| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 23 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 50:06:06 |
| Calls: | 583 |
| Files: | 1,138 |
| Messages: | 111,306 |
https://youtu.be/xCxJroHiwvU?si=HhJLFQJmjqMHBUJ2
weberm@polaris.net wrote:
https://youtu.be/xCxJroHiwvU?si=HhJLFQJmjqMHBUJ2
Female Jem'Hadar.
Tell me you've never watched DS9 without telling me you've never
watched DS9.
weberm@polaris.net wrote:
https://youtu.be/xCxJroHiwvU?si=HhJLFQJmjqMHBUJ2
Female Jem'Hadar.
Tell me you've never watched DS9 without telling me you've never
watched DS9.
On Jul 29, 2025 at 2:29:16 AM PDT, "PoinsettDaliana96@outlook.com" <PoinsettDaliana96@outlook.com> wrote:
weberm@polaris.net wrote:
https://youtu.be/xCxJroHiwvU?si=HhJLFQJmjqMHBUJ2
Female Jem'Hadar.
Tell me you've never watched DS9 without telling me you've never
watched DS9.
The Jem'Hadar had no females. Or even males, since they didn't reproduce sexually. They were grown in vats by the Founders. The soldiers presented with
masculine traits like strength and aggressiveness, but they were neither male nor female.
So to both you and the writers of this mess of a STAR TREK show, right back atcha: Tell me you've never watched DS9 without telling me you've never watched DS9.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
On Jul 29, 2025 at 2:29:16 AM PDT, "PoinsettDaliana96@outlook.com"
<PoinsettDaliana96@outlook.com> wrote:
weberm@polaris.net wrote:
https://youtu.be/xCxJroHiwvU?si=HhJLFQJmjqMHBUJ2
Female Jem'Hadar.
Tell me you've never watched DS9 without telling me you've never
watched DS9.
The Jem'Hadar had no females. Or even males, since they didn't reproduce
sexually. They were grown in vats by the Founders. The soldiers
presented with masculine traits like strength and aggressiveness, but
they were neither male nor female.
So to both you and the writers of this mess of a STAR TREK show, right back >> atcha: Tell me you've never watched DS9 without telling me you've never
watched DS9.
Two words: frog DNA.
OK, one word and one initialism, but you get my drift
weberm@polaris.net wrote:
https://youtu.be/xCxJroHiwvU?si=HhJLFQJmjqMHBUJ2
Female Jem'Hadar.
Tell me you've never watched DS9 without telling me you've never
watched DS9.
On 2025-07-30 21:04:11 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
"PoinsettDaliana96@outlook.com" <PoinsettDaliana96@outlook.com> wrote:
weberm@polaris.net wrote:
https://youtu.be/xCxJroHiwvU?si=HhJLFQJmjqMHBUJ2
Female Jem'Hadar.
Tell me you've never watched DS9 without telling me you've never
watched DS9.
The Jem'Hadar had no females. Or even males, since they didn't reproduce >>> sexually. They were grown in vats by the Founders. The soldiers
presented with masculine traits like strength and aggressiveness, but
they were neither male nor female.
So to both you and the writers of this mess of a STAR TREK show, right
back atcha: Tell me you've never watched DS9 without telling me you've >>> never watched DS9.
Two words: frog DNA.
OK, one word and one initialism, but you get my drift
There is an *unofficial* fan story "Star Trek: Conflict" which does
include the Jem'Hadar's first female, created by a genetic mutation
before fertilization due to being infected with human DNA.
Jek'Kralija is the first Jem'Hadar female.
<https://memory-gamma.fandom.com/wiki/Jek%27Kralija>
"PoinsettDaliana96@outlook.com" <PoinsettDaliana96@outlook.com> wrote:
weberm@polaris.net wrote:
https://youtu.be/xCxJroHiwvU?si=HhJLFQJmjqMHBUJ2
Female Jem'Hadar.
Tell me you've never watched DS9 without telling me you've never
watched DS9.
The Jem'Hadar had no females. Or even males, since they didn't reproduce >sexually. They were grown in vats by the Founders. The soldiers presented >with masculine traits like strength and aggressiveness, but they were >neither male nor female.
IKR?
