• Re: wikipedia

    From Oleg Smirnov@os333@netc.eu to alt.russian.z1,talk.politics.misc,soc.culture.china,alt.politics,nz.politics on Mon Aug 11 09:47:15 2025
    From Newsgroup: nz.politics

    Lawrence D'Oliveiro, <news:107bebv$283kn$1@dont-email.me>
    On Sun, 10 Aug 2025 11:30:39 +0300, Oleg Smirnov wrote:

    <https://tinyurl.com/24pxr4nk> webpronews.com

    Elon Musk Agrees to Ban Wikipedia from X Community Notes ..

    ...

    In real life, as soon as something enthusiasm-driven becomes
    popular, there are powers seeking to adapt it for serving their
    particular interest. Wikipedia was not an exception.

    And when those powers fail to take control of something, they ban it.

    The "leftist" outlet (webpronews.com) has abused the "ban" world,
    because refusal to consider a source as sort of verification tool
    does not mean a ban on reading it for anyone who wants to.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@ldo@nz.invalid to alt.russian.z1,talk.politics.misc,soc.culture.china,alt.politics,nz.politics on Mon Aug 11 07:04:30 2025
    From Newsgroup: nz.politics

    On Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:47:15 +0300, Oleg Smirnov wrote:

    Lawrence D'Oliveiro, <news:107bebv$283kn$1@dont-email.me>

    On Sun, 10 Aug 2025 11:30:39 +0300, Oleg Smirnov wrote:

    <https://tinyurl.com/24pxr4nk> webpronews.com

    Elon Musk Agrees to Ban Wikipedia from X Community Notes ..

    ...

    In real life, as soon as something enthusiasm-driven becomes popular,
    there are powers seeking to adapt it for serving their particular
    interest. Wikipedia was not an exception.

    And when those powers fail to take control of something, they ban it.

    The "leftist" outlet (webpronews.com) has abused the "ban" world,
    because refusal to consider a source as sort of verification tool does
    not mean a ban on reading it for anyone who wants to.

    But he wonrCOt let anyone mention it in those rCLCommunity NotesrCY, will he? --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2