| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 27 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 38:53:44 |
| Calls: | 631 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 1,187 |
| D/L today: |
23 files (29,781K bytes) |
| Messages: | 174,061 |
On 10/4/25 12:34 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2025-10-04, Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:Everyone is a Carroll sock, right Sigmond?
It's actually amazing Adobe was able to con people for as long as they >>>>> did. The power of marketing at work! Remember when you used to spout >>>>> Adobe's marketing bullsh*t as 'fact'? LOL! The good ol' days ;)Snit is dumber than my shoe.
Gee, "new" person who references Carroll's ancient debates... but is clearly
not another Carroll sock, I will respond.
It is no longer 1999. It is no longer 2004.
It isn't 2014 (the year you 'updated' your DW screencast series,
right?), either. But the year is irrelevant. Why? Despite you spouting
Adobe marketing crap as some kind of 'measurement' regarding pro usage,
the fact is DW never had anything but a very tiny percentage of the web
market, even at it peak. I can recall when you said something like, I've
found dozens of web outfits using it'. LOL! Dozens... out of hundreds
of thousands world wide ;) You probably got them off of Adobe's site.
(snip more of the same goofy 'sales pitching' and BS)
Again: I had NOTHING to do with the making of DW.
No one said you did, word weasel. Your idiocy was based on you spouting
Adobe's marketing crap as some kind of industry 'yardstick'. Absurd.
--<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
On 2025-10-04, QuantumFleaBazaar <QuantumFlea@bizaar.com> wrote:
On 10/4/25 12:34 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2025-10-04, Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:Everyone is a Carroll sock, right Sigmond?
It's actually amazing Adobe was able to con people for as long asSnit is dumber than my shoe.
they did. The power of marketing at work! Remember when you used to >>>>>> spout Adobe's marketing bullsh*t as 'fact'? LOL! The good ol' days >>>>>> ;)
Gee, "new" person who references Carroll's ancient debates... but is
clearly not another Carroll sock, I will respond.
It is no longer 1999. It is no longer 2004.
It isn't 2014 (the year you 'updated' your DW screencast series,
right?), either. But the year is irrelevant. Why? Despite you spouting
Adobe marketing crap as some kind of 'measurement' regarding pro
usage,
the fact is DW never had anything but a very tiny percentage of the
web market, even at it peak. I can recall when you said something
like, I've found dozens of web outfits using it'. LOL! Dozens... out
of hundreds of thousands world wide ;) You probably got them off of
Adobe's site.
(snip more of the same goofy 'sales pitching' and BS)
Again: I had NOTHING to do with the making of DW.
No one said you did, word weasel. Your idiocy was based on you
spouting Adobe's marketing crap as some kind of industry 'yardstick'.
Absurd.
Snit has problems dealing with reality and the fact that literally
everyone he comes in contact with on USENET reaches the same conclusion
which is he is a mentally retarded professional grifter and a lying
troll.
There was some German or Austrian developer named Peter who used to call
snit dumber than a loaf of bread.
He was correct.
Snit's latest ruse to explain away his 20 years of trolling is to demand
a MID which even if someone wastes their time finding it, snit will
ignore and move to something else.
An MID is not needed anyway as the complete threads are in most cases
still online to view in context.
As for snit, look here:
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
On Oct 4, 2025 at 10:51:10rC>AM MST, "QuantumFleaBazaar" wrote <10brmqi$deb$1@paganini.bofh.team>:
On 10/4/25 10:38 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2025-10-03, Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:Snit is dumber than my shoe.
On Oct 3, 2025 at 1:07:04rC>PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
<41b0ekd9f063lqfpgkfj83gn34qg5utmue@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 15:22:30 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
<"SteveCarroll"@noone.none> wrote:
On 2025-10-03, Kelly Phillips <KFile@podcasts.org> wrote:
There are things he could talk about, as opposed to 'what he
does'.
Such as? Cutting edge design ideas using Dreamweaver?
'Give me your tired, your poor and your tables'... and I'll give
you divitis? ;)
Tables are a part of HTML... not tied to Dreamweaver.
Hear that? It was the sound of the point flying *way* over your
head...
AGAIN. One of DW's original 'claims to fame' was the removal of tables
for layout. The problem was it overused divs, scratch that. It *WAY*
overused divs!
Most layout, if that is what you are thinking, is now done with CSS
(and has been for a long time).
Reading is fundamental!
Back in the days of "divitis" (not a term I made up), DW overgenerated
divs during the layout process. As someone who did a screencast series
on DW, how are you *not* aware of this fact?!
