From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

This is cracking encryption...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9CBKGLVCME

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

On Thu, 2 Oct 2025 23:09:03 +0000 (UTC), Mr Anderson
<"Agent..."@Matrix.org> wrote:

This is cracking encryption...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9CBKGLVCME

scrambled letters and numbers are for newbies who don't know a thing
about encryption. They'll smarten up after a day or so of reading a few
more pages on the subject.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

1 is A
3 is C
1 is A
2 is B

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

Nessuno <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:

1 is A
3 is C
1 is A
2 is B

[Annalena Charlotte Alma Baerbock] fan?

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annalena_Baerbock>
--
"The government you elect is the government you deserve"
- Thomas Jefferson
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

Nessuno <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:

1 is A
3 is C
1 is A
2 is B

Or how about...

A is 112
B is 118
c is 124

--- Digital Signature --- YECfSUmz6Sbm5b7hbYb5i6UKZyZBV0QdU8aijSjX4+3TPAGuCl/Vi2RxYgBn2qbEOO/zWEvpSbWTSyL/MZv9Aw==


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

Mr Anderson, 2025-10-03 01:09:

This is cracking encryption...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9CBKGLVCME

Well - at least they used ROT13 ;-)
--
Arno Welzel
https://arnowelzel.de
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

Or how about...

A is 112
B is 118
c is 124

Going up 6 at a time? That's just too easy, the cracker would start with
the lowest number and assume that is A and work from there. Needs to be
more random than that.

Maybe...

A is 659
B is 173
C is 518

The receiver would need to hold the 'key' of course.


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

On 02 Oct 2025, Nessuno <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]>
posted some news:20251003011936.DCAA23EAB2@mail.tcpreset.net:

1 is A
3 is C
1 is A
2 is B

1 zssszz Zzz
3 zssszz Zzs
1 zssszz Zzz
2 zssszz Zzc

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

1 zssszz Zzz
3 zssszz Zzs
1 zssszz Zzz
2 zssszz Zzc

Imagine a scenario where no encryption was available, it was all banned
by governments. What would people do? In my IMHO the dark web would
become more popular and everything would just go underground giving the authorities an even bigger headache.

Personally, I don't think it is possible to ban it anyway as there is
too much encryption software out there.

Anyway, just in case...

A is YdIBl088iv8d
B is z+3mCMq5zWrf
C is 0FfxTZjE7pL5

Can' stop people from sending coded messages.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Rosw2UjQk68


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote:

1 zssszz Zzz
3 zssszz Zzs
1 zssszz Zzz
2 zssszz Zzc

Imagine a scenario where no encryption was available, it was all banned
by governments. What would people do? In my IMHO the dark web would
become more popular and everything would just go underground giving the >authorities an even bigger headache.

Personally, I don't think it is possible to ban it anyway as there is
too much encryption software out there.

Anyway, just in case...

A is YdIBl088iv8d
B is z+3mCMq5zWrf
C is 0FfxTZjE7pL5

Can' stop people from sending coded messages.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Rosw2UjQk68

Thickie, the Tor network bases on encryption
no matter what goes on in your IMHO.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

Thickie, the Tor network bases on encryption
no matter what goes on in your IMHO.

TOR is not 100% secure, some say 60% of nodes are run by the feds.
And what if the 'net' goes down in a cyberattack? Then we will
have to send coded messages like mentioned here by snail mail.

Anyway, we're just throwing ideas around to see if some bright
spark (not you) comes up with some good ideas.

Hundreds of Tor Relays are Being Used to De-anonymize Users. Can
you run a TOR relay to make things run safer and faster???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvBAaUPzvBQ

Stop Using Tor With VPNs...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8bIt4K_Kfo


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

On Sun, 05 Oct 2025 00:39:01 +0000, Anonymous User
<noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote:

Thickie, the Tor network bases on encryption
no matter what goes on in your IMHO.

TOR is not 100% secure, some say 60% of nodes are run by the feds.
And what if the 'net' goes down in a cyberattack? Then we will
have to send coded messages like mentioned here by snail mail.

