• AI/LLM reviews of STNG - Galaxy's Child

    From doctor@doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) to rec.arts.startrek.current,rec.arts.sf.fandom,rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv,can.arts.sf on Thu Aug 28 13:54:19 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.tv


    AI/LLM reviews of Star Trek The Next Generation - Galaxy's Child

    Google Gemini

    Plot Synopsis

    The Enterprise encounters a massive, silicon-based,
    spaceborne lifeform. Lieutenant Commander Geordi
    La Forge, fascinated by the creature, names it
    "Gomtuu" after a phrase meaning "lonely one"
    in a children's book. The crew quickly discovers
    that Gomtuu is weak and possibly dying. In a tragic
    and unexpected turn of events, a mistake during
    a diagnostic scan causes the Enterprise
    to inadvertently kill the creature.

    Immediately, a new, much smaller lifeform
    emerges from the dead body of Gomtuu. This "child"
    imprints on the Enterprise, perceiving it
    as its parent. The child begins to feed
    on the ship's energy, drawing power from the warp
    core and causing a critical power drain. The crew
    must race against time to figure out how to
    communicate with the child and teach it to find
    its own energy source before it completely
    drains the ship.

    A compelling secondary plot unfolds as Geordi
    is joined on the bridge by Dr. Leah Brahms,
    the brilliant warp field expert he has long a
    dmired. However, the real Dr. Brahms is
    a stern, serious professional, nothing
    like the idealized, friendly version Geordi
    created on his holodeck. Their professional
    collaboration is strained by the awkwardness
    of GeordirCOs prior "relationship" with
    the simulated Brahms, forcing him to confront
    his own insecurities and idealization of others.

    Strengths
    Classic Moral Dilemma: The episode presents
    a powerful and classic Star Trek ethical conundrum.
    The crew, through no malice, accidentally kills
    a sentient being, and the story explores their
    profound sense of responsibility
    and guilt for its orphaned child.

    Geordi's Character Development: This is a
    standout episode for Geordi La Forge. It
    highlights his passion for science
    and his emotional depth. The subplot
    with Dr. Brahms is a bold, realistic,
    and often uncomfortable look at the
    dangers of idealizing people. It's
    a memorable moment of growth for his character.

    Emotional Core: The relationship between the
    crew and the cosmic lifeform's child is genuinely
    touching. The attempts to communicate with
    the young creature and the sense of mourning
    for the parent create a strong emotional
    foundation for the story.

    Tense Pacing: The urgency of the ship's
    power drain and the impending danger create
    a palpable sense of tension throughout the episode.

    Weaknesses
    The Brahms Subplot: While it is a strong point
    for GeordirCOs character, the subplot is very
    uncomfortable to watch at times. The resolution
    of their conflict, while necessary for the story,
    can feel a bit rushed, especially
    given the emotional fallout.

    Overall Impression
    "Galaxy's Child" is an excellent
    and emotionally resonant episode
    that skillfully balances a compelling
    sci-fi plot with a deep character study.
    It stands as a great example of the show's
    ability to explore complex themes
    of responsibility, grief,
    and the mistakes we make in a powerful
    and memorable way.

    Rating: 8.5/10

    ChatGPT

    HererCOs a thorough review of **rCLStar Trek:
    The Next GenerationrCY rCo *GalaxyrCOs Child***
    (Season 4, Episode 16), based on script
    details and a broad range of critiques
    and fan responses:

    ---

    ### Overview

    In *GalaxyrCOs Child*, Dr. Leah BrahmsrCoone
    of the Enterprise enginerCOs original
    designersrCojoins the ship for consultation.
    Chief Engineer Geordi La Forge, who previously
    relied on a holographic version of her to save
    the Enterprise in *Booby Trap*, is eager
    to meet the real her. However, the meeting
    turns awkward quickly: Brahms dismisses
    his engine modifications,
    and when she discovers the holodeck program
    of her likenessrCowhich was used by Geordi
    without his fully realizing
    the implicationsrCothings become severely uncomfortable.

