| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 27 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 36:12:55 |
| Calls: | 631 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 1,187 |
| D/L today: |
22 files (29,767K bytes) |
| Messages: | 173,011 |
| Kimmel returned with no apologies, but in an emotional
| monologue where he appeared close to tears, the host said
| that he was not trying to joke about the assassination. He
| also paid tribute to Kirk's widow.
|
| And it got a large audience, with ABC reporting nearly 6.3
| million people tuned in to the broadcast alone, despite the
| blackouts in many cities. As is often the case with
| late-night hosts' monologues, there was a larger audience
| online, with more than 15 million people watching Kimmel's
| opening remarks on YouTube by Wednesday evening. ABC says
| more than 26 million people watched Kimmel's return on
| social media, including YouTube.
| Kimmel returned with no apologies, but in an emotional
| monologue where he appeared close to tears, the host said
| that he was not trying to joke about the assassination. He
| also paid tribute to Kirk's widow.
|
| And it got a large audience, with ABC reporting nearly 6.3
| million people tuned in to the broadcast alone, despite the
| blackouts in many cities. As is often the case with
| late-night hosts' monologues, there was a larger audience
| online, with more than 15 million people watching Kimmel's
| opening remarks on YouTube by Wednesday evening. ABC says
| more than 26 million people watched Kimmel's return on
| social media, including YouTube.
|
| Poll: Americans approve of Jimmy Kimmel's return to TV by a
| more than 2-to-1 margin
| ...
<https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/tv/article/poll-americans-approve-of-jimmy-kimmels-return-to-tv-by-a-more-than-2-to-1-margin-183746388.html>
--bks
| Poll: Americans approve of Jimmy Kimmel's return to TV by a
| more than 2-to-1 margin
| Poll: Americans approve of Jimmy Kimmel's return to TV by a
| more than 2-to-1 margin
The most interesting thing about this story is that no one
can point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him
fired. It was just whiny bitch Trump shitting on the First
Amendment.
--bks
| Poll: Americans approve of Jimmy Kimmel's return to TV by a
| more than 2-to-1 margin
The most interesting thing about this story is that no one
can point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him
fired. It was just whiny bitch Trump shitting on the First
Amendment.
--bks
On Sat, 4 Oct 2025 (Bradley K. Sherman) wrote:
| Poll: Americans approve of Jimmy Kimmel's return to TV by a
| more than 2-to-1 margin
The most interesting thing about this story is that no one
can point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him
fired. It was just whiny bitch Trump shitting on the First
Amendment.
--bks
Taking the temperature of the nation: It's clear the great majority
of The People are not yet ready to ditch the Bill of Rights.
On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 10:49:12 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
| Kimmel returned with no apologies, but in an emotional
| monologue where he appeared close to tears, the host said
| that he was not trying to joke about the assassination. He
| also paid tribute to Kirk's widow.
|
| And it got a large audience, with ABC reporting nearly 6.3
| million people tuned in to the broadcast alone, despite the
| blackouts in many cities. As is often the case with
| late-night hosts' monologues, there was a larger audience
| online, with more than 15 million people watching Kimmel's
| opening remarks on YouTube by Wednesday evening. ABC says
| more than 26 million people watched Kimmel's return on
| social media, including YouTube.
|
| Poll: Americans approve of Jimmy Kimmel's return to TV by a
| more than 2-to-1 margin
| ... >><https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/tv/article/poll-americans-approve-of-jimmy-kimmels-return-to-tv-by-a-more-than-2-to-1-margin-183746388.html>
--bks
Laughter!
His ratings bump vanished in days.
Have you condemned the murder of Charlie Kirk?
Look, Kimmel's ratings PLUNGED again right
after his 'return' show. He's a money-loser
and embarrassing.
He's BAD BIZ.
| Poll: Americans approve of Jimmy Kimmel's return to TV by a
| more than 2-to-1 margin
The most interesting thing about this story is that no one
can point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him
fired. It was just whiny bitch Trump shitting on the First
Amendment.
