• Dinosaurs - "vegetarian" ?

    From occam@occam@nowhere.nix to alt.usage.english on Wed Oct 15 00:30:50 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On BBC Radio there was a report of a new species of dinosaur discovered
    on the south coast of the UK.

    <https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/aug/22/new-species-of-dinosaur-with-eye-catching-sail-discovered-on-isle-of-wight>

    One of its characteristics was that they were 'vegetarian', according to
    the reporter.

    Q - Can dinosaurs be described as vegetarian?

    'Plant eating' or 'herbivorous' - yes. But vegetarian? In the modern
    sense of that word, a vegetarian diet includes dairy produce. Were
    cheese and eggs widely available to dinosaurs?

    If anything, this latest species should be described as vegan.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From richard@richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) to alt.usage.english on Tue Oct 14 23:20:50 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    In article <ml818oFr6o7U1@mid.individual.net>,
    occam <occam@nowhere.nix> wrote:

    'Plant eating' or 'herbivorous' - yes. But vegetarian? In the modern
    sense of that word, a vegetarian diet includes dairy produce. Were
    cheese and eggs widely available to dinosaurs?

    Not eating dairy products doesn't stop you being a vegetarian, it just
    makes you a more extreme one.

    -- Richard
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Peter Moylan@peter@pmoylan.org to alt.usage.english on Wed Oct 15 12:50:06 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 15/10/25 09:30, occam wrote:
    On BBC Radio there was a report of a new species of dinosaur
    discovered on the south coast of the UK.

    <https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/aug/22/new-species-of-dinosaur-with-eye-catching-sail-discovered-on-isle-of-wight>

    One of its characteristics was that they were 'vegetarian',
    according to the reporter.

    Q - Can dinosaurs be described as vegetarian?

    'Plant eating' or 'herbivorous' - yes. But vegetarian? In the modern
    sense of that word, a vegetarian diet includes dairy produce. Were
    cheese and eggs widely available to dinosaurs?

    If anything, this latest species should be described as vegan.

    That made me wonder whether there were any vegetables, in our sense, in
    those days. Do leaves and grass count?

    But I guess they should. Things like spinach and lettuce are just
    leaves. And wheat is just grass.
    --
    Peter Moylan peter@pmoylan.org http://www.pmoylan.org
    Newcastle, NSW
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Steve Hayes@hayesstw@telkomsa.net to alt.usage.english on Wed Oct 15 08:34:06 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 00:30:50 +0200, occam <occam@nowhere.nix> wrote:

    On BBC Radio there was a report of a new species of dinosaur discovered
    on the south coast of the UK.

    <https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/aug/22/new-species-of-dinosaur-with-eye-catching-sail-discovered-on-isle-of-wight>

    One of its characteristics was that they were 'vegetarian', according to
    the reporter.

    Q - Can dinosaurs be described as vegetarian?

    'Plant eating' or 'herbivorous' - yes. But vegetarian? In the modern
    sense of that word, a vegetarian diet includes dairy produce. Were
    cheese and eggs widely available to dinosaurs?

    Eggs, perhaps, including those of other dinosaurs.

    But cheese is less likely, since I've heard that most of the mammals
    that co-existed with dinosaurs were pretty small, and so dinosaurs
    that did consume milk and milk products usuallly consumed the
    container as well, which would disqualify them as "vegetarian".





    If anything, this latest species should be described as vegan.
    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From occam@occam@nowhere.nix to alt.usage.english on Wed Oct 15 09:54:42 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 15/10/2025 01:20, Richard Tobin wrote:
    In article <ml818oFr6o7U1@mid.individual.net>,
    occam <occam@nowhere.nix> wrote:

    'Plant eating' or 'herbivorous' - yes. But vegetarian? In the modern
    sense of that word, a vegetarian diet includes dairy produce. Were
    cheese and eggs widely available to dinosaurs?

    Not eating dairy products doesn't stop you being a vegetarian, it just
    makes you a more extreme one.

    You are strictly speaking correct. However, what you are describing is a sub-set of vegetarians called 'vegans'. Now /they/ are extreme
    vegetarians, same as fruitarians.

    The principle here is that - when you are classifying a species - the
    narrower the category the more accurate the classification.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bertel Lund Hansen@rundtosset@lundhansen.dk to alt.usage.english on Wed Oct 15 09:55:10 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Den 15.10.2025 kl. 03.50 skrev Peter Moylan:

    'Plant eating' or 'herbivorous' - yes. But vegetarian? In the modern
    sense of that word, a vegetarian diet includes dairy produce. Were
    cheese and eggs widely available to dinosaurs?

    If anything, this latest species should be described as vegan.

    That made me wonder whether there were any vegetables, in our sense, in
    those days. Do leaves and grass count?

    Any part of plants (in a broad sense) counts. The general criterion is avoidance of meats. What splits veg-people up in groups is what else you
    can eat.
    --
    Bertel, Kolt, Danmark

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Janet@nobody@home.com to alt.usage.english on Wed Oct 15 10:42:35 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    In article <10cmuki$3br47$1@dont-email.me>,
    peter@pmoylan.org says...

    On 15/10/25 09:30, occam wrote:
    On BBC Radio there was a report of a new species of dinosaur
    discovered on the south coast of the UK.

    <https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/aug/22/new-species-of-dinosaur-with-eye-catching-sail-discovered-on-isle-of-wight>

    One of its characteristics was that they were 'vegetarian',
    according to the reporter.

    Q - Can dinosaurs be described as vegetarian?

    'Plant eating' or 'herbivorous' - yes. But vegetarian? In the modern
    sense of that word, a vegetarian diet includes dairy produce. Were
    cheese and eggs widely available to dinosaurs?

    If anything, this latest species should be described as vegan.

    That made me wonder whether there were any vegetables, in our sense, in
    those days. Do leaves and grass count?

    The wild origins of modern fruit and veg must all have
    existed, but lack of intercontinental transport limited
    the range available to dinosaurs. European dinosaurs ate
    no potatoes or tomatoes, etc

    Dinosaurs may have invented the trendy woke term
    "locavore". They just had nowhere to write it down.

    Janet
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam Funk@a24061@ducksburg.com to alt.usage.english on Wed Oct 15 12:02:07 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 2025-10-14, occam wrote:

    On BBC Radio there was a report of a new species of dinosaur discovered
    on the south coast of the UK.

    <https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/aug/22/new-species-of-dinosaur-with-eye-catching-sail-discovered-on-isle-of-wight>

    One of its characteristics was that they were 'vegetarian', according to
    the reporter.

    Q - Can dinosaurs be described as vegetarian?

    'Plant eating' or 'herbivorous' - yes. But vegetarian? In the modern
    sense of that word, a vegetarian diet includes dairy produce. Were
    cheese and eggs widely available to dinosaurs?

    If anything, this latest species should be described as vegan.

    Eggs were certainly available. Some animals today (notably a bunch of
    snakes & some spiders) eat raw eggs.
    --
    A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not
    preserved, except in memory. LLAP. ---Leonard Nimoy
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Silvano@Silvano@noncisonopernessuno.it to alt.usage.english on Wed Oct 15 13:43:38 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Janet hat am 15.10.2025 um 11:42 geschrieben:
    The wild origins of modern fruit and veg must all have
    existed, but lack of intercontinental transport limited
    the range available to dinosaurs. European dinosaurs ate
    no potatoes or tomatoes, etc

    Wikipedia quotes:
    "They (the dinosaurs) first appeared during the Triassic period, between
    243 and 233.23 million years ago."

    "Pangaea or Pangea was a supercontinent that existed during the late
    Paleozoic and early Mesozoic eras.[2] It assembled from the earlier
    continental units of Gondwana, Euramerica and Siberia during the
    Carboniferous period approximately 335 million years ago, and began to
    break apart about 200 million years ago, ..."

