• Microsoft Edit Version 1.2.0

    From Operation Sindoor@Operation.Sindoor@invalid.invalid to alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.windows7.general on Tue Jul 15 02:10:31 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

    Official binaries for Microsoft Edit Version 1.2.0 now available from
    this official link:

    <https://github.com/microsoft/edit/releases/download/v1.2.0/edit-1.2.0-x86_64-windows.zip>

    The above link is live and if you want to read before downloading then
    try this link:

    <https://github.com/microsoft/edit/releases/tag/v1.2.0>

    The advantage of zip file means you just unzip it and start using it.
    There is no need to install anything.

    No 32 bit version but you can download the source code and compile it
    for 32 bit version. It is all at the above link.

    Good luck and happy editing text files!!!!!.

    Jai Hind










    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kerr-Mudd, John@admin@127.0.0.1 to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.windows7.general on Tue Jul 15 10:09:51 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

    On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 02:10:31 +0000
    Operation Sindoor <Operation.Sindoor@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    Official binaries for Microsoft Edit Version 1.2.0 now available from
    this official link:

    <https://github.com/microsoft/edit/releases/download/v1.2.0/edit-1.2.0-x86_64-windows.zip>

    The above link is live and if you want to read before downloading then
    try this link:

    <https://github.com/microsoft/edit/releases/tag/v1.2.0>

    The advantage of zip file means you just unzip it and start using it.
    There is no need to install anything.

    No 32 bit version but you can download the source code and compile it
    for 32 bit version. It is all at the above link.

    Good luck and happy editing text files!!!!!.


    Why don't I just use 'notepad'?
    --
    Bah, and indeed Humbug.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.windows7.general on Tue Jul 15 05:52:48 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

    On Tue, 7/15/2025 5:09 AM, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
    On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 02:10:31 +0000
    Operation Sindoor <Operation.Sindoor@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    Official binaries for Microsoft Edit Version 1.2.0 now available from
    this official link:

    <https://github.com/microsoft/edit/releases/download/v1.2.0/edit-1.2.0-x86_64-windows.zip>

    The above link is live and if you want to read before downloading then
    try this link:

    <https://github.com/microsoft/edit/releases/tag/v1.2.0>

    The advantage of zip file means you just unzip it and start using it.
    There is no need to install anything.

    No 32 bit version but you can download the source code and compile it
    for 32 bit version. It is all at the above link.

    Good luck and happy editing text files!!!!!.


    Why don't I just use 'notepad'?


    There's a paragraph here, giving some of the flavor
    of where this came from.

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44031529

    "Regarding the choice of Rust, I actually wrote the prototype in C, C++, Zig, and Rust!
    Out of these four I personally liked Zig the most, followed by C, Rust, and C++
    in that order. Since Zig is not internally supported at Microsoft just yet
    (chain of trust, etc.), I continued writing it in C, but after a while I became
    quite annoyed by the lack of features that I came to like about Zig. So, I ported
    it to Rust over a few days, as it is internally supported and really not all that
    bad either. The reason I didn't like Rust so much is because of the rather
    weak allocator support and how difficult building trees was. I also found the lack
    of cursors for linked lists in stable Rust rather irritating if I'm honest.
    But I would say that I enjoyed it overall."

    He was canoeing up the Zambezi, and and, bagged an elephant.
    There was a bit of a problem, putting the elephant in the canoe.

    Paul

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy Burns@usenet@andyburns.uk to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.windows7.general on Tue Jul 15 11:17:22 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

    "Kerr-Mudd, John" wrote:

    Operation Sindoor wrote:

    Good luck and happy editing text files!!!!!.

    Why don't I just use 'notepad'?
    Real men edit text files using debug.com

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J. P. Gilliver@G6JPG@255soft.uk to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.windows7.general on Tue Jul 15 12:22:50 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

    On 2025/7/15 11:17:22, Andy Burns wrote:
    "Kerr-Mudd, John" wrote:

    Operation Sindoor wrote:

    Good luck and happy editing text files!!!!!.

    Why don't I just use 'notepad'?
    Real men edit text files using debug.com

    ... having created them in the first place using

    copy con: <filename>

    (-:
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J. P. Gilliver@G6JPG@255soft.uk to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.windows7.general on Tue Jul 15 12:31:05 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

    On 2025/7/15 10:52:48, Paul wrote:
    On Tue, 7/15/2025 5:09 AM, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
    On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 02:10:31 +0000
    Operation Sindoor <Operation.Sindoor@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    Official binaries for Microsoft Edit Version 1.2.0 now available from
    this official link:

    <https://github.com/microsoft/edit/releases/download/v1.2.0/edit-1.2.0-x86_64-windows.zip>
    Why don't I just use 'notepad'?


    There's a paragraph here, giving some of the flavor
    of where this came from.

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44031529

    "Regarding the choice of Rust, I actually wrote the prototype in C, C++, Zig, and Rust!

    []
    That question _does_ get answered - _sort of_ - in that discussion, but
    you have to scroll down a lot, through discussions of programming languages!