Anyway, we're just throwing ideas around to see if some bright
spark (not you) comes up with some good ideas.

Hundreds of Tor Relays are Being Used to De-anonymize Users. Can
you run a TOR relay to make things run safer and faster???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvBAaUPzvBQ

Stop Using Tor With VPNs...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8bIt4K_Kfo

This Tor horse manure has been going on forever. It's not just horse
manure, but bullshit, too.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

mark@invalid.net wrote:

On Sun, 05 Oct 2025 00:39:01 +0000, Anonymous User
<noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote:

Thickie, the Tor network bases on encryption
no matter what goes on in your IMHO.

TOR is not 100% secure, some say 60% of nodes are run by the feds.
And what if the 'net' goes down in a cyberattack? Then we will
have to send coded messages like mentioned here by snail mail.

Anyway, we're just throwing ideas around to see if some bright
spark (not you) comes up with some good ideas.

Hundreds of Tor Relays are Being Used to De-anonymize Users. Can
you run a TOR relay to make things run safer and faster???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvBAaUPzvBQ

Stop Using Tor With VPNs...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8bIt4K_Kfo

This Tor horse manure has been going on forever. It's not just horse
manure, but bullshit, too.

Tor isn't secure.

Above all it's very likely to have all three nodes of a circuit
run by a single entity. But that's only the tip if the iceberg:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_network#Attacks_and_limitations

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

Anonymous User <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote:

Thickie, the Tor network bases on encryption
no matter what goes on in your IMHO.

TOR is not 100% secure, some say 60% of nodes are run by the feds.
And what if the 'net' goes down in a cyberattack? Then we will
have to send coded messages like mentioned here by snail mail.

Anyway, we're just throwing ideas around to see if some bright
spark (not you) comes up with some good ideas.

Hundreds of Tor Relays are Being Used to De-anonymize Users. Can
you run a TOR relay to make things run safer and faster???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvBAaUPzvBQ

Stop Using Tor With VPNs...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8bIt4K_Kfo

We all know that Tor isn't secure. I myself
run it with an increased circuit length.
With my posting I just intended to point out
that banning encryption includes Tor.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

In article <m2i3ekhlbrl68koi6o27ivn32i0022tger@4ax.com> mark@invalid.net
wrote:

On Sun, 05 Oct 2025 00:39:01 +0000, Anonymous User
<noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote:

Thickie, the Tor network bases on encryption
no matter what goes on in your IMHO.

TOR is not 100% secure, some say 60% of nodes are run by the feds.
And what if the 'net' goes down in a cyberattack? Then we will
have to send coded messages like mentioned here by snail mail.

Anyway, we're just throwing ideas around to see if some bright
spark (not you) comes up with some good ideas.

Hundreds of Tor Relays are Being Used to De-anonymize Users. Can
you run a TOR relay to make things run safer and faster???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvBAaUPzvBQ

Stop Using Tor With VPNs...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8bIt4K_Kfo

This Tor horse manure has been going on forever. It's not just horse
manure, but bullshit, too.

For some time now we have a few dubious figures in this group who
bombard us with insecure practices inferior to anonymous remailing.
But being loud doesn't mean being right. It's just the opposite.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

On Sun, 10/05/2025 00:39:01 +0000, Anonymous User wrote:

Thickie, the Tor network bases on encryption
no matter what goes on in your IMHO.

TOR is not 100% secure, some say 60% of nodes are run by the feds.
And what if the 'net' goes down in a cyberattack? Then we will
have to send coded messages like mentioned here by snail mail.

Anyway, we're just throwing ideas around to see if some bright
spark (not you) comes up with some good ideas.

Hundreds of Tor Relays are Being Used to De-anonymize Users. Can
you run a TOR relay to make things run safer and faster???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvBAaUPzvBQ

No, the solution isn't a few more relays but longer circuits, which we
once got with AdvOR/AdvancedOnionRouter and now with Danner's Tor patch.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2