Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 27 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 38:52:50 |
Calls: | 631 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 1,187 |
D/L today: |
23 files (29,781K bytes) |
Messages: | 174,061 |
So we traded in our old Subaru Ascent for a 2025 model, with the
Nav package. And low and behold, it's Linux -- you can even go
to a certain web site and download Linux, as well as the other
open source components of their software.
But what I found amazing about it is that it not only allows one
to use ext4-formatted USB drives for audio, but it will read
FLAC files. I have some 24-bit FLAC files, which sound great
with this system. (You can get 24-bit FLAC at bandcamp.com for
certain labels.)
<snip>
So we traded in our old Subaru Ascent for a 2025 model, with the
Nav package. And low and behold, it's Linux -- you can even go
to a certain web site and download Linux, as well as the other
open source components of their software.
But what I found amazing about it is that it not only allows one
to use ext4-formatted USB drives for audio, but it will read
FLAC files. I have some 24-bit FLAC files, which sound great
with this system. (You can get 24-bit FLAC at bandcamp.com for
certain labels.)
Also, when I've ripped CD's since forever, I've always stored them as
FLAC. Good thing, because that's whats on the sound stick now:
almost all FLAC files, with tags. (That's one thing they have
over .wav files -- you can tag them. For example:
$ metaflac --list 12-Charles.flac
[...]
METADATA block #3
type: 4 (VORBIS_COMMENT)
is last: true
length: 209
vendor string: reference libFLAC 1.2.1 20070917
comments: 7
comment[0]: ALBUM=Beanfield
comment[1]: ARTIST=Beanfield
comment[2]: TITLE=Charles
comment[3]: GENRE=Unclassifiable -> General Unclassifiable
comment[4]: TRACKNUMBER=12
comment[5]: XMCDDISCID=9e0ee90c
comment[6]: ENCODER=xmcd-3.4.0
)
Another trick is using a directory of symlinks as a playlist.
I tested this, and it works. (The utility of that isn't as
nifty as one might think, because it also understands .m3u
files.)
Just goes to show how ubiquitous and awesome Linux is. Could
you imagine if they tried to use MacOS or Windows to do the same
thing? They'd be sure to screw it up somehow.
(One thing: if you use ext4 on a USB stick, you might want
to turn off the journal. This is possible with tune2fs.)
(One thing: if you use ext4 on a USB stick, you might want
to turn off the journal. This is possible with tune2fs.)
On Thu, 09 Oct 2025 09:02:22 +0000, vallor wrote:
(One thing: if you use ext4 on a USB stick, you might want
to turn off the journal. This is possible with tune2fs.)
The smart person will format his USB "sticks" with ext2 which
has no journal.
The performance difference, if any, will be negated by the
inherently slow USB drive.
But I suppose that distro lackeys are given no choice when
they click their "Format USB Drive" buttons.
So we traded in our old Subaru Ascent for a 2025 model, with the
Nav package. And low and behold, it's Linux -- ...
Just goes to show how ubiquitous and awesome Linux is. Could
you imagine if they tried to use MacOS or Windows to do the same
thing? They'd be sure to screw it up somehow.
So we traded in our old Subaru Ascent for a 2025 model, with the
Nav package. And low and behold, it's Linux -- you can even go
to a certain web site and download Linux, as well as the other
open source components of their software.
But what I found amazing about it is that it not only allows one
to use ext4-formatted USB drives for audio, but it will read
FLAC files. I have some 24-bit FLAC files, which sound great
with this system. (You can get 24-bit FLAC at bandcamp.com for
certain labels.)
Also, when I've ripped CD's since forever, I've always stored them as
FLAC. Good thing, because that's whats on the sound stick now:
almost all FLAC files, with tags. (That's one thing they have
over .wav files -- you can tag them. For example:
$ metaflac --list 12-Charles.flac
[...]
METADATA block #3
type: 4 (VORBIS_COMMENT)
is last: true
length: 209
vendor string: reference libFLAC 1.2.1 20070917
comments: 7
comment[0]: ALBUM=Beanfield
comment[1]: ARTIST=Beanfield
comment[2]: TITLE=Charles
comment[3]: GENRE=Unclassifiable -> General Unclassifiable
comment[4]: TRACKNUMBER=12
comment[5]: XMCDDISCID=9e0ee90c
comment[6]: ENCODER=xmcd-3.4.0
)
Another trick is using a directory of symlinks as a playlist.
