1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. nz.general

  • Time to consider Nuclear Electriciti generation?

    From Crash@nogood@dontbother.invalid to nz.general on Tue Aug 19 14:08:05 2025
    From Newsgroup: nz.general

    https://tinyurl.com/287mjn6z

    Makes sense to me. Current fusion is not the same as it was.
    --
    Crash McBash
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Gordon@Gordon@leaf.net.nz to nz.general on Tue Aug 19 05:13:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: nz.general

    On 2025-08-19, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    https://tinyurl.com/287mjn6z

    Makes sense to me. Current fusion is not the same as it was.


    Time moves on, and with it development. Trouble is that the publics mind is stuck in the 80's. The geo political world was vet different, as were the
    wars. The Cold war was the war of choice. China was a third world country
    and Uncle Sam was King.

    NZ needs a paper on what and where we should go, for without energy the
    economy will fail.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tony@lizandtony@orcon.net.nz to nz.general on Tue Aug 19 20:28:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: nz.general

    Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    https://tinyurl.com/287mjn6z

    Makes sense to me. Current fusion is not the same as it was.


    --
    Crash McBash
    I am concerned about current technology in earthquake prone countries. When the
    new fusion reactors are available things will be very different. They work OK in the lab but production sizes are not yet available.
    Nevertheless we should keep our minds open and if safety concerns are manageable then why not? Nothing is 100% safe anyway.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2