| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 23 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 54:42:23 |
| Calls: | 583 |
| Files: | 1,139 |
| D/L today: |
179 files (27,921K bytes) |
| Messages: | 111,801 |
SUPPOSEDLY!
There have been numerous examples in the past where a moron in
management says something (not just TV and movies either) is not being cancelled, only to then turn around weeks or months later to say it is cancelled.
-a-a BBC: Doctor Who "Going forward, with or without Disney",
-a-a Spin-off Confirmed for 2026
-a-a --------------------------------------------------------
-a-a After several months of uncertainty, the BBC has reassured
-a-a audiences that Doctor Who is here to stay, although they
-a-a stopped short of confirming a new series.
-a-a Speaking at the Edinburgh TV Festival, Kate Phillips, Chief
-a-a Content Officer at the BBC, underlined the broadcaster's
-a-a commitment to the Time Lord's future.
-a-a "Any Whovians out there, rest assured - Doctor Who is going
-a-a nowhere," she asserted.
-a-a Phillips acknowledged the importance of the ongoing
-a-a collaboration with Disney, which has boosted the show's
-a-a global reach.
-a-a "Disney has been a great partnership and it continues with
-a-a The War Between The Land And The Sea next year but, going
-a-a forward, with or without Disney, Doctor Who will still be
-a-a on the BBC."
-a-a She sealed her comments with a reassurance that will please
-a-a fans: "The TARDIS is going nowhere."
-a-a The War Between The Land And The Sea becomes the first
-a-a spin-off of Russell T Davies' second era, with the BBC
-a-a confirming a 2026 debut after earlier speculation of a
-a-a late-2025 release.
-a-a Lindsay Salt, the BBC's Director of Drama, added that the
-a-a broadcaster was "committed" to Doctor Who, praising its
-a-a strong connection with younger viewers. She admitted that
-a-a "there's no update at the moment" on the main series, but
-a-a promised, "we will share as soon as we can".
-a-a We will still have to wait for official confirmation of a
-a-a new series, but the signs are more encouraging than fans
-a-a have seen in a while, particularly after the low ratings of
-a-a Series 15.
-a-a <https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/phillips-doctor-who-future-106105.htm>
SUPPOSEDLY!
There have been numerous examples in the past where a moron in
management says something (not just TV and movies either) is not being >cancelled, only to then turn around weeks or months later to say it is >cancelled.
BBC: Doctor Who "Going forward, with or without Disney",
Spin-off Confirmed for 2026
--------------------------------------------------------
After several months of uncertainty, the BBC has reassured
audiences that Doctor Who is here to stay, although they
stopped short of confirming a new series.
Speaking at the Edinburgh TV Festival, Kate Phillips, Chief
Content Officer at the BBC, underlined the broadcaster's
commitment to the Time Lord's future.
"Any Whovians out there, rest assured - Doctor Who is going
nowhere," she asserted.
Phillips acknowledged the importance of the ongoing
collaboration with Disney, which has boosted the show's
global reach.
"Disney has been a great partnership and it continues with
The War Between The Land And The Sea next year but, going
forward, with or without Disney, Doctor Who will still be
on the BBC."
She sealed her comments with a reassurance that will please
fans: "The TARDIS is going nowhere."
The War Between The Land And The Sea becomes the first
spin-off of Russell T Davies' second era, with the BBC
confirming a 2026 debut after earlier speculation of a
late-2025 release.
Lindsay Salt, the BBC's Director of Drama, added that the
broadcaster was "committed" to Doctor Who, praising its
strong connection with younger viewers. She admitted that
"there's no update at the moment" on the main series, but
promised, "we will share as soon as we can".
We will still have to wait for official confirmation of a
new series, but the signs are more encouraging than fans
have seen in a while, particularly after the low ratings of
Series 15.
<https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/phillips-doctor-who-future-106105.htm>
On 21/08/2025 22:28, Your Name wrote:
SUPPOSEDLY!
There have been numerous examples in the past where a moron in
management says something (not just TV and movies either) is not being
cancelled, only to then turn around weeks or months later to say it is
cancelled.