    I don't know if potatoes or tomatoes already existed at that time, but
    if they did, the lack of intercontinental transport was not a problem
    for the first dinosaurs living on a single supercontinent. Of course,
    they were not European dinosaurs. :-)
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From HVS@office@REMOVETHISwhhvs.co.uk to alt.usage.english on Wed Oct 15 12:55:11 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 15 Oct 2025, Adam Funk wrote

    On 2025-10-14, occam wrote:

    On BBC Radio there was a report of a new species of dinosaur
    discovered on the south coast of the UK.

    <https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/aug/22/new-species-of-di
    nosaur-with-eye-catching-sail-discovered-on-isle-of-wight>

    One of its characteristics was that they were 'vegetarian',
    according to the reporter.

    Q - Can dinosaurs be described as vegetarian?

    'Plant eating' or 'herbivorous' - yes. But vegetarian? In the
    modern sense of that word, a vegetarian diet includes dairy
    produce. Were cheese and eggs widely available to dinosaurs?

    If anything, this latest species should be described as vegan.

    Eggs were certainly available. Some animals today (notably a bunch
    of snakes & some spiders) eat raw eggs.

    Don't forget Johnny Cash's dirty old egg-sucking dog...

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Chris Elvidge@chris@internal.net to alt.usage.english on Wed Oct 15 14:22:36 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 14/10/2025 at 23:30, occam wrote:
    On BBC Radio there was a report of a new species of dinosaur discovered
    on the south coast of the UK.

    <https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/aug/22/new-species-of-dinosaur-with-eye-catching-sail-discovered-on-isle-of-wight>

    One of its characteristics was that they were 'vegetarian', according to
    the reporter.

    Q - Can dinosaurs be described as vegetarian?

    Presumably in the same way as cows could be described as vegetarian.



    'Plant eating' or 'herbivorous' - yes. But vegetarian? In the modern
    sense of that word, a vegetarian diet includes dairy produce. Were
    cheese and eggs widely available to dinosaurs?

    If anything, this latest species should be described as vegan.

    --
    Chris Elvidge, England
    I WILL NOT BE A SNICKERPUSS.
    Lisa Simpson on chalkboard in episode 4F01

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Blueshirt@blueshirt@indigo.news to alt.usage.english on Wed Oct 15 14:00:28 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english


    occam wrote:

    On BBC Radio there was a report of a new species of dinosaur
    discovered on the south coast of the UK.


    <https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/aug/22/new-species-of-dinosaur-with-eye-catching-sail-discovered-on-isle-of-wight>

    One of its characteristics was that they were 'vegetarian',
    according to the reporter.

    Q - Can dinosaurs be described as vegetarian?

    'Plant eating' or 'herbivorous' - yes. But vegetarian? In the
    modern sense of that word, a vegetarian diet includes dairy
    produce. Were cheese and eggs widely available to dinosaurs?

    I'm sure there were eggs of other dinosaurs and [early] bird
    species to eat... and surely they suckled milk from their
    Mother too, so kind of dairy. :-)

    If anything, this latest species should be described as vegan.

    Generally, it's hard to put modern day terms onto things from
    that long ago, so I assume the BBC were just trying to use a
    term that people could relate to. (I could go on about modern
    news being dumbed down but that would be another discussion
    entirely!!!)
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From wollman@wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) to alt.usage.english on Wed Oct 15 15:59:25 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    In article <10co1d9$3kjuv$1@dont-email.me>,
    Silvano <Silvano@noncisonopernessuno.it> wrote:
    Wikipedia quotes:
    "They (the dinosaurs) first appeared during the Triassic period, between
    243 and 233.23 million years ago."

    "Pangaea or Pangea was a supercontinent that existed during the late >Paleozoic and early Mesozoic eras.[2] It assembled from the earlier >continental units of Gondwana, Euramerica and Siberia during the >Carboniferous period approximately 335 million years ago, and began to
    break apart about 200 million years ago, ..."

    I don't know if potatoes or tomatoes already existed at that time,

    Angiosperms (the whole clade of flowering plants) are about 300
    million years old. As regards potatoes and tomatoes specifically,
    Wikipedia has this to say:

    Using these new fossils, a team in 2023 estimated the age of
    Solanaceae to be approximately 73.3 million years old. Their
    work proposed that after the K-Pg mass extinction, the family
    began to rapidly diversify, with all subfamilies diverging
    from each other by 56 million years ago.

    (Solanum, the genus of potatoes and tomatoes, is of course the type
    genus of the Solanaceae.)

    -GAWollman
    --
    Garrett A. Wollman | "Act to avoid constraining the future; if you can, wollman@bimajority.org| act to remove constraint from the future. This is Opinions not shared by| a thing you can do, are able to do, to do together."
    my employers. | - Graydon Saunders, _A Succession of Bad Days_ (2015) --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From nospam@nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) to alt.usage.english on Wed Oct 15 20:21:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Janet <nobody@home.com> wrote:

    In article <10cmuki$3br47$1@dont-email.me>,
    peter@pmoylan.org says...

    On 15/10/25 09:30, occam wrote:
    On BBC Radio there was a report of a new species of dinosaur
    discovered on the south coast of the UK.

    <https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/aug/22/new-species-of-dinosaur-w
    ith-eye-catching-sail-discovered-on-isle-of-wight>

    One of its characteristics was that they were 'vegetarian',
    according to the reporter.

    Q - Can dinosaurs be described as vegetarian?

    'Plant eating' or 'herbivorous' - yes. But vegetarian? In the modern sense of that word, a vegetarian diet includes dairy produce. Were
    cheese and eggs widely available to dinosaurs?

    If anything, this latest species should be described as vegan.

    That made me wonder whether there were any vegetables, in our sense, in those days. Do leaves and grass count?

    The wild origins of modern fruit and veg must all have
    existed, but lack of intercontinental transport limited
    the range available to dinosaurs. European dinosaurs ate
    no potatoes or tomatoes, etc

    All Gondwanians and all Laurasians disgree with you.

    Jan


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sam Plusnet@not@home.com to alt.usage.english on Wed Oct 15 19:55:01 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 15/10/2025 10:42, Janet wrote:
    In article <10cmuki$3br47$1@dont-email.me>,
    peter@pmoylan.org says...

    On 15/10/25 09:30, occam wrote:
    On BBC Radio there was a report of a new species of dinosaur
    discovered on the south coast of the UK.

    <https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/aug/22/new-species-of-dinosaur-with-eye-catching-sail-discovered-on-isle-of-wight>

    One of its characteristics was that they were 'vegetarian',
    according to the reporter.

    Q - Can dinosaurs be described as vegetarian?

    'Plant eating' or 'herbivorous' - yes. But vegetarian? In the modern
    sense of that word, a vegetarian diet includes dairy produce. Were
    cheese and eggs widely available to dinosaurs?

    If anything, this latest species should be described as vegan.

    That made me wonder whether there were any vegetables, in our sense, in
    those days. Do leaves and grass count?

    The wild origins of modern fruit and veg must all have
    existed, but lack of intercontinental transport limited
    the range available to dinosaurs. European dinosaurs ate
    no potatoes or tomatoes, etc

    Dinosaurs may have invented the trendy woke term
    "locavore". They just had nowhere to write it down.

    I suppose it all depends on which dinosaurs.
    For most of the dinosaur's time on earth, flowering plants hadn't been 'invented'[1].
    A diet of ferns, cycads, conifers and mosses doesn't sound too exciting.

    [1] I read that dinosaurs and flowering plants _did_ overlap, but only
    towards the end of the dinosaur era.
    --
    Sam Plusnet
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sam Plusnet@not@home.com to alt.usage.english on Wed Oct 15 19:57:26 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 15/10/2025 15:00, Blueshirt wrote:

    occam wrote:

    On BBC Radio there was a report of a new species of dinosaur
    discovered on the south coast of the UK.


