Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 23 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 40:50:56 |
Calls: | 583 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 1,138 |
Messages: | 110,394 |
I think if constexpr should be extended in a way that the not compiled
branch is only syntactically analyzed but not semantically; currently
this holds true only for generic code. With that you could have opera-
tions that are only meaningful if that branch is actually compiled.
Am 17.07.25 um 14:41 schrieb Bonita Montero:
I think if constexpr should be extended in a way that the not compiled
branch is only syntactically analyzed but not semantically; currently
this holds true only for generic code. With that you could have opera-
tions that are only meaningful if that branch is actually compiled.
-v
Do you have an example, that is _not_ working with the current implementation?