-a-a BBC: Doctor Who "Going forward, with or without Disney",
-a-a Spin-off Confirmed for 2026
-a-a --------------------------------------------------------
-a-a After several months of uncertainty, the BBC has reassured
-a-a audiences that Doctor Who is here to stay, although they
-a-a stopped short of confirming a new series.
-a-a Speaking at the Edinburgh TV Festival, Kate Phillips, Chief
-a-a Content Officer at the BBC, underlined the broadcaster's
-a-a commitment to the Time Lord's future.
-a-a "Any Whovians out there, rest assured - Doctor Who is going
-a-a nowhere," she asserted.
-a-a Phillips acknowledged the importance of the ongoing
-a-a collaboration with Disney, which has boosted the show's
-a-a global reach.
-a-a "Disney has been a great partnership and it continues with
-a-a The War Between The Land And The Sea next year but, going
-a-a forward, with or without Disney, Doctor Who will still be
-a-a on the BBC."
-a-a She sealed her comments with a reassurance that will please
-a-a fans: "The TARDIS is going nowhere."
The TARDIS is going nowhere. Sounds like a broken down vehicle. It
hasn't been anywhere since Doctor Who ended in 2017 and it's not going >anywhere now.
-a-a The War Between The Land And The Sea becomes the first
-a-a spin-off of Russell T Davies' second era, with the BBC
-a-a confirming a 2026 debut after earlier speculation of a
-a-a late-2025 release.
-a-a Lindsay Salt, the BBC's Director of Drama, added that the
-a-a broadcaster was "committed" to Doctor Who, praising its
-a-a strong connection with younger viewers. She admitted that
She is living in fantasy land. There are no children watching the
infantile woke degeneracy that Doctor Who has been turned into. No
decent parent would let their child watch it and be sexual groomed.
-a-a "there's no update at the moment" on the main series, but
-a-a promised, "we will share as soon as we can".
-a-a We will still have to wait for official confirmation of a
-a-a new series, but the signs are more encouraging than fans
-a-a have seen in a while, particularly after the low ratings of
-a-a Series 15.
-a-a <https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/phillips-doctor-who-future-106105.htm> >>
The BBC have just confirmed that the TARDIS is going nowhere. The show
is dead!
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
The TARDIS is going nowhere. Sounds like a broken down vehicle.
Verily, in article <10886ne$17fpj$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
The TARDIS is going nowhere. Sounds like a broken down vehicle.
She could definitely have phrased that better!
She also said that Doctor Who is going nowhere, though.
Verily, in article <10886ne$17fpj$1@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
The TARDIS is going nowhere. Sounds like a broken down vehicle.
She could definitely have phrased that better!
She also said that Doctor Who is going nowhere, though.
----
A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always
depend on the support of Paul.
--George Bernard Shaw
On 22/08/2025 00:29, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <10886ne$17fpj$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
The TARDIS is going nowhere. Sounds like a broken down vehicle.
She could definitely have phrased that better!
She also said that Doctor Who is going nowhere, though.
It's totally in limbo then. It won't go on Disney+, on HBO Max, on Prime >Video, on Netflix, and on the BBC either. It's going nowhere along with
the TARDIS.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verily, in article <10886ne$17fpj$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
The TARDIS is going nowhere. Sounds like a broken down
vehicle.
She could definitely have phrased that better!
She also said that Doctor Who is going nowhere, though.
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <10886ne$17fpj$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
The TARDIS is going nowhere. Sounds like a broken down
vehicle.
She could definitely have phrased that better!
She also said that Doctor Who is going nowhere, though.
It's too big a show for the BBC for them to just drop it... they
could do with bringing in a new showrunner, one with no previous
Doctor Who baggage, and freshen it up by making the show about
the Doctor again and dropping all those silly cameo's and
throwback arcs that RTD seems obsessed with.
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <10886ne$17fpj$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
The TARDIS is going nowhere. Sounds like a broken down
vehicle.