    At the same time, the Enterprise encounters a colossal
    space creature that attacks defensively. After accidentally
    killing it, Picard and crew discover it was pregnant.
    Through ingenuity, they safely deliver the offspring,
    which then latches onto the ship for nourishmentrCoforcing
    the crew to find a way to safely separate it and set it free.
    ([Wikipedia][1], [Den of Geek][2], [Everything Explained Today][3])

    ---

    ### What Works

    * **Sci-Fi Concept & Visuals**
    The space creature and its newborn
    are creatively conceived and compellingly
    portrayed, offering an imaginative alien
    subplot that balances the more human drama.
    Effects were praised for their smoothness and originality.
    ([Wikipedia][1], [Thoughts From the Mountain Top][4], [Everything Explained Today][3])

    * **Strong Performances**
    Patrick Stewart delivers moving emotional
    moments as Picard wrestles with guilt over
    killing a sentient beingrCoeven unknowingly.
    ([Wikipedia][1], [Everything Explained Today][3])

    ---

    ### Where It Falls Short

    * **Problematic Portrayal of Geordi**
    A majority of critics and fans find Geordi's
    behaviorrCostemming from unconsented use of BrahmsrCOs
    likenessrCodeeply unsettling. His defense of himself
    rather than acknowledging the violation has drawn
    widespread condemnation: terms like rCLcreepy,rCY
    rCLgaslighting,rCY and rCLuncomfortablerCY frequently
    appear in commentary.
    ([Reddit][5], [angriest.blogspot.com][6], [Trakt][7], [Thoughts From the Mountain Top][4], [Den of Geek][2], [The Trek BBS][8], [jphalt-startrek-tng-reviews.blogspot.com][9])

    * **Uneven Character Resolution**
    Critics point out that BrahmsrCOs final apology toward
    GeordirCogiven her rightful angerrCois tone-deaf,
    reinforcing an imbalanced power dynamic rather than healing it.
    ([angriest.blogspot.com][6], [Trakt][7], [Reddit][10])

    * **Mixed Critical Reception**

    * **Zack Handlen (The A.V. Club):** Gave it a **C+**,
    noting the audience isnrCOt given reason to sympathize
    with Geordi's actions.
    ([Wikipedia][1], [Everything Explained Today][3])
    * **Den of Geek:** Mixed; calls it well-structured
    with good chemistry, but built on a flawed premise.
    ([Den of Geek][2], [Everything Explained Today][3])
    * **Keith DeCandido (Tor.com):** 3/10; praises Picard's
    arc, but condemns GeordirCOs behavior as morally reprehensible.
    ([Everything Explained Today][3])

    ---

    ### Audience Feedback

    * **IMDb Rating:** Approximately **7.0/10**
    from \~3,500 usersrCosuggesting moderate
    viewer approval overall.
    ([IMDb][11])

    * **Fan Perspectives Vary:**

    * Some note the space creature subplot
    is enjoyable and imaginative
    but overshadowed by GeordirCOs unsettling conduct.
    * Others outright skip the episode in
    rewatch marathons due to how uncomfortable
    they find his behavior.
    ([Reddit][12])

    ---

    ### Final Verdict

    **Rating: 5.5 / 10**

    **Verdict:** *GalaxyrCOs Child* presents
    an intriguing sci-fi scenariorCothe birth
    of a living starship babyrCothat showcases
    the series' creative spark. However, it's
    deeply marred by a misjudged romantic
    subplot, where GeordirCOs behavior crosses
    ethical lines without meaningful
    consequence or acknowledgment. The uneven tone
    and dismissal of BrahmsrCOs justified reaction
    undermine the episoderCOs impact. What could have
    been a thoughtful exploration of ambition
    and obsession instead leans into discomfort.