--bks
On Sat, 4 Oct 2025 13:11:05 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
| Poll: Americans approve of Jimmy Kimmel's return to TV by a
| more than 2-to-1 margin
The most interesting thing about this story is that no one
can point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him
fired. It was just whiny bitch Trump shitting on the First
Amendment.
Ask Disney/ABC, the people who fired him
Iron Girly Pants <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote:
On Sat, 4 Oct 2025 13:11:05 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
| Poll: Americans approve of Jimmy Kimmel's return to TV by a
| more than 2-to-1 margin
The most interesting thing about this story is that no one
can point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him
fired. It was just whiny bitch Trump shitting on the First
Amendment.
Ask Disney/ABC, the people who fired him
And right on cue, Girly Pants supports my claim that no one can
point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him fired.
--bks
Twas ever thus.
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 10:02:04 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
...
...The most interesting thing about this story is that no one
can point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him
fired. It was just whiny bitch Trump shitting on the First
Amendment.
Ask Disney/ABC, the people who fired him
And right on cue, Girly Pants supports my claim that no one can
point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him fired.
<ROTFLMAO> That Disney/ABC hasn't informed you about why they fired
him doesn't mean they don't know, Dummy.
Iron Girly Pants <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 10:02:04 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
...
...The most interesting thing about this story is that no one
can point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him
fired. It was just whiny bitch Trump shitting on the First >>>>>Amendment.
Ask Disney/ABC, the people who fired him
And right on cue, Girly Pants supports my claim that no one can
point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him fired.
<ROTFLMAO> That Disney/ABC hasn't informed you about why they fired
him doesn't mean they don't know, Dummy.
Girly Pants, they fired him because Trump, the whiny, thin-skinned,
bitch POTUS, threatened them. Chapter and verse:
|
| Disney's Kimmel suspension shows Trump's increasing grip
| over media
| ...
<https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/disneys-kimmel-suspension-shows-trumps-increasing-grip-over-media-2025-09-20/>
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 12:51:46 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
......
The most interesting thing about this story is that no one
can point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him
fired. It was just whiny bitch Trump shitting on the First >>>>>>Amendment.
Laughter!
...
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 03:46:02 -0400, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
Look, Kimmel's ratings PLUNGED again right
after his 'return' show. He's a money-loser
and embarrassing.
He's BAD BIZ.
But some lefty loons can't get enough of the anti-Trump rhetoric. It
seems to make them feel validated.
Iron Girly Pants <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 10:02:04 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
...
...The most interesting thing about this story is that no one
can point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him
fired. It was just whiny bitch Trump shitting on the First >>>>>Amendment.
Ask Disney/ABC, the people who fired him
And right on cue, Girly Pants supports my claim that no one can
point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him fired.
<ROTFLMAO> That Disney/ABC hasn't informed you about why they fired
him doesn't mean they don't know, Dummy.
Girly Pants, they fired him because Trump, the whiny, thin-skinned,
bitch POTUS, threatened them. Chapter and verse:
|
| Disney's Kimmel suspension shows Trump's increasing grip
| over media
| ...
<https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/disneys-kimmel-suspension-shows-trumps-increasing-grip-over-media-2025-09-20/>
And you still haven't specified anything he said that justified his firing.
--bks
Twas ever thus.
Kremlin Girl <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 12:51:46 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
......
The most interesting thing about this story is that no one
can point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him
fired. It was just whiny bitch Trump shitting on the First >>>>>>>Amendment.
Laughter!
...
KG, in her typically jejune manner, provides further proof that
no one in MAGA can even tell you what Kimmel said that justified
his firing. So sad.
--bks
LeftistsAreDimwits <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote in >news:6ta4ek1h8rk5o40cgp2rqmu1odf2psmkrl@4ax.com:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 03:46:02 -0400, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
Look, Kimmel's ratings PLUNGED again right
after his 'return' show. He's a money-loser
and embarrassing.
He's BAD BIZ.
But some lefty loons can't get enough of the anti-Trump rhetoric. It
seems to make them feel validated.
Q: Why doesn't Fox have any late night
talk show comedians?
A: Because conservatives aren't funny.