What "is now done with" DW is very little, as it should be:
<https://trends.builtwith.com/framework/Adobe-Dreamweaver>
It's actually amazing Adobe was able to con people for as long as they
did. The power of marketing at work! Remember when you used to spout
Adobe's marketing bullsh*t as 'fact'? LOL! The good ol' days ;)
Gee, "new" person who references Carroll's ancient debates... but is
clearly not another Carroll sock, I will respond.
It is no longer 1999. It is no longer 2004. Why you are so needy of
drama is a YOU issue. You bring your mental health challenges as a topic
to EVERY discussion.
On 2025-10-04, QuantumFleaBazaar <QuantumFlea@bizaar.com> wrote:
On 10/4/25 12:34 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2025-10-04, Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:Everyone is a Carroll sock, right Sigmond?
It's actually amazing Adobe was able to con people for as long as they >>>>>> did. The power of marketing at work! Remember when you used to spout >>>>>> Adobe's marketing bullsh*t as 'fact'? LOL! The good ol' days ;)Snit is dumber than my shoe.
Gee, "new" person who references Carroll's ancient debates... but is clearly
not another Carroll sock, I will respond.
It is no longer 1999. It is no longer 2004.
It isn't 2014 (the year you 'updated' your DW screencast series,
right?), either. But the year is irrelevant. Why? Despite you spouting
Adobe marketing crap as some kind of 'measurement' regarding pro usage, >>> the fact is DW never had anything but a very tiny percentage of the web
market, even at it peak. I can recall when you said something like, I've >>> found dozens of web outfits using it'. LOL! Dozens... out of hundreds
of thousands world wide ;) You probably got them off of Adobe's site.
(snip more of the same goofy 'sales pitching' and BS)
Again: I had NOTHING to do with the making of DW.
No one said you did, word weasel. Your idiocy was based on you spouting
Adobe's marketing crap as some kind of industry 'yardstick'. Absurd.
Snit has problems dealing with reality and the fact that literally everyone he
comes in
contact with on USENET reaches the same conclusion which is he is a mentally retarded
professional grifter and a lying troll.
There was some German or Austrian developer named Peter who used to call snit dumber than a loaf of bread.
He was correct.
Snit's latest ruse to explain away his 20 years of trolling is to demand a MID
which
even if someone wastes their time finding it, snit will ignore and move to something else.
An MID is not needed anyway as the complete threads are in most cases still online to view
in context.
As for snit, look here:
On Sat, 4 Oct 2025 22:39:35 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
On 2025-10-04, QuantumFleaBazaar <QuantumFlea@bizaar.com> wrote:
On 10/4/25 12:34 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2025-10-04, Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:Everyone is a Carroll sock, right Sigmond?
It's actually amazing Adobe was able to con people for as long as >>>>>>> they did. The power of marketing at work! Remember when you used to >>>>>>> spout Adobe's marketing bullsh*t as 'fact'? LOL! The good ol' days >>>>>>> ;)Snit is dumber than my shoe.
Gee, "new" person who references Carroll's ancient debates... but is >>>>> clearly not another Carroll sock, I will respond.
It is no longer 1999. It is no longer 2004.
It isn't 2014 (the year you 'updated' your DW screencast series,
right?), either. But the year is irrelevant. Why? Despite you spouting >>>> Adobe marketing crap as some kind of 'measurement' regarding pro
usage,
the fact is DW never had anything but a very tiny percentage of the
web market, even at it peak. I can recall when you said something
like, I've found dozens of web outfits using it'. LOL! Dozens... out
of hundreds of thousands world wide ;) You probably got them off of
Adobe's site.
(snip more of the same goofy 'sales pitching' and BS)
Again: I had NOTHING to do with the making of DW.
No one said you did, word weasel. Your idiocy was based on you
spouting Adobe's marketing crap as some kind of industry 'yardstick'.
Absurd.
Snit has problems dealing with reality and the fact that literally
everyone he comes in contact with on USENET reaches the same conclusion
which is he is a mentally retarded professional grifter and a lying
troll.
There was some German or Austrian developer named Peter who used to call
snit dumber than a loaf of bread.
He was correct.
Snit's latest ruse to explain away his 20 years of trolling is to demand
a MID which even if someone wastes their time finding it, snit will
ignore and move to something else.
An MID is not needed anyway as the complete threads are in most cases
still online to view in context.
As for snit, look here:
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Don't waste your time getting involved in snit's demands.