I tested this, and it works. (The utility of that isn't as
nifty as one might think, because it also understands .m3u
files.)
Just goes to show how ubiquitous and awesome Linux is. Could
you imagine if they tried to use MacOS or Windows to do the same
thing? They'd be sure to screw it up somehow.
(One thing: if you use ext4 on a USB stick, you might want--
to turn off the journal. This is possible with tune2fs.)
On Oct 9, 2025 at 2:02:22rC>AM MST, "vallor" wrote <10c7tmu$2f442$4@dont-email.me>:
So we traded in our old Subaru Ascent for a 2025 model, with the
Nav package. And low and behold, it's Linux -- you can even go
to a certain web site and download Linux, as well as the other
open source components of their software.
But what I found amazing about it is that it not only allows one
to use ext4-formatted USB drives for audio, but it will read
FLAC files. I have some 24-bit FLAC files, which sound great
with this system. (You can get 24-bit FLAC at bandcamp.com for
certain labels.)
Also, when I've ripped CD's since forever, I've always stored them as
FLAC. Good thing, because that's whats on the sound stick now:
almost all FLAC files, with tags. (That's one thing they have
over .wav files -- you can tag them. For example:
$ metaflac --list 12-Charles.flac
[...]
METADATA block #3
type: 4 (VORBIS_COMMENT)
is last: true
length: 209
vendor string: reference libFLAC 1.2.1 20070917
comments: 7
comment[0]: ALBUM=Beanfield
comment[1]: ARTIST=Beanfield
comment[2]: TITLE=Charles
comment[3]: GENRE=Unclassifiable -> General Unclassifiable
comment[4]: TRACKNUMBER=12
comment[5]: XMCDDISCID=9e0ee90c
comment[6]: ENCODER=xmcd-3.4.0
)
Another trick is using a directory of symlinks as a playlist.
I tested this, and it works. (The utility of that isn't as
nifty as one might think, because it also understands .m3u
files.)
Just goes to show how ubiquitous and awesome Linux is. Could
you imagine if they tried to use MacOS or Windows to do the same
thing? They'd be sure to screw it up somehow.
Neither is designed to be in an embedded system.
On 10 Oct 2025 14:30:08 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 9, 2025 at 2:02:22rC>AM MST, "vallor" wrote
<10c7tmu$2f442$4@dont-email.me>:
So we traded in our old Subaru Ascent for a 2025 model, with the Nav
package. And low and behold, it's Linux -- you can even go to a
certain web site and download Linux, as well as the other open source
components of their software.
But what I found amazing about it is that it not only allows one to
use ext4-formatted USB drives for audio, but it will read FLAC files.
I have some 24-bit FLAC files, which sound great with this system.
(You can get 24-bit FLAC at bandcamp.com for certain labels.)
Also, when I've ripped CD's since forever, I've always stored them as
FLAC. Good thing, because that's whats on the sound stick now: almost
all FLAC files, with tags. (That's one thing they have over .wav
files -- you can tag them. For example:
$ metaflac --list 12-Charles.flac [...]
METADATA block #3
type: 4 (VORBIS_COMMENT)
is last: true length: 209 vendor string: reference libFLAC 1.2.1
20070917 comments: 7
comment[0]: ALBUM=Beanfield comment[1]: ARTIST=Beanfield
comment[2]: TITLE=Charles comment[3]: GENRE=Unclassifiable ->
General Unclassifiable comment[4]: TRACKNUMBER=12 comment[5]:
XMCDDISCID=9e0ee90c comment[6]: ENCODER=xmcd-3.4.0
)
Another trick is using a directory of symlinks as a playlist.
I tested this, and it works. (The utility of that isn't as nifty as
one might think, because it also understands .m3u files.)
Just goes to show how ubiquitous and awesome Linux is. Could you
imagine if they tried to use MacOS or Windows to do the same thing?
They'd be sure to screw it up somehow.
Neither is designed to be in an embedded system.
Wrong again snit, at least for Windows.
Aren't you supposed to have an advanced Information Technology degree? Considering how little you seem to know about computers in general I
find that difficult to believe.