    <https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/aug/22/new-species-of-dinosaur-with-eye-catching-sail-discovered-on-isle-of-wight>

    One of its characteristics was that they were 'vegetarian',
    according to the reporter.

    Q - Can dinosaurs be described as vegetarian?

    'Plant eating' or 'herbivorous' - yes. But vegetarian? In the
    modern sense of that word, a vegetarian diet includes dairy
    produce. Were cheese and eggs widely available to dinosaurs?

    I'm sure there were eggs of other dinosaurs and [early] bird
    species to eat... and surely they suckled milk from their
    Mother too, so kind of dairy. :-)

    Dinosaurs were mamalian?? >
    If anything, this latest species should be described as vegan.

    Generally, it's hard to put modern day terms onto things from
    that long ago, so I assume the BBC were just trying to use a
    term that people could relate to. (I could go on about modern
    news being dumbed down but that would be another discussion
    entirely!!!)
    --
    Sam Plusnet
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kerr-Mudd, John@admin@127.0.0.1 to alt.usage.english on Wed Oct 15 20:25:04 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 19:57:26 +0100
    Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote:

    On 15/10/2025 15:00, Blueshirt wrote:

    occam wrote:

    On BBC Radio there was a report of a new species of dinosaur
    discovered on the south coast of the UK.


    <https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/aug/22/new-species-of-dinosaur-with-eye-catching-sail-discovered-on-isle-of-wight>

    One of its characteristics was that they were 'vegetarian',
    according to the reporter.

    Q - Can dinosaurs be described as vegetarian?

    'Plant eating' or 'herbivorous' - yes. But vegetarian? In the
    modern sense of that word, a vegetarian diet includes dairy
    produce. Were cheese and eggs widely available to dinosaurs?

    I'm sure there were eggs of other dinosaurs and [early] bird
    species to eat... and surely they suckled milk from their
    Mother too, so kind of dairy. :-)

    Dinosaurs were mamalian?? >

    Therapsids were the (our) ancestors, but it's a bit tricky to check for
    boobs on fossils.

    If anything, this latest species should be described as vegan.

    Generally, it's hard to put modern day terms onto things from
    that long ago, so I assume the BBC were just trying to use a
    term that people could relate to. (I could go on about modern
    news being dumbed down but that would be another discussion
    entirely!!!)


    --
    Sam Plusnet
    --
    Bah, and indeed Humbug.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lar3ryca@larry@invalid.ca to alt.usage.english on Wed Oct 15 14:31:37 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 2025-10-14 16:30, occam wrote:
    On BBC Radio there was a report of a new species of dinosaur discovered
    on the south coast of the UK.

    <https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/aug/22/new-species-of-dinosaur-with-eye-catching-sail-discovered-on-isle-of-wight>

    One of its characteristics was that they were 'vegetarian', according to
    the reporter.

    Q - Can dinosaurs be described as vegetarian?

    'Plant eating' or 'herbivorous' - yes. But vegetarian? In the modern
    sense of that word, a vegetarian diet includes dairy produce. Were
    cheese and eggs widely available to dinosaurs?

    Eggs most certainly.

    If anything, this latest species should be described as vegan.
    --
    My mind is exceptionally quiet today.
    I get the feeling I'm up to something I don't want to know about.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lar3ryca@larry@invalid.ca to alt.usage.english on Wed Oct 15 14:34:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 2025-10-15 01:55, Bertel Lund Hansen wrote:
    Den 15.10.2025 kl. 03.50 skrev Peter Moylan:

    'Plant eating' or 'herbivorous' - yes. But vegetarian? In the modern
    sense of that word, a vegetarian diet includes dairy produce. Were
    cheese and eggs widely available to dinosaurs?

    If anything, this latest species should be described as vegan.

    That made me wonder whether there were any vegetables, in our sense, in
    those days. Do leaves and grass count?

    Any part of plants (in a broad sense) counts. The general criterion is avoidance of meats. What splits veg-people up in groups is what else you
    can eat.

    Long ago, I decided I was an ovo-lacto-meato vegetarian.
    After all, beef, for example, is just processed grass.
    --
    Private signature.
    Do not read.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Peter Moylan@peter@pmoylan.org to alt.usage.english on Thu Oct 16 09:05:43 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 16/10/25 02:59, Garrett Wollman wrote:
    In article <10co1d9$3kjuv$1@dont-email.me>,
    Silvano <Silvano@noncisonopernessuno.it> wrote:
    Wikipedia quotes:
    "They (the dinosaurs) first appeared during the Triassic period, between
    243 and 233.23 million years ago."

    "Pangaea or Pangea was a supercontinent that existed during the late
    Paleozoic and early Mesozoic eras.[2] It assembled from the earlier
    continental units of Gondwana, Euramerica and Siberia during the
    Carboniferous period approximately 335 million years ago, and began to
    break apart about 200 million years ago, ..."

    I don't know if potatoes or tomatoes already existed at that time,

    Angiosperms (the whole clade of flowering plants) are about 300
    million years old. As regards potatoes and tomatoes specifically,
    Wikipedia has this to say:

    Using these new fossils, a team in 2023 estimated the age of
    Solanaceae to be approximately 73.3 million years old. Their
    work proposed that after the K-Pg mass extinction, the family
    began to rapidly diversify, with all subfamilies diverging
    from each other by 56 million years ago.

    (Solanum, the genus of potatoes and tomatoes, is of course the type
    genus of the Solanaceae.)

    Well, that seems to settle that. The dinosaurs did not eat potatoes or tomatoes.
    --
    Peter Moylan peter@pmoylan.org http://www.pmoylan.org
    Newcastle, NSW
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From richard@richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) to alt.usage.english on Thu Oct 16 00:02:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    In article <10cp0h1$3u5t0$2@dont-email.me>, lar3ryca <larry@invalid.ca> wrote:

    Long ago, I decided I was an ovo-lacto-meato vegetarian.
    After all, beef, for example, is just processed grass.

    Yes, I'm pretty sure that cows are plant-based.

    -- Richard
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Richard Heathfield@rjh@cpax.org.uk to alt.usage.english on Thu Oct 16 01:34:06 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 15/10/2025 21:34, lar3ryca wrote:

    <snip>

    Long ago, I decided I was an ovo-lacto-meato vegetarian.
    After all, beef, for example, is just processed grass.

    That would make you a vegetarianian. You're happy to eat cows and
    sheep, but won't touch hyenas, cats, or weasels.
    --
    Richard Heathfield
    Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
    "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
    Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lar3ryca@larry@invalid.ca to alt.usage.english on Wed Oct 15 22:52:27 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 2025-10-15 18:34, Richard Heathfield wrote:
    On 15/10/2025 21:34, lar3ryca wrote:

    <snip>

    Long ago, I decided I was an ovo-lacto-meato vegetarian.
    After all, beef, for example, is just processed grass.

    Hmm... I should have added -fisho- to that.

    That would make you a vegetarianian. You're happy to eat cows and sheep,
    but won't touch hyenas, cats, or weasels.

    That's true so far. Not having been offered any of those, I have never
    tried them. I have eaten insects and reptiles, though.
    --
    Cross country skiing is great if you live in a small country.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Athel Cornish-Bowden@me@yahoo.com to alt.usage.english on Thu Oct 16 11:19:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 2025-10-15 18:55:01 +0000, Sam Plusnet said:

    On 15/10/2025 10:42, Janet wrote:
    In article <10cmuki$3br47$1@dont-email.me>,
    peter@pmoylan.org says...

    On 15/10/25 09:30, occam wrote:
    On BBC Radio there was a report of a new species of dinosaur
    discovered on the south coast of the UK.