LeftistsAreDimwits <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote in >news:6ta4ek1h8rk5o40cgp2rqmu1odf2psmkrl@4ax.com:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 03:46:02 -0400, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
Look, Kimmel's ratings PLUNGED again right
after his 'return' show. He's a money-loser
and embarrassing.
He's BAD BIZ.
But some lefty loons can't get enough of the anti-Trump rhetoric. It
seems to make them feel validated.
Q: Why doesn't Fox have any late night
talk show comedians?
A: Because conservatives aren't funny.
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 12:51:46 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
Iron Girly Pants <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 10:02:04 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
...
...The most interesting thing about this story is that no one
can point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him
fired. It was just whiny bitch Trump shitting on the First >>>>>>Amendment.
Ask Disney/ABC, the people who fired him
And right on cue, Girly Pants supports my claim that no one can
point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him fired.
<ROTFLMAO> That Disney/ABC hasn't informed you about why they fired
him doesn't mean they don't know, Dummy.
Girly Pants, they fired him because Trump, the whiny, thin-skinned,
bitch POTUS, threatened them. Chapter and verse:
|
| Disney's Kimmel suspension shows Trump's increasing grip
| over media
| ... >><https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/disneys-kimmel-suspensi >>on-shows-trumps-increasing-grip-over-media-2025-09-20/>
And you still haven't specified anything he said that justified his
firing.
--bks
Twas ever thus.
If nobody knows why Disney/ABC fired him, its because Disney/ABC
hasn't informed anyone about why they fired him.
On Sun, 05 Oct 2025 13:15:16 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>
wrote:
LeftistsAreDimwits <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote in >>news:6ta4ek1h8rk5o40cgp2rqmu1odf2psmkrl@4ax.com:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 03:46:02 -0400, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
Look, Kimmel's ratings PLUNGED again right
after his 'return' show. He's a money-loser
and embarrassing.
He's BAD BIZ.
But some lefty loons can't get enough of the anti-Trump rhetoric. It
seems to make them feel validated.
Q: Why doesn't Fox have any late night
talk show comedians?
A: Because conservatives aren't funny.
Perhaps not funny to you, Dummy.
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 13:09:27 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
Kremlin Girl <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 12:51:46 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
......
The most interesting thing about this story is that no one
can point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him >>>>>>>>fired. It was just whiny bitch Trump shitting on the First >>>>>>>>Amendment.
Laughter!
...
KG, in her typically jejune manner, provides further proof that
no one in MAGA can even tell you what Kimmel said that justified
his firing. So sad.
--bks
As for me, I've never watched Kimmel, so I can't quote anything he's
ever said.
Jimmy went WAY overboard over the Charlie Kirk news.Bullshit, of course. He didn't say anything offensive. He didn't say Kirk deserved it (although Kirk probably did deserve it); he didn't mock Kirk or his
On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 10:49:12 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
| Kimmel returned with no apologies, but in an emotional
| monologue where he appeared close to tears, the host said
| that he was not trying to joke about the assassination. He
| also paid tribute to Kirk's widow.
|
| And it got a large audience, with ABC reporting nearly 6.3
| million people tuned in to the broadcast alone, despite the
| blackouts in many cities. As is often the case with
| late-night hosts' monologues, there was a larger audience
| online, with more than 15 million people watching Kimmel's
| opening remarks on YouTube by Wednesday evening. ABC says
| more than 26 million people watched Kimmel's return on
| social media, including YouTube.
|
| Poll: Americans approve of Jimmy Kimmel's return to TV by a
| more than 2-to-1 margin
| ...
<https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/tv/article/poll-americans-approve-of-jimmy-kimmels-return-to-tv-by-a-more-than-2-to-1-margin-183746388.html>
--bks
Laughter!
His ratings bump vanished in days.
I have not condemned the murder of Melissa Hortman.
LeftistsAreDimwits <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote in news:3ds4ekheobebhgi8ulcn73069qu438ta5u@4ax.com:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 13:09:27 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
Kremlin Girl <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 12:51:46 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
......
The most interesting thing about this story is that no one
can point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him
fired. It was just whiny bitch Trump shitting on the First
Amendment.
Laughter!
...
