From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal


We do not know how to travel at 80% of the speed of light.

Oh, it is possible. Nothing in our science, nothing in our
physics says it's impossible. Nothing within our knowledge
rules it out as a possibility. But, we do not know how to
tvael at 80% of the speed of light.

We can do it, as far as we know, it does lie within the
realm of possibilities but, we don't know how.

It's a tough problem, traveling at 80% of the speed of
light, a lot of things we'd need to figure out.

Some form of propulsion that can get us that fast.. energy
and/or fuel to run the engines... DOUBLED, because we'd
need exactly as much to bring us to a stop once we get to
where we're going...

Never mind an interstellar comet or meteorite, a rock, a
pebble at those velocities would vaporize our ship. We'd
need a solution for that, how to protect us from debris...

So there's a lot to work out before we'd be capable of
traveling at 80% of the speed of light, and everything tells
us that it's possible and nothing tells us that it's
impossible.

This is not the case with the speed of light.

As far as what we know, our physics, all of sciences tells
us that NOBODY and NOTHING can exceed light speed, or even
reach it.

"We don't know" does NOT apply to everything equally. In
the case of the speed of light, we do know. To the best of
our knowledge, according to our science, our phsyics it's
impossible.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 2025-07-31 13:21, JTEM wrote:

We do not know how to travel at 80% of the speed of light.

<snip>

Why are you even posting this?
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

JTEM wrote:

We do not know how to travel at 80% of the speed of light.

Oh, it is possible. Nothing in our science, nothing in our
physics says it's impossible. Nothing within our knowledge
rules it out as a possibility. But, we do not know how to
tvael at 80% of the speed of light.

We can do it, as far as we know, it does lie within the
realm of possibilities but, we don't know how.

It's a tough problem, traveling at 80% of the speed of
light, a lot of things we'd need to figure out.

Some form of propulsion that can get us that fast.. energy
and/or fuel to run the engines... DOUBLED, because we'd
need exactly as much to bring us to a stop once we get to
where we're going...

Never mind an interstellar comet or meteorite, a rock, a
pebble at those velocities would vaporize our ship. We'd
need a solution for that, how to protect us from debris...

So there's a lot to work out before we'd be capable of
traveling at 80% of the speed of light, and everything tells
us that it's possible and nothing tells us that it's
impossible.

This is not the case with the speed of light.

As far as what we know, our physics, all of sciences tells
us that NOBODY and NOTHING can exceed light speed, or even
reach it.

"We don't know" does NOT apply to everything equally. In
the case of the speed of light, we do know. To the best of
our knowledge, according to our science, our phsyics it's
impossible.

some say that fuel such as anti-matter can be used to move at a
significant percent of c.

i am hoping that we can figure out how to move space instead of
move through space with new physics.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 7/31/2025 3:21 PM, JTEM wrote:

We do not know how to travel at 80% of the speed of light.

Oh, it is possible. Nothing in our science, nothing in our
physics says it's impossible. Nothing within our knowledge
rules it out as a possibility. But, we do not know how to
tvael at 80% of the speed of light.

We can do it, as far as we know, it does lie within the
realm of possibilities but, we don't know how.

It's a tough problem, traveling at 80% of the speed of
light, a lot of things we'd need to figure out.

Some form of propulsion that can get us that fast.. energy
and/or fuel to run the engines... DOUBLED, because we'd
need exactly as much to bring us to a stop once we get to
where we're going...

Never mind an interstellar comet or meteorite, a rock, a
pebble at those velocities would vaporize our ship. We'd
need a solution for that, how to protect us from debris...

So there's a lot to work out before we'd be capable of
traveling at 80% of the speed of light, and everything tells
us that it's possible and nothing tells us that it's
impossible.

This is not the case with the speed of light.

As far as what we know, our physics, all of sciences tells
us that NOBODY and NOTHING can exceed light speed, or even
reach it.

"We don't know" does NOT apply to everything equally. In
the case of the speed of light, we do know. To the best of
our knowledge, according to our science, our phsyics it's
impossible.

Honey, we're all going through spacetime at the speed of light:

https://backreaction.blogspot.com/2020/08/do-we-really-travel-through-time-with.html

You need to read & learn more, okay?!

Dawn
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 7/31/25 5:57 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

Honey, we're all going through

Lol! SO typical of a narcissist... has to oppose... has to
try and stop any conversation it -- and I do mean "it" --
can't control....
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 7/31/25 4:45 PM, jojo wrote:

some say that fuel such as anti-matter can be used to move at a
significant percent of c.

i am hoping that we can figure out how to move space instead of move
through space with new physics.