    Basically - as I understand it - they prefer it to Notepad as
    rCo it opens faster
    rCo it can handle bigger files (or, maybe, opens them faster)
    rCo Notepad is beginning to be infected with complexity, such as AI.--
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Zaidy036@Zaidy036@air.isp.spam to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.windows7.general on Tue Jul 15 10:03:27 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

    On 7/15/2025 5:09 AM, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
    On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 02:10:31 +0000
    Operation Sindoor <Operation.Sindoor@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    Official binaries for Microsoft Edit Version 1.2.0 now available from
    this official link:

    <https://github.com/microsoft/edit/releases/download/v1.2.0/edit-1.2.0-x86_64-windows.zip>

    The above link is live and if you want to read before downloading then
    try this link:

    <https://github.com/microsoft/edit/releases/tag/v1.2.0>

    The advantage of zip file means you just unzip it and start using it.
    There is no need to install anything.

    No 32 bit version but you can download the source code and compile it
    for 32 bit version. It is all at the above link.

    Good luck and happy editing text files!!!!!.


    Why don't I just use 'notepad'?

    or Notepad++
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.windows7.general on Tue Jul 15 10:37:18 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

    On Tue, 7/15/2025 7:22 AM, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
    On 2025/7/15 11:17:22, Andy Burns wrote:
    "Kerr-Mudd, John" wrote:

    Operation Sindoor wrote:

    Good luck and happy editing text files!!!!!.

    Why don't I just use 'notepad'?
    Real men edit text files using debug.com

    ... having created them in the first place using

    -a-a-a-acopy con: <filename>

    (-:

    And why not.

    It is all good, if it serves a purpose.

    If a DOS command allows you to finish a project, why the hell not.

    I think the Microsoft Edit could make a name for itself,
    if it could edit a 1TB text file. It seems to have a
    4GB limit at the moment. It just stops loading your
    text file at that point.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kerr-Mudd, John@admin@127.0.0.1 to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.windows7.general on Tue Jul 15 18:49:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

    On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 12:22:50 +0100
    "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:

    On 2025/7/15 11:17:22, Andy Burns wrote:
    "Kerr-Mudd, John" wrote:

    Operation Sindoor wrote:

    Good luck and happy editing text files!!!!!.

    Why don't I just use 'notepad'?
    Real men edit text files using debug.com

    ... having created them in the first place using

    copy con: <filename>

    (-:

    Feh.

    Echo This is line1 >newfile.txt
    Echo This is line2 >>newfile.txt
    --
    Bah, and indeed Humbug.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J. P. Gilliver@G6JPG@255soft.uk to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.windows7.general on Tue Jul 15 22:35:37 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

    On 2025/7/15 15:3:27, Zaidy036 wrote:
    On 7/15/2025 5:09 AM, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
    On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 02:10:31 +0000
    []

    Good luck and happy editing text files!!!!!.


    Why don't I just use 'notepad'?

    or Notepad++

    Whenever this discussion starts, I wonder - was I the only one who used Notepad+ (rather than ++)?

    (I can't remember what all the differences were; I haven't got round to putting _any_ alternative to Notepad on this one. Though I _have_
    implemented the "edit" from the beginning of this thread.)
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    It's not the pace of life that concerns me, it's the sudden stop at the end. --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kerr-Mudd, John@admin@127.0.0.1 to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.windows7.general on Wed Jul 16 09:31:50 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

    On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 22:35:37 +0100
    "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:

    On 2025/7/15 15:3:27, Zaidy036 wrote:
    On 7/15/2025 5:09 AM, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
    On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 02:10:31 +0000
    []

    Good luck and happy editing text files!!!!!.


    Why don't I just use 'notepad'?

    or Notepad++

    Whenever this discussion starts, I wonder - was I the only one who used Notepad+ (rather than ++)?

    (I can't remember what all the differences were; I haven't got round to putting _any_ alternative to Notepad on this one. Though I _have_ implemented the "edit" from the beginning of this thread.)

    I replaced MS's Notepad with Notepad2 decades ago; it has syntax
    highlighting and can limit multiple changes to a selected area.
    --
    Bah, and indeed Humbug.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J. P. Gilliver@G6JPG@255soft.uk to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.windows7.general on Thu Jul 17 00:22:22 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

    On 2025/7/16 9:31:50, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
    On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 22:35:37 +0100
    "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:

    On 2025/7/15 15:3:27, Zaidy036 wrote:
    On 7/15/2025 5:09 AM, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
    On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 02:10:31 +0000
    []

    Good luck and happy editing text files!!!!!.


    Why don't I just use 'notepad'?

    or Notepad++

    Whenever this discussion starts, I wonder - was I the only one who used
    Notepad+ (rather than ++)?

    (I can't remember what all the differences were; I haven't got round to
    putting _any_ alternative to Notepad on this one. Though I _have_
    implemented the "edit" from the beginning of this thread.)

    I replaced MS's Notepad with Notepad2 decades ago; it has syntax
    highlighting and can limit multiple changes to a selected area.

    Notepad+ seems to have been passed by by most people! See <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notepad%2B for> details.

    I _had_ assumed that Notepad++ was so called to indicate that it was the
    next step on from Notepad+, but on reading ++'s Wikipedia page, I see it
    was given its name by its author based on the C "increment" syntax,
    i.-ae. he saw it as an improvement on Notepad, not on Notepad+.
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    Parkinson: "What caused your conversion to women - was it the love of a
    good one?" George Melly: "No the love of several bad ones"
    (Lizbuff in UMRA '01-4-25)
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2