• Re: (tears) The Continent Makers by L. Sprague de Camp

    From ram@ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) to rec.arts.sf.written on Fri Sep 26 13:04:52 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) wrote or quoted:
    |The Restaurant at the End of the Universe is one of the most
    |extraordinary ventures in the entire history of catering. It
    |has been built on the fragmented remains of . . . it will be
    |built on the fragmented . . . that is to say it will have been
    |built by this time, and indeed has been -
    "The Restaurant at the End of the Universe" (1995-09-27) -
    Douglas Adams

    So, today [2025-09-27] that [1995-09-27] is thirty years ago.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Robert Carnegie@rja.carnegie@gmail.com to rec.arts.sf.written on Sat Sep 27 03:10:29 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    On 04/08/2025 22:20, William Hyde wrote:
    John Savard wrote:
    On Mon, 04 Aug 2025 00:00:45 +0000, John Savard wrote:

    On Sun, 04 May 2025 09:26:51 -0400, James Nicoll wrote:

    The Continent Makers by L. Sprague de Camp

    Star flight allows Earth's vast bounty of confidence agents to bilk the >>>> peoples of other star systems... or attempt to, at least.

    If L. Sprague de Camp is going to avoid including faster-than-light
    travel in his stories about people casually hopping from one star-system >>> to another, the least he could have done was, say, include the invention >>> of a *longevity drug* in his stories instead, so as to make them not
    utterly implausible.

    Of course, it seems clear to me that the invention of the Internet has
    made interstellar travel an impossibility, except for a few very rare
    individuals, unless we do have not merely FTL, but ridiculously fast
    FTL. People just won't stand being offline for years; they couldn't
    endure the boredom.

    I don't feel that I have the talent to write a science-fiction novel that
    anyone would want to read.


    But if I were to do so... and I were to indulge my own feelings about how
    FTL would play out in real life, instead of following genre
    conventions...
    I might end up with a story in this setting:

    Humanity lives underground beneath the surface of Proxima Centauri b.
    Both
    Sol and Alpha Centauri have long since gone nova, but Proxima Centauri
    still has most of its future ahead of it.

    Minor nit.-a Neither Sol nor Alpha is going to go nova.-a But both will eventually shed much of their mass as red giants, and become white
    dwarfs, giving much the same scenario.

    If it helps anyone, there's a couple of stories
    where using a new FTL drive causes your sun to
    explode. But that makes it difficult, in the
    setting, to talk about anything else. Or to
    talk at all, really.

    And you are right about Proxima.-a All this will occur before Proxima is more than one percent of the way through it's main sequence period.-a And you definitely want to live underground as Proxima is a flare star.

    Still, any of our descendants living in this period, five billion years
    from now, will be about as closely related to us as we are to
    cyanobacteria.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Robert Carnegie@rja.carnegie@gmail.com to rec.arts.sf.written on Sat Sep 27 10:24:17 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    On 04/08/2025 18:51, Bobbie Sellers wrote:


    On 8/4/25 10:35, Stefan Ram wrote:
    -a It can't cause time paradoxes since we
    -a-a can't encode any useful information into it.

    -a-a-a-aSo far!
    -a-a-a-aBut maybe the future determined the past.
    Lots of SpecFic written about people who go back in
    time to start Life on the Primeval Earth simply by
    going there and dying or even merely excreting.

    -a-a-a-aI think there is even a Doctor Who about
    the Doctor, Tardis and companion visiting both
    the beginning and the end of the Univers and
    who is to say that these only represent the
    -asame moment.

    -a-a-a-aRight now we are ~13+ Billion years from
    the beginning and trying to figure out how those
    few moments determined the present state of
    things. If the present on the other hand sent
    information back to the beginning it might have
    set up the conditions that resulted in present
    conditions.
    -a-a-a-aNot that this is of any importance to us
    at the present moment.-a We can in no way
    change our present to have magic working
    because we have a simply logical universe
    already and it is better so. IMO of course.

    I think there are at least two Doctor Who stories
    which involve a spaceship or asteroid or something
    which turns out to back in time and become the
    Big Bang though that's rather unlikely in terms of
    scale. And a very early story where the TARDIS
    seems to be in danger of doing that. I think
    I read that they'd spent most of the series budget
    on Daleks, or maybe the next story wasn't ready,
    so they did a story where the time machine doesn't
    land anywhere and just keeps going and going...
    because they already had the studio sets.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Robert Carnegie@rja.carnegie@gmail.com to rec.arts.sf.written on Sat Sep 27 10:37:57 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    On 04/08/2025 22:53, William Hyde wrote:
    Paul S Person wrote:


    If you consider the determination with which scientists hang on to
    their current theory in the face of the evidence,

    When a theory has been wildly successful in a variety of areas, it is
    absurd to drop it in the face of a contrary observation when another explanation has not been ruled out.-a The theory is put in some doubt, to
    be sure, but not abandoned.-a Not immediately, anyway.

    For example, deviations in the orbit of Uranus put Newton's theory into doubt, but people speculated that the presence of an unknown planet
    could be responsible.-a Neptune was discovered, and the theory survived
    that test.

    On the other hand deviations in the orbit of Mercury could not be solved
    in this way.-a A perturbation mass, Vulcan, was hypothesized, but it did
    not do us the favour of existing.-a The theory had to be changed, though
    it took a while (Einstein figured it out in 1909 but didn't publish for several years).

    Fun fact: Doctor Who and the Daleks also have
    visited Vulcan. In the 22nd century. So they
    should have known... (In later versions, it
    wasn't Sol's Vulcan.)
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dimensional Traveler@dtravel@sonic.net to rec.arts.sf.written on Sat Sep 27 07:42:17 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    On 9/27/2025 2:24 AM, Robert Carnegie wrote:
    On 04/08/2025 18:51, Bobbie Sellers wrote:


    On 8/4/25 10:35, Stefan Ram wrote:
    -a It can't cause time paradoxes since we
    -a-a can't encode any useful information into it.

    -a-a-a-a-aSo far!
    -a-a-a-a-aBut maybe the future determined the past.
    Lots of SpecFic written about people who go back in
    time to start Life on the Primeval Earth simply by
    going there and dying or even merely excreting.

    -a-a-a-a-aI think there is even a Doctor Who about
    the Doctor, Tardis and companion visiting both
    the beginning and the end of the Univers and
    who is to say that these only represent the
    -a-asame moment.

    -a-a-a-a-aRight now we are ~13+ Billion years from
    the beginning and trying to figure out how those
    few moments determined the present state of
    things. If the present on the other hand sent
    information back to the beginning it might have
    set up the conditions that resulted in present
    conditions.
    -a-a-a-a-aNot that this is of any importance to us
    at the present moment.-a We can in no way
    change our present to have magic working
    because we have a simply logical universe
    already and it is better so. IMO of course.

    I think there are at least two Doctor Who stories
    which involve a spaceship or asteroid or something
    which turns out to back in time and become the
    Big Bang though that's rather unlikely in terms of
    scale.-a And a very early story where the TARDIS
    seems to be in danger of doing that.-a I think
    I read that they'd spent most of the series budget
    on Daleks, or maybe the next story wasn't ready,
    so they did a story where the time machine doesn't
    land anywhere and just keeps going and going...
    because they already had the studio sets.

    AKA "Bottle Episode".
    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2