From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

I noticed that the encrypted messages sent to aam by dizum (nomen
nescio)
have a subject modified as follows

[Spam] 1e9036c2887bff896a3b2b5c816ed60cdaf8bee0cb7fa7ea

for some reason [Spam] appears in front to the subject

It is possible that OmniMix or Hamster is not able to find these
messages?
Thank You

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

On 10/4/25 11:04, thegoodstudent wrote:

I noticed that the encrypted messages sent to aam by dizum (nomen
nescio)
have a subject modified as follows

[Spam] 1e9036c2887bff896a3b2b5c816ed60cdaf8bee0cb7fa7ea

for some reason [Spam] appears in front to the subject

It is possible that OmniMix or Hamster is not able to find these
messages?

Yes. you're correct. This is what's happening.
It's been going on for months. A year(?)

Neodome Admin has not posted here on the matter.
Until he does it's hard to know whether it's a
deliberate anti-abuse strategy of his, or if he
is unaware that it's happening and unaware of the
detrimental affect it is having on nym messsage
functionality in AAM.
--
SEC3

YAMN Help Tutorial - https://www.sec3.net/yamnhelp/
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

In article <20251004150420.63D7B20526@remailer.paranoici.org>
thegoodstudent <thegoodstudent@nymph.paranoici.org> wrote:

I noticed that the encrypted messages sent to aam by dizum (nomen
nescio)
have a subject modified as follows

[Spam] 1e9036c2887bff896a3b2b5c816ed60cdaf8bee0cb7fa7ea

for some reason [Spam] appears in front to the subject

It is possible that OmniMix or Hamster is not able to find these
messages?
Thank You

The [Spam] is injected by neodome, not dizum.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

thegoodstudent <thegoodstudent@nymph.paranoici.org> wrote:

I noticed that the encrypted messages sent to aam by dizum (nomen
nescio)
have a subject modified as follows

[Spam] 1e9036c2887bff896a3b2b5c816ed60cdaf8bee0cb7fa7ea

for some reason [Spam] appears in front to the subject

It is possible that OmniMix or Hamster is not able to find these
messages?

No, they aren't, and there's no reason to correct messages that are deliberately crippled with hostile intent.

Just remove the "mail2news@neodome.net" service from the "M2N Gate(s)"
field of your nym configuration as that malign gateway adds the "[Spam]"
tag to your messages, which makes your nym replies inaccessible. And
don't forget to update your nym account with the modified configuration!

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

On Sat, 4 Oct 2025 19:42:38 +0200, Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202510.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote:

thegoodstudent <thegoodstudent@nymph.paranoici.org> wrote:

It is possible that OmniMix or Hamster is not able to find these
messages?

No, they aren't, and there's no reason to correct messages that are >deliberately crippled with hostile intent.
Just remove the "mail2news@neodome.net" service from the "M2N Gate(s)"
field of your nym configuration as that malign gateway adds the "[Spam]"
tag to your messages, which makes your nym replies inaccessible. And
don't forget to update your nym account with the modified configuration!

just checked news:alt.anonymous.messages . . . 957 articles with "[spam]"
in the subject header since 26 february . . . 31 with "[spam]" since the
1st of october, and 178 for the whole month of september . . . so if the neodome "[spam]" tag actually does make "nym replies inaccessible", then
why would some nym users still be using this (yes, deliberately crippled
seems correct . . . hostile, malign, also seems reasonable at this point,
but what might've prompted such rather unsportsmanlike conduct from this conspicuously unavailable neodome sysop remains a mystery) . . . it does
seem prudent to avoid using the neodome m2n, but the mail2news@dizum.com gateway is the only (remaining) alternative for anonymous remailer users

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

On 04 Oct 2025, thegoodstudent <thegoodstudent@nymph.paranoici.org>
posted some news:20251004150420.63D7B20526@remailer.paranoici.org:

I noticed that the encrypted messages sent to aam by dizum (nomen
nescio)
have a subject modified as follows

[Spam] 1e9036c2887bff896a3b2b5c816ed60cdaf8bee0cb7fa7ea

for some reason [Spam] appears in front to the subject

It is possible that OmniMix or Hamster is not able to find these
messages?
Thank You

It's not dizum doing it. It's Neodome because some fake-socked up cunts
have been complaining when users reply to their posts with responses
they don't like.

The assholes post from panix3.panix.com, giganews.com,
eternal-september.org and newshosting.com.

Neodome seems to feel it's okay for these pieces of shit to x-post into
other groups to try and start flame wars, but it's not okay for other
posters to respond back to them using YAMN, which exits through the
neodome news server, hence the pointless [Spam] tag.

It's stupid really because posters will continue to reply to the tagged
posts so in effect it accomplishes nothing except contextual blight.

The service Neodome provides is not unappreciated, but he needs to man
up and tell these three or four jerks to clean up their own house before shitting in his inbox.

One of them in particular has been instrumental in ruining public
posting access for numerous previously open news servers. Two even
closed down because of the asshole posting from newshosting.com now,
formerly from easynews. He was also the main abuser of Neodome's
services when it was first implemented here resulting in present day restrictions. Some of you know who this sneaky smarmy SOB is.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

On Sat, 4 Oct 2025 18:28:51 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:

The [Spam] is injected by neodome, not dizum.

"they" know that . . . but as for the persistent and unexplained neodome m2n gateway <mail2news@neodome.net> "[spam]" prefix appearing in subject headers
of many (not all, it's sporadic) articles posted from anonymous remailers to usenet newsgroups, the first, earliest/oldest in news:alt.anonymous.messages
is <8924b20ae8c36bfc821a72c95c22a7cb@dizum.com> 2025-02-26 ... ~220 days ago, and posted to a.p.a-s <20250830.014959.407b288d@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> 2025-08-30 with subject "neodome 'spam' six months and counting" 35 days ago

nearly thirty-two weeks since neodome's "[spam]" nuisance first showed up in a.a.m., and because mail2news@dizum.com is the only other gateway that works with anonymous remailers, the bigger question is why would the neodome sysop
be so taciturn . . . especially since yamn remailers won't post without m2ns

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

On Sat, 4 Oct 2025 18:28:51 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:

The [Spam] is injected by neodome, not dizum.

"they" know that . . . but as for the persistent and unexplained neodome m2n gateway <mail2news@neodome.net> "[spam]" prefix appearing in subject headers
of many (not all, it's sporadic) articles posted from anonymous remailers to usenet newsgroups, the first, earliest/oldest in news:alt.anonymous.messages
is <8924b20ae8c36bfc821a72c95c22a7cb@dizum.com> 2025-02-26 ... ~220 days ago, and posted to a.p.a-s <20250830.014959.407b288d@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> 2025-08-30 with subject "neodome 'spam' six months and counting" 35 days ago

nearly thirty-two weeks since neodome's "[spam]" nuisance first showed up in a.a.m., and because mail2news@dizum.com is the only other gateway that works with anonymous remailers, the bigger question is why would the neodome sysop
be so taciturn . . . especially since yamn remailers won't post without m2ns

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2