    <https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/aug/22/new-species-of-dinosaur-with-eye-catching-sail-discovered-on-isle-of-wight>


    One of its characteristics was that they were 'vegetarian',
    according to the reporter.

    Q - Can dinosaurs be described as vegetarian?

    'Plant eating' or 'herbivorous' - yes. But vegetarian? In the modern
    sense of that word, a vegetarian diet includes dairy produce. Were
    cheese and eggs widely available to dinosaurs?

    If anything, this latest species should be described as vegan.

    That made me wonder whether there were any vegetables, in our sense, in
    those days. Do leaves and grass count?

    The wild origins of modern fruit and veg must all have
    existed, but lack of intercontinental transport limited
    the range available to dinosaurs. European dinosaurs ate
    no potatoes or tomatoes, etc

    Dinosaurs may have invented the trendy woke term
    "locavore". They just had nowhere to write it down.

    I suppose it all depends on which dinosaurs.
    For most of the dinosaur's time on earth, flowering plants hadn't been 'invented'[1].
    A diet of ferns, cycads, conifers and mosses doesn't sound too exciting.

    [1] I read that dinosaurs and flowering plants _did_ overlap, but only towards the end of the dinosaur era.

    Yes, that's right. Until I checked yesterday, I had the idea that
    flowering plants and bees appeared at around the time the dinosaurs disappeared, but yes, it was a bit earlier.
    --
    Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 38 years; mainly
    in England until 1987.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Athel Cornish-Bowden@me@yahoo.com to alt.usage.english on Thu Oct 16 11:24:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 2025-10-16 00:34:06 +0000, Richard Heathfield said:

    On 15/10/2025 21:34, lar3ryca wrote:

    <snip>

    Long ago, I decided I was an ovo-lacto-meato vegetarian.
    After all, beef, for example, is just processed grass.

    That would make you a vegetarianian. You're happy to eat cows and
    sheep, but won't touch hyenas, cats, or weasels.

    Hmm. The reason why rabbits in butcher's shops were displayed with
    heads is said to be to make it clear that they were not cats.
    Apparently enough people couldn't tell the difference that that was worthwhile.
    --
    Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 38 years; mainly
    in England until 1987.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam Funk@a24061@ducksburg.com to alt.usage.english on Thu Oct 16 14:45:02 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 2025-10-16, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2025-10-16 00:34:06 +0000, Richard Heathfield said:

    On 15/10/2025 21:34, lar3ryca wrote:

    <snip>

    Long ago, I decided I was an ovo-lacto-meato vegetarian.
    After all, beef, for example, is just processed grass.

    That would make you a vegetarianian. You're happy to eat cows and
    sheep, but won't touch hyenas, cats, or weasels.

    Hmm. The reason why rabbits in butcher's shops were displayed with
    heads is said to be to make it clear that they were not cats.
    Apparently enough people couldn't tell the difference that that was worthwhile.

    I'm surprised. I was under the impression (not from experience,
    though) that meat from carnivores generally tastes unpleasant to most
    people.
    --
    To live without killing is a thought which could electrify the world,
    if men were only capable of staying awake long enough to let the idea
    soak in. ---Henry Miller
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam Funk@a24061@ducksburg.com to alt.usage.english on Thu Oct 16 14:43:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 2025-10-15, HVS wrote:

    On 15 Oct 2025, Adam Funk wrote

    On 2025-10-14, occam wrote:

    On BBC Radio there was a report of a new species of dinosaur
    discovered on the south coast of the UK.

    <https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/aug/22/new-species-of-di
    nosaur-with-eye-catching-sail-discovered-on-isle-of-wight>

    One of its characteristics was that they were 'vegetarian',
    according to the reporter.

    Q - Can dinosaurs be described as vegetarian?

    'Plant eating' or 'herbivorous' - yes. But vegetarian? In the
    modern sense of that word, a vegetarian diet includes dairy
    produce. Were cheese and eggs widely available to dinosaurs?

    If anything, this latest species should be described as vegan.

    Eggs were certainly available. Some animals today (notably a bunch
    of snakes & some spiders) eat raw eggs.

    Don't forget Johnny Cash's dirty old egg-sucking dog...

    Ha! I'd forgotten about that.

    He had a great sense of humour. He played a murdering country singer
    in a _Columbo_ episode and swapped outfits with Elton John on SNL.

    <https://ultimateclassicrock.com/elton-john-johnny-cash-snl/>
    --
    Papa Hegel he say that all we learn from history is that we learn
    nothing from history. I know people who can't even learn from what
    happened this morning. Hegel must have been taking the long view.
    ---Chad C. Mulligan
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam Funk@a24061@ducksburg.com to alt.usage.english on Thu Oct 16 14:41:20 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 2025-10-15, Peter Moylan wrote:

    On 16/10/25 02:59, Garrett Wollman wrote:
    In article <10co1d9$3kjuv$1@dont-email.me>,
    Silvano <Silvano@noncisonopernessuno.it> wrote:
    Wikipedia quotes:
    "They (the dinosaurs) first appeared during the Triassic period, between >>> 243 and 233.23 million years ago."

    "Pangaea or Pangea was a supercontinent that existed during the late
    Paleozoic and early Mesozoic eras.[2] It assembled from the earlier
    continental units of Gondwana, Euramerica and Siberia during the
    Carboniferous period approximately 335 million years ago, and began to
    break apart about 200 million years ago, ..."

    I don't know if potatoes or tomatoes already existed at that time,

    Angiosperms (the whole clade of flowering plants) are about 300
    million years old. As regards potatoes and tomatoes specifically,
    Wikipedia has this to say:

    Using these new fossils, a team in 2023 estimated the age of
    Solanaceae to be approximately 73.3 million years old. Their
    work proposed that after the K-Pg mass extinction, the family
    began to rapidly diversify, with all subfamilies diverging
    from each other by 56 million years ago.

    (Solanum, the genus of potatoes and tomatoes, is of course the type
    genus of the Solanaceae.)

    Well, that seems to settle that. The dinosaurs did not eat potatoes or tomatoes.

    Also, all the above-ground parts of potato plants are poisonous, at
    least to mammals (I'm not sure about reptiles and/or birds).
    --
    really don't mind
    if you sit this one out
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul Carmichael@wibbleypants@gmail.com to alt.usage.english on Thu Oct 16 15:26:07 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    El Wed, 15 Oct 2025 09:54:42 +0200, occam escribi||:


    what you are describing is a
    sub-set of vegetarians called 'vegans'.

    Isn't veganism a lifestyle? We can't be certain that the dinosaurs didn't
    use animal products in some other way. They just didn't ingest them.

    Vegetarians simply don't eat meat. Vegans are against any "exploitation"
    of animals.
    --
    Paul.

    https://paulc.es

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul Carmichael@wibbleypants@gmail.com to alt.usage.english on Thu Oct 16 15:30:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    El Wed, 15 Oct 2025 12:02:07 +0100, Adam Funk escribi||:

    Eggs were certainly available. Some animals today (notably a bunch of
    snakes & some spiders) eat raw eggs.

    As do foxes. If our lake is dry in the spring, the flamingoes don't bother laying as there is nothing to stop the foxes nicking the eggs.
    --
    Paul.

    https://paulc.es

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From wollman@wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) to alt.usage.english on Thu Oct 16 15:37:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    In article <pan$86d6a$bab464d1$cea57eb$a5262209@gmail.com>,
    Paul Carmichael <wibbleypants@gmail.com> wrote:
    El Wed, 15 Oct 2025 09:54:42 +0200, occam escribi||:


    what you are describing is a
    sub-set of vegetarians called 'vegans'.

    Isn't veganism a lifestyle? We can't be certain that the dinosaurs didn't >use animal products in some other way. They just didn't ingest them.