One massive problem here is that science explains nature, figures
out how it works. Technology is the application of what science
learned about nature.

If and I do mean IF it is possible to move space itself, shouldn't
that be occurring in nature?

I've argued the same about time travel.

if physics allows for time travel, and it does, should we not be
searching for examples of naturally occurring "Time Machines,"
such as worm holes?

Should we not be searching for materials -- even if just rocks
-- that have traveled through time?

Again, science explains nature. Science is just figuring out
how nature works. So in what is effectively an infinitely large
universe, if [blah-blah] conditions will honestly allow for things
like time travel, or the movement of space itself, should we be
able to work out what those conditions would be & search for them?

Or search for their results?
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

JTEM wrote:

On 7/31/25 4:45 PM, jojo wrote:

some say that fuel such as anti-matter can be used to move at a
significant percent of c.

i am hoping that we can figure out how to move space instead of
move through space with new physics.

One massive problem here is that science explains nature, figures
out how it works. Technology is the application of what science
learned about nature.

If and I do mean IF it is possible to move space itself, shouldn't
that be occurring in nature?

dark energy?

I've argued the same about time travel.

if physics allows for time travel, and it does, should we not be
searching for examples of naturally occurring "Time Machines,"
such as worm holes?

Should we not be searching for materials -- even if just rocks
-- that have traveled through time?

Again, science explains nature. Science is just figuring out
how nature works. So in what is effectively an infinitely large
universe, if [blah-blah] conditions will honestly allow for things
like time travel, or the movement of space itself, should we be
able to work out what those conditions would be & search for them?

Or search for their results?

i dont think time travel like moving into the past is possible.
but space moving does happen via dark energy (whatever that is).

and it has no speed limit of light.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

jojo wrote:

JTEM wrote:

On 7/31/25 4:45 PM, jojo wrote:

some say that fuel such as anti-matter can be used to move at a
significant percent of c.

i am hoping that we can figure out how to move space instead of move
through space with new physics.

One massive problem here is that science explains nature, figures
out how it works. Technology is the application of what science
learned about nature.

If and I do mean IF it is possible to move space itself, shouldn't
that be occurring in nature?

dark energy?

I've argued the same about time travel.

if physics allows for time travel, and it does, should we not be
searching for examples of naturally occurring "Time Machines,"
such as worm holes?

Should we not be searching for materials -- even if just rocks
-- that have traveled through time?

Again, science explains nature. Science is just figuring out
how nature works. So in what is effectively an infinitely large
universe, if [blah-blah] conditions will honestly allow for things
like time travel, or the movement of space itself, should we be
able to work out what those conditions would be & search for them?

Or search for their results?

i dont think time travel like moving into the past is possible. but
space moving does happen via dark energy (whatever that is).

and it has no speed limit of light.

i want the dope you take
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

% wrote:

jojo wrote:

JTEM wrote:

On 7/31/25 4:45 PM, jojo wrote:

some say that fuel such as anti-matter can be used to move at
a significant percent of c.

i am hoping that we can figure out how to move space instead
of move through space with new physics.

One massive problem here is that science explains nature, figures
out how it works. Technology is the application of what science
learned about nature.

If and I do mean IF it is possible to move space itself,
shouldn't
that be occurring in nature?

dark energy?

I've argued the same about time travel.

if physics allows for time travel, and it does, should we not be
searching for examples of naturally occurring "Time Machines,"
such as worm holes?

Should we not be searching for materials -- even if just rocks
-- that have traveled through time?

Again, science explains nature. Science is just figuring out
how nature works. So in what is effectively an infinitely large
universe, if [blah-blah] conditions will honestly allow for
things
like time travel, or the movement of space itself, should we be
able to work out what those conditions would be & search for
them?

Or search for their results?

i dont think time travel like moving into the past is possible.
but space moving does happen via dark energy (whatever that is).

and it has no speed limit of light.

i want the dope you take

you know the expansion of the universe is accelerating right? and
the further away, greater the acceleration?

so there is a concept known as cosmic horizon, point at which
space is expanding at a speed beyond light, so the light from
that place will not reach us.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

jojo wrote:

% wrote:

jojo wrote:

JTEM wrote:

On 7/31/25 4:45 PM, jojo wrote:

some say that fuel such as anti-matter can be used to move at a
significant percent of c.

i am hoping that we can figure out how to move space instead of
move through space with new physics.

One massive problem here is that science explains nature, figures
out how it works. Technology is the application of what science
learned about nature.

If and I do mean IF it is possible to move space itself, shouldn't
that be occurring in nature?

dark energy?

