From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

This is cracking encryption...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9CBKGLVCME

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

Nessuno <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:

1 is A
3 is C
1 is A
2 is B

Or how about...

A is 112
B is 118
c is 124

--- Digital Signature --- YECfSUmz6Sbm5b7hbYb5i6UKZyZBV0QdU8aijSjX4+3TPAGuCl/Vi2RxYgBn2qbEOO/zWEvpSbWTSyL/MZv9Aw==


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

Mr Anderson, 2025-10-03 01:09:

This is cracking encryption...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9CBKGLVCME

Well - at least they used ROT13 ;-)
--
Arno Welzel
https://arnowelzel.de
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

Or how about...

A is 112
B is 118
c is 124

Going up 6 at a time? That's just too easy, the cracker would start with
the lowest number and assume that is A and work from there. Needs to be
more random than that.

Maybe...

A is 659
B is 173
C is 518

The receiver would need to hold the 'key' of course.


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

1 zssszz Zzz
3 zssszz Zzs
1 zssszz Zzz
2 zssszz Zzc

Imagine a scenario where no encryption was available, it was all banned
by governments. What would people do? In my IMHO the dark web would
become more popular and everything would just go underground giving the authorities an even bigger headache.

Personally, I don't think it is possible to ban it anyway as there is
too much encryption software out there.

Anyway, just in case...

A is YdIBl088iv8d
B is z+3mCMq5zWrf
C is 0FfxTZjE7pL5

Can' stop people from sending coded messages.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Rosw2UjQk68


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote:

1 zssszz Zzz
3 zssszz Zzs
1 zssszz Zzz
2 zssszz Zzc

Imagine a scenario where no encryption was available, it was all banned
by governments. What would people do? In my IMHO the dark web would
become more popular and everything would just go underground giving the >authorities an even bigger headache.

Personally, I don't think it is possible to ban it anyway as there is
too much encryption software out there.

Anyway, just in case...

A is YdIBl088iv8d
B is z+3mCMq5zWrf
C is 0FfxTZjE7pL5

Can' stop people from sending coded messages.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Rosw2UjQk68

Thickie, the Tor network bases on encryption
no matter what goes on in your IMHO.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

Thickie, the Tor network bases on encryption
no matter what goes on in your IMHO.

TOR is not 100% secure, some say 60% of nodes are run by the feds.
And what if the 'net' goes down in a cyberattack? Then we will
have to send coded messages like mentioned here by snail mail.

Anyway, we're just throwing ideas around to see if some bright
spark (not you) comes up with some good ideas.

Hundreds of Tor Relays are Being Used to De-anonymize Users. Can
you run a TOR relay to make things run safer and faster???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvBAaUPzvBQ

Stop Using Tor With VPNs...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8bIt4K_Kfo


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote:

Thickie, the Tor network bases on encryption
no matter what goes on in your IMHO.

TOR is not 100% secure, some say 60% of nodes are run by the feds.
And what if the 'net' goes down in a cyberattack? Then we will
have to send coded messages like mentioned here by snail mail.

Anyway, we're just throwing ideas around to see if some bright
spark (not you) comes up with some good ideas.

Hundreds of Tor Relays are Being Used to De-anonymize Users. Can
you run a TOR relay to make things run safer and faster???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvBAaUPzvBQ

Stop Using Tor With VPNs...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8bIt4K_Kfo

We all know that Tor isn't secure. I myself
run it with an increased circuit length.
With my posting I just intended to point out
that banning encryption includes Tor.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

On Sun, 10/05/2025 00:39:01 +0000, Anonymous User wrote:

Thickie, the Tor network bases on encryption
no matter what goes on in your IMHO.

TOR is not 100% secure, some say 60% of nodes are run by the feds.
And what if the 'net' goes down in a cyberattack? Then we will
have to send coded messages like mentioned here by snail mail.

Anyway, we're just throwing ideas around to see if some bright
spark (not you) comes up with some good ideas.

Hundreds of Tor Relays are Being Used to De-anonymize Users. Can
you run a TOR relay to make things run safer and faster???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvBAaUPzvBQ

No, the solution isn't a few more relays but longer circuits, which we
once got with AdvOR/AdvancedOnionRouter and now with Danner's Tor patch.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2