It gets even worse. She's a Jem'Hadar and Klingon hybrid.
A FAT one.
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 19:51:21 -0400, Ubiquitous wrote:
IKR?
It gets even worse. She's a Jem'Hadar and Klingon hybrid.
A FAT one.
There's no Ozempic in the ST continuum.
s|b wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 19:51:21 -0400, Ubiquitous wrote:
IKR?
It gets even worse. She's a Jem'Hadar and Klingon hybrid.
A FAT one.
There's no Ozempic in the ST continuum.
But there are exercise and diets.
Actually, I always wondered why no one is fat in Star Trek, considering
their sedementary lifestyle.
s|b wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 19:51:21 -0400, Ubiquitous wrote:
IKR?
It gets even worse. She's a Jem'Hadar and Klingon hybrid.
A FAT one.
There's no Ozempic in the ST continuum.
But there are exercise and diets.
Actually, I always wondered why no one is fat in Star Trek, considering
their sedementary lifestyle.
s|b wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 19:51:21 -0400, Ubiquitous wrote:
IKR?
It gets even worse. She's a Jem'Hadar and Klingon hybrid.
A FAT one.
There's no Ozempic in the ST continuum.
But there are exercise and diets.
Actually, I always wondered why no one is fat in Star Trek, considering
their sedementary lifestyle.
Verily, in article <r5qdneVXIqD29Qr1nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com>, did weberm@polaris.net deliver unto us this message:
s|b wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 19:51:21 -0400, Ubiquitous wrote:
IKR?
It gets even worse. She's a Jem'Hadar and Klingon hybrid.
A FAT one.
There's no Ozempic in the ST continuum.
But there are exercise and diets.
Actually, I always wondered why no one is fat in Star Trek, considering
their sedementary lifestyle.
Perhaps they've cured it in the future. Either that or there are
Starfleet fitness requirements and we're just not seeing them.
On Aug 9, 2025 at 8:25:31 AM PDT, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
s|b wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 19:51:21 -0400, Ubiquitous wrote:
IKR?
It gets even worse. She's a Jem'Hadar and Klingon hybrid.
A FAT one.
There's no Ozempic in the ST continuum.
But there are exercise and diets.
Actually, I always wondered why no one is fat in Star Trek, considering
their sedementary lifestyle.
Sedentary. Sedimentary would mean they accumulate layers of sediment over centuries.
On 8/9/2025 9:14 AM, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <r5qdneVXIqD29Qr1nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com>, didOriginal flavor Trek had a scene in one episode where McCoy was giving
weberm@polaris.net deliver unto us this message:
s|b wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 19:51:21 -0400, Ubiquitous wrote:
IKR?
It gets even worse. She's a Jem'Hadar and Klingon hybrid.
A FAT one.
There's no Ozempic in the ST continuum.
But there are exercise and diets.
Actually, I always wondered why no one is fat in Star Trek, considering
their sedementary lifestyle.
Perhaps they've cured it in the future. Either that or there are
Starfleet fitness requirements and we're just not seeing them.
Kirk a physical that involved enough exertion to raise a sweat.
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 19:51:21 -0400, Ubiquitous wrote:
IKR?
It gets even worse. She's a Jem'Hadar and Klingon hybrid.
A FAT one.
There's no Ozempic in the ST continuum.
Actually, I always wondered why no one is fat in Star Trek, considering
their sedementary lifestyle.
On Sat, 09 Aug 2025 11:25:31 -0400, Ubiquitous wrote:
Actually, I always wondered why no one is fat in Star Trek, considering
their sedementary lifestyle.
The replicator provides low calories?
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
s|b wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 19:51:21 -0400, Ubiquitous wrote:
It gets even worse. She's a Jem'Hadar and Klingon hybrid.
A FAT one.
There's no Ozempic in the ST continuum.
But there are exercise and diets.
Actually, I always wondered why no one is fat in Star Trek, considering
their sedementary lifestyle.
Harcourt Fenton Mudd
On Sat, 09 Aug 2025 11:25:31 -0400, Ubiquitous wrote:
Actually, I always wondered why no one is fat in Star Trek, considering
their sedementary lifestyle.
The replicator provides low calories?
