• MT VOID, 08/15/25 -- Vol. 44, No. 7, Whole Number 2393

    From Evelyn C. Leeper@evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Sun Aug 17 08:19:22 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    THE MT VOID
    08/15/25 -- Vol. 44, No. 7, Whole Number 2393

    Editor: Evelyn Leeper, evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com
    All material is the opinion of the author and is copyrighted by
    the author unless otherwise noted.
    All comments sent or posted will be assumed authorized for
    inclusion unless otherwise noted.

    To subscribe or unsubscribe, send mail to
    evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com
    The latest issue is at <http://www.leepers.us/mtvoid/latest.htm>.
    An index with links to the issues of the MT VOID since 1986 is at <http://leepers.us/mtvoid/back_issues.htm>.

    Topics:
    KING KONG (film comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
    KING KONG (non-film comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
    UNEARTHLY STRANGER (letter of comment by Jay Morris)
    Tsundoku (letter of comment by Gary McGath)
    Fake Endings (letter of comment by Gary McGath)
    The Fear of Death, Agnosticism, and Atheism (letters
    of comment by Gary McGath, Hal Heydt, Scott Dorsey,
    and Tim Illingworth)
    UNEARTHLY STRANGER (letter of comment by Jay Morris)
    RUMOURS (letter of comment by Paul Dormer)
    This Week's Reading (KING KONG, KONG UNBOUND)
    (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: KING KONG (film comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

    KING KONG (1933): This is not a review so much as a bunch of
    random comments.

    Kong is never called "King Kong" in dialogue. Within the story,
    the title appears only on the theater marquee.

    Overtures to movies used to be a thing. Now they're replaced by
    ads.

    The Morse code at the beginning says, "VVV A RADIO PICTURE VVVVV"
    and syncs with the appearance of the letters of "A Radio Picture"
    as they appear on the screen.

    Orville Goldner (one of the credited technical staff) wrote the
    book THE MAKING OF KING KONG.

    As everyone now knows, the "old Arabian proverb" was written by
    that old Arabian, Merian C. Cooper.

    I had always thought the ship was docked in New York, but the book
    claims it was Hoboken, and the opening shots do appear to be from
    the other side of the river.

    One of the things you can start to notice after many viewings is
    the glimpse into the trivia of everyday life in 1933. For example,
    when Englehorn and Riscoll light matches to light a pipe or a
    cigarette, Englehorn strikes the side of the cup holding the
    matches, but Driscoll uses his fingernail, and then holds the lit
    match for at least ten seconds. It is clearly a wooden
    "strike-anywhere" match of the sort we don't see anymore, or at
    least very widely, and for good reason. As one site notes,
    "'Strike anywhere' matches light easily, even when unattended,
    such as in the mail during shipping." As a result, they are
    heavily regulated.

    We also see (reasonably authentic scenes) of the Depression.

    Apples tended to sell for a nickel, so Denham's payment of a
    dollar is quite impressive.

    Everyone wears hats (or caps). It's not just because it's winter;
    it was just what everyone did. (One movie I saw recently from that
    period had construction workers wearing hats.)

    The ship does indeed seem to be overpopulated (as a character in
    the first scene notes).

    Denham's recounting of the "Beauty and the Beast" has no
    resemblance to the familiar fairy tale; in Denham's telling, the
    Beast is strong until he met Beauty, then he "went soft, he forgot
    his wisdom, and the little fellas licked him."

    The position "2 south, 90 east" is in fact far west of Sumatra,
    and there is nothing for thousands of miles southwest; the closest
    land of any size is Mauritius, about 2000 miles in that direction.

    The wall was built so long ago that "the people have slipped back,
    forgotten the high civilization that built it." Denham also refers
    to "centuries". So is Kong that old? Is he the last of a long
    line? (The sequel says not.) We see no other giant apes, and apes
    are not solitary creatures.

    How did knowledge of Kong get to other islands? Apparently
    Englehorn had heard of it.

    Ann's reactions during the screen test anticipate what Denham is
    going to ask for. For example, he tells her to look amazed, but
    she looks frightened rather than just amazed. Then he says that
    there's a chance if she could scream, which would normally cause
    Ann to scream, but she knows not to at that point, but to wait
    until he tells her to.

    In the fog near the island you get a shot of the whole ship. It's
    clearly not big enough to hold Kong.

    As someone pointed out, the villagers are limited to the peninsula
    on their side of the wall, so it is not clear how that many people
    can find enough food, fresh water, clothing materials, etc.--not
    to mention enough girls to sacrifice. Harry Harrison claims we see
    no boats or canoes, so they can't survive on fish. In fact, we do
    see outriggers, first on the beach when Denham lands, and later
    when the natives come out to the Venture. And Ann refers to them
    when they first land on the island. Still, it doesn't look like
    enough to support all the people we see.