    Plenty of dinosaurs ate meat and eggs, and continue to do so to this
    day.

    Certainly true that they don't wear leather, not voluntarily anyway.

    -GAWollman
    --
    Garrett A. Wollman | "Act to avoid constraining the future; if you can, wollman@bimajority.org| act to remove constraint from the future. This is Opinions not shared by| a thing you can do, are able to do, to do together."
    my employers. | - Graydon Saunders, _A Succession of Bad Days_ (2015) --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Athel Cornish-Bowden@me@yahoo.com to alt.usage.english on Thu Oct 16 18:01:24 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 2025-10-16 13:41:20 +0000, Adam Funk said:

    On 2025-10-15, Peter Moylan wrote:

    On 16/10/25 02:59, Garrett Wollman wrote:
    In article <10co1d9$3kjuv$1@dont-email.me>,
    Silvano <Silvano@noncisonopernessuno.it> wrote:
    Wikipedia quotes:
    "They (the dinosaurs) first appeared during the Triassic period, between >>>> 243 and 233.23 million years ago."

    "Pangaea or Pangea was a supercontinent that existed during the late
    Paleozoic and early Mesozoic eras.[2] It assembled from the earlier
    continental units of Gondwana, Euramerica and Siberia during the
    Carboniferous period approximately 335 million years ago, and began to >>>> break apart about 200 million years ago, ..."

    I don't know if potatoes or tomatoes already existed at that time,

    Angiosperms (the whole clade of flowering plants) are about 300
    million years old. As regards potatoes and tomatoes specifically,
    Wikipedia has this to say:

    Using these new fossils, a team in 2023 estimated the age of
    Solanaceae to be approximately 73.3 million years old. Their
    work proposed that after the K-Pg mass extinction, the family
    began to rapidly diversify, with all subfamilies diverging
    from each other by 56 million years ago.

    (Solanum, the genus of potatoes and tomatoes, is of course the type
    genus of the Solanaceae.)

    Well, that seems to settle that. The dinosaurs did not eat potatoes or
    tomatoes.

    Also, all the above-ground parts of potato plants are poisonous, at
    least to mammals (I'm not sure about reptiles and/or birds).

    Fora long time (maybe 200 years) tomato plants were grown in Europe
    only as ornamental plants. People didn't eat the tomatoes because they
    were believed to be just as poisonous as potato fruit.
    --
    Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 38 years; mainly
    in England until 1987.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lar3ryca@larry@invalid.ca to alt.usage.english on Thu Oct 16 11:46:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 2025-10-16 07:45, Adam Funk wrote:
    On 2025-10-16, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2025-10-16 00:34:06 +0000, Richard Heathfield said:

    On 15/10/2025 21:34, lar3ryca wrote:

    <snip>

    Long ago, I decided I was an ovo-lacto-meato vegetarian.
    After all, beef, for example, is just processed grass.

    That would make you a vegetarianian. You're happy to eat cows and
    sheep, but won't touch hyenas, cats, or weasels.

    Hmm. The reason why rabbits in butcher's shops were displayed with
    heads is said to be to make it clear that they were not cats.
    Apparently enough people couldn't tell the difference that that was
    worthwhile.

    I'm surprised. I was under the impression (not from experience,
    though) that meat from carnivores generally tastes unpleasant to most
    people.

    I think you may be mistaken, though I can't be sure that there may be
    some carnivores whose meat is unpleasant.

    Check out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_meat

    for a long list of places where cats were used for meat.

    I have eaten alligator, and found it pleasant enough. It's not
    surprising that it tastes like and has the same texture as chicken,
    since they are pretty close relatives.
    --
    To the person who invented Zero: Thanks for nothing.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Athel Cornish-Bowden@me@yahoo.com to alt.usage.english on Thu Oct 16 20:37:52 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 2025-10-16 17:46:45 +0000, lar3ryca said:

    On 2025-10-16 07:45, Adam Funk wrote:
    On 2025-10-16, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2025-10-16 00:34:06 +0000, Richard Heathfield said:

    On 15/10/2025 21:34, lar3ryca wrote:

    <snip>

    Long ago, I decided I was an ovo-lacto-meato vegetarian.
    After all, beef, for example, is just processed grass.

    That would make you a vegetarianian. You're happy to eat cows and
    sheep, but won't touch hyenas, cats, or weasels.

    Hmm. The reason why rabbits in butcher's shops were displayed with
    heads is said to be to make it clear that they were not cats.
    Apparently enough people couldn't tell the difference that that was
    worthwhile.

    I'm surprised. I was under the impression (not from experience,
    though) that meat from carnivores generally tastes unpleasant to most
    people.

    I think you may be mistaken, though I can't be sure that there may be
    some carnivores whose meat is unpleasant.

    Check out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_meat

    for a long list of places where cats were used for meat.

    I have eaten alligator, and found it pleasant enough.

    I've eaten crocodile, and ...

    It's not surprising that it tastes like and has the same texture as chicken, since they are pretty close relatives.

    ... had the same impression.

    Of other non-mammals, I've also eaten frog. No insects though, not deliberately, anyway: I may have swallowed one or two that flrx intomy
    mouth.
    --
    Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 38 years; mainly
    in England until 1987.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From richard@richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) to alt.usage.english on Thu Oct 16 18:46:48 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    In article <10cre20$jdes$1@dont-email.me>,
    Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:
    Of other non-mammals, I've also eaten frog. No insects though, not >deliberately, anyway: I may have swallowed one or two that flrx intomy >mouth.

    And some insect extract - cochineal.

    -- Richard
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Snidely@snidely.too@gmail.com to alt.usage.english on Thu Oct 16 12:01:16 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    After serious thinking lar3ryca wrote :
    On 2025-10-16 07:45, Adam Funk wrote:
    On 2025-10-16, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2025-10-16 00:34:06 +0000, Richard Heathfield said:

    On 15/10/2025 21:34, lar3ryca wrote:

    <snip>

    Long ago, I decided I was an ovo-lacto-meato vegetarian.
    After all, beef, for example, is just processed grass.

    That would make you a vegetarianian. You're happy to eat cows and
    sheep, but won't touch hyenas, cats, or weasels.

    Hmm. The reason why rabbits in butcher's shops were displayed with
    heads is said to be to make it clear that they were not cats.
    Apparently enough people couldn't tell the difference that that was
    worthwhile.

    I'm surprised. I was under the impression (not from experience,
    though) that meat from carnivores generally tastes unpleasant to most
    people.

    I think you may be mistaken, though I can't be sure that there may be some carnivores whose meat is unpleasant.

    And some herbivores may have an unpleasant taste. I haven't tried deer
    meat, but I often see it described as "gamey", and "gamey" is used in a negative sense.

    And there is often discussion about the difference in flavor between
    grass-fed beef and grain-fed, although AIUI feeding grain is just a
    final touch to add heft to a market animal.


    Check out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_meat

    for a long list of places where cats were used for meat.

    I have eaten alligator, and found it pleasant enough. It's not surprising that it tastes like and has the same texture as chicken, since they are pretty close relatives.

    And free-range chickens eat plenty of bugs, which is a non-vegan trait.

    /dps
    --
    "This is all very fine, but let us not be carried away be excitement,
    but ask calmly, how does this person feel about in in his cooler
    moments next day, with six or seven thousand feet of snow and stuff on
    top of him?"
    _Roughing It_, Mark Twain.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Snidely@snidely.too@gmail.com to alt.usage.english on Thu Oct 16 12:04:13 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Athel Cornish-Bowden asserted that:
    On 2025-10-16 13:41:20 +0000, Adam Funk said:

    On 2025-10-15, Peter Moylan wrote:

    On 16/10/25 02:59, Garrett Wollman wrote:
    In article <10co1d9$3kjuv$1@dont-email.me>,
    Silvano <Silvano@noncisonopernessuno.it> wrote:
    Wikipedia quotes:
    "They (the dinosaurs) first appeared during the Triassic period, between >>>>> 243 and 233.23 million years ago."