Windows Embedded, now known as Windows IoT. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_IoT>
You sure are one ignorant fucker.
On Oct 9, 2025 at 2:02:22rC>AM MST, "vallor" wrote <10c7tmu$2f442$4@dont-email.me>:
Just goes to show how ubiquitous and awesome Linux is. Could you
imagine if they tried to use MacOS or Windows to do the same thing?
They'd be sure to screw it up somehow.
Neither is designed to be in an embedded system.
On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 13:15:36 -0400, ALB wrote:
On 10 Oct 2025 14:30:08 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 9, 2025 at 2:02:22rC>AM MST, "vallor" wrote
<10c7tmu$2f442$4@dont-email.me>:
So we traded in our old Subaru Ascent for a 2025 model, with the Nav
package. And low and behold, it's Linux -- you can even go to a
certain web site and download Linux, as well as the other open source
components of their software.
But what I found amazing about it is that it not only allows one to
use ext4-formatted USB drives for audio, but it will read FLAC files. >>>> I have some 24-bit FLAC files, which sound great with this system.
(You can get 24-bit FLAC at bandcamp.com for certain labels.)
Also, when I've ripped CD's since forever, I've always stored them as
FLAC. Good thing, because that's whats on the sound stick now: almost >>>> all FLAC files, with tags. (That's one thing they have over .wav
files -- you can tag them. For example:
$ metaflac --list 12-Charles.flac [...]
METADATA block #3
type: 4 (VORBIS_COMMENT)
is last: true length: 209 vendor string: reference libFLAC 1.2.1
20070917 comments: 7
comment[0]: ALBUM=Beanfield comment[1]: ARTIST=Beanfield
comment[2]: TITLE=Charles comment[3]: GENRE=Unclassifiable ->
General Unclassifiable comment[4]: TRACKNUMBER=12 comment[5]:
XMCDDISCID=9e0ee90c comment[6]: ENCODER=xmcd-3.4.0
)
Another trick is using a directory of symlinks as a playlist.
I tested this, and it works. (The utility of that isn't as nifty as
one might think, because it also understands .m3u files.)
Just goes to show how ubiquitous and awesome Linux is. Could you
imagine if they tried to use MacOS or Windows to do the same thing?
They'd be sure to screw it up somehow.
Neither is designed to be in an embedded system.
Wrong again snit, at least for Windows.
Aren't you supposed to have an advanced Information Technology degree?
Considering how little you seem to know about computers in general I
find that difficult to believe.
Windows Embedded, now known as Windows IoT.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_IoT>
You sure are one ignorant fucker.
In case you haven't figured it out yet, snit is a pathological liar. He
lies in order to boost his low self esteem and because he believes that he is superior to other people he has convinced himself that nobody will
notice his profuse lying.
Snit is a retard whose only purpose in life is to provide comical entertainment for the normal IQ people watching him. As you have found
out, the best laughs are when snit gets roped into a tech discussion and proceeds to step on his own dick, assuming he has one.
The most entertaining topics are Mac vs Windows vs Linux. Snit really
shows how little he knows about computers and operating systems when he hijacks one of those threads.
I'll wager that snit's comfort bear Bilby is also laughing at him.
Right snitty?
So we traded in our old Subaru Ascent for a 2025 model, with the
Nav package. And low and behold, it's Linux -- you can even go
to a certain web site and download Linux, as well as the other
open source components of their software.
Just goes to show how ubiquitous and awesome Linux is. Could
you imagine if they tried to use MacOS or Windows to do the same
thing? They'd be sure to screw it up somehow.
(One thing: if you use ext4 on a USB stick, you might want
to turn off the journal. This is possible with tune2fs.)
On 10 Oct 2025 14:30:08 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 9, 2025 at 2:02:22rC>AM MST, "vallor" wrote
<10c7tmu$2f442$4@dont-email.me>:
So we traded in our old Subaru Ascent for a 2025 model, with the
Nav package. And low and behold, it's Linux -- you can even go
to a certain web site and download Linux, as well as the other
open source components of their software.
Just goes to show how ubiquitous and awesome Linux is. Could
you imagine if they tried to use MacOS or Windows to do the same
thing? They'd be sure to screw it up somehow.
Neither is designed to be in an embedded system.