    How does Ann keep the same hair length and hair style after more
    than six weeks at sea?

    The birds we see at the beach are cartoons, not stop-motion
    animation.

    Driscoll claims nobody knows who built Angkor Wat. Even in the
    1930s I suspect archaeologists had figured out when it was built
    (12th century), and concluded it was built by the ancestors of the
    current inhabitants of that area. It's not as if the area was
    completely deserted of people.

    Someone (Bradbury? Harryhuasen?) relates going to Nias (Island)
    and trying out some of the phrases from KING KONG. They were met
    by total bafflement on the part of the Nias islanders. Thus is
    drawn the line between filmmakers who hire linguists to write
    foreign language dialogue and those who just make it up as they go
    along.

    I love the way Ann wears high heels when going to the island.

    While the DVD doesn't subtitled the islanders' language, the
    novelization does, so it is easier to distinguish words.

    Why Denham thinks he won't be noticed when he is in a clearing in
    the direct line of sight of the chief is a mystery.

    The natives are clearly African rather than southeast Asian. (In
    "The Myth Goes Ever Downward", Paul Di Filippo talks about the
    dearth of Samoan extras in Hollywood at the time, but Samoans
    would be equally wrong geographically--Skull Island is *west* of
    Sumatra in the middle of the Indian Ocean, not east in the
    Pacific.)

    How do the natives manage to pick just the spot to come to on the
    ship to be able to capture Ann over the railing?

    Charlie might be a bit of a stereotype, but at least he is not
    used for comic relief.

    One wonders where the natives got the fur for all the Kong
    costumes in the ceremony. Were there other giant Kongs they
    killed? Were there also normal-sized apes on the island?

    The tracking shot from the rear of the procession to the gate
    makes the viewer feel they are actually there as part of it.

    Thank goodness Cooper didn't go for the super-phallic bolt across
    the gate that DiLaurentiis did.

    Where did the giant gong come from? The islanders don't seem to
    have any metal-working capabilities (or enough raw material).

    As Robert Silverberg notes in "The Magic and Mystery of Kong",
    Kong's lower canines make no sense.

    Note that Kong seems to have two differently shaped heads: one
    squarish (in close-ups) and one more elongated (for the full-body
    shots).

    Kong also has nothing in front to identify him as male (and no
    cleft in back either). Is it possible that Kong is actually female?

    Kong clearly knows how the fastening on the pillars work,
    indicating a high level of intelligence.

    At this point, Driscoll apparently takes charge, over Englehorn or
    Denham.

    We start to see the influence of Gustave Dore, with jungle scenes
    in which the foreground is in shadow and the background well lit,
    almost in a frame formed by the trees. (In spite of this, the
    foreground is remarkable well-lit considering it is supposedly
    nighttime and the characters all talk about how dark it is.)

    The stegosaurus was considerably larger than stegosauri were.

    The stegosaurus tail rattle (and the T-rex tail wave we see later)
    were adopted by Ray Harryhausen in his stop-motion animation.
    (Harryhausen worked with O'Brien on MIGHTY JOE YOUNG.)

    If the swamp is shallow enough for them to push the raft with
    poles, how does the entire brotosaurus submerge to get under the
    raft?

    If you are escaping from an animal whose head is high off the
    ground, why would you climb an exposed tree that would put you at
    exactly that level?

    We see more Dore images as we travel across the island.

    No one is really quite sure what the creature crawling up the vine
    is when Driscoll is hiding in the cave.

    If the dinosaur Kong fights is supposed to be a Tyrannosaurus rex,
    it has one too many fingers on its forelegs (three rather than
    two). If it was an allosaurus, on the other hand (pun intended),
    the fingers are correct. Most sources say it is a T-rex, but that
    is probably only because that is a better-known dinosaur. The book
    claims merely that it is a carnivorous dinosaur.

    We now know that the jaw strength of a T-rex (or an allosaur)
    would be such that Kong could not have wrenched the carnivore's
    mouth open the way he did.

    The scene with the waterfall at the left of the screen (right
    after Driscoll has returned to the village) was duplicated by
    Peter Jackson in his 2005 version.

    The scene in the cavern where Kong fights a sea serpent is a tour
    de force of multiple exposures: the main action is the stop motion
    of Kong fighting the serpent, while in the upper left there is a
    cut-out with film of a live-action Ann, and in the lower right
    another cut-out has a live-action film of Driscoll. The depth of
    field is such that Ann is farther back and is at times obscured by
    Kong, while Driscoll is always closer than Kong.