    "Pangaea or Pangea was a supercontinent that existed during the late >>>>> Paleozoic and early Mesozoic eras.[2] It assembled from the earlier
    continental units of Gondwana, Euramerica and Siberia during the
    Carboniferous period approximately 335 million years ago, and began to >>>>> break apart about 200 million years ago, ..."

    I don't know if potatoes or tomatoes already existed at that time,

    Angiosperms (the whole clade of flowering plants) are about 300
    million years old. As regards potatoes and tomatoes specifically,
    Wikipedia has this to say:

    Using these new fossils, a team in 2023 estimated the age of
    Solanaceae to be approximately 73.3 million years old. Their
    work proposed that after the K-Pg mass extinction, the family
    began to rapidly diversify, with all subfamilies diverging
    from each other by 56 million years ago.

    (Solanum, the genus of potatoes and tomatoes, is of course the type
    genus of the Solanaceae.)

    Well, that seems to settle that. The dinosaurs did not eat potatoes or
    tomatoes.

    Also, all the above-ground parts of potato plants are poisonous, at
    least to mammals (I'm not sure about reptiles and/or birds).

    Fora long time (maybe 200 years) tomato plants were grown in Europe only as ornamental plants. People didn't eat the tomatoes because they were believed to be just as poisonous as potato fruit.

    AIUI, that's the /northern/ European view. The Italians seem to have
    picked the fruit for food somewhat ahead of the rest of us.

    /dps
    --
    You could try being nicer and politer
    instead, and see how that works out.
    -- Katy Jennison
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lar3ryca@larry@invalid.ca to alt.usage.english on Thu Oct 16 13:12:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 2025-10-16 12:37, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
    On 2025-10-16 17:46:45 +0000, lar3ryca said:

    On 2025-10-16 07:45, Adam Funk wrote:
    On 2025-10-16, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2025-10-16 00:34:06 +0000, Richard Heathfield said:

    On 15/10/2025 21:34, lar3ryca wrote:

    <snip>

    Long ago, I decided I was an ovo-lacto-meato vegetarian.
    After all, beef, for example, is just processed grass.

    That would make you a vegetarianian. You're happy to eat cows and
    sheep, but won't touch hyenas, cats, or weasels.

    Hmm. The reason why rabbits in butcher's shops were displayed with
    heads is said to be to make it clear that they were not cats.
    Apparently enough people couldn't tell the difference that that was
    worthwhile.

    I'm surprised. I was under the impression (not from experience,
    though) that meat from carnivores generally tastes unpleasant to most
    people.

    I think you may be mistaken, though I can't be sure that there may be
    some carnivores whose meat is unpleasant.

    Check out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_meat

    for a long list of places where cats were used for meat.

    I have eaten alligator, and found it pleasant enough.

    I've eaten crocodile, and ...

    -aIt's not surprising that it tastes like and has the same texture as
    chicken, since they are pretty close relatives.

    ... had the same impression.

    Of other non-mammals, I've also eaten frog. No insects though, not deliberately, anyway: I may have swallowed one or two that flrx intomy mouth.

    Ahh. Forgot about frog. I've eaten their legs. No idea if other parts of
    them are served in restaurants.

    As for insects, many years ago, probably some time in the mid 50s, a
    local store (Super Valu) carried 'chocolate covered ants' and 'fried grasshoppers'. I and a few brave friends tried them.
    --
    Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit.
    Wisdom is knowing not to put it in a fruit salad.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lar3ryca@larry@invalid.ca to alt.usage.english on Thu Oct 16 13:22:34 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 2025-10-16 13:01, Snidely wrote:
    After serious thinking lar3ryca wrote :
    On 2025-10-16 07:45, Adam Funk wrote:
    On 2025-10-16, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2025-10-16 00:34:06 +0000, Richard Heathfield said:

    On 15/10/2025 21:34, lar3ryca wrote:

    <snip>

    Long ago, I decided I was an ovo-lacto-meato vegetarian.
    After all, beef, for example, is just processed grass.

    That would make you a vegetarianian. You're happy to eat cows and
    sheep, but won't touch hyenas, cats, or weasels.

    Hmm. The reason why rabbits in butcher's shops were displayed with
    heads is said to be to make it clear that they were not cats.
    Apparently enough people couldn't tell the difference that that was
    worthwhile.

    I'm surprised. I was under the impression (not from experience,
    though) that meat from carnivores generally tastes unpleasant to most
    people.

    I think you may be mistaken, though I can't be sure that there may be
    some carnivores whose meat is unpleasant.

    And some herbivores may have an unpleasant taste.-a I haven't tried deer meat, but I often see it described as "gamey", and "gamey" is used in a negative sense.

    Many wild game animals have a distinctive flavour, usually described as 'gamey'. I don't mind venison, but elk and moose are much less gamey.

    And there is often discussion about the difference in flavor between grass-fed beef and grain-fed, although AIUI feeding grain is just a
    final touch to add heft to a market animal.

    There is a difference between 'grain-fed' and 'grain-finished', and
    between 'grass-fed' and 'grass-finished' beef.

    I VERY much prefer grass-fed beef.

    Check out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_meat

    for a long list of places where cats were used for meat.

    I have eaten alligator, and found it pleasant enough. It's not
    surprising that it tastes like and has the same texture as chicken,
    since they are pretty close relatives.

    And free-range chickens eat plenty of bugs, which is a non-vegan trait.

    Indeed they do. I raised chickens (primarily for eggs) for about 25
    years, and can vouch for that.
    --
    The greatest tragedy in mankindrCOs entire history may be the hijacking of morality by religion.
    rCo Arthur C. Clarke

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Janet@nobody@home.com to alt.usage.english on Thu Oct 16 21:45:07 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    In article <10creio$l8sb$1@artemis.inf.ed.ac.uk>,
    richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk says...

    In article <10cre20$jdes$1@dont-email.me>,
    Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:
    Of other non-mammals, I've also eaten frog. No insects though, not >deliberately, anyway: I may have swallowed one or two that flrx intomy >mouth.

    And some insect extract - cochineal.

    I've eaten ants (and crocodile and snake) at an
    Aboriginal meal.

    The ants were a salad dressing, tasted slightly lemony.

    Janet
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Aidan Kehoe@kehoea@parhasard.net to alt.usage.english on Thu Oct 16 21:46:29 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english


    Ar an s|-|| l|i d|-ag de m|! Deireadh F||mhair, scr|!obh lar3ryca:

    On 2025-10-16 13:01, Snidely wrote:
    [...] There is a difference between 'grain-fed' and 'grain-finished', and between 'grass-fed' and 'grass-finished' beef.

    I VERY much prefer grass-fed beef.

    Kerrygold does very well with its exports of grass-fed butter, or as we call it, butter, to much of the world, North America included. IrCOm not certain how much the tariffs have hit it.

    [...] And free-range chickens eat plenty of bugs, which is a non-vegan trait.

    Indeed they do. I raised chickens (primarily for eggs) for about 25 years, and can vouch for that.

    I likely knew that at some point, but it hadnrCOt clicked. I donrCOt eat enough free-range chicken to comment on the taste.
    --
    rCyAs I sat looking up at the Guinness ad, I could never figure out /
    How your man stayed up on the surfboard after fourteen pints of stoutrCO
    (C. Moore)
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sam Plusnet@not@home.com to alt.usage.english on Thu Oct 16 23:51:47 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 16/10/2025 18:46, lar3ryca wrote:
    On 2025-10-16 07:45, Adam Funk wrote:
    On 2025-10-16, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2025-10-16 00:34:06 +0000, Richard Heathfield said:

    On 15/10/2025 21:34, lar3ryca wrote:

    <snip>

    Long ago, I decided I was an ovo-lacto-meato vegetarian.
    After all, beef, for example, is just processed grass.