In article <mfs6p6Freo3U3@mid.individual.net>, me@privacy.invalid wrote:
On Sat, 09 Aug 2025 11:25:31 -0400, Ubiquitous wrote:
Actually, I always wondered why no one is fat in Star Trek, considering >>> their sedementary lifestyle.
The replicator provides low calories?
Holodeck food?
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
In article <mfs6p6Freo3U3@mid.individual.net>, me@privacy.invalid wrote:
On Sat, 09 Aug 2025 11:25:31 -0400, Ubiquitous wrote:
Actually, I always wondered why no one is fat in Star Trek, considering >>> their sedementary lifestyle.
The replicator provides low calories?
Holodeck food?
VOYAGER never did get that right. They had a holo deck where you could live indefinitely on imaginary food and drink, and yet they established that it went away when you exited. So if you were in the holo deck very long, you should just die when you walked outside.
Verily, in article <635212760.776606512.130859.anim8rfsk- cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this message:
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
In article <mfs6p6Freo3U3@mid.individual.net>, me@privacy.invalid wrote: >>>> On Sat, 09 Aug 2025 11:25:31 -0400, Ubiquitous wrote:
Actually, I always wondered why no one is fat in Star Trek, considering >>>>> their sedementary lifestyle.
The replicator provides low calories?
Holodeck food?
VOYAGER never did get that right. They had a holo deck where you could live >> indefinitely on imaginary food and drink, and yet they established that it >> went away when you exited. So if you were in the holo deck very long, you
should just die when you walked outside.
So... you could stay in the holodeck for a year and just live on
imaginary food? Did something like this actually happen?
That implies... hmm, I think it implies that the crew are being
converted to virtual avatars when they enter the holodeck. Perhaps it
also works the other way, which is how the holodeck creations can occasionally escape and materialize.
Sounds crazy, but is it that far removed from transporter technology?
That also converts matter into a virtual representation and back again.
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <635212760.776606512.130859.anim8rfsk- cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this message:
VOYAGER never did get that right. They had a holo deck where you could live
indefinitely on imaginary food and drink, and yet they established that it >> went away when you exited. So if you were in the holo deck very long, you >> should just die when you walked outside.
So... you could stay in the holodeck for a year and just live on
imaginary food? Did something like this actually happen?
Not a year, but probably weeks and certainly several days, long enough that it would kill you.
Then they had an episode where they were running out of food, but itdidn?t
occur to anybody to just go into the Irish pub holodeck program and eat and drink all you want.
Verily, in article <392916302.776642579.774871.anim8rfsk- cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this message:
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <635212760.776606512.130859.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this
message:
VOYAGER never did get that right. They had a holo deck where you could live
indefinitely on imaginary food and drink, and yet they established that it >>>> went away when you exited. So if you were in the holo deck very long, you >>>> should just die when you walked outside.
So... you could stay in the holodeck for a year and just live on
imaginary food? Did something like this actually happen?
Not a year, but probably weeks and certainly several days, long enough that >> it would kill you.
Several days wouldn't kill you. People can live at least a month without food, on average. The old rule I recall is "four minutes without air,
four days without water, forty days without food."
Several weeks might. At the least, you'd show some signs when you came
out. If not, the holofood must be providing real nourishment.
Then they had an episode where they were running out of food, but itdidn?t
occur to anybody to just go into the Irish pub holodeck program and eat and >> drink all you want.
...but then there's that.
Perhaps time moves differently on the holodeck? Do we know for sure that
the people inside for weeks were gone from the outside for weeks?
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <392916302.776642579.774871.anim8rfsk- cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this message:
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <635212760.776606512.130859.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this >>> message:
VOYAGER never did get that right. They had a holo deck where you could live
indefinitely on imaginary food and drink, and yet they established that it
went away when you exited. So if you were in the holo deck very long, you
should just die when you walked outside.
So... you could stay in the holodeck for a year and just live on
imaginary food? Did something like this actually happen?
Not a year, but probably weeks and certainly several days, long enough that
it would kill you.
Several days wouldn't kill you. People can live at least a month without food, on average. The old rule I recall is "four minutes without air,
four days without water, forty days without food."
Good point. They presumably aren?t having real water either. They are
living off of imaginary beer and pub food made of hard light.
