• Re: (ReacTor) Defining Our Terms: What Do We Mean by "Hard SF"?

    From John Savard@quadibloc@invalid.invalid to rec.arts.sf.written on Sun Sep 28 03:52:19 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 11:00:53 -0700, The Horny Goat wrote:

    On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:54:58 -0400, Joy Beeson
    <jbeeson@invalid.net.invalid> wrote:

    Many years later, I learned that this was because my teachers not only >>didn't explain the fundamental thereom to me, they didn't even tell me
    that calculus *had* a fundamental thereom.

    You scared me for a moment since 40 years ago I was a math major so
    obviously would have learned that. So I Googled and realized I hadn't forgotten the theorem, just the name of it...

    Yes, it's a pretty obvious calculus fact - that the derivative of the
    integral of a function is the original function, so integration is the
    inverse of differentiation. That lets one work out the first few integrals
    to get started.

    Even though you could never approach teaching first-year calculus to first graders, I thought that you could probably explain the fundamental theorem
    of calculus to them with a felt board. Although the usefulness of that
    would be limited.

    John Savard
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From ram@ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) to rec.arts.sf.written on Sun Sep 28 10:30:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> wrote or quoted:
    Yes, it's a pretty obvious calculus fact - that the derivative of the >integral of a function is the original function, so integration is the >inverse of differentiation. That lets one work out the first few integrals >to get started.

    Even though you could never approach teaching first-year calculus to first >graders, I thought that you could probably explain the fundamental theorem >of calculus to them with a felt board. Although the usefulness of that
    would be limited.

    Everybody gets that a bucket fills up faster if the stream of water
    coming in is stronger. What ends up in the bucket is the integral,
    basically the sum. The force of the stream, though, that's the
    derivative, the rate of change. If we watch how the water level
    rises, we can figure out how strong the stream is, and the other
    way around too. That's the fundamental theorem of calculus.

    Like I mentioned earlier, if you want legit hard science
    fiction, check out that Springer book with stories written by
    actual scientists. The quality's all over the place, but a few
    of them have been pretty solid so far (I have not yet read all).

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From ram@ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) to rec.arts.sf.written on Sun Sep 28 11:34:28 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) wrote or quoted:
    Everybody gets that a bucket fills up faster if the stream of water
    coming in is stronger. What ends up in the bucket is the integral,
    basically the sum. The force of the stream, though, that's the
    derivative, the rate of change. If we watch how the water level
    rises, we can figure out how strong the stream is, and the other
    way around too. That's the fundamental theorem of calculus.

    And if there's already some water in the bucket at the start,
    that's the integration constant!

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From kludge@kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) to rec.arts.sf.written on Sun Sep 28 09:45:44 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    John Savard <quadibloc@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    Even though you could never approach teaching first-year calculus to first >graders, I thought that you could probably explain the fundamental theorem >of calculus to them with a felt board. Although the usefulness of that
    would be limited.

    I could see it being kind of useful in special cases... like how if you
    know your speed and time you can find your distance and so that means if
    you know your distance and time you can figure our your speed. That is
    a thing that a first grader might find valuable.

    I took calculus for engineers and we got a mention of how the integral
    and the derivative were opposites, but it was never described as a
    theorem and never proven. It was just something we were expected to
    take for granted as part of the definition of what the operations were.

    Engineering calculus was all about how to do operations as quickly as
    possible rather than what they actually meant.
    --scott
    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2