1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. comp.ai.philosophy

  • ChatGPT's verbose understanding of my refutation of the Linz halting problem proof

    From olcott@polcott333@gmail.com to comp.theory,sci.logic,comp.ai.philosophy on Mon Aug 4 12:33:25 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.ai.philosophy

    https://chatgpt.com/share/6890ee5a-52bc-8011-852e-3d9f97bcfbd8
    --
    Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
    hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mr Flibble@flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp to comp.theory,sci.logic,comp.ai.philosophy on Mon Aug 4 17:36:00 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.ai.philosophy

    On Mon, 04 Aug 2025 12:33:25 -0500, olcott wrote:

    https://chatgpt.com/share/6890ee5a-52bc-8011-852e-3d9f97bcfbd8

    Stochastic parrots are token predictors, they do not understand things.

    /Flibble
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mr Flibble@flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp to comp.theory,sci.logic,comp.ai.philosophy on Mon Aug 4 17:42:01 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.ai.philosophy

    On Mon, 04 Aug 2025 12:33:25 -0500, olcott wrote:

    https://chatgpt.com/share/6890ee5a-52bc-8011-852e-3d9f97bcfbd8

    https://chatgpt.com/share/6890f0cd-2258-800b-bec9-3efa8a50ee3d
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From olcott@polcott333@gmail.com to comp.theory,sci.logic,comp.ai.philosophy on Mon Aug 4 12:43:22 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.ai.philosophy

    On 8/4/2025 12:36 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
    On Mon, 04 Aug 2025 12:33:25 -0500, olcott wrote:

    https://chatgpt.com/share/6890ee5a-52bc-8011-852e-3d9f97bcfbd8

    Stochastic parrots are token predictors, they do not understand things.

    /Flibble

    *None-the-less this is irrefutable*

    *From the bottom of page 319 has been adapted to this* https://www.liarparadox.org/Peter_Linz_HP_317-320.pdf

    -n.q0 rf?-nrf- reo* -n.embedded_H rf?-nrf- rf?-nrf- reo* -n.reR,
    if -n applied to rf?-nrf- halts, and
    -n.q0 rf?-nrf- reo* -n.embedded_H rf?-nrf- rf?-nrf- reo* -n.qn
    if -n applied to rf?-nrf- does not halt.

    "The contradiction in Linz's (or Turing's) self-referential
    halting construction only appears if one insists that the
    machine can and must decide on its own behavior, which is
    neither possible nor required."

    https://chatgpt.com/share/6890ee5a-52bc-8011-852e-3d9f97bcfbd8
    --
    Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
    hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mr Flibble@flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp to comp.theory,sci.logic,comp.ai.philosophy on Mon Aug 4 17:46:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.ai.philosophy

    On Mon, 04 Aug 2025 12:43:22 -0500, olcott wrote:

    On 8/4/2025 12:36 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
    On Mon, 04 Aug 2025 12:33:25 -0500, olcott wrote:

    https://chatgpt.com/share/6890ee5a-52bc-8011-852e-3d9f97bcfbd8

    Stochastic parrots are token predictors, they do not understand things.

    /Flibble

    *None-the-less this is irrefutable*

    *From the bottom of page 319 has been adapted to this* https://www.liarparadox.org/Peter_Linz_HP_317-320.pdf

    -n.q0 rf?-nrf- reo* -n.embedded_H rf?-nrf- rf?-nrf- reo* -n.reR,
    if -n applied to rf?-nrf- halts, and
    -n.q0 rf?-nrf- reo* -n.embedded_H rf?-nrf- rf?-nrf- reo* -n.qn
    if -n applied to rf?-nrf- does not halt.

    "The contradiction in Linz's (or Turing's) self-referential
    halting construction only appears if one insists that the machine
    can and must decide on its own behavior, which is neither possible
    nor required."

    https://chatgpt.com/share/6890ee5a-52bc-8011-852e-3d9f97bcfbd8

    You have completely lost it: you are using this same reply to different authors in completely different threads: you have no interest in debate at all, you just want to shout your baseless assertions at people.

    /Flibble
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From olcott@polcott333@gmail.com to comp.theory,sci.logic,comp.ai.philosophy on Mon Aug 4 13:02:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.ai.philosophy

    On 8/4/2025 12:42 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
    On Mon, 04 Aug 2025 12:33:25 -0500, olcott wrote:

    https://chatgpt.com/share/6890ee5a-52bc-8011-852e-3d9f97bcfbd8

    https://chatgpt.com/share/6890f0cd-2258-800b-bec9-3efa8a50ee3d

    I have proved that the traditional proofs do not
    prove undecidability. I have not proved decidability.
    --
    Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
    hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From olcott@polcott333@gmail.com to comp.theory,sci.logic,comp.ai.philosophy on Mon Aug 4 13:43:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.ai.philosophy

    On 8/4/2025 12:46 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
    On Mon, 04 Aug 2025 12:43:22 -0500, olcott wrote:

    On 8/4/2025 12:36 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
    On Mon, 04 Aug 2025 12:33:25 -0500, olcott wrote:

    https://chatgpt.com/share/6890ee5a-52bc-8011-852e-3d9f97bcfbd8

    Stochastic parrots are token predictors, they do not understand things.

    /Flibble

    *None-the-less this is irrefutable*

    *From the bottom of page 319 has been adapted to this*
    https://www.liarparadox.org/Peter_Linz_HP_317-320.pdf

    -n.q0 rf?-nrf- reo* -n.embedded_H rf?-nrf- rf?-nrf- reo* -n.reR,
    if -n applied to rf?-nrf- halts, and
    -n.q0 rf?-nrf- reo* -n.embedded_H rf?-nrf- rf?-nrf- reo* -n.qn
    if -n applied to rf?-nrf- does not halt.

    "The contradiction in Linz's (or Turing's) self-referential
    halting construction only appears if one insists that the machine
    can and must decide on its own behavior, which is neither possible
    nor required."

    https://chatgpt.com/share/6890ee5a-52bc-8011-852e-3d9f97bcfbd8

    You have completely lost it: you are using this same reply to different authors in completely different threads: you have no interest in debate at all, you just want to shout your baseless assertions at people.

    /Flibble

    Every thread that I have responded to is a thread
    about my halting problem proof rebuttal.

    Every post that I have made is about my halting
    problem proof rebuttal.

    Maybe you are confused of the difference between
    threads within a group and the groups themselves?
    My posts are only indirectly related to sci.logic.
    --
    Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
    hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2