Several weeks might. At the least, you'd show some signs when you came out. If not, the holofood must be providing real nourishment.
And yet they don?t use it when they?re having problems with the food supply outside the holo deck
Verily, in article <165840835.776667635.718336.anim8rfsk- cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this message:
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <392916302.776642579.774871.anim8rfsk- cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this message:
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <635212760.776606512.130859.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this >>> message:
VOYAGER never did get that right. They had a holo deck where you could live
indefinitely on imaginary food and drink, and yet they established that it
went away when you exited. So if you were in the holo deck very long, you
should just die when you walked outside.
So... you could stay in the holodeck for a year and just live on
imaginary food? Did something like this actually happen?
Not a year, but probably weeks and certainly several days, long enough that
it would kill you.
Several days wouldn't kill you. People can live at least a month without food, on average. The old rule I recall is "four minutes without air, four days without water, forty days without food."
Good point. They presumably aren?t having real water either. They are living off of imaginary beer and pub food made of hard light.
Several weeks might. At the least, you'd show some signs when you came out. If not, the holofood must be providing real nourishment.
And yet they don?t use it when they?re having problems with the food supply outside the holo deck
Maybe it's real food. The holodeck could have food replication ability,
but it would need the same supplies as other replicators.
Verily, in article <165840835.776667635.718336.anim8rfsk- cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this message:
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <392916302.776642579.774871.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this
message:
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <635212760.776606512.130859.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this >>>>> message:
VOYAGER never did get that right. They had a holo deck where you could live
indefinitely on imaginary food and drink, and yet they established that it
went away when you exited. So if you were in the holo deck very long, you
should just die when you walked outside.
So... you could stay in the holodeck for a year and just live on
imaginary food? Did something like this actually happen?
Not a year, but probably weeks and certainly several days, long enough that
it would kill you.
Several days wouldn't kill you. People can live at least a month without >>> food, on average. The old rule I recall is "four minutes without air,
four days without water, forty days without food."
Good point. They presumably aren?t having real water either. They are
living off of imaginary beer and pub food made of hard light.
Several weeks might. At the least, you'd show some signs when you came
out. If not, the holofood must be providing real nourishment.
And yet they don?t use it when they?re having problems with the food supply >> outside the holo deck
Maybe it's real food. The holodeck could have food replication ability,
but it would need the same supplies as other replicators.
Verily, in article <MPG.43050ba5768f1a8d9897d7@news.eternal-
september.org>, did thetruemelissa@gmail.com deliver unto us this
message:
Verily, in article <165840835.776667635.718336.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this
message:
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <392916302.776642579.774871.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this >>>> message:
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <635212760.776606512.130859.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this >>>>>> message:
VOYAGER never did get that right. They had a holo deck where you could live
indefinitely on imaginary food and drink, and yet they established that it
went away when you exited. So if you were in the holo deck very long, you
should just die when you walked outside.
So... you could stay in the holodeck for a year and just live on
imaginary food? Did something like this actually happen?
Not a year, but probably weeks and certainly several days, long enough that
it would kill you.
Several days wouldn't kill you. People can live at least a month without >>>> food, on average. The old rule I recall is "four minutes without air, >>>> four days without water, forty days without food."
Good point. They presumably aren?t having real water either. They are
living off of imaginary beer and pub food made of hard light.
Several weeks might. At the least, you'd show some signs when you came >>>> out. If not, the holofood must be providing real nourishment.
And yet they don?t use it when they?re having problems with the food supply >>> outside the holo deck
Maybe it's real food. The holodeck could have food replication ability,
but it would need the same supplies as other replicators.
No, wait, I've got it. It's a configurable option. You can have hard
light food when you want to pig out on steak and chocolate without consequences, but have real food when you and your friends are spending
a whole weekend climbing a fake mountain.
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <165840835.776667635.718336.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this
message:
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <392916302.776642579.774871.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this >>>> message:
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <635212760.776606512.130859.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this >>>>>> message:
VOYAGER never did get that right. They had a holo deck where you could live
indefinitely on imaginary food and drink, and yet they established that it
went away when you exited. So if you were in the holo deck very long, you
should just die when you walked outside.
So... you could stay in the holodeck for a year and just live on >>>>>> imaginary food? Did something like this actually happen?