KG, in her typically jejune manner, provides further proof that
no one in MAGA can even tell you what Kimmel said that justified
his firing. So sad.
--bks
As for me, I've never watched Kimmel, so I can't quote anything he's
ever said.
Massively unfunny but you have never watched him.
Kinda like KG's rant about posted articles
"full of liberals lies and besides it is paywalled
so I haven't read it"
LeftistsAreDimwits <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote in >news:2ks4ekhvqios84g005n6cnf10a0oe85qq8@4ax.com:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2025 13:15:16 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>
wrote:
LeftistsAreDimwits <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote in >>>news:6ta4ek1h8rk5o40cgp2rqmu1odf2psmkrl@4ax.com:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 03:46:02 -0400, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
Look, Kimmel's ratings PLUNGED again right
after his 'return' show. He's a money-loser
and embarrassing.
He's BAD BIZ.
But some lefty loons can't get enough of the anti-Trump rhetoric. It
seems to make them feel validated.
Q: Why doesn't Fox have any late night
talk show comedians?
A: Because conservatives aren't funny.
Perhaps not funny to you, Dummy.
Name 3 conservative comedians.
LeftistsAreDimwits <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote in >news:3ds4ekheobebhgi8ulcn73069qu438ta5u@4ax.com:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 13:09:27 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
Kremlin Girl <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 12:51:46 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
......
The most interesting thing about this story is that no one >>>>>>>>>can point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him >>>>>>>>>fired. It was just whiny bitch Trump shitting on the First >>>>>>>>>Amendment.
Laughter!
...
KG, in her typically jejune manner, provides further proof that
no one in MAGA can even tell you what Kimmel said that justified
his firing. So sad.
--bks
As for me, I've never watched Kimmel, so I can't quote anything he's
ever said.
Massively unfunny but you have never watched him.
Kinda like KG's rant about posted articles
"full of liberals lies and besides it is paywalled
so I haven't read it"
On Sun, 05 Oct 2025 17:55:04 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>
wrote:
LeftistsAreDimwits <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote in
news:3ds4ekheobebhgi8ulcn73069qu438ta5u@4ax.com:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 13:09:27 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
Kremlin Girl <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 12:51:46 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K. >>>>>>> ...
...The most interesting thing about this story is that no one >>>>>>>>>> can point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him
fired. It was just whiny bitch Trump shitting on the First >>>>>>>>>> Amendment.
Laughter!
...
KG, in her typically jejune manner, provides further proof that
no one in MAGA can even tell you what Kimmel said that justified
his firing. So sad.
--bks
As for me, I've never watched Kimmel, so I can't quote anything he's
ever said.
Massively unfunny but you have never watched him.
Kinda like KG's rant about posted articles
"full of liberals lies and besides it is paywalled
so I haven't read it"
I've never watched him
On Sun, 05 Oct 2025 17:38:50 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>
wrote:
LeftistsAreDimwits <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote in
news:2ks4ekhvqios84g005n6cnf10a0oe85qq8@4ax.com:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2025 13:15:16 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>
wrote:
LeftistsAreDimwits <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote in
news:6ta4ek1h8rk5o40cgp2rqmu1odf2psmkrl@4ax.com:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 03:46:02 -0400, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote: >>>>>
Look, Kimmel's ratings PLUNGED again right
after his 'return' show. He's a money-loser
and embarrassing.
He's BAD BIZ.
But some lefty loons can't get enough of the anti-Trump rhetoric. It >>>>> seems to make them feel validated.
Q: Why doesn't Fox have any late night
talk show comedians?
A: Because conservatives aren't funny.
Perhaps not funny to you, Dummy.
Name 3 conservative comedians.
<LOL> NDo it yourself, Dummy. I don't errands for you pathetic left
losers.
LeftistsAreDimwits <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote in news:2ks4ekhvqios84g005n6cnf10a0oe85qq8@4ax.com:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2025 13:15:16 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>
wrote:
LeftistsAreDimwits <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote in >>>news:6ta4ek1h8rk5o40cgp2rqmu1odf2psmkrl@4ax.com:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 03:46:02 -0400, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
Look, Kimmel's ratings PLUNGED again right
after his 'return' show. He's a money-loser
and embarrassing.
