From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 8/27/25 4:28 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

Honey

Darwin never believed in "Evolution." He wasn't writing about it, not
on his 'Origins'. He was writing about common descent, which he had
gotten from his grandfather.

Darwin was hired for the voyage to the Galapagos islands. He never
"Discovered" anything. The British sent him -- and other naturalists
elsewhere -- BECAUSE they knew of the interests held on the galapagos.

Darwin never came up with "natural selection." He stole that from
Wallace. And Darwin never understood it anyway. Like I said, he never
believed in evolution.

A man named Mendel cracked the secrets of inheritance and contacted
Darwin with his findings. Darwin appears to have destroyed what Mendel
sent him. Not an isolated incident for Darwin. No, he seems to have
also lost letters from Wallace that very well would have made Darwin
look a little... unflattering.

In addition to what Mendel sent Darwin, Darwin owned a book in which
an excerpt from Mendel's work was printed. Darwin read the book and
to this day the absolute BEST excuse the devout worshipers of the
Darwin myth can come up with is that he didn't bother with that part
of the book. Afterwards -- AFTER his exposure to Mendel -- Darwin
came out with a pseudo scientific "Theory" in competition with Mendel.
He called his "Theory" pangenesis.

Pangenesis was little different from Lysenkoism, what the communist
would would later adopt in the place of the study/teaching of
evolution. Yes, they banned evolution and instead believed as Darwin
believed.

Darwin's pangenesis and Stalin's Lysenkoism were both cheap copies
of Lamarckism, which many will tell you wasn't even original to him!

A pattern has already formed: Darwin always looked backwards, never
forward: The very old idea of common descent coupled to his later
plagiarism of Lamarck's writings.

In 20 years, Darwin never once corrected his error. So it took all
that time before the English speaking world rediscovered Mendel and
actual science -- not the pseudo scientific idiocy of Darwin --
could advance.

Oh. When biology did finally advance, 20 years later, it was no
thanks to Darwin.

So, as we can all see Darwin was a curse on science. If he had been
drowned as a baby, as his mother should have rightfully seen to,
then someone else would have gotten all the credit, and the odds that
this someone else could be as stupid and as damaging as Darwin turned
out to be is LAUGHABLE!

Wallace pretty much got things right BEFORE Darwin. Like I said, it
was Wallace that Darwin stole the "Natural Selection" from, even if
Darwin never understood it...




what's your point?!-a That Darwin got some things wrong?!-a Well,

duh!!-a Did you know that Aristotle believed that women were not fully human??-a Of course, such proves that he was a jerk, but as philosophers
go, he is still ranked quite high on the list.

Dawn

--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 8/27/25 4:32 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

I haven't

You haven't a clue.

Google: Pangenesis lysenkoism lamarckism

To show you how intentionally this Darwin fraud is, THIS is from
the Google A.I.'s comparison of pangenesis & lamarckism...

<Quote>
Darwin's theory of Pangenesis and Lamarckism both proposed
the inheritance of acquired characteristics as a mechanism
of evolution, with Lamarckism stating that traits developed
during an organism's lifetime were passed on, while
Pangenesis suggested the body produced "gemmules" that
collected in the gonads to be inherited.
</Quote>

HINT: BOTH state that traits acquired during an organisms
lifetime are passed on!

BOTH!

"Gemmules" are the means for passing these traits on!

THEY ARE THE SAME THING! Darwin just names his "Gemmules"
as the way traits are passed. That's all.

Now Google A.I.'s comparison of lysenkoism and lamarckism...

<Quote?
Lamarckism is an outdated evolutionary theory that claimed an
organism can pass on characteristics acquired during its lifetime
to its offspring.
</Quote>

It goes on to describe lysenkoism as pseudo scientific -- as if
lamarckism or pangenesis isn't -- and also calls it political. If
this is true then it's still one better than Darwin as he came
to it by way of sheer stupidity...

Darwin has ZERO incentive to go the pseudo scientific route. He
was just too stupid to know there was a difference!
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal


Epigenetics is how your genetic information is modified by methylation
which shuts off certain genes when you are alive.
--
Vasos Panagiotopoulos panix.com/~vjp2/vasos.htm
---{Nothing herein constitutes advice. Everything fully disclaimed.}---
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 8/27/2025 11:35 PM, JTEM wrote:

On 8/27/25 4:28 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

Honey

Darwin never believed in "Evolution." He wasn't writing about it, not
on his 'Origins'. He was writing about common descent, which he had
gotten from his grandfather.