    That would make you a vegetarianian. You're happy to eat cows and
    sheep, but won't touch hyenas, cats, or weasels.

    Hmm. The reason why rabbits in butcher's shops were displayed with
    heads is said to be to make it clear that they were not cats.
    Apparently enough people couldn't tell the difference that that was
    worthwhile.

    I'm surprised. I was under the impression (not from experience,
    though) that meat from carnivores generally tastes unpleasant to most
    people.

    I think you may be mistaken, though I can't be sure that there may be
    some carnivores whose meat is unpleasant.

    Check out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_meat

    for a long list of places where cats were used for meat.

    I have eaten alligator, and found it pleasant enough. It's not
    surprising that it tastes like and has the same texture as chicken,
    since they are pretty close relatives.

    There was a man who made a hobby of eating pretty much any animal he
    could lay a fork on - he got a great many from a zoo.
    IIRC, he said the most foul thing he ever tasted was a mole.
    --
    Sam Plusnet
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From occam@occam@nowhere.nix to alt.usage.english on Fri Oct 17 09:13:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 16/10/2025 17:26, Paul Carmichael wrote:
    El Wed, 15 Oct 2025 09:54:42 +0200, occam escribi||:


    what you are describing is a
    sub-set of vegetarians called 'vegans'.

    Isn't veganism a lifestyle? We can't be certain that the dinosaurs didn't use animal products in some other way. They just didn't ingest them.

    Vegetarians simply don't eat meat. Vegans are against any "exploitation"
    of animals.


    No, it's more than just a lifestyle. Vegans do not eat meat nor any
    products derived from animals (milk, eggs, gelatine, honey) on the
    grounds that it is the by-product of animal exploitation.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Athel Cornish-Bowden@me@yahoo.com to alt.usage.english on Fri Oct 17 09:42:28 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 2025-10-16 18:37:52 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden said:

    On 2025-10-16 17:46:45 +0000, lar3ryca said:

    On 2025-10-16 07:45, Adam Funk wrote:
    On 2025-10-16, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2025-10-16 00:34:06 +0000, Richard Heathfield said:

    On 15/10/2025 21:34, lar3ryca wrote:

    <snip>

    Long ago, I decided I was an ovo-lacto-meato vegetarian.
    After all, beef, for example, is just processed grass.

    That would make you a vegetarianian. You're happy to eat cows and
    sheep, but won't touch hyenas, cats, or weasels.

    Hmm. The reason why rabbits in butcher's shops were displayed with
    heads is said to be to make it clear that they were not cats.
    Apparently enough people couldn't tell the difference that that was
    worthwhile.

    I'm surprised. I was under the impression (not from experience,
    though) that meat from carnivores generally tastes unpleasant to most
    people.

    I think you may be mistaken, though I can't be sure that there may be
    some carnivores whose meat is unpleasant.

    Check out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_meat

    for a long list of places where cats were used for meat.

    I have eaten alligator, and found it pleasant enough.

    I've eaten crocodile, and ...

    It's not surprising that it tastes like and has the same texture as
    chicken, since they are pretty close relatives.

    ... had the same impression.

    Of other non-mammals, I've also eaten frog. No insects though, not deliberately, anyway: I may have swallowed one or two that flrx intomy mouth.

    Much more important, I'm very partial to squid and octopus. I forgot to mention them. Also snails, which I've eaten occasionally, but I can
    live without them.
    --
    Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 38 years; mainly
    in England until 1987.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bertel Lund Hansen@rundtosset@lundhansen.dk to alt.usage.english on Fri Oct 17 09:43:25 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Den 16.10.2025 kl. 19.46 skrev lar3ryca:

    I think you may be mistaken, though I can't be sure that there may be
    some carnivores whose meat is unpleasant.

    Check out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_meat

    for a long list of places where cats were used for meat.

    I have eaten alligator, and found it pleasant enough. It's not
    surprising that it tastes like and has the same texture as chicken,
    since they are pretty close relatives.

    Snakes should also taste something similar - according to a couple of
    movies.
    --
    Bertel, Kolt, Danmark

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bertel Lund Hansen@rundtosset@lundhansen.dk to alt.usage.english on Fri Oct 17 09:45:00 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Den 16.10.2025 kl. 22.45 skrev Janet:

    I've eaten ants (and crocodile and snake) at an
    Aboriginal meal.

    The ants were a salad dressing, tasted slightly lemony.

    At least one Danish Michelin-starred restaurant has ants with some dishes.
    --
    Bertel, Kolt, Danmark

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bertel Lund Hansen@rundtosset@lundhansen.dk to alt.usage.english on Fri Oct 17 09:49:01 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Den 17.10.2025 kl. 09.42 skrev Athel Cornish-Bowden:

    Much more important, I'm very partial to squid and octopus. I forgot to mention them.

    You can have them with sea food in many Danish restaurants. I have yet
    to try some that doesn't taste and feel like a rubber.

    Also snails, which I've eaten occasionally, but I can live
    without them.

    I've had snails once. I didn't enjoy them. They were small garden
    snails. Maybe Helix pomatia would taste better?
    --
    Bertel, Kolt, Danmark

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bertel Lund Hansen@rundtosset@lundhansen.dk to alt.usage.english on Fri Oct 17 09:51:29 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Den 16.10.2025 kl. 21.22 skrev lar3ryca:

    Many wild game animals have a distinctive flavour, usually described as 'gamey'. I don't mind venison, but elk and moose are much less gamey.

    I've had elk meat once as a child My dad brought it home from Finland.
    It was great. We all enjoyed it.
    --
    Bertel, Kolt, Danmark

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From nospam@nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) to alt.usage.english on Fri Oct 17 11:15:34 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote:

    On 16/10/2025 18:46, lar3ryca wrote:
    On 2025-10-16 07:45, Adam Funk wrote:
    On 2025-10-16, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2025-10-16 00:34:06 +0000, Richard Heathfield said:

    On 15/10/2025 21:34, lar3ryca wrote:

    <snip>

    Long ago, I decided I was an ovo-lacto-meato vegetarian.
    After all, beef, for example, is just processed grass.

    That would make you a vegetarianian. You're happy to eat cows and
    sheep, but won't touch hyenas, cats, or weasels.

    Hmm. The reason why rabbits in butcher's shops were displayed with
    heads is said to be to make it clear that they were not cats.
    Apparently enough people couldn't tell the difference that that was
    worthwhile.

    I'm surprised. I was under the impression (not from experience,
    though) that meat from carnivores generally tastes unpleasant to most
    people.

    I think you may be mistaken, though I can't be sure that there may be
    some carnivores whose meat is unpleasant.

    Check out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_meat

    for a long list of places where cats were used for meat.

    I have eaten alligator, and found it pleasant enough. It's not
    surprising that it tastes like and has the same texture as chicken,
    since they are pretty close relatives.

    There was a man who made a hobby of eating pretty much any animal he
    could lay a fork on - he got a great many from a zoo.
    IIRC, he said the most foul thing he ever tasted was a mole.

    IIRC it was also a hobby of Charles Darwin.
    A tawny owl was his worst eating experience,
    (hibous may feel safe)

    Jan

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From nospam@nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) to alt.usage.english on Fri Oct 17 11:15:34 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On 2025-10-15 18:55:01 +0000, Sam Plusnet said:

    On 15/10/2025 10:42, Janet wrote:
    In article <10cmuki$3br47$1@dont-email.me>,
    peter@pmoylan.org says...