Not a year, but probably weeks and certainly several days, long enough that
it would kill you.
Several days wouldn't kill you. People can live at least a month without >>>> food, on average. The old rule I recall is "four minutes without air, >>>> four days without water, forty days without food."
Good point. They presumably aren?t having real water either. They are
living off of imaginary beer and pub food made of hard light.
Several weeks might. At the least, you'd show some signs when you came >>>> out. If not, the holofood must be providing real nourishment.
And yet they don?t use it when they?re having problems with the food supply
outside the holo deck
Maybe it's real food. The holodeck could have food replication ability,
but it would need the same supplies as other replicators.
All the food replicators need is power. They donrCOt rearrange molecules. They just use power to make something out of nothing.
However, the food replicators use a different kind of power than anything else uses. The holodecks run on a different kind of power than the food replicators do. They canrCOt make real food.
IrCOm not sure how many different kinds of power Voyager requires, but they very definitely established that food replicator power is different than anything else on the ship.
All the food replicators need is power. They don?t rearrange molecules.
They just use power to make something out of nothing.
On Aug 12, 2025 at 12:13:13 PM PDT, "anim8rfsk" <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <165840835.776667635.718336.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this
message:
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <392916302.776642579.774871.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this >>>>> message:
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <635212760.776606512.130859.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this >>>>>>> message:
VOYAGER never did get that right. They had a holo deck where you could live
indefinitely on imaginary food and drink, and yet they established that it
went away when you exited. So if you were in the holo deck very long, you
should just die when you walked outside.
So... you could stay in the holodeck for a year and just live on >>>>>>> imaginary food? Did something like this actually happen?
Not a year, but probably weeks and certainly several days, long enough that
it would kill you.
Several days wouldn't kill you. People can live at least a month without >>>>> food, on average. The old rule I recall is "four minutes without air, >>>>> four days without water, forty days without food."
Good point. They presumably aren?t having real water either. They are
living off of imaginary beer and pub food made of hard light.
Several weeks might. At the least, you'd show some signs when you came >>>>> out. If not, the holofood must be providing real nourishment.
And yet they don?t use it when they?re having problems with the food supply
outside the holo deck
Maybe it's real food. The holodeck could have food replication ability, >>> but it would need the same supplies as other replicators.
All the food replicators need is power. They donrCOt rearrange molecules.
They just use power to make something out of nothing.
However, the food replicators use a different kind of power than anything
else uses. The holodecks run on a different kind of power than the food
replicators do. They canrCOt make real food.
IrCOm not sure how many different kinds of power Voyager requires, but they >> very definitely established that food replicator power is different than
anything else on the ship.
Food replicator power is artificial. The rest of the ship runs on natural power.
Verily, in article <1827605190.776718401.734510.anim8rfsk- cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this message:
All the food replicators need is power. They don?t rearrange molecules.
They just use power to make something out of nothing.
Well, that's certainly insane. The amount of energy needed to
materialize even a piece of toast... yeesh. They're probably using more energy on each evening's dinner than on warping around the galaxy.
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <MPG.43050ba5768f1a8d9897d7@news.eternal-
september.org>, did thetruemelissa@gmail.com deliver unto us this
message:
Verily, in article <165840835.776667635.718336.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this
message:
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <392916302.776642579.774871.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this >>>>> message:
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <635212760.776606512.130859.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this >>>>>>> message:
VOYAGER never did get that right. They had a holo deck where you could live
indefinitely on imaginary food and drink, and yet they established that it
went away when you exited. So if you were in the holo deck very long, you
should just die when you walked outside.
So... you could stay in the holodeck for a year and just live on >>>>>>> imaginary food? Did something like this actually happen?
Not a year, but probably weeks and certainly several days, long enough that
it would kill you.
Several days wouldn't kill you. People can live at least a month without >>>>> food, on average. The old rule I recall is "four minutes without air, >>>>> four days without water, forty days without food."
Good point. They presumably aren?t having real water either. They are
living off of imaginary beer and pub food made of hard light.
Several weeks might. At the least, you'd show some signs when you came >>>>> out. If not, the holofood must be providing real nourishment.
