| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 23 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 52:12:18 |
| Calls: | 583 |
| Files: | 1,139 |
| D/L today: |
36 files (539K bytes) |
| Messages: | 111,533 |
Message-ID: <d865d65b6cad977c32f162eb2ec56aaa@dizum.com>
Path: news..!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!sewer!news.dizum.net!not-for-mail
Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 2001::1/128'
On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 20:12:35 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
Message-ID: <d865d65b6cad977c32f162eb2ec56aaa@dizum.com>
Path: news..!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!sewer!news.dizum.net!not-for-mail
Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 2001::1/128'
headers look correct, @dizum.com, .dizum.net, .dizum.com . . . _looks_ correct,
but considering the flood of anti-anonymous remailer propaganda (by tor-mailer
promoters) in this and other busy usenet newsgroups especially within the past
several years, could these hawkish operatives be using their "mini-mailers" to
spoof real domain names, such as appearing in message id and path headers etc.?
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=domain+spoofing . . . i've been subscribed to usenet
newsgroups since 1997, yet i don't recall ever reading about "domain spoofing"
in the context of usenet article headers ever before . . . i'll post a copy of
this reply to news:news.software.nntp , and perhaps some other relevant groups
(not that i would expect any replies, but lurkers abound, and word gets around)
if domain spoofing is more common than i'd ever heard of, some usenet articles
w/message ids might be educational for others reading as well, and furthermore
could domain spoofing be used against authentic anonymous remailers, mail2news
gateways, that use common top-level domain such as .com, .net, and if so, what
about the increasingly common "onion" address *.onion, could tor get "spoofed"?