There is so much information about snit on the internet that it's actually laughable for him to demand messages and the like.
And you need to realize that when someone asks snit to clarify his accusations against other posters he runs away every time.
I've asked snit to explain his reasoning that certain people in this group and others are white supremacists based upon his list of messages.
He runs away every time.
Why?
Because his so called proof in no way fathomable confirms his claims.
Here they are once again. Decide for yourself. <683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<100sjei$ngvm$1@dont-email.me>
The links posted above and copied here are spot on.
They are not faked.
They are not made up.
they are factual and snit knows it which is why he will never attempt to prove them wrong.
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Hey snitty, what say you?
On 04 Oct 2025 19:21:11 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 4, 2025 at 10:51:10rC>AM MST, "QuantumFleaBazaar" wrote
<10brmqi$deb$1@paganini.bofh.team>:
On 10/4/25 10:38 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2025-10-03, Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:Snit is dumber than my shoe.
On Oct 3, 2025 at 1:07:04rC>PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
<41b0ekd9f063lqfpgkfj83gn34qg5utmue@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 15:22:30 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
<"SteveCarroll"@noone.none> wrote:
On 2025-10-03, Kelly Phillips <KFile@podcasts.org> wrote:
There are things he could talk about, as opposed to 'what he >>>>>>>>> does'.
Such as? Cutting edge design ideas using Dreamweaver?
'Give me your tired, your poor and your tables'... and I'll give >>>>>>> you divitis? ;)
Tables are a part of HTML... not tied to Dreamweaver.
Hear that? It was the sound of the point flying *way* over your
head...
AGAIN. One of DW's original 'claims to fame' was the removal of tables >>>> for layout. The problem was it overused divs, scratch that. It *WAY*
overused divs!
Most layout, if that is what you are thinking, is now done with CSS
(and has been for a long time).
Reading is fundamental!
Back in the days of "divitis" (not a term I made up), DW overgenerated >>>> divs during the layout process. As someone who did a screencast series >>>> on DW, how are you *not* aware of this fact?!
What "is now done with" DW is very little, as it should be:
<https://trends.builtwith.com/framework/Adobe-Dreamweaver>
It's actually amazing Adobe was able to con people for as long as they >>>> did. The power of marketing at work! Remember when you used to spout
Adobe's marketing bullsh*t as 'fact'? LOL! The good ol' days ;)
Gee, "new" person who references Carroll's ancient debates... but is
clearly not another Carroll sock, I will respond.
It is no longer 1999. It is no longer 2004. Why you are so needy of
drama is a YOU issue. You bring your mental health challenges as a topic
to EVERY discussion.
Hey, you accused me of being a Carroll sock. Whatever that is.
Is that your way of explaining away why so many people seem to dislike you snit?
So are all of these people Carroll socks as well?
https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit
https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods
https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews
On 04 Oct 2025 19:21:11 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 4, 2025 at 10:51:10rC>AM MST, "QuantumFleaBazaar" wrote
<10brmqi$deb$1@paganini.bofh.team>:
On 10/4/25 10:38 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2025-10-03, Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:Snit is dumber than my shoe.
On Oct 3, 2025 at 1:07:04rC>PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
<41b0ekd9f063lqfpgkfj83gn34qg5utmue@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 15:22:30 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
<"SteveCarroll"@noone.none> wrote:
On 2025-10-03, Kelly Phillips <KFile@podcasts.org> wrote:
There are things he could talk about, as opposed to 'what he >>>>>>>>> does'.
Such as? Cutting edge design ideas using Dreamweaver?
'Give me your tired, your poor and your tables'... and I'll give >>>>>>> you divitis? ;)
Tables are a part of HTML... not tied to Dreamweaver.
Hear that? It was the sound of the point flying *way* over your
head...
AGAIN. One of DW's original 'claims to fame' was the removal of tables >>>> for layout. The problem was it overused divs, scratch that. It *WAY*
overused divs!
Most layout, if that is what you are thinking, is now done with CSS
(and has been for a long time).
Reading is fundamental!
Back in the days of "divitis" (not a term I made up), DW overgenerated >>>> divs during the layout process. As someone who did a screencast series >>>> on DW, how are you *not* aware of this fact?!
What "is now done with" DW is very little, as it should be:
<https://trends.builtwith.com/framework/Adobe-Dreamweaver>
It's actually amazing Adobe was able to con people for as long as they >>>> did. The power of marketing at work! Remember when you used to spout
Adobe's marketing bullsh*t as 'fact'? LOL! The good ol' days ;)
Gee, "new" person who references Carroll's ancient debates... but is
clearly not another Carroll sock, I will respond.
