From Newsgroup: comp.lang.scheme
Frank Buss wrote:
joswig@corporate-world.lisp.de wrote:
For combinations of this kind of stuff I really prefer the functional approach:
CL-USER 5 > (remove-if-not 'oddp '(1 2 3))
(1 3)
I know it is possible, but I'm not sure aboout how to write the following with a functional approach:
(loop for i from 1 to 10 collect (loop for j from 1 to i collect j))
((1) (1 2) (1 2 3) (1 2 3 4) (1 2 3 4 5) (1 2 3 4 5 6) (1 2 3 4 5 6 7) (1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8) (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9) (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10))
Is "map" functional enough?
Gauche Scheme:
(map (cut iota <> 1) (iota 10 1))
===>
((1) (1 2) (1 2 3) (1 2 3 4) (1 2 3 4 5) (1 2 3 4 5 6)
(1 2 3 4 5 6 7) (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8) (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9)
(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10))
--
[T]he problem is that lispniks are as cultish as any other devout group and basically fall down frothing at the mouth if they see [heterodoxy].
--- Kenny Tilton
The good news is, it's not Lisp that sucks, but Common Lisp. --- Paul Graham --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2