Darwin was hired for the voyage to the Galapagos islands. He never "Discovered" anything. The British sent him -- and other naturalists elsewhere -- BECAUSE they knew of the interests held on the galapagos.

Darwin never came up with "natural selection." He stole that from
Wallace. And Darwin never understood it anyway. Like I said, he never believed in evolution.

A man named Mendel cracked the secrets of inheritance and contacted
Darwin with his findings. Darwin appears to have destroyed what Mendel
sent him. Not an isolated incident for Darwin. No, he seems to have
also lost letters from Wallace that very well would have made Darwin
look a little... unflattering.

In addition to what Mendel sent Darwin, Darwin owned a book in which
an excerpt from Mendel's work was printed. Darwin read the book and
to this day the absolute BEST excuse the devout worshipers of the
Darwin myth can come up with is that he didn't bother with that part
of the book. Afterwards -- AFTER his exposure to Mendel -- Darwin
came out with a pseudo scientific "Theory" in competition with Mendel.
He called his "Theory" pangenesis.

Pangenesis was little different from Lysenkoism, what the communist
would would later adopt in the place of the study/teaching of
evolution. Yes, they banned evolution and instead believed as Darwin believed.

Darwin's pangenesis and Stalin's Lysenkoism were both cheap copies
of Lamarckism, which many will tell you wasn't even original to him!

A pattern has already formed:-a Darwin always looked backwards, never forward:-a The very old idea of common descent coupled to his later plagiarism of Lamarck's writings.

In 20 years, Darwin never once corrected his error. So it took all
that time before the English speaking world rediscovered Mendel and
actual science -- not the pseudo scientific idiocy of Darwin --
could advance.

Oh. When biology did finally advance, 20 years later, it was no
thanks to Darwin.

So, as we can all see Darwin was a curse on science. If he had been
drowned as a baby, as his mother should have rightfully seen to,
then someone else would have gotten all the credit, and the odds that
this someone else could be as stupid and as damaging as Darwin turned
out to be is LAUGHABLE!

Wallace pretty much got things right BEFORE Darwin. Like I said, it
was Wallace that Darwin stole the "Natural Selection" from, even if
Darwin never understood it...

Your ideas are in the same category as those who claim that the South
won the American Civil War. Here's one of many online copies of
Darwin's Origin:

https://darwin-online.org.uk/

It sold out on its first day of publication, and four revisions would be published after the first. No one living during Darwin's time made the accusations that you are now making or anything at all similar to what
you are claiming. Even Darwin's critics acknowledged his genius.

Dawn
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 8/28/25 11:18 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:

Your ideas

I'm going to pause for a moment, but only for a moment, to laugh to
you for pretending this is about me. That, this things are "Ideas"
instead of verifiable facts.

Anyone can Google pangenesis, lysenkoism and lamarckism. Anyone.
Anyone can see that they pretend that animals change because
their behaviors shape their physical bodies, and these new traits
are passed on to their offspring.

It's akin to pretending that if you circumcise your boy then his
children with be born without foreskins...

The only actual difference between Darwin and the people who
banned evolution -- in favor of lysenkoism -- is that Darwin
added is hair brained "Gemmules" thing to it. Darwin made up
this idiocy where each part of the body produces it's own
"Gemmules," and if you build up your legs then your legs will
produce & release "Built up legs" gemmules, which will travel
to your gonads (pretending you ever had any) and get passed
along to offspring, who would then be born with built-up legs.

The take away here, because you are intensely stupid and not
just mentally unhinged, is that Darwin and the people who
criminalized evolution both copied lamarckism. They both
believed that behavior changed the body and then these changes
were passed along to their children.

This is NOT natural selection, btw. No surprise as Darwin was
a raging jackass and never understood a goddamn thing he was
writing about...
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 8/28/2025 1:13 PM, JTEM wrote:

On 8/28/25 11:18 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:

Your ideas

I'm going to pause for a moment, but only for a moment, to laugh to
you for pretending this is about me. That, this things are "Ideas"
instead of verifiable facts.