Wrong again snit, at least for Windows.
Aren't you supposed to have an advanced Information Technology degree? Considering how little you seem to know about computers in general I find that difficult to believe.
Windows Embedded, now known as Windows IoT. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_IoT>
You sure are one ignorant fucker.
On 10 Oct 2025 14:30:08 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 9, 2025 at 2:02:22rC>AM MST, "vallor" wrote
<10c7tmu$2f442$4@dont-email.me>:
Just goes to show how ubiquitous and awesome Linux is. Could you
imagine if they tried to use MacOS or Windows to do the same thing?
They'd be sure to screw it up somehow.
Neither is designed to be in an embedded system.
Neither is designed to be a versatile, adaptable OS.
Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?= <ldo@nz.invalid> news:10cc9mm$ei6n$1@dont-email.me Sat, 11 Oct 2025 00:51:34 GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote:
On 10 Oct 2025 14:30:08 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 9, 2025 at 2:02:22rC>AM MST, "vallor" wrote
<10c7tmu$2f442$4@dont-email.me>:
Just goes to show how ubiquitous and awesome Linux is. Could you
imagine if they tried to use MacOS or Windows to do the same thing?
They'd be sure to screw it up somehow.
Neither is designed to be in an embedded system.
Neither is designed to be a versatile, adaptable OS.
I suppose that depends on what versatile and adaptable mean to you...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_IoT
IMHO, Linux is the superior choice. :)
On 10 Oct 2025 14:30:08 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 9, 2025 at 2:02:22rC>AM MST, "vallor" wrote
<10c7tmu$2f442$4@dont-email.me>:
Just goes to show how ubiquitous and awesome Linux is. Could you
imagine if they tried to use MacOS or Windows to do the same thing?
They'd be sure to screw it up somehow.
Neither is designed to be in an embedded system.
Neither is designed to be a versatile, adaptable OS.
On Oct 10, 2025 at 5:51:34rC>PM MST, "Lawrence D-|Oliveiro" wrote <10cc9mm$ei6n$1@dont-email.me>:
On 10 Oct 2025 14:30:08 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 9, 2025 at 2:02:22rC>AM MST, "vallor" wrote
<10c7tmu$2f442$4@dont-email.me>:
Just goes to show how ubiquitous and awesome Linux is. Could you
imagine if they tried to use MacOS or Windows to do the same thing?
They'd be sure to screw it up somehow.
Neither is designed to be in an embedded system.
Neither is designed to be a versatile, adaptable OS.
Certainly not in the way Linux is. Sure.
On 11 Oct 2025 05:16:26 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 10, 2025 at 5:51:34rC>PM MST, "Lawrence D-|Oliveiro" wrote
<10cc9mm$ei6n$1@dont-email.me>:
On 10 Oct 2025 14:30:08 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 9, 2025 at 2:02:22rC>AM MST, "vallor" wrote
<10c7tmu$2f442$4@dont-email.me>:
Just goes to show how ubiquitous and awesome Linux is. Could you
imagine if they tried to use MacOS or Windows to do the same thing?
They'd be sure to screw it up somehow.
Neither is designed to be in an embedded system.
Neither is designed to be a versatile, adaptable OS.
Certainly not in the way Linux is. Sure.
Are they rCLversatile and adaptablerCY in some other, non-Linuxy way?
No, they are not.
On Oct 10, 2025 at 10:20:00rC>PM MST, "Lawrence D-|Oliveiro" wrote <10ccpe0$i5cm$2@dont-email.me>:
On 11 Oct 2025 05:16:26 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 10, 2025 at 5:51:34rC>PM MST, "Lawrence D-|Oliveiro" wrote
<10cc9mm$ei6n$1@dont-email.me>:
On 10 Oct 2025 14:30:08 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 9, 2025 at 2:02:22rC>AM MST, "vallor" wrote
<10c7tmu$2f442$4@dont-email.me>:
Just goes to show how ubiquitous and awesome Linux is. Could you
imagine if they tried to use MacOS or Windows to do the same thing? >>>>>> They'd be sure to screw it up somehow.
Neither is designed to be in an embedded system.
Neither is designed to be a versatile, adaptable OS.
Certainly not in the way Linux is. Sure.