    [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy%27s_Child?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Galaxy's Child"
    [2]: https://www.denofgeek.com/tv/revisiting-star-trek-tng-galaxys-child/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Revisiting Star Trek TNG: Galaxy's Child | Den of Geek"
    [3]: https://everything.explained.today/Galaxy%27s_Child/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Galaxy's Child Explained"
    [4]: https://thoughtsfromthemountaintop.com/2020/08/24/star-trek-the-next-generation-galaxys-child/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Star Trek: The Next Generation rCo GalaxyrCOs Child rCo Geordi LaForgerCOs Love Strugglesopinions, ideas, thoughts, & reviews"
    [5]: https://www.reddit.com/r/DaystromInstitute/comments/m7ig3k?utm_source=chatgpt.com "\"Galaxy's Child\" is a severely misunderstood episode which is critical (albeit, gently) of the male gaze - NOT an endorsement of it."
    [6]: https://angriest.blogspot.com/2015/12/star-trek-next-generation-galaxys-child.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com "The Angriest: Star Trek: The Next Generation: \"Galaxy's Child\""
    [7]: https://trakt.tv/comments/372804?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Star Trek: The Next Generation 4x16 \"Galaxy's Child\" review by Andrew Bloom - Trakt"
    [8]: https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/galaxys-child-in-a-tng-marathon-why-i-skipped-this-episode.302645/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Poll - Galaxy's Child: in a tng marathon why I skipped this episode? | The Trek BBS"
    [9]: https://jphalt-startrek-tng-reviews.blogspot.com/2011/09/4-16-galaxys-child.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Star Trek: The Next Generation (1987 - 1994) - Random Musings: 4-16. Galaxy's Child"
    [10]: https://www.reddit.com/r/startrek/comments/ho6zch?utm_source=chatgpt.com "The ending of \"Galaxy's Child\" makes no sense"
    [11]: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0708720/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "\"Star Trek: The Next Generation\" Galaxy's Child (TV Episode 1991) - IMDb"
    [12]: https://www.reddit.com/r/TNG/comments/kl44hh?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Episodes you skip when rewatching ?"
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    All I want to hear from JEsus Christ is WEll done Good and Faithful servant
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Keith F. Lynch@kfl@KeithLynch.net to rec.arts.startrek.current,rec.arts.sf.fandom,rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv,can.arts.sf on Thu Aug 28 15:17:43 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.tv

    Nobody here wants to read AI slop.
    --
    Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
    Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Cryptoengineer@petertrei@gmail.com to rec.arts.startrek.current,rec.arts.sf.fandom,rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv,can.arts.sf on Thu Aug 28 11:37:52 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.tv

    On 8/28/2025 11:17 AM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    Nobody here wants to read AI slop.

    I concur with Keith. Its garbage.

    pt
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From anim8rfsk@no_email@invalid.invalid to rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.startrek.current,rec.arts.sf.fandom,rec.arts.sf.tv,can.arts.sf on Thu Aug 28 09:52:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.tv

    Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 8/28/2025 11:17 AM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    Nobody here wants to read AI slop.

    I concur with Keith. Its garbage.

    So is most of TNG so isnrCOt this fitting?



    pt

    --
    The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From kludge@kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) to rec.arts.startrek.current,rec.arts.sf.fandom,rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv,can.arts.sf on Thu Aug 28 19:49:55 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.tv

    Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 8/28/2025 11:17 AM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    Nobody here wants to read AI slop.

    I concur with Keith. Its garbage.

    But it's the GARBAGE of the FUTURE!
    --scott
    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From anim8rfsk@anim8rfsk@cox.net to rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.startrek.current,rec.arts.sf.fandom,rec.arts.sf.tv,can.arts.sf on Thu Aug 28 17:24:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.tv

    anim8rfsk <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 8/28/2025 11:17 AM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    Nobody here wants to read AI slop.

    I concur with Keith. Its garbage.

    So is most of TNG so isnrCOt this fitting?



    pt




    --
    The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2