Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 26 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 56:13:28 |
Calls: | 632 |
Files: | 1,187 |
D/L today: |
27 files (19,977K bytes) |
Messages: | 179,568 |
https://www.tomsguide.com/phones/i-put-the-iphone-17-pro-max-vs-galaxy-s25-ultra-through-a-7-round-face-off-heres-the-winner
Summary
"After tallying up the results, the undisputed winner in this iPhone 17
Pro Max vs Galaxy S25 Ultra face-off is Appleos flagship phone. Not only does it cost less, but its brighter display, more attractive design, outstanding processing power, and longer battery life really drive the
point of how much better it is."
Read the full report:ArlenrCOs gonna have to put some effort into spinning this...
https://www.tomsguide.com/phones/i-put-the-iphone-17-pro-max-vs-galaxy-s25-ult
ra-through-a-7-round-face-off-heres-the-winner
Summary
"After tallying up the results, the undisputed winner in this iPhone 17
Pro Max vs Galaxy S25 Ultra face-off is ApplerCOs flagship phone. Not only does it cost less, but its brighter display, more attractive design, outstanding processing power, and longer battery life really drive the
point of how much better it is.rCY
On Sep 21, 2025, Tom Elam wrote
(in article <10apdjl$1sejv$1@dont-email.me>):
Read the full report:ArlenrCOs gonna have to put some effort into spinning this...
https://www.tomsguide.com/phones/i-put-the-iphone-17-pro-max-vs-galaxy-s25-ult
ra-through-a-7-round-face-off-heres-the-winner
Summary
"After tallying up the results, the undisputed winner in this iPhone 17
Pro Max vs Galaxy S25 Ultra face-off is ApplerCOs flagship phone. Not only >> does it cost less, but its brighter display, more attractive design,
outstanding processing power, and longer battery life really drive the
point of how much better it is.rCY
On Sep 21, 2025 at 5:35:11rC>PM EDT, "WolfFan"<akwolffan@zoho.com> wrote:
On Sep 21, 2025, Tom Elam wrote
(in article <10apdjl$1sejv$1@dont-email.me>):
Read the full report:
https://www.tomsguide.com/phones/i-put-the-iphone-17-pro-max-vs-galaxy-s25-
ult
ra-through-a-7-round-face-off-heres-the-winner
Summary
"After tallying up the results, the undisputed winner in this iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Galaxy S25 Ultra face-off is ApplerCOs flagship phone. Not onlyArlenrCOs gonna have to put some effort into spinning this...
does it cost less, but its brighter display, more attractive design, outstanding processing power, and longer battery life really drive the point of how much better it is.rCY
Yes, posted his usual drivel. He copy/pasted his "dumb terminal" bit again. Yawn.
Tom Elam wrote:
https://www.tomsguide.com/phones/i-put-the-iphone-17-pro-max-vs-galaxy-s25-ultra-through-a-7-round-face-off-heres-the-winner
Summary
"After tallying up the results, the undisputed winner in this iPhone 17
Pro Max vs Galaxy S25 Ultra face-off is Applero4 flagship phone. Not only
does it cost less, but its brighter display, more attractive design,
outstanding processing power, and longer battery life really drive the
point of how much better it is."
Heh heh heh
Given no iPhone can compare to even a $35 Android in terms of app functionality, the only way you can "compare" the two platforms is if you ignore that the iPhone can't do half of what an Android phone does.
You can compare, 1:1 the other half though, which is what Tom's Guide did.
But they ignored that an iPhone can't do useful things that Android does, such as anonymity (the iPhone has no privacy) which is important to some.
The iPhone, being designed as a dumb terminal, can't do anything without logging into Cupertino servers, which makes it the worst platform of all.
Windows works fine without logging into Redmond's servers.
Android works even better without logging into Palo Alto servers.
It's only iOS which is designed as a toy that can't do anything useful without logging into Cupertino's servers every moment of your entire life.
Tom Elam wrote:
https://www.tomsguide.com/phones/i-put-the-iphone-17-pro-max-vs-galaxy-s25-ultra-through-a-7-round-face-off-heres-the-winner
Summary
"After tallying up the results, the undisputed winner in this iPhone 17
Pro Max vs Galaxy S25 Ultra face-off is Applero4 flagship phone. Not only
does it cost less, but its brighter display, more attractive design,
outstanding processing power, and longer battery life really drive the
point of how much better it is."
Heh heh heh
Given no iPhone can compare to even a $35 Android in terms of app functionality, the only way you can "compare" the two platforms is if you ignore that the iPhone can't do half of what an Android phone does.
You can compare, 1:1 the other half though, which is what Tom's Guide did.
But they ignored that an iPhone can't do useful things that Android does, such as anonymity (the iPhone has no privacy) which is important to some.
The iPhone, being designed as a dumb terminal, can't do anything without logging into Cupertino servers, which makes it the worst platform of all.
Windows works fine without logging into Redmond's servers.
Android works even better without logging into Palo Alto servers.
It's only iOS which is designed as a toy that can't do anything useful without logging into Cupertino's servers every moment of your entire life.