From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal


If you're not on facebook or aren't logged in, click or tap
the x in the top right of the box trying to force you to\
log in. That should allow you to watch the reel...

https://www.facebook.com/reel/2223830978051965 is th

NOTE: For phones, I have to copy the url and then paste it
into a browser. That, or load facebook onto my phone...

The point is *This* is exactly what I've been talking about,
here and elsewhere, going back years now, when I saw we can
test ancient atifacts for an alien origins.

We can test, and we do find alien materials!

Well. Meteorites. We keep identifying iron objects sources
from meteorites, even (sometimes) identifying the location
where the meteorite struck...

All of this, non-invasive.

The artifact being tested is not harmed.

In the 1870s Napoleon III famously served top-tier guests
using aluminum table war, a precious, exotic material at
that time often said to be worth "The Price of Gold,"
though perhaps closer to silver...

Aluminum isn't rare, btw. It comes from bauxite ore,
which is super common, but we extract it using
electrolysis, which is energy intensive, and of course
requires some knowledge of electricity! So now imagine
finding Napoleon III's tableware in 1170 AD. Or 1379 BC...

THAT would make it an OOPART: Out Of Place ARTifact.

Which, btw, is any archeological find that doesn't seem
to find the location, time and/or culture it is found
within.

THIS is what debris from an alien craft would look like:

An OOPART.

Take any modern plane, or even a WWII plane, and crash
it 3,000 years ago. Even stripped completely, it's ever
component reworked as something else, we could come
across it's remains in museums today and STILL recognize
that their composition excludes and ancient origins...

So if "Ancient Aliens" visiting us is correct, and "UFO
crash site" lore is correct ala Roswell, we can predict
the presence of & find pieces within archaeology site,
museums and private collections.

Of course of just part of the UFO mythology is false --
no crashes or no ancient aliens (just modern ones) --
then it's impossible to "Prove" anything by this method.

AND this method can only confirm "Aliens," in a sense,
but can't exclude the, If we find materials that are
far too advanced from the culture they are associated
with, that supports "Aliens." But if we don't find it
then maybe we just haven't gotten around to it yet
(there's lots to go through) or maybe it's still laying
in the ground, maybe in a tomb, not yet discovered
yet...


So, like SETI, a search for alien artifacts here on
earth is capable of confirming but not of falsifying.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 7/14/2025 2:00 PM, JTEM wrote:

So, like SETI, a search for alien artifacts here on
earth is capable of confirming but not of falsifying.

Yeah, duh; in general, hypotheses are hard to falsify.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 7/14/25 4:48 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

On 7/14/2025 2:00 PM, JTEM wrote:

So, like SETI, a search for alien artifacts here on
earth is capable of confirming but not of falsifying.

Yeah, duh; in general, hypotheses are hard to falsify.

No, sweet cheeks. By definition a hypothesis is falsifiable.

If it ain't falsifiable it ain't a scientific hypothesis...
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

JTEM wrote:

On 7/14/25 4:48 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

On 7/14/2025 2:00 PM, JTEM wrote:

So, like SETI, a search for alien artifacts here on
earth is capable of confirming but not of falsifying.

Yeah, duh; in general, hypotheses are hard to falsify.

No, sweet cheeks. By definition a hypothesis is falsifiable.

If it ain't falsifiable it ain't a scientific hypothesis...

--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5

hypotheses? falsifiable??


If you're wondering if flying saucers exist, just call you wife a cunt and you'll will see flying saucers!!!!

Where do you think the word "flying saucers" came from?


There are no flying saucers from outer space (just a lot of cunts on earth).


There are no aliens from outer space (they exist only on public transportations here on earth)



For the Pentagon and NASA types, it just means 'more grant money'.




But I can tell you exactly what are those things
flying from outer space to earth...

"it ain't local!"


It's , it's ...Nature
monitering earth.

Nature uses little rocks and
little lights from
very far away places..
it jumps in and it jumps out.


"it ain't local!"


You wanna see flying saucers? Go home and call your girlfriend or wife a CUNT.


Then slap her a few times...
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 7/14/2025 7:55 PM, JTEM wrote:

On 7/14/25 4:48 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

On 7/14/2025 2:00 PM, JTEM wrote:

So, like SETI, a search for alien artifacts here on
earth is capable of confirming but not of falsifying.

Yeah, duh; in general, hypotheses are hard to falsify.

No, sweet cheeks. By definition a hypothesis is falsifiable.

If it ain't falsifiable it ain't a scientific hypothesis...

I never claimed otherwise. Look at geocentricism, as just one example.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 7/16/25 2:36 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

There are no flying saucers from outer space (just a lot of cunts on earth).

The media. The Pentagon.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 7/16/25 5:39 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

I never claimed otherwise.

Yes you did. Your narcissistic personality disorder can never
allow you to accept your mistake. Your psyche is far too
fragile.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 7/16/2025 4:46 PM, JTEM wrote:

On 7/16/25 5:39 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

I never claimed otherwise.

Yes you did. Your narcissistic personality disorder can never
allow you to accept your mistake. Your psyche is far too
fragile.

Read my words, "in general, hypotheses (plural) are hard to falsify".
Here's another example: the conservative model of DNA replication
versus the semi-conservative & dispersive models. Just toss these terms
into Google AI to see the point that I was *trying* to make here.

Dawn

P.S. You're not one of my ex's, and so, accusing me of narcissism is
not appropriate in this context.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

Dawn Flood wrote:

On 7/16/2025 4:46 PM, JTEM wrote:

On 7/16/25 5:39 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

I never claimed otherwise.

Yes you did. Your narcissistic personality disorder can never
allow you to accept your mistake. Your psyche is far too
fragile.

Read my words, "in general, hypotheses (plural) are hard to
falsify". Here's another example:-a the conservative model of DNA replication versus the semi-conservative & dispersive models.
Just toss these terms into Google AI to see the point that I was
*trying* to make here.

Dawn

P.S.-a You're not one of my ex's, and so, accusing me of
narcissism is not appropriate in this context.

dawn are you single or married?

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

On 7/17/25 9:13 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:

Read my words

Oh, please, you're such a pussy! You can never admit your
mistakes, not ever!

Cling to whatever fiber you can grasp at...
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2