It is no longer 1999. It is no longer 2004. Why you are so needy of
drama is a YOU issue. You bring your mental health challenges as a topic
to EVERY discussion.
Hey, you accused me of being a Carroll sock. Whatever that is.
Is that your way of explaining away why so many people seem to dislike you snit?
So are all of these people Carroll socks as well?
https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit
https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods
https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews
On Sat, 4 Oct 2025 22:39:35 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
On 2025-10-04, QuantumFleaBazaar <QuantumFlea@bizaar.com> wrote:
On 10/4/25 12:34 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2025-10-04, Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:Everyone is a Carroll sock, right Sigmond?
It's actually amazing Adobe was able to con people for as long as >>>>>>> they did. The power of marketing at work! Remember when you used to >>>>>>> spout Adobe's marketing bullsh*t as 'fact'? LOL! The good ol' days >>>>>>> ;)Snit is dumber than my shoe.
Gee, "new" person who references Carroll's ancient debates... but is >>>>> clearly not another Carroll sock, I will respond.
It is no longer 1999. It is no longer 2004.
It isn't 2014 (the year you 'updated' your DW screencast series,
right?), either. But the year is irrelevant. Why? Despite you spouting >>>> Adobe marketing crap as some kind of 'measurement' regarding pro
usage,
the fact is DW never had anything but a very tiny percentage of the
web market, even at it peak. I can recall when you said something
like, I've found dozens of web outfits using it'. LOL! Dozens... out
of hundreds of thousands world wide ;) You probably got them off of
Adobe's site.
(snip more of the same goofy 'sales pitching' and BS)
Again: I had NOTHING to do with the making of DW.
No one said you did, word weasel. Your idiocy was based on you
spouting Adobe's marketing crap as some kind of industry 'yardstick'.
Absurd.
Snit has problems dealing with reality and the fact that literally
everyone he comes in contact with on USENET reaches the same conclusion
which is he is a mentally retarded professional grifter and a lying
troll.
There was some German or Austrian developer named Peter who used to call
snit dumber than a loaf of bread.
He was correct.
Snit's latest ruse to explain away his 20 years of trolling is to demand
a MID which even if someone wastes their time finding it, snit will
ignore and move to something else.
An MID is not needed anyway as the complete threads are in most cases
still online to view in context.
As for snit, look here:
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Don't waste your time getting involved in snit's demands.
There is so much information about snit on the internet that it's actually laughable for him to demand messages and the like.
And you need to realize that when someone asks snit to clarify his accusations against other posters he runs away every time.
I've asked snit to explain his reasoning that certain people in this group and others are white supremacists based upon his list of messages.
He runs away every time.
Why?
Because his so called proof in no way fathomable confirms his claims.
Here they are once again. Decide for yourself. <683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<100sjei$ngvm$1@dont-email.me>
The links posted above and copied here are spot on.
They are not faked.
They are not made up.
they are factual and snit knows it which is why he will never attempt to prove them wrong.
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Hey snitty, what say you?
On 04 Oct 2025 19:21:11 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 4, 2025 at 10:51:10rC>AM MST, "QuantumFleaBazaar" wrote
<10brmqi$deb$1@paganini.bofh.team>:
On 10/4/25 10:38 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2025-10-03, Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:Snit is dumber than my shoe.
On Oct 3, 2025 at 1:07:04rC>PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
<41b0ekd9f063lqfpgkfj83gn34qg5utmue@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 15:22:30 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
<"SteveCarroll"@noone.none> wrote:
On 2025-10-03, Kelly Phillips <KFile@podcasts.org> wrote:
There are things he could talk about, as opposed to 'what he >>>>>>>>> does'.
Such as? Cutting edge design ideas using Dreamweaver?
'Give me your tired, your poor and your tables'... and I'll give >>>>>>> you divitis? ;)
Tables are a part of HTML... not tied to Dreamweaver.
Hear that? It was the sound of the point flying *way* over your
head...
AGAIN. One of DW's original 'claims to fame' was the removal of tables >>>> for layout. The problem was it overused divs, scratch that. It *WAY*
overused divs!
Most layout, if that is what you are thinking, is now done with CSS
(and has been for a long time).
Reading is fundamental!
Back in the days of "divitis" (not a term I made up), DW overgenerated >>>> divs during the layout process. As someone who did a screencast series >>>> on DW, how are you *not* aware of this fact?!
