1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. comp.sys.transputer

  • New transputer board

    From Oscar Toledo G.@biyubi@gmail.com to comp.sys.transputer on Fri Jul 4 22:26:03 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.transputer

    Hi all!

    I've developed a ISA board for one single TRAM, compatible with the Inmos B004 board.

    It is able to run the software I've developed in 1993-1996, along with the old Inmos software.

    I've wrote an article about its development https://nanochess.org/transputer_board.html

    The files are in my git https://github.com/nanochess/transputer/pcb

    Enjoy it!

    Regards,
    Óscar
    --
    Oscar Toledo G.
    Email: biyubi at gmail dot com
    "You may remember me from such books as Programming Boot Sector Games and More Boot Sector Games"
    I remember when companies used VAX
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy Rabagliati@andyr@wizzy.com to comp.sys.transputer on Mon Jul 7 21:33:13 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.transputer

    On 7/5/25 00:26, Oscar Toledo G. wrote:
    Hi all!

    I've developed a ISA board for one single TRAM, compatible with the Inmos B004
    board.

    It is able to run the software I've developed in 1993-1996, along with the old
    Inmos software.

    I've wrote an article about its development https://nanochess.org/transputer_board.html

    The files are in my git https://github.com/nanochess/transputer/pcb


    Nice board, Oscar!

    What do you do with the other three TRAM links ?

    I seem to remember the T412 (??) boards used mouse extender cables to
    get two flipped pairs end to end.

    Cheers, Andy!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From David Arnold@davida@pobox.com to comp.sys.transputer on Sun Aug 3 14:28:34 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.transputer

    On 7/14/25 07:20, Oscar Toledo G. wrote:
    On 7 Jul 2025 at 13:33:13 CST, "Andy Rabagliati" <andyr@wizzy.com> wrote:
    On 7/5/25 00:26, Oscar Toledo G. wrote:

    What do you do with the other three TRAM links ?

    The extra 3 links aren't connected.

    I couldn't determine if there is a standard for connection, but now I think I could expose at the very least the links in a connector. And it would need also a way to disable the board port decoding to avoid conflicts.

    I vaguely remember someone using 0.1" headers on a ribbon cable, and
    someone else using RJ45 (or perhaps RJ11) connectors, and CSA's
    Transputer Education Kits used 8-pin MiniDIN connections (with LocalTalk-compatible cables, I think?)

    I don't think there was an official standard?




    d

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2