She could definitely have phrased that better!
She also said that Doctor Who is going nowhere, though.
It's too big a show for the BBC for them to just drop it... they
could do with bringing in a new showrunner, one with no previous
Doctor Who baggage, and freshen it up by making the show about
the Doctor again and dropping all those silly cameo's and
throwback arcs that RTD seems obsessed with.
It's too big a show for the BBC for them to just drop it... they
could do with bringing in a new showrunner, one with no previous
Doctor Who baggage, and freshen it up by making the show about
the Doctor again and dropping all those silly cameo's and
throwback arcs that RTD seems obsessed with.
There is no way it can ever recover from that unless there's a complete reboot from either Sylvester McCoy or Paul McGann
Verily, in article <xn0p9ui50d0y7i0002@post.eweka.nl>, did blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
It's too big a show for the BBC for them to just drop it... they
could do with bringing in a new showrunner, one with no previous
Doctor Who baggage, and freshen it up by making the show about
the Doctor again and dropping all those silly cameo's and
throwback arcs that RTD seems obsessed with.
It might be best to let it mellow for a couple of years. After that,
they could do a sort of soft reboot where they get back to the show's
roots. A break could let them attract kids who haven't already learned
that the Doctor is cringe.
Verily, in article <1089r0k$1iv1j$2@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
There is no way it can ever recover from that unless there's a complete
reboot from either Sylvester McCoy or Paul McGann
Why would we have to go back that far? I liked the Eccleston year and
most of Tennant as Ten, though it did start spinning out a bit at the
end.
I liked most of Matt Smith's era as well. IMO, things didn't really get
bad until Capaldi's tenure. MISI/Missy/The Mistress was probably the beginning of the end.
Tennant killed off all of his street-cred when he came back and allowed himself to be attacked and insulted for being a man by a transgender
bigot and their bigoted mother,
Verily, in article <1089uoq$1iv1j$5@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Tennant killed off all of his street-cred when he came
back and allowed himself to be attacked and insulted for
being a man by a transgender bigot and their bigoted mother,
Well, that's true enough, but I'm still okay with keeping his
run as Ten.
It's the return which stank up the airwaves.
SUPPOSEDLY!
There have been numerous examples in the past where a moron in
management says something (not just TV and movies either) is not being >cancelled, only to then turn around weeks or months later to say it is >cancelled.
In article <108832o$16p5g$1@dont-email.me>,
YourName@YourISP.com wrote:
SUPPOSEDLY!
There have been numerous examples in the past where a moron
in management says something (not just TV and movies either)
is not being cancelled, only to then turn around weeks or
months later to say it is cancelled.
I imagine this spin-off is as doomed as doomed can be!
Ten's run was fine. Well, until all of the "I don't want to
go" stuff at the end... which was just lame.
David Tennant's return was RTD replaying his greatest hits
and hoping the popular pairing of Ten (aka Fourteen) and Donna
would restore some fan credibility and help the show recover
from Jodie's era.
Verily, in article <xn0p9utpn21xn18000@post.eweka.nl>, did blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
David Tennant's return was RTD replaying his greatest hits
and hoping the popular pairing of Ten (aka Fourteen) and
Donna would restore some fan credibility and help the show
recover from Jodie's era.
I agree. That's what I said as soon as I heard he was coming
back. He probably hoped the early audiences would flock back,
but it doesn't work that way.
I hope this massive retcon happens and happens well, but I
don't have much confidence.
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0p9utpn21xn18000@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
David Tennant's return was RTD replaying his greatest hits
and hoping the popular pairing of Ten (aka Fourteen) and
Donna would restore some fan credibility and help the show
recover from Jodie's era.
I agree. That's what I said as soon as I heard he was coming
back. He probably hoped the early audiences would flock back,
but it doesn't work that way.
I hope this massive retcon happens and happens well, but I
don't have much confidence.
RTD's arrogance and ego will stop him retconning anything...
the only chance the show has going forward is for a fresh start
with a new showrunner... not the return of Billie Piper and
David Tennant in more of the same.