He's BAD BIZ.
But some lefty loons can't get enough of the anti-Trump rhetoric. It
seems to make them feel validated.
Q: Why doesn't Fox have any late night
talk show comedians?
A: Because conservatives aren't funny.
Perhaps not funny to you, Dummy.
Name 3 conservative comedians.
On 9/17/2025 4:00 PM, c186282, Nazi pseudo-sage and cocksucking cipher,
took his hands and mouth off Xi's dick long enough to peck:
Jimmy went WAY overboard over the Charlie Kirk news.Bullshit, of course. He didn't say anything offensive. He didn't say
Kirk deserved it (although Kirk probably did deserve it); he didn't
mock Kirk or his family; he didn't mock fascist Kirktards who falsely revered Kirk. He said just one *true* thing that angered Kirktards:
that in the weekend following Kirk's death, the neo-Nazi far right was desperately trying to portray the gunman as anyone but one of them. And that's an absolutely true statement: that's *exactly* what the neo-Nazi
far right was trying to do. And that's what you neo-Nazi filth are
*still* trying to do. You and the other knuckle-dragging neo-Nazi
shitbags in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh are still trying to portray Tyler
Robinson as a "leftist," but you have *zero* evidence to support that.
You bullshit about "evidence" to that effect supposedly released by the prosecution, but there is *no such evidence*. You're just lying about
it.
The other excellent thing Kimmel did was to show just how completely unperturbed the Orange Fat Fuck was over the death of his supposedly
"good friend" Kirk. When asked how he was holding up over it, Trump
didn't answer. Instead, he immediately pivoted to talking about the construction of this grotesque, garish pile-of-shit ballroom. What he
did in doing that was to show that he didn't give a fuck about Kirk.
And Kimmel proved it.
Kimmel said and did nothing wrong. And now he's back on the air, and
you're eating shit.
Of course it did.
There are alternatives on at the same time and Kimmel is simply not funny. >The guy is a useful idiot, political hack for the left wing.
And you can count on him being moved somewhere else to slowly decay and be history.
Like I have said all along, he is a pawn and his "statements" were just an excuse to
jettison him as he is a money loser.
Look, Kimmel's ratings PLUNGED again right
after his 'return' show. He's a money-loser
and embarrassing.
He's BAD BIZ.
The other excellent thing Kimmel did was to show just how completely unperturbed
the Orange Fat Fuck was over the death of his supposedly "good friend" Kirk. >When asked how he was holding up over it, Trump didn't answer. Instead, he >immediately pivoted to talking about the construction of this grotesque, garish
pile-of-shit ballroom. What he did in doing that was to show that he didn't give
a fuck about Kirk. And Kimmel proved it.
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 03:46:02 -0400, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
Look, Kimmel's ratings PLUNGED again right
after his 'return' show. He's a money-loser
and embarrassing.
He's BAD BIZ.
They returned to what they were. <shrug> So what? The only thing
that matters to the network is, "is the show turning a profit?"
On 2025-10-05 18:22:10 +0000, Jerry Buchanan said:
On 9/17/2025 4:00 PM, c186282, Nazi pseudo-sage and cocksucking cipher,
took his hands and mouth off Xi's dick long enough to peck:
Jimmy went WAY overboard over the Charlie Kirk news.Bullshit, of course. He didn't say anything offensive. He didn't say
Kirk deserved it (although Kirk probably did deserve it); he didn't
mock Kirk or his family; he didn't mock fascist Kirktards who falsely
revered Kirk. He said just one *true* thing that angered Kirktards:
that in the weekend following Kirk's death, the neo-Nazi far right was
desperately trying to portray the gunman as anyone but one of them. And
that's an absolutely true statement: that's *exactly* what the neo-Nazi
far right was trying to do. And that's what you neo-Nazi filth are
*still* trying to do. You and the other knuckle-dragging neo-Nazi
shitbags in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh are still trying to portray Tyler
Robinson as a "leftist," but you have *zero* evidence to support that.
