From Newsgroup: nz.general
On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 04:25:42 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<
lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 20:27:44 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 07:07:27 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 00:36:37 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2025/07/02/geoffrey-palmer-passing-regulatory-standards-bill-will-exact-high-political-price/
Perhaps we should be thankful for each of the three government parties >>>>>>>>demonstrating how unfit for office they are - in their own ways they >>>>>>>>appear to know that the end is near - Luxon just wants photo-ops for >>>>>>>>the retirement he would rather not have; Peters and Jones just want >>>>>>>>more money for the retirement they know is coming, and Seymour is just >>>>>>>>doing what he is told. Three weak party "leaders", with no real >>>>>>>>leadership in any of them.
I've suggested more than once before that you really shouldn't try to >>>>>>>post
humour, your jokes just don't seem to have class.
Keep on topic Rich or do your usual copwardly run n' hide.
Some of us have a life, Tony - if I am away I do not post. You on the >>>>other hand literally cut posts you cannot understand or do not like - >>>>that is a real cowardly cut and run . . .
No, that is my right when facing a selfish, opinionated, politically obsessed
moron like you.
Abuse gone.
Clearly you do not know yourself, Tony. You appear to have a similar
level of self-awareness as CLuxon - enough to fool yourself but not
enough to give confidence to anyone else - one of those dim bulbs that
thinks deleting words covers up your own weakness - it fails.
Abuse gone
So back to the Regulatory Standards Bill - it will cost a huge amount
of money for reviews that are already taking place in government >>departments - we will pay twice for the same work - it will slow down >>legislation until it gets Seymour's approval; Seymour will be able to
delay anything he does not like and over-ride parliament - and you
agree with that?
I have not addressed that here, only your stupidity. But what you just wrote >seem to be stupid also.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2