From Newsgroup: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 15:36:04 +0200, Arno Welzel wrote :
[...]> Proof of statements above using the iOS SMB LAN drive 3rd-party app: [...]
As far as anyone can show in this thread, this is the only useful
capability that iOS has that Android (and all other OS's) lack.
And the capability is not even "SMB" but just using ports below 1024 to provide SMB as *sever*. Using SMB als *client* to access other servers
is no problem with Android.
Actually, nobody has found a single funcitohality on iOS that isn't on
Android (which plenty of functionality on Android isn't on iOS).
What the thought question was, specifically, was to teach people why.
But first people had to try for weeks to find something (anything).
And yet, after almost 200 posts, nobody has found more than port 445.
Hint:
a. Most computer functionality is written by developers.
b. Apple severely limits what developers can do.
c. Google can't.
The thread in question with hundreds of posts is this one:
From: Marion <
marion@facts.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Is there really only one thing that iOS can do that Android can't do?
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2025 17:37:54 -0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <106lidi$6h7$
1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
A whole bunch of people suggested the highly marketed tools that Apple promotes, but all of them, so far anyway, are already long ago on Android.
They're just not as well promoted as the Apple tools are.
But that Android sucks at marketing doesn't make functionality disappear.
It's good that people are trying to find something (anything!) else that
iOS can do that is useful that Android can't do - but nobody has found it.
Although I agree that iOS being able to bind to privileged ports is nice.
Personally, I'm shocked there's at least 1 thing iOS does that Android
can't do, so that's nice that iOS does one thing only that Android can't.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2