You bullshit about "evidence" to that effect supposedly released by the
prosecution, but there is *no such evidence*. You're just lying about
it.
My state has Republican House primary candidates running ads that say
"THEY killed Charlie Kirk....THEY took a shot at Pres. Trump".
They don't specify who "THEY" is but the implication is it's the other
party who is responsible.
It's as disrespectful to Kirk as anything Kimmel said.
<snip>
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 03:46:02 -0400, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
Look, Kimmel's ratings PLUNGED again right
after his 'return' show. He's a money-loser
and embarrassing.
He's BAD BIZ.
They returned to what they were. <shrug> So what? The only thing
that matters to the network is, "is the show turning a profit?"
On 10/5/2025 3:33 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 03:46:02 -0400, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
Look, Kimmel's ratings PLUNGED again right
after his 'return' show. He's a money-loser
and embarrassing.
He's BAD BIZ.
They returned to what they were. <shrug> So what? The only thing
that matters to the network is, "is the show turning a profit?"
And even at that, they think, "Is there anything we could put in
that slot that would be more profitable?" If the answer is no,
then Kimmel remains.
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 11:22:10 -0700, Jerry Buchanan wrote:
The other excellent thing Kimmel did was to show just how completely unperturbed
the Orange Fat Fuck was over the death of his supposedly "good friend" Kirk. >>When asked how he was holding up over it, Trump didn't answer. Instead, he >>immediately pivoted to talking about the construction of this grotesque, garish
pile-of-shit ballroom. What he did in doing that was to show that he didn't give
a fuck about Kirk. And Kimmel proved it.
Good paragraph.
On Sun, 05 Oct 2025 17:38:50 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>wrote:
wrote:
LeftistsAreDimwits <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote in >>news:2ks4ekhvqios84g005n6cnf10a0oe85qq8@4ax.com:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2025 13:15:16 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>
wrote:
LeftistsAreDimwits <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote in >>>>news:6ta4ek1h8rk5o40cgp2rqmu1odf2psmkrl@4ax.com:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 03:46:02 -0400, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
It
Look, Kimmel's ratings PLUNGED again right
after his 'return' show. He's a money-loser
and embarrassing.
He's BAD BIZ.
But some lefty loons can't get enough of the anti-Trump rhetoric.
seems to make them feel validated.
Q: Why doesn't Fox have any late night
talk show comedians?
A: Because conservatives aren't funny.
Perhaps not funny to you, Dummy.
Name 3 conservative comedians.
<LOL> NDo it yourself, Dummy. I don't errands for you pathetic left
losers.
LeftistsAreDimwits <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote in >news:ucg5ekt038fe0k85jto5p3lhlglb6tduni@4ax.com:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2025 17:38:50 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>wrote:
wrote:
LeftistsAreDimwits <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote in >>>news:2ks4ekhvqios84g005n6cnf10a0oe85qq8@4ax.com:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2025 13:15:16 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>
wrote:
LeftistsAreDimwits <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>news:6ta4ek1h8rk5o40cgp2rqmu1odf2psmkrl@4ax.com:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 03:46:02 -0400, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
It
Look, Kimmel's ratings PLUNGED again right
after his 'return' show. He's a money-loser
and embarrassing.
He's BAD BIZ.
But some lefty loons can't get enough of the anti-Trump rhetoric.
seems to make them feel validated.
Q: Why doesn't Fox have any late night
talk show comedians?
A: Because conservatives aren't funny.
Perhaps not funny to you, Dummy.
Name 3 conservative comedians.
<LOL> NDo it yourself, Dummy. I don't errands for you pathetic left
losers.
See what I mean?
There no conservative comedians, MAGAs
want the liberal removed but have idea how
to replace them.
Just like they want immigrant workers
removed with no idea how to replace them,
and "woke" scientists removed with no idea
how to replace them.
Kremlin Girl <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 12:51:46 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
......
The most interesting thing about this story is that no one
can point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him
fired. It was just whiny bitch Trump shitting on the First >>>>>>>Amendment.
Laughter!
...
KG, in her typically jejune manner, provides further proof that
no one in MAGA can even tell you what Kimmel said that justified
his firing. So sad.