What "is now done with" DW is very little, as it should be:
<https://trends.builtwith.com/framework/Adobe-Dreamweaver>
It's actually amazing Adobe was able to con people for as long as they >>>> did. The power of marketing at work! Remember when you used to spout
Adobe's marketing bullsh*t as 'fact'? LOL! The good ol' days ;)
Gee, "new" person who references Carroll's ancient debates... but is
clearly not another Carroll sock, I will respond.
It is no longer 1999. It is no longer 2004. Why you are so needy of
drama is a YOU issue. You bring your mental health challenges as a topic
to EVERY discussion.
Hey, you accused me of being a Carroll sock. Whatever that is.
Is that your way of explaining away why so many people seem to dislike you >snit?
So are all of these people Carroll socks as well?
https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit
https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods
https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews
Pye R. Squared wrote:
On 04 Oct 2025 19:21:11 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 4, 2025 at 10:51:10rC>AM MST, "QuantumFleaBazaar" wrote
<10brmqi$deb$1@paganini.bofh.team>:
On 10/4/25 10:38 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2025-10-03, Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:Snit is dumber than my shoe.
On Oct 3, 2025 at 1:07:04rC>PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
<41b0ekd9f063lqfpgkfj83gn34qg5utmue@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 15:22:30 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
<"SteveCarroll"@noone.none> wrote:
On 2025-10-03, Kelly Phillips <KFile@podcasts.org> wrote:
There are things he could talk about, as opposed to 'what he >>>>>>>>>> does'.
Such as? Cutting edge design ideas using Dreamweaver?
'Give me your tired, your poor and your tables'... and I'll give >>>>>>>> you divitis? ;)
Tables are a part of HTML... not tied to Dreamweaver.
Hear that? It was the sound of the point flying *way* over your
head...
AGAIN. One of DW's original 'claims to fame' was the removal of tables >>>>> for layout. The problem was it overused divs, scratch that. It *WAY* >>>>> overused divs!
Most layout, if that is what you are thinking, is now done with CSS >>>>>> (and has been for a long time).
Reading is fundamental!
Back in the days of "divitis" (not a term I made up), DW overgenerated >>>>> divs during the layout process. As someone who did a screencast series >>>>> on DW, how are you *not* aware of this fact?!
What "is now done with" DW is very little, as it should be:
<https://trends.builtwith.com/framework/Adobe-Dreamweaver>
It's actually amazing Adobe was able to con people for as long as they >>>>> did. The power of marketing at work! Remember when you used to spout >>>>> Adobe's marketing bullsh*t as 'fact'? LOL! The good ol' days ;)
Gee, "new" person who references Carroll's ancient debates... but is
clearly not another Carroll sock, I will respond.
It is no longer 1999. It is no longer 2004. Why you are so needy of
drama is a YOU issue. You bring your mental health challenges as a topic >>> to EVERY discussion.
Hey, you accused me of being a Carroll sock. Whatever that is.
Is that your way of explaining away why so many people seem to dislike you >>snit?
So are all of these people Carroll socks as well?
https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit
https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods
https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews
I had great sex with a boy but before I shoot my load, I think of Adolf Hitler, the greatest white man ever.
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Hey snitty, what say you?
Snit will claim they are fabrications.
Sure.
He ignores the fact that some of those links point to statements that
snit himself made.
Like this one for example.
https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1
Or this one
https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2
Go through the list yourself.
snit is one very sick duck.
Gef|a-nngnis <"Gef|a-nngnisVogel"@deutsch.si> news:1biyxen4ztrtb$.t6zlnzkh3h6$.dlg@40tude.net Sun, 05 Oct 2025
01:17:27 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Hey snitty, what say you?
Snit will claim they are fabrications. Sure. He ignores the fact
that some of those links point to statements that snit himself
made.
*none* of them are fabrications. Not a single one. He just thinks
he's smart enough to con people into thinking otherwise. That people
won't check his 'receipts' out. Some have and found those 'receipts'
to be not what Snit was claiming. His list for SC and myself is
bullshit. He tries to back his claims up by quoting out of context.
It doesn't work when you check the posts/conversation and read the
full context. That's when you find out that snit was trying to con.
Like this one for example.
https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1
Or this one
https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2
Go through the list yourself.
snit is one very sick duck.
He's a well cooked duck on a stick - he just doesn't know it yet. His
dear 'friend' David Brooks does though. Oh, yes, indeed he does.