Ubiquitous wrote:
In article <108832o$16p5g$1@dont-email.me>,
YourName@YourISP.com wrote:
SUPPOSEDLY!
There have been numerous examples in the past where a moron
in management says something (not just TV and movies either)
is not being cancelled, only to then turn around weeks or
months later to say it is cancelled.
I imagine this spin-off is as doomed as doomed can be!
The BBC don't seem to be in a rush to air it anyway...
Verily, in article <xn0p9ui50d0y7i0002@post.eweka.nl>, did >blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
It's too big a show for the BBC for them to just drop it... they
could do with bringing in a new showrunner, one with no previous
Doctor Who baggage, and freshen it up by making the show about
the Doctor again and dropping all those silly cameo's and
throwback arcs that RTD seems obsessed with.
It might be best to let it mellow for a couple of years. After that,
they could do a sort of soft reboot where they get back to the show's
roots. A break could let them attract kids who haven't already learned
that the Doctor is cringe.
----
A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always
depend on the support of Paul.
--George Bernard Shaw
Verily, in article <1089r0k$1iv1j$2@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
There is no way it can ever recover from that unless there's a complete
reboot from either Sylvester McCoy or Paul McGann
Why would we have to go back that far? I liked the Eccleston year and
most of Tennant as Ten, though it did start spinning out a bit at the
end.
I liked most of Matt Smith's era as well. IMO, things didn't really get
bad until Capaldi's tenure. MISI/Missy/The Mistress was probably the >beginning of the end.
----
A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always
depend on the support of Paul.
--George Bernard Shaw
On 22/08/2025 14:31, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0p9ui50d0y7i0002@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
It's too big a show for the BBC for them to just drop it... they
could do with bringing in a new showrunner, one with no previous
Doctor Who baggage, and freshen it up by making the show about
the Doctor again and dropping all those silly cameo's and
throwback arcs that RTD seems obsessed with.
It might be best to let it mellow for a couple of years. After that,
they could do a sort of soft reboot where they get back to the show's
roots. A break could let them attract kids who haven't already learned
that the Doctor is cringe.
You mean transgender and gay. The show is dead! No decent parent will
let their children watch it ever again, and no child that has watched it >would ever admit to it at school.
No head of drama in their right mind would have ever agreed to the
Doctor being gender swapped and being turned gay. The BBC only have >themselves to blame.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <1089uoq$1iv1j$5@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Tennant killed off all of his street-cred when he came
back and allowed himself to be attacked and insulted for
being a man by a transgender bigot and their bigoted mother,
Well, that's true enough, but I'm still okay with keeping his
run as Ten.
Ten's run was fine. Well, until all of the "I don't want to
go" stuff at the end... which was just lame.
Jodie Whittaker regenerating into David Tennant was RTD doing
his clickbait television thing to get people talking about
Doctor Who ... he's now done the same thing with Billie Piper.
It's the return which stank up the airwaves.
David Tennant's return was RTD replaying his greatest hits
and hoping the popular pairing of Ten (aka Fourteen) and Donna
would restore some fan credibility and help the show recover
from Jodie's era.
In article <108832o$16p5g$1@dont-email.me>, YourName@YourISP.com wrote:
SUPPOSEDLY!
There have been numerous examples in the past where a moron in
management says something (not just TV and movies either) is not being >>cancelled, only to then turn around weeks or months later to say it is >>cancelled.
I imagine this spin-off is as doomed as doomed can be!
Ubiquitous wrote:
In article <108832o$16p5g$1@dont-email.me>,
YourName@YourISP.com wrote:
SUPPOSEDLY!
There have been numerous examples in the past where a moron
in management says something (not just TV and movies either)
is not being cancelled, only to then turn around weeks or
months later to say it is cancelled.
I imagine this spin-off is as doomed as doomed can be!
The BBC don't seem to be in a rush to air it anyway...
Verily, in article <xn0p9utpn21xn18000@post.eweka.nl>, did >blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
Ten's run was fine. Well, until all of the "I don't want to
go" stuff at the end... which was just lame.