Are they rCLversatile and adaptablerCY in some other, non-Linuxy way?
No, they are not.
Apple's software is built to run on pretty much everything it makes --
On Thu, 09 Oct 2025 09:02:22 +0000, vallor wrote:
(One thing: if you use ext4 on a USB stick, you might want
to turn off the journal. This is possible with tune2fs.)
The smart person
will format his USB "sticks" with ext2 which
has no journal.
The performance difference, if any, will be negated by the
inherently slow USB drive.
But I suppose
that distro lackeys are given no choice when
they click their "Format USB Drive" buttons.
On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 02:51:50 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin wrote:
Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?= <ldo@nz.invalid>
news:10cc9mm$ei6n$1@dont-email.me Sat, 11 Oct 2025 00:51:34 GMT in
comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote:
On 10 Oct 2025 14:30:08 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 9, 2025 at 2:02:22rC>AM MST, "vallor" wrote
<10c7tmu$2f442$4@dont-email.me>:
Just goes to show how ubiquitous and awesome Linux is. Could you
imagine if they tried to use MacOS or Windows to do the same thing? >>>>> They'd be sure to screw it up somehow.
Neither is designed to be in an embedded system.
Neither is designed to be a versatile, adaptable OS.
I suppose that depends on what versatile and adaptable mean to you...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_IoT
IMHO, Linux is the superior choice. :)
Windows IoT Edition is a joke. ItrCOs MicrosoftrCOs sad attempt to compete with Linux, while still strictly abiding by the iron principle of
maximizing MicrosoftrCOs revenue, by ensuring that it cannot possibly cannibalize sales of any other version of Windows.
As a result, it ends up being seriously crippled in functionality, and requires a separate full-fat Windows PC to do development on. Unlike
Linux, which is fully capable of self-hosting its own development and deployment stack.
What for? I can see no reason to use ext2 today.
On 11 Oct 2025 13:29:51 GMT, St|-phane CARPENTIER wrote:
What for? I can see no reason to use ext2 today.
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
What an idiotic clown!
Ext2 is managed by the kernel in the exact same way as
ext3/4, except that it has no journal, and that characteristic
can be critical to an external USB drive.
Furthermore, any external drive should be mounted with the
"noatime" option. This will greatly improve performance.
Now get the fuck out of here and don't come back.
You have no technical knowledge and can only pollute and distort
the group with your idiotic messages.
You are a TRIPLE IDIOT.
On 11 Oct 2025 07:07:56 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 10, 2025 at 10:20:00rC>PM MST, "Lawrence D-|Oliveiro" wrote
<10ccpe0$i5cm$2@dont-email.me>:
On 11 Oct 2025 05:16:26 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 10, 2025 at 5:51:34rC>PM MST, "Lawrence D-|Oliveiro" wrote
<10cc9mm$ei6n$1@dont-email.me>:
On 10 Oct 2025 14:30:08 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 9, 2025 at 2:02:22rC>AM MST, "vallor" wrote
<10c7tmu$2f442$4@dont-email.me>:
Just goes to show how ubiquitous and awesome Linux is. Could you >>>>>>> imagine if they tried to use MacOS or Windows to do the same thing? >>>>>>> They'd be sure to screw it up somehow.
Neither is designed to be in an embedded system.
Neither is designed to be a versatile, adaptable OS.
Certainly not in the way Linux is. Sure.
Are they rCLversatile and adaptablerCY in some other, non-Linuxy way?
No, they are not.
Apple's software is built to run on pretty much everything it makes --
So is MicrosoftrCOs. So what? Neither of them is capable of competing with Linux.
You implied further up that Linux is somehow oriented towards rCLembeddedrCY systems.
Have you heard of an rCLembeddedrCY system that does containers and virtualization and has an advanced network stack? That can do SMP on up to 2048 CPU cores? No you havenrCOt.
Linux has all those things.