    On 15/10/25 09:30, occam wrote:
    On BBC Radio there was a report of a new species of dinosaur
    discovered on the south coast of the UK.

    <https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/aug/22/new-species-of-dinosaur-
    with-eye-catching-sail-discovered-on-isle-of-wight>


    One of its characteristics was that they were 'vegetarian',
    according to the reporter.

    Q - Can dinosaurs be described as vegetarian?

    'Plant eating' or 'herbivorous' - yes. But vegetarian? In the modern >>>> sense of that word, a vegetarian diet includes dairy produce. Were
    cheese and eggs widely available to dinosaurs?

    If anything, this latest species should be described as vegan.

    That made me wonder whether there were any vegetables, in our sense, in >>> those days. Do leaves and grass count?

    The wild origins of modern fruit and veg must all have
    existed, but lack of intercontinental transport limited
    the range available to dinosaurs. European dinosaurs ate
    no potatoes or tomatoes, etc

    Dinosaurs may have invented the trendy woke term
    "locavore". They just had nowhere to write it down.

    I suppose it all depends on which dinosaurs.
    For most of the dinosaur's time on earth, flowering plants hadn't been 'invented'[1].
    A diet of ferns, cycads, conifers and mosses doesn't sound too exciting.

    [1] I read that dinosaurs and flowering plants _did_ overlap, but only towards the end of the dinosaur era.

    Yes, that's right. Until I checked yesterday, I had the idea that
    flowering plants and bees appeared at around the time the dinosaurs disappeared, but yes, it was a bit earlier.

    'A bit' in geology is still millions of years.
    What I remember from a dinosaur book is the statement
    that the last of the dinosaurs lived
    in what was essentially a modern landscape,

    Jan
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From nospam@nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) to alt.usage.english on Fri Oct 17 11:15:34 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Paul Carmichael <wibbleypants@gmail.com> wrote:

    El Wed, 15 Oct 2025 12:02:07 +0100, Adam Funk escribi<:

    Eggs were certainly available. Some animals today (notably a bunch of snakes & some spiders) eat raw eggs.

    As do foxes. If our lake is dry in the spring, the flamingoes don't bother laying as there is nothing to stop the foxes nicking the eggs.

    Same on the 'Wadden Islands'.
    These are fox-free.
    Every now and then a fox manages to appear there.
    Reason unknown, sneaked on a ferry, or perhaps human vandalism.

    When that happens much effort is spent on hunting it down,
    to save the gull colonies,

    Jan


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul Carmichael@wibbleypants@gmail.com to alt.usage.english on Fri Oct 17 09:51:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    El Fri, 17 Oct 2025 09:13:45 +0200, occam escribi||:

    On 16/10/2025 17:26, Paul Carmichael wrote:
    El Wed, 15 Oct 2025 09:54:42 +0200, occam escribi||:


    what you are describing is a sub-set of vegetarians called 'vegans'.

    Isn't veganism a lifestyle? We can't be certain that the dinosaurs
    didn't use animal products in some other way. They just didn't ingest
    them.

    Vegetarians simply don't eat meat. Vegans are against any
    "exploitation" of animals.


    No, it's more than just a lifestyle. Vegans do not eat meat nor any
    products derived from animals (milk, eggs, gelatine, honey) on the
    grounds that it is the by-product of animal exploitation.


    Erm, I think I just said that. Lifestyle is following a set of specific
    rules. Maybe "regime" says it better?
    --
    Paul.

    https://paulc.es

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Janet@nobody@home.com to alt.usage.english on Fri Oct 17 10:53:22 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    In article <87o6q6tw0q.fsf@parhasard.net>,
    kehoea@parhasard.net says...
    From: Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>

    Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 21:46:29 +0100


    Ar an so. lb doag de m0 Deireadh F<mhair, scr0obh lar3ryca:

    On 2025-10-16 13:01, Snidely wrote:
    [...] There is a difference between 'grain-fed' and 'grain-finished', and between 'grass-fed' and 'grass-finished' beef.

    I VERY much prefer grass-fed beef.

    Kerrygold does very well with its exports of grass-fed butter, or as we call it, butter, to much of the world, North America included. I?m not certain how much the tariffs have hit it.

    [...] And free-range chickens eat plenty of bugs, which is a non-vegan trait.

    They will also peck open and eat eggs (cannibals).

    Indeed they do. I raised chickens (primarily for eggs) for about 25 years, and can vouch for that.

    I likely knew that at some point, but it hadn?t clicked. I don?t eat enough free-range chicken to comment on the taste.


    Our chicken were free range, and many times I've seen
    them come across frogs or a nest of small mice in the
    long grass, and scramble to gobble the lot. Our (wild)
    ducks lose most of their eggs and ducklings to local
    crows, and any ducklings the crows didn't get are often
    taken by herons. Ducks eat a lot of slugs snails frogs
    and small fish.

    Janet

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bertel Lund Hansen@rundtosset@lundhansen.dk to alt.usage.english on Fri Oct 17 11:58:22 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Den 16.10.2025 kl. 22.46 skrev Aidan Kehoe:

    Kerrygold does very well with its exports of grass-fed butter,

    In Denmark you can find free-walking eggs.
    --
    Bertel, Kolt, Danmark

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John Dunlop@dunlop.john@ymail.com to alt.usage.english on Fri Oct 17 11:29:38 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Paul Carmichael:

    El Fri, 17 Oct 2025 09:13:45 +0200, occam escribi||:

    No, it's more than just a lifestyle. Vegans do not eat meat nor any
    products derived from animals (milk, eggs, gelatine, honey) on the
    grounds that it is the by-product of animal exploitation.


    Erm, I think I just said that. Lifestyle is following a set of specific rules. Maybe "regime" says it better?

    It's trendy nowadays to describe what you do as a "practice". "Vegan
    practice" seems to have some currency among the more earnest types.
    --
    John
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From nospam@nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) to alt.usage.english on Fri Oct 17 13:57:31 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Kerr-Mudd, John <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote:

    On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 19:57:26 +0100
    Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote:

    On 15/10/2025 15:00, Blueshirt wrote:

    occam wrote:

    On BBC Radio there was a report of a new species of dinosaur
    discovered on the south coast of the UK.


    <https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/aug/22/new-species-of-dinosaur-w
    ith-eye-catching-sail-discovered-on-isle-of-wight>

    One of its characteristics was that they were 'vegetarian',
    according to the reporter.

    Q - Can dinosaurs be described as vegetarian?

    'Plant eating' or 'herbivorous' - yes. But vegetarian? In the
    modern sense of that word, a vegetarian diet includes dairy
    produce. Were cheese and eggs widely available to dinosaurs?

    I'm sure there were eggs of other dinosaurs and [early] bird
    species to eat... and surely they suckled milk from their
    Mother too, so kind of dairy. :-)

    Dinosaurs were mamalian?? >

    Therapsids were the (our) ancestors, but it's a bit tricky to check for
    boobs on fossils.

    Check. None found,

    Jan
    -- <http://blog.everythingdinosaur.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ichthyosaur_live_birth_stenopterygius.jpg>

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The True Melissa@thetruemelissa@gmail.com to alt.usage.english on Fri Oct 17 08:21:00 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    In article <ml818oFr6o7U1@mid.individual.net>, occam@nowhere.nix says...
    Q - Can dinosaurs be described as vegetarian?

    'Plant eating' or 'herbivorous' - yes. But vegetarian? In the modern
    sense of that word, a vegetarian diet includes dairy produce. Were
    cheese and eggs widely available to dinosaurs?

    If anything, this latest species should be described as vegan.


    Before we had the word "vegan," "strict vegetarian" was one term
    for people who avoided all animal products and ate only vegetation.
    I don't believe it implied a position on leather or fur, though.


    Melissa

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2