    The sea serpent inexplicably has legs.

    Not as evident on the small screen but visible on a theatrical
    screen is the wall and the village in the background when we see
    Kong on his "penthouse patio". On the small screen, you can see it
    best when Driscoll and Ann are descending on the vine.

    Pteranodons could barely lift their own weight, let alone pick up
    a hundred-pound woman. Pteranodons lived in the late Cretaceous.
    Pterosaurs also include pterodactyls, which lived in the late
    Jurassic.

    Even after weeks at sea, the sailors refers to Ann as "the lady"
    rather than by name.

    Apparently the gate was merely a symbol, since it survives Kong's
    onslaught for all of fifty seconds.

    Coconut bras were never a part of Polynesian, or south or
    southeast Asian culture. They seem to have been invented as a way
    to come up with something to satisfy modesty requirements of
    photographs, movies, etc., that appeared to be indigenous. They
    would be incredibly uncomfortable in real life.

    Several of the "Kong rampage" scenes were cut in later releases as
    being too violent, but have been restored.

    He's always be king of his world" is as close as the dialogue
    comes to calling him "King Kong". "King Kong" was what the lights
    said on Broadway.

    The tickets were "20 bucks"--was that for one or two? Either way,
    it was a lot cheaper than HAMILTON.

    Driscoll says it's the first time he's worn an open-front suit.
    Sailors' uniforms buttoned all the way to the neck.

    How did Denham get Kong back to New York? (Remember, the Venture
    wasn't large enough to hold him.) And how did he get Kong from the
    ship to the theater without anyone seeing Kong? And how did he
    convince reporters to hold off taking photographs until they were
    on stage?

    Again, the scene of Kong dropping the woman was excised in later
    releases.

    How does Kong manage to find Ann in New York? And how does he
    climb buildings while holding her?

    Why does Ann try to escape Kong's grip when to do so would mean a
    fall to her death?

    Several people escape from the El train; you can see them fall out
    of the windows which are now on the bottom side of the train and
    run away.

    It becomes full daylight rather quickly from the time Kong escapes
    to when the planes are attacking.

    [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: KING KONG (non-film comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

    In July 2007, we were traveling to the Canadian Rockies and we
    drove to Cardston, Alberta. Our destination here was the
    Remington-Alberta Carriage Museum, but we made a quick stop when
    we came unexpectedly upon a silhouette sign of a giant ape. It was
    the sign for the Fay Wray Fountain. Fay Wray was born at Wrayland
    southwest of Cardston in 1907, and the fountain was built/named
    during her visit to Cardston in the 1990s. The "King Kong"
    connection in Cardston has not been exploited as much as Vulcan,
    Alberta's name has, though, and there is no Kong Kong statue, or
    Skull Island Restaurant, or Carl Denham Movie Theater.

    Cardston is the "Mormon capital" of Canada, known for its Temple
    (the oldest outside the US and the only one in Canada until the
    1990s), and was founded by Charles Ora Card, Orson Scott Card's great-grandfather.

    (A photo of the Fay Wray Fountain can be seen at <http://leepers.us/FayWrayFountain.jpg>.)

    Photos of Vulcan can be seen at
    <http://leepers.us/vulcan/vulcan_pics.htm>.)

    [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Tsundoku (letter of comment by Gary McGath)

    In response to Evelyn's comments on tsundoku in the 08/08/25 issue
    of the MT VOID, Gary McGath writes:

    Adding this word to my vocabulary. [-gmg]

    Evelyn responds:

    Aren't we all? [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Fake Endings (letter of comment by Gary McGath)

    In response to Evelyn's comments on THE DEVIL RIDES OUT in the
    08/08/25/25 issue of the MT VOID, Gary McGath writes:

    Haydn used that trick in his 90th symphony. It comes to what seems
    like a typical emphatic ending, pauses for four measures during
    which the audience will doubtless start applauding, and then
    resumes quietly in the "wrong" key, building to the real ending a
    minute and a half later. [-gmg]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: The Fear of Death, Agnosticism, and Atheism (letters of
    comment by Gary McGath, Hal Heydt, Scott Dorsey, and Tim
    Illingworth)

    In response to Hal Heydt's comments on a fear of death in the
    08/08/25 issue of the MT VOID, Gary McGath writes:

    As I understand the terms, you can't really be "between" atheist
    and agnostic. To be atheistic means not to believe in a god. To be
    agnostic means to think the question of a deity's existence can't
    be resolved. An agnostic can believe that there's a god in spite
    of that lack of evidence, or not.