Gef|nngnis <"Gef|nngnisVogel"@deutsch.sil> news:1biyxen4ztrtb$.t6zlnzkh3h6$.dlg@40tude.net Sun, 05 Oct 2025 01:17:27
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Hey snitty, what say you?
Snit will claim they are fabrications.
Sure.
He ignores the fact that some of those links point to statements that
snit himself made.
*none* of them are fabrications. Not a single one. He just thinks he's smart enough to con people into thinking otherwise. That people won't check his 'receipts' out. Some have and found those 'receipts' to be not what Snit was claiming. His list for SC and myself is bullshit. He tries to back his
claims up by quoting out of context. It doesn't work when you check the posts/conversation and read the full context. That's when you find out that snit was trying to con.
Like this one for example.
https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1
Or this one
https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2
Go through the list yourself.
snit is one very sick duck.
He's a well cooked duck on a stick - he just doesn't know it yet. His dear 'friend' David Brooks does though. Oh, yes, indeed he does.
At Mon, 6 Oct 2025 00:59:49 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin <nobody@haph.org>
wrote:
Gef|a-nngnis <"Gef|a-nngnisVogel"@deutsch.si>
news:1biyxen4ztrtb$.t6zlnzkh3h6$.dlg@40tude.net Sun, 05 Oct 2025
01:17:27 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Hey snitty, what say you?
Snit will claim they are fabrications. Sure. He ignores the fact
that some of those links point to statements that snit himself
made.
*none* of them are fabrications. Not a single one. He just thinks
he's smart enough to con people into thinking otherwise. That people
won't check his 'receipts' out. Some have and found those 'receipts'
to be not what Snit was claiming. His list for SC and myself is
bullshit. He tries to back his claims up by quoting out of context.
It doesn't work when you check the posts/conversation and read the
full context. That's when you find out that snit was trying to con.
Like this one for example.
https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1
Or this one
https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2
Go through the list yourself.
snit is one very sick duck.
He's a well cooked duck on a stick - he just doesn't know it yet. His
dear 'friend' David Brooks does though. Oh, yes, indeed he does.
Some of us -- with a penchant to joust windmills -- are trying
to get some respectability back for cola.
If the feud could stay in acw, would very much appreciate it.
Also, the "Snit" is long-gone from cola, and good riddance
to bad trolling.
(I would set fu2 to acw, but I don't have that ability in--
this newsreader, yet. Yes, I've been writing my own
newsreader in tk/perl, which is more windmill-jousting.
ObLinux:
About to try booting linux-next-next-20251003 on bare metal,
but it is unlikely I'll keep running it. The problem: the
NVIDIA drivers probably won't work, because though Linux
is really good about not breaking userspace, the internals
shift around all the time.
Gef|nngnis <"Gef|nngnisVogel"@deutsch.sil> news:1biyxen4ztrtb$.t6zlnzkh3h6$.dlg@40tude.net Sun, 05 Oct 2025 01:17:27
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Hey snitty, what say you?
Snit will claim they are fabrications.
Sure.
He ignores the fact that some of those links point to statements that
snit himself made.
*none* of them are fabrications. Not a single one. He just thinks he's smart enough to con people into thinking otherwise. That people won't check his 'receipts' out. Some have and found those 'receipts' to be not what Snit was claiming. His list for SC and myself is bullshit. He tries to back his claims up by quoting out of context. It doesn't work when you check the posts/conversation and read the full context. That's when you find out that snit was trying to con.
Like this one for example.
https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1
Or this one
https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2
Go through the list yourself.
snit is one very sick duck.
He's a well cooked duck on a stick - he just doesn't know it yet. His dear 'friend' David Brooks does though. Oh, yes, indeed he does.
GefEngnis <"GefEngnisVogel"@deutsch.sil> news:1biyxen4ztrtb$.t6zlnzkh3h6$.dlg@40tude.net Sun, 05 Oct 2025 01:17:27
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Hey snitty, what say you?
Snit will claim they are fabrications.
Sure.
He ignores the fact that some of those links point to statements that
snit himself made.
*none* of them are fabrications. Not a single one. He just thinks he's smart enough to con people into thinking otherwise. That people won't check his 'receipts' out. Some have and found those 'receipts' to be not what Snit was claiming. His list for SC and myself is bullshit. He tries to back his claims up by quoting out of context. It doesn't work when you check the posts/conversation and read the full context. That's when you find out that snit was trying to con.
Like this one for example.
https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1
Or this one
https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2
Go through the list yourself.
snit is one very sick duck.
