From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal



The Warren Commission!

Dallas Doctors, men on duty at the hospital, doctors who
examined JFK on that day in Dallas are on record denouncing
the Warren Commission. The FBI's own investigation ignored
the Warren Commission, particularly on the wounds. CHILDREN
still working with crayons can find holes in the Warren
Commission large enough to drive trucks through...

The Warren Commission was absolute bullshit. It was politics,
run my politicians and their staffers, not law enforcement.

The stated goal of the Warren Commission was to placate the
public: To be seen doing something before pronouncing the
conclusion that had begun with.

Nothing "Kooky" here, you'd have to be raving mad to believe
the Warren Commission was a legitimate investigation with
solid finding. But...

But what do you do with that?

You have this all important "Warren Commission" investigating
the murder of the President of the United States, and every
word it printed, every hearing was utter bullshit: What do
you do with this fact?

*This*, my dear people, *This* is where the only "Kooky" can
seep in...

Yes. There are those who claim that JFK was murdered to protect
some secret UFO program. And that is kooky. They come to a very
kooky conspiracy conclusion. BUT...

But their basis, their starting people -- "The Warren Commission
is utter bullshit" -- is NOT kooky. It's fact. Whole libraries of
books debunk it, officials, doctors, law enforcement... the
Warren Commission is garbage. This is a fact. "They were covering
up the murder of JFK by a super secret UFO Caba" is kooky but not
THE FACT that the Warren Commission was bullshit.

See? See this?

A lot of conspiracy theories labelled "Kooky" are actually based
on solid facts. Where they go kooky is when they try to explain
those facts, using conjecture... imagination... various mental
disorders...

This may be true for most "Kooky" conspiracy theories: The whole
thing is denounced as "Kooky" when their underlying basis is
factual. It's only their attempts to explain those facts, their
conjecture, when they go kooky. Yet THE WHOLE THING is denounced
as kooky!

Hitler didn't die in the bunker. Well, maybe a different bunker
but never the Berlin bunker. This is a fact: Berlin was the
wrong bunker! Where I speculate, where I introduce "Theory" is
when I saying things like, "U believe he may not have survived
the July bomb plot."

That's speculation.

It in itself is based on facts -- "Evidence" for Hitler's
survival which wasn't real -- but there's other explanations
for that evidence. And, besides, even if he survived the bomb
he may have been incapable of serving as head of state and
the military.

The problem I'm addressing is your training. You are trained
to reject "Conspiracy Theories," a lesson you learned so well
that you never even stop to figure out WHAT precisely is the
theory and WHAT is the fact.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal


Here's an example of the kind of facts that fuel conspiracy
theories:

https://youtu.be/MpmpNCYI0VY?feature=shared

So most conspiracy "Theories" are similar to the above in that the
are fact, not theory. Where the "Kooky" in the "Kooky conspiracy
theory" comes in is the explanation. NOT that the FBI broke into
Epstein's home to find evidence that he never had any intention of
collecting -- they really did that -- before leaving it completely
unsecured (they did that, too), the "Kooky" enters the equation
only when someone tries to explain the WHY!

Not what the FBI did -- that's not theory -- but WHY they did it...

"The aliens, Reptilians, no doubt, ordered the FBI to do that to
hide their harvesting of human flesh to eat."

But...

But, though nearly all "Kooky" conspiracy theories aren't kooky
at all, not even "Theories" but fact, if there is any way that
an explanation, the attempt to answer the "Why" can be attacked,
it will be. And you'll throw EVERYTHING out as "Kooky."

Me?

I don't believe anything. I don't believe the FBI blundered into
Epstein's home. They knew exactly what they were doing. They were
following orders. And Thomas Cook? They traced everything. Private
citizens did not outperform them.

The narrative is bullshit.

Is there a coverup? Yes. Are they concealing information from us?
But they're not telling us that. And what they are telling us is
bullshit.

THAT is my perspective.

But, even my casual "Well the story is bullshit, that's why it
sounds so wrong" is an acknowledgment AND NOT dismissal of the
FACT OF conspiracy. They are conspiring to keep up ignorant.

NOTE: It makes no sense to hide information from us and then
release a factually true account of their actions. Because THAT
exposes not only their efforts but who made those efforts. But
if you make up a narrative, no matter how damaging it sounds, it
provides no footprints to follow, so to speak.

But that's my conclusion, my answer to the "Why?" The conspiracy
FACT here that you are trained to dismiss (Pavlov's Dogs) is the
coverup.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2