• MT VOID, 05/16/25 -- Vol. 43, No. 46, Whole Number 2380

    From Evelyn C. Leeper@evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Sun May 18 09:52:23 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    THE MT VOID
    05/16/25 -- Vol. 43, No. 46, Whole Number 2380

    Editor: Evelyn Leeper, evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com
    All material is the opinion of the author and is copyrighted by
    the author unless otherwise noted.
    All comments sent or posted will be assumed authorized for
    inclusion unless otherwise noted.

    To subscribe or unsubscribe, send mail to
    evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com
    The latest issue is at <http://www.leepers.us/mtvoid/latest.htm>.
    An index with links to the issues of the MT VOID since 1986 is at <http://leepers.us/mtvoid/back_issues.htm>.

    Topics:
    Mini Reviews, Part 12 (MONOLITH, THE MOON, SEVERANCE)
    (film reviews by Evelyn C. Leeper)
    This Week's Reading (HENRY VI, PARTS 1 and 2)
    (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Mini Reviews, Part 12 (film reviews by Evelyn C. Leeper)

    Three science fiction films or series:

    MONOLITH (2024): There are mysterious bricks that just appear.
    They have strange inscriptions inside them. The people who get
    them feel strangely affected by them. However, although the
    ending tries to be enigmatic, it seems fairly clear early on what
    caused these bricks to appear to whom they do, even if the
    mechanism and the explanation for the monolith are never
    explained. We see the monolith only once, apparently to justify
    the title (and poster), since "Monolith" has more box-office
    appeal than "Black Brick".

    Released theatrically 16 February 2024.

    Film Credits:
    <https://www.imdb.com/title/tt18298588/reference>

    What others are saying:
    <https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/monolith_2023>


    THE MOON (DEO MUN) (2023): THE MOON is a South Korean science
    fiction film heavily influenced by APOLLO 13, THE MARTIAN, and
    films of the actual Apollo 11 landing. Oh, and a slight reference
    to STAR TREK V. There's an astronaut stranded in space, the goal
    is to get him home safely, and he has to overcome a series of
    dangers. Okay, it's a meteor storm, not a sandstorm, but the idea
    is the same.

    Released theatrically 18 August 2023.

    Film Credits:
    <https://www.imdb.com/title/tt27688034/reference>

    What others are saying:
    <https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_moon_2023>


    SEVERANCE (2022): SEVERANCE has an interesting science fiction
    idea, but I probably would not have watched it had they not filmed
    parts of it at Bell Labs Holmdel (now known as BellWorks). The
    first episode has scenes in the atrium, a scene at the base of the
    stairs from the center of the atrium down to the first floor, a
    couple of shots of the exterior (especially the parking lots), and
    even one of the water tower shaped like a Martian war machine--oh,
    sorry, I mean a transistor.

    But the premise is why most people watch it. The idea sort of
    comes out of L. Bob Rife's complaint in SNOW CRASH that people
    work on all sort of proprietary things at work, and then take them
    all home in the head every night. "Severance" is a procedure that
    splits a person brain/memories into two parts: one that is
    dominant in the work environment, and one that is dominant outside
    of work. And not just dominant, but exclusive: at work, someone
    severed cannot remember anything of their outside life, and
    outside, they cannot remember anything of their work life.

    If it worked perfectly it would be bad enough, but there are
    apparently some glitches that cause unexpected problems. I
    suppose this gives the writers more to fill the series out with,
    but they strike me as unnecessary complications, especially when
    there are more interesting ideas that get short shrift. For
    example, once a person is "severed", apparently the personality
    outside of work is considered the "real" person in the sense that
    they make all the decisions, including whether the personality
    inside of work can quit their job. So effectively they have
    created a slave, who shares their body, but not their
    consciousness. (There was a somewhat similar idea in David Brin's
    KILN PEOPLE, although there is was a separate body.) There are
    also echoes of THE SUBSTANCE, although there it is more like one
    person inhabiting two bodies. At any rate, this aspect is touched
    upon, but never explored. Instead there is more time spent on the
    main character's dead wife and a mystery surrounding her.

    Released streaming 18 February 2022; also now available on DVD.

    Film Credits:
    <https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11280740/reference>

    What others are saying:
    <https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/severance>


    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

    I am listening to a history of the Plantagenets and the War of the
    Roses and so decided to re-watch THE HOLLOW CROWN. RICHARD II is
    excellent, and one has a good idea of the characters even without
    being as familiar with them as a 16th century English audience
    would have been. But HENRY VI, PART 1, is a puzzlement. Prince
    Hal is a carouser who condones theft, ridicules those who cannot
    return the insult, and is in general a wastrel. It's no wonder
    his father loses patience with him. Falstaff is the same, only
    worse. Hotspur is totally obnoxious, constantly insulting people
    for no reason. None of them seem to have any redeeming
    characteristics.

    And far too much of the play is devoted to the "antics" of
    Falstaff and his companions (including Prince Hal as one of them).
    I'm sure it was popular with the audience in the pit, but to me,
    it just is the pits.

    HENRY IV, PART 2 is somewhat better, since there is less (well, it
    seemed like less) of Falstaff's antics, and Henry V does redeem
    himself at the end, at least in my opinion. I'm sure some would
    think he should have remained loyal to his scumbag friends and
    given them all positions at court. [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    Evelyn C. Leeper
    evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com


    Books are like imprisoned souls till someone takes
    them down from a shelf and frees them.
    --Samuel Butler

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2