Anyone can Google pangenesis, lysenkoism and lamarckism. Anyone.
Anyone can see that they pretend that animals change because
their behaviors shape their physical bodies, and these new traits
are passed on to their offspring.

It's akin to pretending that if you circumcise your boy then his
children with be born without foreskins...

The only actual difference between Darwin and the people who
banned evolution -- in favor of lysenkoism -- is that Darwin
added is hair brained "Gemmules" thing to it. Darwin made up
this idiocy where each part of the body produces it's own
"Gemmules," and if you build up your legs then your legs will
produce & release "Built up legs" gemmules, which will travel
to your gonads (pretending you ever had any) and get passed
along to offspring, who would then be born with built-up legs.

The take away here, because you are intensely stupid and not
just mentally unhinged, is that Darwin and the people who
criminalized evolution both copied lamarckism. They both
believed that behavior changed the body and then these changes
were passed along to their children.

This is NOT natural selection, btw. No surprise as Darwin was
a raging jackass and never understood a goddamn thing he was
writing about...

You can't answer this question, can you? Here it is again:

"Why did Darwin's Origin book sell out on its very first day of being published??"

Dawn
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 8/27/2025 11:44 PM, JTEM wrote:

On 8/27/25 4:32 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

I haven't

You haven't a clue.

Google:-a Pangenesis lysenkoism lamarckism

To show you how intentionally this Darwin fraud is, THIS is from
the Google A.I.'s comparison of pangenesis & lamarckism...

<Quote>
Darwin's theory of Pangenesis and Lamarckism both proposed
the inheritance of acquired characteristics as a mechanism
of evolution, with Lamarckism stating that traits developed
during an organism's lifetime were passed on, while
Pangenesis suggested the body produced "gemmules" that
collected in the gonads to be inherited.
</Quote>

HINT:-a BOTH state that traits acquired during an organisms
lifetime are passed on!

BOTH!

"Gemmules" are the means for passing these traits on!

THEY ARE THE SAME THING! Darwin just names his "Gemmules"
as the way traits are passed. That's all.

Now Google A.I.'s comparison of lysenkoism and lamarckism...

<Quote?
Lamarckism is an outdated evolutionary theory that claimed an
organism can pass on characteristics acquired during its lifetime
to its offspring.
</Quote>

It goes on to describe lysenkoism as pseudo scientific -- as if
lamarckism or pangenesis isn't -- and also calls it political. If
this is true then it's still one better than Darwin as he came
to it by way of sheer stupidity...

Darwin has ZERO incentive to go the pseudo scientific route. He
was just too stupid to know there was a difference!

Okay, Darwin got some things wrong? And, your point is??

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 8/28/25 7:41 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

You

Pangenesis. Lamarcjism. Lysenkoism.

All just shades of gray from the next, and adopted by those who
OUTLAWED evolution. Darwin did not believe in evolution.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 8/28/25 7:44 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

Okay, Darwin got some things wrong?

Darwin is a myth. He got nothing right. The man didn't even
believe in evolution. He was in agreement with those who
would later OUTLAW evolution.

Darwin harmed science. By becoming the name & face of
naturalism and burying Mendel he held back science in the
English speaking world for 20 years!

You've believed in a fairy tale your whole life!
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 8/29/2025 6:34 PM, JTEM wrote:

On 8/28/25 7:44 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

Okay, Darwin got some things wrong?

Darwin is a myth. He got nothing right. The man didn't even
believe in evolution. He was in agreement with those who
would later OUTLAW evolution.

Darwin harmed science. By becoming the name & face of
naturalism and burying Mendel he held back science in the
English speaking world for 20 years!

You've believed in a fairy tale your whole life!

Why wasn't any of this mentioned at the Scopes Trial? What did BOTH
sides miss?? Both sides stated that Darwin believed & taught in
evolution. Once again, read it!

https://profjoecain.net/scopes-monkey-trial-1925-complete-trial-transcripts/

Here is the breakdown of the words:

evolution -- 819
Darwin -- 74
Origin of Species -- 12
Wallace -- 2
descent with modification -- 2

Go & see for yourself!!
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 8/29/25 11:46 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

Why wasn't any of this mentioned at

"But, but, but I couldn't have been taught a myth! They would have
taught me that they were teaching me a myth if they had been
teaching me a myth all that time!"