And yet they don?t use it when they?re having problems with the food supply
outside the holo deck
Maybe it's real food. The holodeck could have food replication ability,
but it would need the same supplies as other replicators.
No, wait, I've got it. It's a configurable option. You can have hard
light food when you want to pig out on steak and chocolate without
consequences, but have real food when you and your friends are spending
a whole weekend climbing a fake mountain.
If only the voyager rCLwritersrCY had put this much effort into the show.
On 8/12/2025 12:13 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:As I recall "Holodeck energy" was different than all the other energy
Verily, in article <MPG.43050ba5768f1a8d9897d7@news.eternal-
september.org>, did thetruemelissa@gmail.com deliver unto us this
message:
Verily, in article <165840835.776667635.718336.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this >>>> message:
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <392916302.776642579.774871.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this >>>>>> message:
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <635212760.776606512.130859.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this >>>>>>>> message:
VOYAGER never did get that right. They had a holo deck where you could live
indefinitely on imaginary food and drink, and yet they established that it
went away when you exited. So if you were in the holo deck very long, you
should just die when you walked outside.
So... you could stay in the holodeck for a year and just live on >>>>>>>> imaginary food? Did something like this actually happen?
Not a year, but probably weeks and certainly several days, long enough that
it would kill you.
Several days wouldn't kill you. People can live at least a month without >>>>>> food, on average. The old rule I recall is "four minutes without air, >>>>>> four days without water, forty days without food."
Good point. They presumably aren?t having real water either. They are >>>>> living off of imaginary beer and pub food made of hard light.
Several weeks might. At the least, you'd show some signs when you came >>>>>> out. If not, the holofood must be providing real nourishment.
And yet they don?t use it when they?re having problems with the food supply
outside the holo deck
Maybe it's real food. The holodeck could have food replication ability, >>>> but it would need the same supplies as other replicators.
No, wait, I've got it. It's a configurable option. You can have hard
light food when you want to pig out on steak and chocolate without
consequences, but have real food when you and your friends are spending
a whole weekend climbing a fake mountain.
If only the voyager rCLwritersrCY had put this much effort into the show.
the ship used, so replicators in the holodeck weren't possible.
Yes, it really was that stupid.
Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
On 8/12/2025 12:13 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:As I recall "Holodeck energy" was different than all the other energy
Verily, in article <MPG.43050ba5768f1a8d9897d7@news.eternal-
september.org>, did thetruemelissa@gmail.com deliver unto us this
message:
Verily, in article <165840835.776667635.718336.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this >>>>> message:
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <392916302.776642579.774871.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this >>>>>>> message:
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <635212760.776606512.130859.anim8rfsk-
cox.net@news.easynews.com>, did anim8rfsk@cox.net deliver unto us this
message:
VOYAGER never did get that right. They had a holo deck where you could live
indefinitely on imaginary food and drink, and yet they established that it
went away when you exited. So if you were in the holo deck very long, you
should just die when you walked outside.
So... you could stay in the holodeck for a year and just live on >>>>>>>>> imaginary food? Did something like this actually happen?
Not a year, but probably weeks and certainly several days, long enough that
it would kill you.
Several days wouldn't kill you. People can live at least a month without
food, on average. The old rule I recall is "four minutes without air, >>>>>>> four days without water, forty days without food."
Good point. They presumably aren?t having real water either. They are >>>>>> living off of imaginary beer and pub food made of hard light.
Several weeks might. At the least, you'd show some signs when you came >>>>>>> out. If not, the holofood must be providing real nourishment.
And yet they don?t use it when they?re having problems with the food supply
outside the holo deck
Maybe it's real food. The holodeck could have food replication ability, >>>>> but it would need the same supplies as other replicators.
No, wait, I've got it. It's a configurable option. You can have hard
light food when you want to pig out on steak and chocolate without
consequences, but have real food when you and your friends are spending >>>> a whole weekend climbing a fake mountain.
If only the voyager rCLwritersrCY had put this much effort into the show. >>>
the ship used, so replicators in the holodeck weren't possible.
Yes, it really was that stupid.
I think that qualifies me for Holodeck ice cream.
Judges?
As I recall "Holodeck energy" was different than all the other energy
the ship used, so replicators in the holodeck weren't possible.
Yes, it really was that stupid.