I've argued the same about time travel.

if physics allows for time travel, and it does, should we not be
searching for examples of naturally occurring "Time Machines,"
such as worm holes?

Should we not be searching for materials -- even if just rocks
-- that have traveled through time?

Again, science explains nature. Science is just figuring out
how nature works. So in what is effectively an infinitely large
universe, if [blah-blah] conditions will honestly allow for things
like time travel, or the movement of space itself, should we be
able to work out what those conditions would be & search for them?

Or search for their results?

i dont think time travel like moving into the past is possible. but
space moving does happen via dark energy (whatever that is).

and it has no speed limit of light.

i want the dope you take

you know the expansion of the universe is accelerating right? and the further away, greater the acceleration?

so there is a concept known as cosmic horizon, point at which space is expanding at a speed beyond light, so the light from that place will not reach us.

i don't care i wuit playing rocket ships a long time ago
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 8/1/25 1:52 PM, jojo wrote:

i dont think time travel like moving into the past is possible.

Physics doesn't have a problem with it, and supposedly you always
ARE moving into the past & future IN RELATION TO a far distant
observer.

I'm not pretending to understand "Light Cones" but, supposedly,
to someone in an entirely different "Light Cone," there's no
reason why you need to be operating within the same time.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 8/1/25 3:23 PM, jojo wrote:

you know the expansion of the universe is accelerating right? and the further away, greater the acceleration?

so there is a concept known as cosmic horizon, point at which space is expanding at a speed beyond light, so the light from that place will not reach us.

What blows my mind is the idea that space is supposed to be
expanding IN ALL DIRECTIONS all at once.

Which, in a way, would make you the center of the universe.

Right?

If space is expanding no matter which direction you look,
you are the center... in a philosophical sense.

THAT'S mind blowing!

Plus motion is important, not distance or time or anything.

If I buzz around at near the speed of light, time slows for
me. Not you. Yet you are always just as far away from me as
I am from you. So it's the very motion itself that is the
deciding factor. The speed in which our positions in relation
to each other do not matter, it's which one of us is in
motion, or the most motion...

"Thinking's hard... let's go shopping!"
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 16:32:30 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
in alt.atheism with message-id
<106j88u$kcui$3@dont-email.me> wrote:

What blows my mind is the idea that space is supposed to be
expanding IN ALL DIRECTIONS all at once.

Which, in a way, would make you the center of the universe.

Right?

Wrong. Space will expand in all directions (like a round
balloon) no matter where the observer is located. Only at
the center would the edge in all directions be equally
distant - which has nothing to do with the rate of
expansion.
--


Every person in the US is here either
legally or illegally. Those that are
here illegally should be afraid.
Be very afraid. It does not matter
how long you have been here. It does
not matter why you are here. It does not
matter what you have done legally while you
were here. It does not matter what any
relative may have done while you were here.
It only matters that you are here illegally.
It may take a day, a week, a year, or longer
but we will find you and we will deport you.
Be prepared.

Deport them all.

All politicians are trained to lie
and make those lies sound like
the truth. They start with the biggest
lie of all: Politicians are public
servants.

The Dims have an appropriate party
symbol: A jackass.

Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting
and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I support:

A Constitional Amendment establishing
the Freedom of Choice.

The elimination of public expression,
display or support of religion or
religious positions.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 8/2/25 1:34 PM, Attila wrote:

Wrong. Space will expand in all directions (like a round
balloon) no matter where the observer is located.

Which would make you the center of the universe.

Only at
the center would the edge in all directions be equally
distant

You just invented an edge.

What evidence do you have for this edge?
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 20:56:38 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
in alt.atheism with message-id
<106mc46$1bqvk$2@dont-email.me> wrote:

On 8/2/25 1:34 PM, Attila wrote:

Wrong. Space will expand in all directions (like a round
balloon) no matter where the observer is located.

Which would make you the center of the universe.

Nonsense. You can be at any point inside the expanding
universe and it will be expanding in all directions.

Only at
the center would the edge in all directions be equally
distant

You just invented an edge.

If there is no edge how can something be expanding? It
would already be everywhere.

What evidence do you have for this edge?

The fact that if something is expanding it must have
somewhere to expand to. Therefore there must be a condition
that marks the transition from inside what is expanding from
whatever it is expanding into. That transition is defined
as an edge. If there is no edge there cannot be any
expansion because there could be nowhere to expand into.
--


Every person in the US is here either
legally or illegally. Those that are
here illegally should be afraid.
Be very afraid. It does not matter
how long you have been here. It does
not matter why you are here. It does not
matter what you have done legally while you
were here. It does not matter what any
relative may have done while you were here.
It only matters that you are here illegally.
It may take a day, a week, a year, or longer
but we will find you and we will deport you.
Be prepared.