    The main point is that being atheistic doesn't require
    affirmatively believing in the non-existence of a god. Someone who
    has never been exposed to the idea of gods and hasn't come up with
    it independently would be an atheist.

    Personally, I don't fear death (the state of being dead), but I do
    fear dying (the process). [-gmg]

    Hal replies:

    I don't know whether or not the existence of one or more deities
    can be resolved. I do know that, at least to my satisfaction, that
    it has not been. To date, despite great efforts by many people
    over many centuries, there is a profound lack of evidence or
    demonstration FOR the existence of a god or gods. So far, this
    makes the probability of such existence extremely low, so--at
    present--my default position is that god(s) do not exist.

    So....you tell me. Does that make me an atheist or an
    agnostic...or some fuzzy state in between the two that has not yet
    had a quantum collapse?

    As for death... In the specific instance, I would never have
    experienced dying. [-hh]

    Scott Dorsey responds to the question:

    Perhaps it makes you actually a god, but you don't know it yet?
    [-sd]

    And Tim Illingworth adds:

    You are Emperor Claudius and I claim my 5 million sesterces. [-ti]

    Gary suggests:

    Both. You say you don't know whether the question can be resolved.
    That's the agnostic position. You also say your default position
    is that god(s) do not exist. That's the atheist position. The two
    aren't mutually exclusive. [-gmg]

    [And in response to never experiencing dying]

    Sounds to me like the best way to die, given that we have to.
    [-gmg]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: UNEARTHLY STRANGER (letter of comment by Jay Morris)

    In response to Evelyn's comments on UNEARTHLY STRANGER in the
    08/08/25 issue of the MT VOID, Jay Morris writes:

    [Evelyn wrote,] "(Also, the claim is that the aliens don't blink,
    except they do.)" [-ecl]

    The only time I noticed any blinking was at the dinner table and I
    think Julia was playing upon the line "Thank you Kindly Sir she
    said" and John follows up with "as she waved her wooden leg
    aloft". This was evidently a saying at the time. [-gmg]

    Evelyn replies:

    I was specifically looking for blinking, and caught it a couple of
    times, including once when Julia was at her desk with no one else
    in the room to see her. [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: RUMOURS (letter of comment by Paul Dormer)

    In a follow-up to his comments on RUMOURS in the 08/08/25 issue of
    the MT VOID, Paul Dormer writes:

    Nowhere as weird as his other films. [-pd]

    Evelyn notes:

    Well, I did say, "RUMOURS is Guy Maddin's latest film, and may be
    the most normal Guy Maddin film I've seen." [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

    KING KONG by Edgar Wallace and Merian C. Cooper, novelization by
    Delos W. Lovelace (Bantam, no ISBN) is a little unusual for a
    novelization in that there are a lot of differences from the film.
    This is because Lovelace was working from Ruth Rose's first draft
    of the script.

    So the book has the ship's name as the Wanderer, not the Venture,
    and has it docked in Hoboken rather than in New York. The cook is
    "Lumpy", not "Charlie" (and isn't Chinese). (Jackson restored the
    name in his 2005 version.) The monkey is "Ignatz" rather than
    "Iggy". (It's possible that the filmmakers decided to pick a less
    German name, I suppose.)

    The first dinosaur encountered on the book is more a therapod than
    a stegosaurus. Lovelace also seems to think that "triceratops" is
    the plural of "triceratop". He also has a character describe the
    triceratops as "another of Nature's mistakes," but since it
    survived as a species for about two million years, it wasn't an
    immediate mistake.

    The animal that crawls up a vine to attack Driscoll is a spider
    rather than a lizard. It is possible that it started out that way,
    but that Willis O'Brien thought the spider would be too difficult/expensive/time-consuming to animate.

    There are a few "racially insensitive" comments. Ann at one point
    says, "Probably the natives will be as friendly as reservation
    Indians." Denham uses the term "a Chinaman's chance", and
    Englehorn refers to the native men as "bucks".

    I also read KONG UNBOUND edited by Karen Haber (Byron Preiss, ISBN 978-1-4165-1670-5), a collection of essays about Kong that came
    out in 2005 to ride the coattails of Peter Jackson's KING KONG.
    (It's labeled "Official Movie Merchandise" along with a logo for
    the movie.) Some of the more interesting articles include Robert
    Silverberg writing about the dinosaur inaccuracies, Harry Harrison
    writing about various plot holes, and several about just what the
    attraction of Kong for Ann was based on. [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    Evelyn C. Leeper
    evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com


    The fundamental flaw in God is that He will say that He
    requires the sacrifice of Isaac/Isma'il; the fundamental
    flaw in man is that he takes his knife in hand to do
    God's bidding.
    --Russell Hoban, PILGERMANN

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2