Yeah, the end was lame. Some people thought he was whiny throughout, but
I thought it was good until the whiny end.
David Tennant's return was RTD replaying his greatest hits
and hoping the popular pairing of Ten (aka Fourteen) and Donna
would restore some fan credibility and help the show recover
from Jodie's era.
I agree. That's what I said as soon as I heard he was coming back. He >probably hoped the early audiences would flock back, but it doesn't work >that way.
I hope this massive retcon happens and happens well, but I don't have
much confidence.
----
A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always
depend on the support of Paul.
--George Bernard Shaw
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0p9utpn21xn18000@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
David Tennant's return was RTD replaying his greatest hits
and hoping the popular pairing of Ten (aka Fourteen) and
Donna would restore some fan credibility and help the show
recover from Jodie's era.
I agree. That's what I said as soon as I heard he was coming
back. He probably hoped the early audiences would flock back,
but it doesn't work that way.
I hope this massive retcon happens and happens well, but I
don't have much confidence.
RTD's arrogance and ego will stop him retconning anything...
the only chance the show has going forward is for a fresh start
with a new showrunner... not the return of Billie Piper and
David Tennant in more of the same.
On 22/08/2025 21:00, Blueshirt wrote:
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0p9utpn21xn18000@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
David Tennant's return was RTD replaying his greatest hits
and hoping the popular pairing of Ten (aka Fourteen) and
Donna would restore some fan credibility and help the show
recover from Jodie's era.
I agree. That's what I said as soon as I heard he was coming
back. He probably hoped the early audiences would flock back,
but it doesn't work that way.
I hope this massive retcon happens and happens well, but I
don't have much confidence.
RTD's arrogance and ego will stop him retconning anything...
the only chance the show has going forward is for a fresh start
with a new showrunner... not the return of Billie Piper and
David Tennant in more of the same.
The only way forward is Dallas, and even then turning the Doctor gay and >using that to sexually groom children has done too much irreparable
damage. Why would any child dare admit to watching this show at school
when it would be bullied and accused of being gay or a transvestite?
The total erasure of the entire RTD era since 2005 is probably the only >viable option. All trust has been lost in the BBC thanks to its
perverted agenda.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Why would any child dare admit to watching this show at school
when it would be bullied and accused of being gay or a transvestite?
Verily, in article <108al9p$1pjl8$2@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Why would any child dare admit to watching this show at school
when it would be bullied and accused of being gay or a transvestite?
That's been trendy for quite some time. Many kids report feeling
pressured to be gay or trans, for cred.
Have you been following the story of former child star Jojo Siwa? For
about two minutes, she performed "gaypop" and billed herself as "the
gayest person in the world." Then, she met a guy. She is now being
wildly attacked as a so-called tradwife, just for dating a guy.
Given what Gaiman planted in The Doctor's Wife.
In article <108al9p$1pjl8$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
The total erasure of the entire RTD era since 2005 is probably the only >viable option. All trust has been lost in the BBC thanks to its
perverted agenda.
Woke agenda you mean.
Verily, in article <108aoid$emi$14@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <108al9p$1pjl8$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
The total erasure of the entire RTD era since 2005 is probably the only
viable option. All trust has been lost in the BBC thanks to its
perverted agenda.
Woke agenda you mean.
Some might say that's the same thing.
On 22/08/2025 22:58, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <108al9p$1pjl8$2@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Why would any child dare admit to watching this show at school
when it would be bullied and accused of being gay or a transvestite?
That's been trendy for quite some time. Many kids report feeling
pressured to be gay or trans, for cred.
That is called sexual grooming, not trendy.
Have you been following the story of former child star Jojo Siwa? For
about two minutes, she performed "gaypop" and billed herself as "the
gayest person in the world." Then, she met a guy. She is now being
wildly attacked as a so-called tradwife, just for dating a guy.
So she was sexually groomed into thinking she was gay and now the
groomers are attacking and bullying her for refusing to submit to their will.