--bks
On 2025-10-05 18:22:10 +0000, Jerry Buchanan said:
On 9/17/2025 4:00 PM, c186282, Nazi pseudo-sage and cocksucking cipher,
took his hands and mouth off Xi's dick long enough to peck:
Jimmy went WAY overboard over the Charlie Kirk news.Bullshit, of course. He didn't say anything offensive. He didn't say
Kirk deserved it (although Kirk probably did deserve it); he didn't
mock Kirk or his family; he didn't mock fascist Kirktards who falsely
revered Kirk. He said just one *true* thing that angered Kirktards:
that in the weekend following Kirk's death, the neo-Nazi far right was
desperately trying to portray the gunman as anyone but one of them. And
that's an absolutely true statement: that's *exactly* what the neo-Nazi
far right was trying to do. And that's what you neo-Nazi filth are
*still* trying to do. You and the other knuckle-dragging neo-Nazi
shitbags in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh are still trying to portray Tyler
Robinson as a "leftist," but you have *zero* evidence to support that.
You bullshit about "evidence" to that effect supposedly released by the
prosecution, but there is *no such evidence*. You're just lying about
it.
My state has Republican House primary candidates running ads that say
"THEY killed Charlie Kirk....THEY took a shot at Pres. Trump".
They don't specify who "THEY" is but the implication is it's the other
party who is responsible.
It's as disrespectful to Kirk as anything Kimmel said.
On Mon, 06 Oct 2025 01:38:49 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com><noemail@aol.com>
wrote:
LeftistsAreDimwits <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote in >>news:ucg5ekt038fe0k85jto5p3lhlglb6tduni@4ax.com:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2025 17:38:50 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>
wrote:
LeftistsAreDimwits <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote in >>>>news:2ks4ekhvqios84g005n6cnf10a0oe85qq8@4ax.com:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2025 13:15:16 +0000, Mitchell Holman
Itwrote:
LeftistsAreDimwits <Iron_White@Systemic.Patriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>news:6ta4ek1h8rk5o40cgp2rqmu1odf2psmkrl@4ax.com:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 03:46:02 -0400, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> >>wrote:
Look, Kimmel's ratings PLUNGED again right
after his 'return' show. He's a money-loser
and embarrassing.
He's BAD BIZ.
But some lefty loons can't get enough of the anti-Trump rhetoric.
seems to make them feel validated.
Q: Why doesn't Fox have any late night
talk show comedians?
A: Because conservatives aren't funny.
Perhaps not funny to you, Dummy.
Name 3 conservative comedians.
<LOL> NDo it yourself, Dummy. I don't errands for you pathetic left
losers.
See what I mean?
Mo, what do you mean?
There no conservative comedians, MAGAs
want the liberal removed but have idea how
to replace them.
Just like they want immigrant workers
removed with no idea how to replace them,
and "woke" scientists removed with no idea
how to replace them.
I don't want any comedians removed, but I do want the illegals
removed.
Except the ones who pick YOUR
crops and fix YOUR potholes and
clean up after YOUR natural disaster.
Mitchell Holman wrote:
Except the ones who pick YOUR
crops and fix YOUR potholes and
clean up after YOUR natural disaster.
We should cancel their Social Security and force seniors into the field to >pick the crops. They're going to need the money and long house of labor in >the fields will build character in what otherwise are seen as the weak, >stupid American boomer gernation.
On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 13:25:22 -0000 (UTC), Zon <x@y.com> wrote:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
Except the ones who pick YOUR
crops and fix YOUR potholes and
clean up after YOUR natural disaster.
We should cancel their Social Security and force seniors into the field to >>pick the crops. They're going to need the money and long house of labor in >>the fields will build character in what otherwise are seen as the weak, >>stupid American boomer gernation.
Two birds, one stone. Most of them will drop dead with the work and
their free health care canceled.
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 03:46:02 -0400, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
Look, Kimmel's ratings PLUNGED again right
after his 'return' show. He's a money-loser
and embarrassing.
He's BAD BIZ.
