hegeseth's >>>>>intolerance for middle-age sprawl and were sent back to Texas.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/10/14/texas-national-guard-illinois-sent-home/
How you feeling about your governor and mayor of Chicago refusing to >>>>enforce laws and allowing the criminals to run rampant?
How are you able to see his state better than he can?
Well, I can see *my* state and city and the deployment of the national guard >>to put down our regular bi-monthly riots was both necessary and welcome >>because my governor and mayor refuse to enforce laws and allow criminals to >>run rampant.
I'm sorry if Los Angeles is being subject to riots, but Chicago isn't,
so I concede that you are leading in the race to the bottom.
Ghod forbid we get discussion of what's going on in this thread.
1) Crime is on a downward trend nationwide, from which Chicago benefits.
The serious crime that remains is not from police failing to enforce the
law. The governor is not in charge of local police. Chicago is being led
by a cop's cop, even appointed by Mayor Brandon Johnson, who is policing >regardless of idiotic rhetoric out of Johnson's mouth. He even assists
ICE and federal authorities with crowd control in the case of protests
that might overwhelm federal authorities.
That's why Chicago patrol officers called in for crowd control are
routinely tear gassed by ICE, which has been their common tactic,
Curious that NoBody failed to note that.
The problem with policing in Chicago with respect to the most serious
crime is ineffectiveness of criminal investigations and the unacceptably
low clearance rates. The prosecutor is filing charges when police
present good evidence and there is a statute tha tdet is applicable to
the nature of the crime and evidence obtained. SHe is simply no longer >ignoring the criminal code.
For the 2,321st time, military troops, unless they are M.P.s, are
absolutely not police officers. They cannot patrol then make arrests if
they witness crimes. They cannot investigate crimes. NoBody is well
aware of this,
2) moviePig's followup isn't directly related to anything I wrote.--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
Oct 15, 2025 at 8:22:26 AM PDT, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
10/15/2025 7:40 AM, NoBody wrote:
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 07:22:17 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:
As you know by now, Texas national guard troops were sent to my state >>>>> to, whatever, and their deployment was blocked by a federal judge for >>>>> lack of a lawful reason to deploy. They've been sitting at an Army
Reserve base southwest of Joliet, so they don't even get to eat at
Chicago restaurants.
The funny part of the story was a number of them failed Pete Hegeseth's >>>>> intolerance for middle-age sprawl and were sent back to Texas.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/10/14/texas-national-guard-illinois-sent-home/
How you feeling about your governor and mayor of Chicago refusing to
enforce laws and allowing the criminals to run rampant?
How are you able to see his state better than he can?
Well, I can see *my* state and city and the deployment of the national guard >> to put down our regular bi-monthly riots was both necessary and welcome
because my governor and mayor refuse to enforce laws and allow criminals to >> run rampant.
I'm sorry if Los Angeles is being subject to riots, but Chicago isn't,
so I concede that you are leading in the race to the bottom.
Ghod forbid we get discussion of what's going on in this thread.
1) Crime is on a downward trend nationwide, from which Chicago benefits.
The serious crime that remains is not from police failing to enforce the
law. The governor is not in charge of local police. Chicago is being led
by a cop's cop, even appointed by Mayor Brandon Johnson, who is policing regardless of idiotic rhetoric out of Johnson's mouth. He even assists
ICE and federal authorities with crowd control in the case of protests
that might overwhelm federal authorities.
That's why Chicago patrol officers called in for crowd control are
routinely tear gassed by ICE, which has been their common tactic,
Curious that NoBody failed to note that.
The problem with policing in Chicago with respect to the most serious
crime is ineffectiveness of criminal investigations and the unacceptably
low clearance rates. The prosecutor is filing charges when police
present good evidence and there is a statute tha tdet is applicable to
the nature of the crime and evidence obtained. SHe is simply no longer ignoring the criminal code.
For the 2,321st time, military troops, unless they are M.P.s, are
absolutely not police officers. They cannot patrol then make arrests if
they witness crimes. They cannot investigate crimes. NoBody is well
aware of this,
2) moviePig's followup isn't directly related to anything I wrote.
For the 2,321st time, military troops, unless they are M.P.s, are
absolutely not police officers. They cannot patrol then make arrests if
they witness crimes. They cannot investigate crimes.
On Oct 15, 2025 at 8:22:26 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 10/15/2025 7:40 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 07:22:17 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
As you know by now, Texas national guard troops were sent to my state >>>> to, whatever, and their deployment was blocked by a federal judge for >>>> lack of a lawful reason to deploy. They've been sitting at an Army
Reserve base southwest of Joliet, so they don't even get to eat at
Chicago restaurants.
The funny part of the story was a number of them failed Pete Hegeseth's >>>> intolerance for middle-age sprawl and were sent back to Texas.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/10/14/texas-national-guard-illinois-sent-home/
How you feeling about your governor and mayor of Chicago refusing to
enforce laws and allowing the criminals to run rampant?
How are you able to see his state better than he can?
Well, I can see *my* state and city and the deployment of the national guard to put down our regular bi-monthly riots was both necessary and welcome because my governor and mayor refuse to enforce laws and allow criminals to run rampant.
On Oct 15, 2025 at 12:01:46 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
For the 2,321st time, military troops, unless they are M.P.s, are
absolutely not police officers. They cannot patrol then make arrests if
they witness crimes. They cannot investigate crimes.
No, but they can form perimeters around federal facilities and federal law enforcement operations and enforce them so that the federal agents can do their jobs free from interference and attack, which they wouldn't have to do if, in the case of L.A. and Portland, the mayor and governor would do their jobs and enforce the law.
In both L.A. and Portland, the governing authorities don't just refuse to allow the police to assist ICE in their efforts or protect them while they perform their perfectly legal and constitutional duties, they won't even come to the aid of local residents who are victims of a panoply crimes from the 'protesters' who have infested their neighborhoods. Everything from blasting acid metal and rap music at high volume all night, to the use of air horns and
fireworks, to arson, to assault and battery on anyone the mob believes might be "on the other side". They recently tried to chain the doors shut on the Portland ICE building and set it on fire with people inside. That's attempted mass murder. The Portland police did nothing about it.
Also in Portland, reminiscent of the CHAZ settlement in Seattle, the mob has even set up checkpoints in the neighborhood around the ICE facility and demand
residents show their IDs under threat of violence and exclusion from their own
homes because the mob is trying to weed out reporters and counterprotestors from the area.
And the police do nothing about it. They tell any local resident who calls for
help-- even ones reporting physical assaults and batteries-- that they're on their own because local police enforcing *any* laws in the area surrounding the ICE facility could be seen as assisting ICE and they've been forbidden from doing it.
The only people they arrest are the conservatives and counterprotestors for being attacked. Two notable conservative YouTubers were violently set upon by the mob and suffered serious injuries, only to have the police arrest *them*, claiming their mere presence was tantamount to incitement.
Under these circumstances, it is *absolutely* appropriate for the federal government to step in and put down the insurrection which is being allowed to happen with the full knowledge and tacit permission of the state and local governments.