On Oct 11, 2025 at 2:12:05rC>AM MST, "Lawrence D-|Oliveiro" wrote <10cd714$lj7u$1@dont-email.me>:
On 11 Oct 2025 07:07:56 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 10, 2025 at 10:20:00rC>PM MST, "Lawrence D-|Oliveiro" wrote
<10ccpe0$i5cm$2@dont-email.me>:
On 11 Oct 2025 05:16:26 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 10, 2025 at 5:51:34rC>PM MST, "Lawrence D-|Oliveiro" wrote
<10cc9mm$ei6n$1@dont-email.me>:
On 10 Oct 2025 14:30:08 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 9, 2025 at 2:02:22rC>AM MST, "vallor" wrote
<10c7tmu$2f442$4@dont-email.me>:
Just goes to show how ubiquitous and awesome Linux is. Could you >>>>>>>> imagine if they tried to use MacOS or Windows to do the same thing? >>>>>>>> They'd be sure to screw it up somehow.
Neither is designed to be in an embedded system.
Neither is designed to be a versatile, adaptable OS.
Certainly not in the way Linux is. Sure.
Are they rCLversatile and adaptablerCY in some other, non-Linuxy way?
No, they are not.
Apple's software is built to run on pretty much everything it makes --
So is MicrosoftrCOs. So what? Neither of them is capable of competing with >> Linux.
When do you think they will be closing shop? Pick a date and we can check if you are correct.
You implied further up that Linux is somehow oriented towards rCLembeddedrCY >> systems.
It handles that well. Does not mean it does handle other things well. Not sure
where you got that idea.
Have you heard of an rCLembeddedrCY system that does containers and
virtualization and has an advanced network stack? That can do SMP on up to >> 2048 CPU cores? No you havenrCOt.
Linux has all those things.
You are arguing against a straw man and pushing a pissing war I am not interested in.
But if you really think MS and Apple have lost, pick a date when they will shut their doors, or at least take a huge dive in the market and have their stock prices crumble (and not recover). Would be curious to see if you are right.
My guess: 10 years from now both will still be doing very well. As will Linux.
There is room for all of them, and they all offer pros and cons. Personally I am happy they all exist and that I (and others) have more choice because they all exist. I like choice.
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 13:15:36 -0400, ALB wrote:
On 10 Oct 2025 14:30:08 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 9, 2025 at 2:02:22rC>AM MST, "vallor" wrote
<10c7tmu$2f442$4@dont-email.me>:
So we traded in our old Subaru Ascent for a 2025 model, with the Nav
package. And low and behold, it's Linux -- you can even go to a
certain web site and download Linux, as well as the other open source
components of their software.
But what I found amazing about it is that it not only allows one to
use ext4-formatted USB drives for audio, but it will read FLAC files.
I have some 24-bit FLAC files, which sound great with this system.
(You can get 24-bit FLAC at bandcamp.com for certain labels.)
Also, when I've ripped CD's since forever, I've always stored them as
FLAC. Good thing, because that's whats on the sound stick now: almost >>>> all FLAC files, with tags. (That's one thing they have over .wav
files -- you can tag them. For example:
$ metaflac --list 12-Charles.flac [...]
METADATA block #3
type: 4 (VORBIS_COMMENT)
is last: true length: 209 vendor string: reference libFLAC 1.2.1
20070917 comments: 7
comment[0]: ALBUM=Beanfield comment[1]: ARTIST=Beanfield
comment[2]: TITLE=Charles comment[3]: GENRE=Unclassifiable ->
General Unclassifiable comment[4]: TRACKNUMBER=12 comment[5]:
XMCDDISCID=9e0ee90c comment[6]: ENCODER=xmcd-3.4.0
)
Another trick is using a directory of symlinks as a playlist.
I tested this, and it works. (The utility of that isn't as nifty as
one might think, because it also understands .m3u files.)
Just goes to show how ubiquitous and awesome Linux is. Could you
imagine if they tried to use MacOS or Windows to do the same thing?
They'd be sure to screw it up somehow.
Neither is designed to be in an embedded system.
Wrong again snit, at least for Windows.
Aren't you supposed to have an advanced Information Technology degree?
Considering how little you seem to know about computers in general I
find that difficult to believe.
Windows Embedded, now known as Windows IoT.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_IoT>
You sure are one ignorant fucker.
In case you haven't figured it out yet, snit is a pathological liar. He
lies in order to boost his low self esteem and because he believes that he
is superior to other people he has convinced himself that nobody will
notice his profuse lying.
Snit is a retard whose only purpose in life is to provide comical entertainment for the normal IQ people watching him. As you have found
out, the best laughs are when snit gets roped into a tech discussion and proceeds to step on his own dick, assuming he has one.