Verily, in article <108apnt$1q5p4$2@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 22/08/2025 22:58, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <108al9p$1pjl8$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Why would any child dare admit to watching this show at school
when it would be bullied and accused of being gay or a transvestite?
That's been trendy for quite some time. Many kids report feeling
pressured to be gay or trans, for cred.
That is called sexual grooming, not trendy.
That's the thing. The kids themselves decide what kids find trendy.
They're highly influenced in those decisions, and for years now most of
those influencing them have been gay or trans or sympathetic. So, yes,
it is trendy.
The good news -- from my POV, and probably yours -- is that GenZ is
shaping up to be more conservative than many predicted. They may have
just plain gone too far, running into some hardwired instincts like
"protect the children." Even so, reversing the trend will take time and different influences.
Have you been following the story of former child star Jojo Siwa? For
about two minutes, she performed "gaypop" and billed herself as "the
gayest person in the world." Then, she met a guy. She is now being
wildly attacked as a so-called tradwife, just for dating a guy.
So she was sexually groomed into thinking she was gay and now the
groomers are attacking and bullying her for refusing to submit to their
will.
Yeah, pretty much. I felt bad for her. I laughed at her initial gaypop
video, but I regret that. Now I just hope people lay off before they
bully her into something drastic.
Verily, in article <108al9p$1pjl8$2@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Why would any child dare admit to watching this show at school
when it would be bullied and accused of being gay or a transvestite?
That's been trendy for quite some time. Many kids report feeling
pressured to be gay or trans, for cred.
Have you been following the story of former child star Jojo Siwa? For
about two minutes, she performed "gaypop" and billed herself as "the
gayest person in the world." Then, she met a guy. She is now being
wildly attacked as a so-called tradwife, just for dating a guy.
----
A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always
depend on the support of Paul.
--George Bernard Shaw
On 22/08/2025 22:58, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <108al9p$1pjl8$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Why would any child dare admit to watching this show at school
when it would be bullied and accused of being gay or a transvestite?
That's been trendy for quite some time. Many kids report feeling
pressured to be gay or trans, for cred.
That is called sexual grooming, not trendy.
Have you been following the story of former child star Jojo Siwa? For
about two minutes, she performed "gaypop" and billed herself as "the
gayest person in the world." Then, she met a guy. She is now being
wildly attacked as a so-called tradwife, just for dating a guy.
So she was sexually groomed into thinking she was gay and now the
groomers are attacking and bullying her for refusing to submit to their >will. Disgusting bunch of perverts! They should be allowed nowhere
children or social media.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verily, in article <108ao8h$emi$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Given what Gaiman planted in The Doctor's Wife.
My memory of that episode consists largely of "The TARDIS turned human.
So dumb." What did he plant?
----
A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always
depend on the support of Paul.
--George Bernard Shaw
Verily, in article <108aoid$emi$14@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <108al9p$1pjl8$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
The total erasure of the entire RTD era since 2005 is probably the only
viable option. All trust has been lost in the BBC thanks to its
perverted agenda.
Woke agenda you mean.
Some might say that's the same thing.
----
A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always
depend on the support of Paul.
--George Bernard Shaw
On 22/08/2025 23:11, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <108aoid$emi$14@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <108al9p$1pjl8$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
The total erasure of the entire RTD era since 2005 is probably the only >>>> viable option. All trust has been lost in the BBC thanks to its
perverted agenda.
Woke agenda you mean.
Some might say that's the same thing.
Woke and perverted are both synonyms for each other.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verily, in article <108apnt$1q5p4$2@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 22/08/2025 22:58, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <108al9p$1pjl8$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Why would any child dare admit to watching this show at school
when it would be bullied and accused of being gay or a transvestite?
That's been trendy for quite some time. Many kids report feeling
pressured to be gay or trans, for cred.
That is called sexual grooming, not trendy.
That's the thing. The kids themselves decide what kids find trendy.
They're highly influenced in those decisions, and for years now most of >those influencing them have been gay or trans or sympathetic. So, yes,
it is trendy.
