Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 23 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 54:28:08 |
Calls: | 583 |
Files: | 1,139 |
D/L today: |
179 files (27,921K bytes) |
Messages: | 111,799 |
for three decades and counting, all active newsgroups have been occupied by
the usenet troll farm (ever since "eternal september" opened the floodgates >in the mid-1990s) . . . fortunately, most newsreaders (dialog, tbird, etc.) >can use "ignore" flag [i] on sub-threads without ignoring the entire thread, >and scoring can be used on overview(xover) and non-overview message headers >with simple rules applied globally to all newsgroups (e.g. to demote/delete
cross-posted articles), and more specific rules custom-tailored for popular >newsgroups/hierarchies ... which can turn any active newsgroup into a ghost >town if your scoring rules simply delete offenders instead of demoting them, >as signal-to-noise ratios in popular newsgroups probably exceed hundreds to >one, and surely thousands to zero in forums involving politics and religion >which are swamped entirely by troll farm rhetoric, narrative and propaganda
but don't let that dissuade anyone serious about exercising free expression >from contributing their plain text articles anyway, especially since usenet >lurkers outnumber contributors by a wide margin and reliable usenet servers >typically retain their "spool" of articles for at least a year, some longer,
so that your lurking audience (silent majority of newsgroup subscribers and >visitors) might discover, download and perhaps read, whatever you've posted >before it, too, expires from whatever server(s) they may be connecting with >(and articles can be reposted, improved, edited, consolidated, posted again)
every usenet "faq" has advised newsgroup contributors to ignore trolls, and
to avoid responding to obvious trolls, and learn to spot troll conversation >or "trollversation" (/trol-ver-sa'shen/) that becomes apparent in newsgroup
threads that attract their sock puppets into feigning newsgroup discussions >intended solely to discourage substantive dialog from occurring under their >"big brother is watching you" watch; so be careful, it's a jungle out there
On 2025-05-20 10:04?a.m., D wrote:
for three decades and counting, all active newsgroups have been occupied by
the usenet troll farm (ever since "eternal september" opened the floodgates >>in the mid-1990s) . . . fortunately, most newsreaders (dialog, tbird, etc.)
can use "ignore" flag [i] on sub-threads without ignoring the entire thread,
and scoring can be used on overview(xover) and non-overview message headers
with simple rules applied globally to all newsgroups (e.g. to demote/delete
cross-posted articles), and more specific rules custom-tailored for popular >>newsgroups/hierarchies ... which can turn any active newsgroup into a ghost >>town if your scoring rules simply delete offenders instead of demoting them, >>as signal-to-noise ratios in popular newsgroups probably exceed hundreds to >>one, and surely thousands to zero in forums involving politics and religion >>which are swamped entirely by troll farm rhetoric, narrative and propaganda
but don't let that dissuade anyone serious about exercising free expression >>from contributing their plain text articles anyway, especially since usenet >>lurkers outnumber contributors by a wide margin and reliable usenet servers >>typically retain their "spool" of articles for at least a year, some longer,
so that your lurking audience (silent majority of newsgroup subscribers and >>visitors) might discover, download and perhaps read, whatever you've posted
before it, too, expires from whatever server(s) they may be connecting with >>(and articles can be reposted, improved, edited, consolidated, posted again)
every usenet "faq" has advised newsgroup contributors to ignore trolls, and
to avoid responding to obvious trolls, and learn to spot troll conversation >>or "trollversation" (/trol-ver-sa'shen/) that becomes apparent in newsgroup
threads that attract their sock puppets into feigning newsgroup discussions >>intended solely to discourage substantive dialog from occurring under their >>"big brother is watching you" watch; so be careful, it's a jungle out there
Good advice, thanks. I just discovered this news group and was happy to see
a healthy set of current message postings without too much spam.
One thing in particular that I noticed happening in other news groups that
are seemingly going well, is that all of a sudden someone will start
spamming messages into it for a large binary download. It's so annoying because drowns out everything else.
Certain newsgroup servers will filter out this garbage, but others don't. I
noticed that the current Eternal September free news server is pretty good
at filtering out this kind of thing. But there's another news server I use that doesn't.
It's sad that there are people and or bots out there that are designed to
disrupt various text news groups and flood them like this. It's a clear
sign of intentional malice in my opinion.
On Tue, 08 Jul 2025 03:25:40 GMT, LV-426 <nore ply@noreply.com> wrote:
This guy has to be another troll. Nobody who uses Usenet could be so >ignorant about newsreaders and filtering.
On 2025-05-20 10:04?a.m., D wrote:
for three decades and counting, all active newsgroups have been occupied by >>the usenet troll farm (ever since "eternal september" opened the floodgates >>in the mid-1990s) . . . fortunately, most newsreaders (dialog, tbird, etc.) >>can use "ignore" flag [i] on sub-threads without ignoring the entire thread, >>and scoring can be used on overview(xover) and non-overview message headers >>with simple rules applied globally to all newsgroups (e.g. to demote/delete >>cross-posted articles), and more specific rules custom-tailored for popular >>newsgroups/hierarchies ... which can turn any active newsgroup into a ghost >>town if your scoring rules simply delete offenders instead of demoting them, >>as signal-to-noise ratios in popular newsgroups probably exceed hundreds to >>one, and surely thousands to zero in forums involving politics and religion >>which are swamped entirely by troll farm rhetoric, narrative and propaganda >>but don't let that dissuade anyone serious about exercising free expression >>from contributing their plain text articles anyway, especially since usenet >>lurkers outnumber contributors by a wide margin and reliable usenet servers >>typically retain their "spool" of articles for at least a year, some longer, >>so that your lurking audience (silent majority of newsgroup subscribers and >>visitors) might discover, download and perhaps read, whatever you've posted >>before it, too, expires from whatever server(s) they may be connecting with >>(and articles can be reposted, improved, edited, consolidated, posted again) >>every usenet "faq" has advised newsgroup contributors to ignore trolls, and >>to avoid responding to obvious trolls, and learn to spot troll conversation >>or "trollversation" (/trol-ver-sa'shen/) that becomes apparent in newsgroup >>threads that attract their sock puppets into feigning newsgroup discussions >>intended solely to discourage substantive dialog from occurring under their >>"big brother is watching you" watch; so be careful, it's a jungle out there
Good advice, thanks. I just discovered this news group and was happy to see
a healthy set of current message postings without too much spam.
One thing in particular that I noticed happening in other news groups that
are seemingly going well, is that all of a sudden someone will start
spamming messages into it for a large binary download. It's so annoying because drowns out everything else.
Certain newsgroup servers will filter out this garbage, but others don't. I
noticed that the current Eternal September free news server is pretty good
at filtering out this kind of thing. But there's another news server I use that doesn't.
It's sad that there are people and or bots out there that are designed to
disrupt various text news groups and flood them like this. It's a clear
sign of intentional malice in my opinion.