Again, you have ZERO clue how to approach question, deconstruct
problems & pose a test. You are a moron. Period.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 8/29/2025 6:31 PM, JTEM wrote:

On 8/28/25 7:41 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

You

Pangenesis. Lamarcjism. Lysenkoism.

All just shades of gray from the next, and adopted by those who
OUTLAWED evolution. Darwin did not believe in evolution.

What did Darwin believe in then?
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

Dawn Flood wrote:

On 8/29/2025 6:31 PM, JTEM wrote:

On 8/28/25 7:41 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

You

Pangenesis. Lamarcjism. Lysenkoism.

All just shades of gray from the next, and adopted by those who
OUTLAWED evolution. Darwin did not believe in evolution.

What did Darwin believe in then?

sex
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 8/30/25 7:04 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

On 8/29/2025 6:31 PM, JTEM wrote:

On 8/28/25 7:41 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

You

Pangenesis. Lamarcjism. Lysenkoism.

All just shades of gray from the next, and adopted by those who
OUTLAWED evolution. Darwin did not believe in evolution.

What did Darwin believe in then?

Besides the pangenesis that I pointed out again & again?
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 8/30/2025 7:44 PM, % wrote:

Dawn Flood wrote:

On 8/29/2025 6:31 PM, JTEM wrote:

On 8/28/25 7:41 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

You

Pangenesis. Lamarcjism. Lysenkoism.

All just shades of gray from the next, and adopted by those who
OUTLAWED evolution. Darwin did not believe in evolution.

What did Darwin believe in then?

sex

I have a headache.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 8/30/2025 11:26 PM, JTEM wrote:

On 8/30/25 7:04 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

On 8/29/2025 6:31 PM, JTEM wrote:

On 8/28/25 7:41 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

You

Pangenesis. Lamarcjism. Lysenkoism.

All just shades of gray from the next, and adopted by those who
OUTLAWED evolution. Darwin did not believe in evolution.

What did Darwin believe in then?

Besides the pangenesis that I pointed out again & again?

Honey, read!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangenesis

Such was Darwin's idea of HOW evolution happened, which is different
from the FACT that evolution DID happen!!

Get it now?!

Dawn
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

Dawn Flood wrote:

On 8/30/2025 7:44 PM, % wrote:

Dawn Flood wrote:

On 8/29/2025 6:31 PM, JTEM wrote:

On 8/28/25 7:41 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

You

Pangenesis. Lamarcjism. Lysenkoism.

All just shades of gray from the next, and adopted by those who
OUTLAWED evolution. Darwin did not believe in evolution.

What did Darwin believe in then?

sex

I have a headache.

we won't be using your head this time
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

Dawn Flood wrote:

On 8/30/2025 7:44 PM, % wrote:

Dawn Flood wrote:

On 8/29/2025 6:31 PM, JTEM wrote:

On 8/28/25 7:41 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

You

Pangenesis. Lamarcjism. Lysenkoism.

All just shades of gray from the next, and adopted by those who
OUTLAWED evolution. Darwin did not believe in evolution.

What did Darwin believe in then?

sex

I have a headache.

you took any medicine?

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 8/31/2025 12:03 PM, jojo wrote:

Dawn Flood wrote:

On 8/30/2025 7:44 PM, % wrote:

Dawn Flood wrote:

On 8/29/2025 6:31 PM, JTEM wrote:

On 8/28/25 7:41 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

You

Pangenesis. Lamarcjism. Lysenkoism.

All just shades of gray from the next, and adopted by those who
OUTLAWED evolution. Darwin did not believe in evolution.

What did Darwin believe in then?

sex

I have a headache.

you took any medicine?

No, but I am feeling better now!

Dawn
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

Dawn Flood wrote:

On 8/31/2025 12:03 PM, jojo wrote:

Dawn Flood wrote:

On 8/30/2025 7:44 PM, % wrote:

Dawn Flood wrote:

On 8/29/2025 6:31 PM, JTEM wrote:

On 8/28/25 7:41 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

You

Pangenesis. Lamarcjism. Lysenkoism.

All just shades of gray from the next, and adopted by those who
OUTLAWED evolution. Darwin did not believe in evolution.

What did Darwin believe in then?

sex

I have a headache.

you took any medicine?

No, but I am feeling better now!

Dawn

good sex
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2