He's a well cooked duck on a stick - he just doesn't know it yet. His dear 'friend' David Brooks does though. Oh, yes, indeed he does.
On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 00:59:49 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin wrote:
Gef|nngnis <"Gef|nngnisVogel"@deutsch.sil>
news:1biyxen4ztrtb$.t6zlnzkh3h6$.dlg@40tude.net Sun, 05 Oct 2025 01:17:27
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Hey snitty, what say you?
Snit will claim they are fabrications.
Sure.
He ignores the fact that some of those links point to statements that
snit himself made.
*none* of them are fabrications. Not a single one. He just thinks he's smart >> enough to con people into thinking otherwise. That people won't check his
'receipts' out. Some have and found those 'receipts' to be not what Snit was >> claiming. His list for SC and myself is bullshit. He tries to back his
claims up by quoting out of context. It doesn't work when you check the
posts/conversation and read the full context. That's when you find out that >> snit was trying to con.
I took the time to check every link listed above as well as Snit's white supremacy links and my conclusion is that snit is a fucking massive liar.
Regarding the links above, reposted here for ease of checking, snit the fucktard keeps attacking the credibility by claiming no mid has been
posted.
What in the fucking name of Satan is he mumbling about?
Does snit actually understand how USENET and the Internet work?
Even the basics?
apparently he does not because the tinyurl links show the complete threads
so why the fuck would anyone need an mid?
It's just another lame attempt at deflection by fuckface snit.
Then there are the white supreme msid that snit keeps posting.
Not a single one proves that the posters are white supremacist at all.
It's not even close.
And I looked up every single one of those as well.
And lastly I took a look at the fucktard snit's claims against you for technical abilities and having looked at some of the code you have posted
you obviously know your shit.
Snit's claims about you not knowing ASCII and simple basics like that are more laughable accusations.
The same applies to the fucktards comments against Steve Carroll.
Especially when it comes to snit's criminal record.
The stupid fucker is actually trying to argue that all those who
posted screenshots are lying and faking them?
Is snit really that fucking stupid?
I'm agreeing with others that he is severely retarded.
There is no other explanation.
Like this one for example.
https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1
Or this one
https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2
Go through the list yourself.
snit is one very sick duck.
Yes.
He's a well cooked duck on a stick - he just doesn't know it yet. His dear >> 'friend' David Brooks does though. Oh, yes, indeed he does.
You had better toss that BBQ in the trash because after cooking a fowl, stinking fucker like snit it will never be the same again.
You will never be able to degrease it.
On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 00:59:49 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin wrote:
Gef|nngnis <"Gef|nngnisVogel"@deutsch.sil>
news:1biyxen4ztrtb$.t6zlnzkh3h6$.dlg@40tude.net Sun, 05 Oct 2025
01:17:27 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Hey snitty, what say you?
Snit will claim they are fabrications.
Sure.
He ignores the fact that some of those links point to statements that
snit himself made.
*none* of them are fabrications. Not a single one. He just thinks he's
smart enough to con people into thinking otherwise. That people won't
check his 'receipts' out. Some have and found those 'receipts' to be
not what Snit was claiming. His list for SC and myself is bullshit. He
tries to back his claims up by quoting out of context. It doesn't work
when you check the posts/conversation and read the full context. That's
when you find out that snit was trying to con.
I took the time to check every link listed above as well as Snit's white supremacy links and my conclusion is that snit is a fucking massive
liar.
Regarding the links above, reposted here for ease of checking, snit the fucktard keeps attacking the credibility by claiming no mid has beenGood question.
posted.
What in the fucking name of Satan is he mumbling about?
Does snit actually understand how USENET and the Internet work?
Even the basics?
apparently he does not because the tinyurl links show the complete
threads so why the fuck would anyone need an mid?
It's just another lame attempt at deflection by fuckface snit.
Then there are the white supreme msid that snit keeps posting.
Not a single one proves that the posters are white supremacist at all.
It's not even close.
And I looked up every single one of those as well.
And lastly I took a look at the fucktard snit's claims against you for technical abilities and having looked at some of the code you have
posted you obviously know your shit.
Snit's claims about you not knowing ASCII and simple basics like that
are more laughable accusations.
The same applies to the fucktards comments against Steve Carroll.
Especially when it comes to snit's criminal record.
The stupid fucker is actually trying to argue that all those who posted screenshots are lying and faking them?
Is snit really that fucking stupid?
I'm agreeing with others that he is severely retarded.
There is no other explanation.
