• Re: Good-bye - God be with you

    From Rich Ulrich@rich.ulrich@comcast.net to alt.usage.english on Mon Aug 25 18:53:42 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On Mon, 11 Aug 2025 07:55:45 +0200, occam <occam@nowhere.nix> wrote:

    On 11/08/2025 06:41, Rich Ulrich wrote:
    On Sun, 10 Aug 2025 07:39:52 +0200, Bertel Lund Hansen
    <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> wrote:

    Den 10.08.2025 kl. 07.25 skrev Hibou:

    I think free will is an illusion. Our choices are determined by the
    conditions existing in our brains - what we see, how we feel, how our >>>> history has fashioned our neural networks.

    Oversimplification.


    Once one has seen what a mentalist[1] can make people do, one abandons
    any notion of a free will.

    Mentalists (as you call them) are very careful in the selection of their >candidates when they do their 'demonstrations'>
    "... abandon[ing] any notion of a free will" is taking it too far.

    Agree

    <snip>


    My experience with a 'mentalist' was a fruitful evening class,
    8 or 10 lessons, conducted by a psychologist who was a good friend
    of my boss on the first research project I worked on.

    Beyond leaving me with thoughts of the incidental metaphysics
    (free will, etc.), the class taught me self-relaxationn exercises that
    I'm glad to have learned. I'm not surprised that these are not
    well-known to the general public, but learned 40 years later that
    my co-worker/friends who were psychiatric nurses were not well-
    informed about them.


    What I'm more interested in is if you got any insights into the
    selection process of 'easy' candidates. Derren Brown - a very impressive
    UK illusionist - has a selection process when selecting subjects for his >experiments. Just by looking at their faces/eyes of a person, he
    decides to reject or accept a subject on some unknown basis (at least
    unknown to me).

    One thing I am pretty sure of -- the explanation that he
    selects subjects solely by looking in their eyes is intentionally
    misleading.

    Okay, maybe there are clues in pupil dilation and micro-
    expressions while conducting a close-up interview. But why
    would he ignore all the opportunities to watch the audience
    members before he starts his act, or while he talks before
    he selects subjects? Mention one door, and who looks that
    direction?

    Beyond hypnotism - mentalist acts may conduct observation
    of subjects in the foyer or on the street, before they are
    allowed to enter the hall. The doors may be kept closed,
    intentionally, so the crowd gathers, and confederates can
    prowl and listen for juicy bits of conversation or 'bump' into
    people to check out lumpy pockets.
    --
    Rich Ulrich

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bertel Lund Hansen@rundtosset@lundhansen.dk to alt.usage.english on Tue Aug 26 08:54:46 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Den 26.08.2025 kl. 00.53 skrev Rich Ulrich:

    Beyond hypnotism - mentalist acts may conduct observation
    of subjects in the foyer or on the street, before they are
    allowed to enter the hall. The doors may be kept closed,
    intentionally, so the crowd gathers, and confederates can
    prowl and listen for juicy bits of conversation or 'bump' into
    people to check out lumpy pockets.

    That is plain cheating as performed by many preachers. That's not
    mentalist work.

    A mentalist percieves many micro reactions that the rest of us do not catch.
    --
    Bertel, Kolt, Danmark

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bertel Lund Hansen@rundtosset@lundhansen.dk to alt.usage.english on Tue Aug 26 09:02:31 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Den 26.08.2025 kl. 08.54 skrev Bertel Lund Hansen:

    A mentalist percieves

    Sorry about that: perceives
    --
    Bertel, Kolt, Danmark

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From occam@occam@nowhere.nix to alt.usage.english on Tue Aug 26 09:14:34 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 26/08/2025 08:54, Bertel Lund Hansen wrote:
    Den 26.08.2025 kl. 00.53 skrev Rich Ulrich:

    Beyond hypnotism - mentalist acts may conduct observation
    of subjects in the foyer or on the street, before they are
    allowed to enter the hall. The doors may be kept closed,
    intentionally, so the crowd gathers, and confederates can
    prowl and listen for juicy bits of conversation or 'bump' into
    people to check out lumpy pockets.

    That is plain cheating as performed by many preachers. That's not
    mentalist work.

    Nonsense. Is an interviewer 'cheating' when he asks you questions
    regarding a post he is recruiting for? Not at all. That is, if I may
    say so, 'Bertel logic'.


    A mentalist percieves many micro reactions that the rest of us do not
    catch.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2