Deport them all.

All politicians are trained to lie
and make those lies sound like
the truth. They start with the biggest
lie of all: Politicians are public
servants.

The Dims have an appropriate party
symbol: A jackass.

Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting
and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I support:

A Constitional Amendment establishing
the Freedom of Choice.

The elimination of public expression,
display or support of religion or
religious positions.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

Attila wrote:

On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 20:56:38 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
in alt.atheism with message-id
<106mc46$1bqvk$2@dont-email.me> wrote:

On 8/2/25 1:34 PM, Attila wrote:

Wrong. Space will expand in all directions (like a round
balloon) no matter where the observer is located.

Which would make you the center of the universe.

Nonsense. You can be at any point inside the expanding
universe and it will be expanding in all directions.

You misunderstood. I did NOT say that you are AT the center
of the universe, I said that you ARE the center of the
universe. By definition. Which you are.

Everyone else is too, yes, but we already knew about
"Relativity."

Only at
the center would the edge in all directions be equally
distant

You just invented an edge.

If there is no edge how can something be expanding?

We're speaking of the universe.

You do understand that you can't Quantum Tunnel yet there
is such a thing. Right?

YOUR rules don't apply.

What evidence do you have for this edge?

The fact that if something is expanding it must have
somewhere to expand to.

But you already know that's not true, because the universe
is expanding in all directions from you, no matter where
you are.

By YOUR rules that's impossible.

You're trying to bring the universe down to your level,
instead of trying to understand it at it's level.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On Sun, 3 Aug 2025 04:19:44 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
in alt.atheism with message-id
<106n630$1gm67$1@dont-email.me> wrote:

Attila wrote:

On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 20:56:38 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
in alt.atheism with message-id
<106mc46$1bqvk$2@dont-email.me> wrote:

On 8/2/25 1:34 PM, Attila wrote:

Wrong. Space will expand in all directions (like a round
balloon) no matter where the observer is located.

Which would make you the center of the universe.

Nonsense. You can be at any point inside the expanding
universe and it will be expanding in all directions.

You misunderstood. I did NOT say that you are AT the center
of the universe, I said that you ARE the center of the
universe. By definition. Which you are.

No. I would need to be equally distant from every edge of
the expansion and that is not necessarily the case.

Everyone else is too, yes, but we already knew about
"Relativity."

Only at
the center would the edge in all directions be equally
distant

You just invented an edge.

If there is no edge how can something be expanding?

We're speaking of the universe.

You do understand that you can't Quantum Tunnel yet there
is such a thing. Right?

When you talk about quantum mechanics all bets are off. At
that level all sorts of impossible things seem to happen
simultaneously.

YOUR rules don't apply.

They are not my rules.

What evidence do you have for this edge?

The fact that if something is expanding it must have
somewhere to expand to.

But you already know that's not true, because the universe
is expanding in all directions from you, no matter where
you are.

By YOUR rules that's impossible.

Not at all.

You're trying to bring the universe down to your level,
instead of trying to understand it at it's level.

--


Every person in the US is here either
legally or illegally. Those that are
here illegally should be afraid.
Be very afraid. It does not matter
how long you have been here. It does
not matter why you are here. It does not
matter what you have done legally while you
were here. It does not matter what any
relative may have done while you were here.
It only matters that you are here illegally.
It may take a day, a week, a year, or longer
but we will find you and we will deport you.
Be prepared.

Deport them all.

All politicians are trained to lie
and make those lies sound like
the truth. They start with the biggest
lie of all: Politicians are public
servants.

The Dims have an appropriate party
symbol: A jackass.

Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting
and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I support:

A Constitional Amendment establishing
the Freedom of Choice.

The elimination of public expression,
display or support of religion or
religious positions.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 8/3/25 7:47 AM, Attila wrote:

On Sun, 3 Aug 2025 04:19:44 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>

You misunderstood. I did NOT say that you are AT the center
of the universe, I said that you ARE the center of the
universe. By definition. Which you are.

No. I would need to be equally distant from every edge of
the expansion and that is not necessarily the case.

There's no edge.

There are perspectives, valid perspectives, that time itself
doesn't exist. A photon doesn't experience time, for example,
nor space. The universe isn't a box with defined edges.

You do understand that you can't Quantum Tunnel yet there
is such a thing. Right?

When you talk about quantum mechanics all bets are off.

We're talking about the very fabric of our universe. It's
an example of how the limitations on you are not the
limitations on nature, the universe.

What I'm saying is that you may be trying to see the
universe but, you're looking at yourself.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2