The most entertaining topics are Mac vs Windows vs Linux. Snit really
shows how little he knows about computers and operating systems when he hijacks one of those threads.
I'll wager that snit's comfort bear Bilby is also laughing at him.
Right snitty?
He has a masters in IT.
Gremlin wrote:
He has a masters in IT.
The "Snit" thing has no masters degree in anything.
Gremlin wrote:
He has a masters in IT.
The "Snit" thing has no masters degree in anything.
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> news:5tkqekda21ijqurjiekql7iq3c1nmvuq5b@4ax.com Mon, 13 Oct 2025 19:32:54 GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote:Michael Glasser aka snit has an IT degree from Kaplan University which at
Gremlin wrote:
He has a masters in IT.
The "Snit" thing has no masters degree in anything.
I'm well aware of the fact he doesn't have the knowledge he should have for such a thing, but, He actually does have one. It's either from a papermill, or, he did the course work online and his former wife was the one who actually did the work - because he doesn't and hasn't ever demonstrating as having the knowledge one should have for such a thing.
Paper wise, though, he does have one. In his real name. There's no reason for me or anyone else to lie about such a thing...
Have a good day!
Gremlin wrote:
He has a masters in IT.
The "Snit" thing has no masters degree in anything.
On Mon, 13 Oct 2025 14:32:54 -0500, chrisv wrote:
Gremlin wrote:
He has a masters in IT.
The "Snit" thing has no masters degree in anything.
Certainly he does -- Baiting.
I am very open that I mostly use macOS.[...]
Some will find that offensive.
On Oct 13, 2025 at 4:55:12aPM MST, "rbowman" wrote <ml5hqvFe19tU3@mid.individual.net>:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2025 14:32:54 -0500, chrisv wrote:
Gremlin wrote:
He has a masters in IT.
The "Snit" thing has no masters degree in anything.
Certainly he does -- Baiting.
I am speaking of Linux. Excited to dip my toes back in.
I am very open that I mostly use macOS. Some will find that offensive. So be it. I also look at the good and bad of macOS, Linux, and Windows. I do not claim any is perfect and am happy all three exist. Some find that offensive, too. That, to me, is their problem. Not mine.
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA1
SiO2_Man <StockholmDetektiv@meatball.com> wrote:
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA1
Impressive.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
I am very open that I mostly use macOS.[...]
Some will find that offensive.
Offense is more taken than given.
On Mon, 13 Oct 2025 20:43:11 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin wrote:
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>Michael Glasser aka snit has an IT degree from Kaplan University which
news:5tkqekda21ijqurjiekql7iq3c1nmvuq5b@4ax.com Mon, 13 Oct 2025
19:32:54 GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote:
Gremlin wrote:
He has a masters in IT.
The "Snit" thing has no masters degree in anything.
I'm well aware of the fact he doesn't have the knowledge he should have
for such a thing, but, He actually does have one. It's either from a
papermill, or, he did the course work online and his former wife was
the one who actually did the work - because he doesn't and hasn't ever
demonstrating as having the knowledge one should have for such a thing.
Paper wise, though, he does have one. In his real name. There's no
reason for me or anyone else to lie about such a thing...
Have a good day!
at the time was a known diploma mill and a degree from them was useless
as employers knew all about the place.
Learning was optional.
Paying the tuition was all that mattered.
POSSIBLE JOBS
POSSIBLE EDUCATION
SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER
POSSIBLE RELATIVES
ASSOCIATES
First Name Middle Name Last Name
Michael Lee Glasser
Birth Date Age Astrological Sign
July 22, 1969 50 Cancer
Mike Lee Glasser M Glasser
Job Worked Dates
Instructor at Yavapai College
Trainer at Intuit Jan. 1, 1995 - Dec. 31, 2000
Systems Administrator at Clark County Public Education Foundation Jan.
1, 1993 - Dec. 31, 1995
Lecturer at Yavapai College
Adjunct Faculty at YAVAPAI COLLEGE LIBRARY (Libraries-Institutional)
KAPLAN UNIVERSITY
Attendance Dates: January 1, 2008 - December 31, 2011
Qualification Type: Masters IT
Subjects: Information Technology
University: Kaplan University