The good news -- from my POV, and probably yours -- is that GenZ is
shaping up to be more conservative than many predicted. They may have
just plain gone too far, running into some hardwired instincts like
"protect the children." Even so, reversing the trend will take time and >different influences.
Have you been following the story of former child star Jojo Siwa? For
about two minutes, she performed "gaypop" and billed herself as "the
gayest person in the world." Then, she met a guy. She is now being
wildly attacked as a so-called tradwife, just for dating a guy.
So she was sexually groomed into thinking she was gay and now the
groomers are attacking and bullying her for refusing to submit to their
will.
Yeah, pretty much. I felt bad for her. I laughed at her initial gaypop >video, but I regret that. Now I just hope people lay off before they
bully her into something drastic.
----
A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always
depend on the support of Paul.
--George Bernard Shaw
On 22/08/2025 23:57, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <108apnt$1q5p4$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 22/08/2025 22:58, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <108al9p$1pjl8$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Why would any child dare admit to watching this show at school
when it would be bullied and accused of being gay or a transvestite? >>>>>
That's been trendy for quite some time. Many kids report feeling
pressured to be gay or trans, for cred.
That is called sexual grooming, not trendy.
That's the thing. The kids themselves decide what kids find trendy.
They don't and never have done. They're told by marketing companies and >sexual predators what they should think is trendy. This has been the
case since the 1950s when people figured out how to make money from
them, or in the case of the music industry, sexually groom and entice them.
They're highly influenced in those decisions, and for years now most of
those influencing them have been gay or trans or sympathetic. So, yes,
it is trendy.
The good news -- from my POV, and probably yours -- is that GenZ is
shaping up to be more conservative than many predicted. They may have
just plain gone too far, running into some hardwired instincts like
"protect the children." Even so, reversing the trend will take time and
different influences.
We have Donald Trump and Elon Musk to thank for that.
Have you been following the story of former child star Jojo Siwa? For
about two minutes, she performed "gaypop" and billed herself as "the
gayest person in the world." Then, she met a guy. She is now being
wildly attacked as a so-called tradwife, just for dating a guy.
So she was sexually groomed into thinking she was gay and now the
groomers are attacking and bullying her for refusing to submit to their
will.
Yeah, pretty much. I felt bad for her. I laughed at her initial gaypop
video, but I regret that. Now I just hope people lay off before they
bully her into something drastic.
They need to stop this degeneracy being taught in schools. Governor Ron >DeSantis is on the right track but more needs to be done in the same >direction. No sex education for kids until they reach the age of 13, and >even then it needs to limited to being taught as the means by which to >produce children, no different to how animals mate, and it is naturally >between a man and a woman, and how to protect yourself and prevent
unwanted pregnancies. Children also need to be taught about sexual >predators, especially those in the entertainment industry and how to
report them to the authorities.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 22/08/2025 20:43, Blueshirt wrote:
Ubiquitous wrote:
I imagine this spin-off is as doomed as doomed can be!
The BBC don't seem to be in a rush to air it anyway...
They're waiting for the graveyard shift to become available,
or Disney are. Disney probably doesn't want to air it so they
can use it as a tax break like Warner did with Batgirl.
Ubiquitous wrote:
YourName@YourISP.com wrote:
SUPPOSEDLY!
There have been numerous examples in the past where a moron
in management says something (not just TV and movies either)
is not being cancelled, only to then turn around weeks or
months later to say it is cancelled.
I imagine this spin-off is as doomed as doomed can be!
The BBC don't seem to be in a rush to air it anyway...
blueshirt@indigo.news wrote:
Ubiquitous wrote:
YourName@YourISP.com wrote:
SUPPOSEDLY!
There have been numerous examples in the past where a moron
in management says something (not just TV and movies either)
is not being cancelled, only to then turn around weeks or
months later to say it is cancelled.
I imagine this spin-off is as doomed as doomed can be!
The BBC don't seem to be in a rush to air it anyway...
I imagine it's hard to find actors with the stamina required to film it.
--
Not a joke! Don't jump!