Like this one for example.
https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1 Or this one
https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2
Go through the list yourself.
snit is one very sick duck.
Yes.
Dig a deep pit and bury it.He's a well cooked duck on a stick - he just doesn't know it yet. His
dear 'friend' David Brooks does though. Oh, yes, indeed he does.
You had better toss that BBQ in the trash because after cooking a fowl, stinking fucker like snit it will never be the same again.
You will never be able to degrease it.
On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 19:32:41 -0400, Gef|nngnis wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 00:59:49 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin wrote:
Gef|nngnis <"Gef|nngnisVogel"@deutsch.sil>
news:1biyxen4ztrtb$.t6zlnzkh3h6$.dlg@40tude.net Sun, 05 Oct 2025
01:17:27 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck> >>>>> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>
Hey snitty, what say you?
Snit will claim they are fabrications.
Sure.
He ignores the fact that some of those links point to statements that
snit himself made.
*none* of them are fabrications. Not a single one. He just thinks he's
smart enough to con people into thinking otherwise. That people won't
check his 'receipts' out. Some have and found those 'receipts' to be
not what Snit was claiming. His list for SC and myself is bullshit. He
tries to back his claims up by quoting out of context. It doesn't work
when you check the posts/conversation and read the full context. That's
when you find out that snit was trying to con.
I took the time to check every link listed above as well as Snit's white
supremacy links and my conclusion is that snit is a fucking massive
liar.
You've reached the same conclusion that many others have reached.
The bottom line is that snit's links in most cases have nothing to do with his claims. This is why when asked to specifically explain the association between the links and his comments, snit ignores all requests.
Regarding the links above, reposted here for ease of checking, snit the
fucktard keeps attacking the credibility by claiming no mid has been
posted.
What in the fucking name of Satan is he mumbling about?
Good question.
Showing a complete thread or discussion in context is far more accurate
than showing a list of msg-id.
Does snit actually understand how USENET and the Internet work?
Even the basics?
apparently he does not because the tinyurl links show the complete
threads so why the fuck would anyone need an mid?
Snit once stated how the Internet, all of it, was stored locally on his
hard disk.
He tries to accuse Gremlin of that statement but the evidence proves it
was snit's statement and not Gremlins.
It's just another lame attempt at deflection by fuckface snit.
Yepper.
It's what snit does.
Then there are the white supreme msid that snit keeps posting.
Not a single one proves that the posters are white supremacist at all.
It's not even close.
And I looked up every single one of those as well.
Me as well.
And plenty of other people who discovered the same. This is why snit is unable to garner any support for his claims. Others realize snit is a
Usenet kook.
There are plenty of them.
And lastly I took a look at the fucktard snit's claims against you for
technical abilities and having looked at some of the code you have
posted you obviously know your shit.
Snit's claims about you not knowing ASCII and simple basics like that
are more laughable accusations.
Gremlin is the real deal.
He's a former black hat gone legit.
the Internet is full of information about him and although snit seems
jealous of Gremlin's accomplishments and tries to label him a phony the
truth is if Gremlin was a phony posting here in ACW, he would be exposed
in a matter of hours as a phony.
The hacker community would destroy a phony.
Search the net and this group for information.
Oh, and BTW, you can search the Internet for infomation regarding snit
whose real name is Michael Glasser.
Try it for a good laugh.
The same applies to the fucktards comments against Steve Carroll.
Especially when it comes to snit's criminal record.
The stupid fucker is actually trying to argue that all those who posted
screenshots are lying and faking them?
Is snit really that fucking stupid?
I'm agreeing with others that he is severely retarded.
There is no other explanation.
Snit, due to his mental deficiency is unable to process the difference between an opinion and a factual statement.
If you have time to waste look at SC posts regarding snit's arrest and you will quickly see that while some of it is fact, much of it is speculation
and opinion.
Snit once again mischaracterize s the statements of others.
Snit is either a moron, stupid, or doing it on purpose.
Look for yourself.
Like this one for example.
https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1 Or this one
https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2
Go through the list yourself.
snit is one very sick duck.
Yes.
That's the conclusion most people reach.
All of those drug cocktails have rotted snit's brain.
He's a well cooked duck on a stick - he just doesn't know it yet. His
dear 'friend' David Brooks does though. Oh, yes, indeed he does.
You had better toss that BBQ in the trash because after cooking a fowl,
stinking fucker like snit it will never be the same again.
You will never be able to degrease it.
Dig a deep pit and bury it.
Toss some lime in just to prevent the infection from spreading.