They returned to what they were. <shrug> So what? The only thing
that matters to the network is, "is the show turning a profit?"
SNL's recent cold-opening is pretty funny. Pegs Kegbreath and Dump
pretty well, except the Trump imitator still has his subject
talking somewhat coherently, contrary to Trump's recent tired
confabulations.
On Mon, 06 Oct 2025 17:30:11 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 13:25:22 -0000 (UTC), Zon <x@y.com> wrote:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
Except the ones who pick YOUR
crops and fix YOUR potholes and
clean up after YOUR natural disaster.
We should cancel their Social Security and force seniors into the
field to pick the crops. They're going to need the money and long
house of labor in the fields will build character in what otherwise
are seen as the weak, stupid American boomer gernation.
Two birds, one stone. Most of them will drop dead with the work and
their free health care canceled.
Who is this "we" that is going to cancel Social Security and force
seniors into the field?
Don't the leftist clowns realize that that don't have the power to
make their fantasies come true?
LeftistsAreMorons <IronWhite@Systemic_Patriotism.org> wrote in >news:i0e8ekdojktj4e85r5ipi59upqrb768jau@4ax.com:
On Mon, 06 Oct 2025 17:30:11 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 13:25:22 -0000 (UTC), Zon <x@y.com> wrote:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
Except the ones who pick YOUR
crops and fix YOUR potholes and
clean up after YOUR natural disaster.
We should cancel their Social Security and force seniors into the
field to pick the crops. They're going to need the money and long >>>>house of labor in the fields will build character in what otherwise
are seen as the weak, stupid American boomer gernation.
Two birds, one stone. Most of them will drop dead with the work and >>>their free health care canceled.
Who is this "we" that is going to cancel Social Security and force
seniors into the field?
Don't the leftist clowns realize that that don't have the power to
make their fantasies come true?
Silly boy.
Republicans don't want seniors to work,
Republicans want them to DIE.
Texas Lt. Governor: Old People Should Volunteer
to Die to Save the Economy
MARCH 24, 2020
https://tinyurl.com/be9bn9uv
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 13:09:27 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
Kremlin Girl <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 12:51:46 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
......
The most interesting thing about this story is that no one
can point to what Kimmel said that should have gotten him >>>>>>>>fired. It was just whiny bitch Trump shitting on the First >>>>>>>>Amendment.
Laughter!
...
KG, in her typically jejune manner, provides further proof that
no one in MAGA can even tell you what Kimmel said that justified
his firing. So sad.
--bks
Why did you clip the context of my response?
Laughter!
"Control of the media" that trashes him daily?
How does that work exactly?
Have you condemned the murder of Charlie Kirk?
Just answer the questions.
LeftistsAreMorons <IronWhite@Systemic_Patriotism.org> wrote in >news:i0e8ekdojktj4e85r5ipi59upqrb768jau@4ax.com:
On Mon, 06 Oct 2025 17:30:11 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 13:25:22 -0000 (UTC), Zon <x@y.com> wrote:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
Except the ones who pick YOUR
crops and fix YOUR potholes and
clean up after YOUR natural disaster.
We should cancel their Social Security and force seniors into the
field to pick the crops. They're going to need the money and long >>>>house of labor in the fields will build character in what otherwise
are seen as the weak, stupid American boomer gernation.
Two birds, one stone. Most of them will drop dead with the work and >>>their free health care canceled.
Who is this "we" that is going to cancel Social Security and force
seniors into the field?
Don't the leftist clowns realize that that don't have the power to
make their fantasies come true?
Silly boy.
Republicans don't want seniors to work,
Republicans want them to DIE.
Texas Lt. Governor: Old People Should Volunteer
to Die to Save the Economy
MARCH 24, 2020
https://tinyurl.com/be9bn9uv
You don't even work in television but you have enough access to ABC's
balance sheets to know whether or not his show is profitable.
You're convinced the whole "scandal" was just a ploy by the network to
fire him because his show wasn't making money but they brought him
back in just days.
With all the troubles in the world and all the problems Americans
face, the most important thing to you seems to be making stuff up
about a late night host who said something or other (you don't even
know what) about some conservative who got murdered.