• Re: NASA's great conspiracy

    From JTEM@jtem01@gmail.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Fri Jul 4 16:06:01 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    On 7/4/25 8:27 AM, Malte Runz wrote:
    On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 13:24:07 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
    wrote:


    (snip)

    Crashed craft retrieval cases have come out hundreds of times. ...

    Now, that's what I call a 'positive claim', and we all know what that entails.

    To be fair, we can all agree that there had to be crashes galore!

    Satellites, military aircraft, secret test crafts, balloons...

    Plenty crashed.

    And if any of them had the slightest value to the military or the
    CIA, they were retrieved.

    I mean, you do know about the whole "Chinese Balloon" thing from
    2023. Right?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Chinese_balloon_incident

    Balloon technology is centuries old, and spy balloons go back at
    least as far as the 1950s.

    The Japanese used balloons are long range weapons platforms during
    WWII...

    Think of this: Even a weather balloon, once retrieved, might
    provide you with a heck of a lot of intel on a potential enemy's capabilities... the equipment inside... gets you a look at some
    of their high end instruments!

    So I think it safe to say that everyone agrees that there have
    been countless crashes over the last 80 years or so, and that
    many of these involved retrieval efforts. What is under dispute
    is NOT the fact that things crash (and get retrieved) but what
    specifically it was that crashed.
    --
    https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From pursent100@pursent100@gmail.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Fri Jul 4 13:10:06 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    JTEM wrote:
    On 7/4/25 8:27 AM, Malte Runz wrote:
    On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 13:24:07 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
    wrote:


    (snip)

    Crashed craft retrieval cases have come out hundreds of times. ...

    Now, that's what I call a 'positive claim', and we all know what that
    entails.

    To be fair, we can all agree that there had to be crashes galore!

    Satellites, military aircraft, secret test crafts, balloons...

    Plenty crashed.

    And if any of them had the slightest value to the military or the
    CIA, they were retrieved.

    I mean, you do know about the whole "Chinese Balloon" thing from
    2023. Right?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Chinese_balloon_incident

    Balloon technology is centuries old, and spy balloons go back at
    least as far as the 1950s.

    The Japanese used balloons are long range weapons platforms during
    WWII...

    Think of this:  Even a weather balloon, once retrieved, might
    provide you with a heck of a lot of intel on a potential enemy's capabilities... the equipment inside... gets you a look at some
    of their high end instruments!

    So I think it safe to say that everyone agrees that there have
    been countless crashes over the last 80 years or so, and that
    many of these involved retrieval efforts. What is under dispute
    is NOT the fact that things crash (and get retrieved) but what
    specifically it was that crashed.






    i heard you died are you dead
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andrew W@space@defense.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sat Jul 5 09:58:50 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message news:qbhf6klnb7a6djkojsklqo6iga95ssdfg4@4ax.com...

    On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 13:24:07 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
    wrote:


    (snip)

    Crashed craft retrieval cases have come out hundreds of times. ...

    Now, that's what I call a 'positive claim', and we all know what that >entails.


    Only mainstream media followers and 'authority' followers have never heard
    of that. Normies.



    ... Upgrade your
    sources.

    Name one.


    Of course you don't know any except the mainstream info suppressing ones.



    And no, don't wiggle your way out the usual way, suggesting
    I'm too lazy to find one myself.


    You are lazy, two minute Google result believer.



    Also, this is not about what my
    sources have to say, it's all about /your/ sources.


    But your sources are lying/suppressing crap. That's the real issue.



    So, do you have an 'upgraded source' that provides evidence for the
    retrieval of a crashed craft created by an alien race?


    I have plenty but you will never search for yourself and switch. You're not interested.



    My sole point is to expose you as a liar, and every time you fail to
    provide a source for your claims my point is proven.


    No, you're just a mainstream believing troll and smartass who follows professional liars and thinks he has 'facts'. Your kind are well known.
    You obviously still don't know that mainstream scientists are paid grant
    money to shut up about certain things that would threaten the profits of big corporations and corrupt governments.
    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JTEM@jtem01@gmail.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Fri Jul 4 21:01:19 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    On 7/4/25 7:58 PM, Andrew W wrote:

    No, you're just a mainstream believing troll and smartass who follows professional liars and thinks he has 'facts'. Your kind are well known.
    You obviously still don't know that mainstream scientists are paid grant money to shut up about certain things that would threaten the profits of
    big corporations and corrupt governments.

    Ironically, I'm the exact opposite of a "Mainstream Believing Troll"
    and yet I don't believe in crashed UFOs.

    The military is well practiced in controlling information, hiding it.
    Because, even information that might seem completely innocuous might,
    to an enemy, prove deadly.

    During WWII, "Signals Intelligence" even listened to and kept track of
    signals traffic it couldn't read -- codes it hadn't cracked. They
    were looking for any changes in the patterns that might coincide with,
    and seemingly confirm, other intelligence sources...

    My point? Roswell is bogus. it fails the Duck Test. The Roswell
    narrative can't be true as the military simply does not operate the
    way the narrative orders you to believe.

    The military simply does not exist to inform the public. It can't.
    Not without informing the rest of the world, including potential
    enemies...

    A CRITICAL view of the mainstream media reporting tells you that the
    Roswell crash is nonsense.
    --
    https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andrew W@space@defense.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sat Jul 5 11:16:10 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    "JTEM" wrote in message news:1049tgv$13vb2$1@dont-email.me...

    On 7/4/25 7:58 PM, Andrew W wrote:

    No, you're just a mainstream believing troll and smartass who follows
    professional liars and thinks he has 'facts'. Your kind are well known.
    You obviously still don't know that mainstream scientists are paid grant
    money to shut up about certain things that would threaten the profits of
    big corporations and corrupt governments.

    Ironically, I'm the exact opposite of a "Mainstream Believing Troll"
    and yet I don't believe in crashed UFOs.

    The military is well practiced in controlling information, hiding it. >Because, even information that might seem completely innocuous might,
    to an enemy, prove deadly.

    During WWII, "Signals Intelligence" even listened to and kept track of >signals traffic it couldn't read -- codes it hadn't cracked. They
    were looking for any changes in the patterns that might coincide with,
    and seemingly confirm, other intelligence sources...

    My point? Roswell is bogus. it fails the Duck Test. The Roswell
    narrative can't be true as the military simply does not operate the
    way the narrative orders you to believe.

    The military simply does not exist to inform the public. It can't.
    Not without informing the rest of the world, including potential
    enemies...

    A CRITICAL view of the mainstream media reporting tells you that the
    Roswell crash is nonsense.


    It wasn't the military that informed us about Roswell, it was the press. And the military promptly stopped it and cover it up. They wanted the tech for themselves.
    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JTEM@jtem01@gmail.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Fri Jul 4 21:34:38 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    On 7/4/25 9:16 PM, Andrew W wrote:

    It wasn't the military that informed us about Roswell, it was the press.

    Lol! It was the military.

    Don't confuse the means of dissemination with the point of
    origins.

    And the military promptly stopped it and cover it up.

    The military released the "information" and then stopped
    it. Yes.

    It does not pass the Duck Test.

    It's a bogus narrative.
    --
    https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andrew W@space@defense.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sat Jul 5 12:28:16 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    "JTEM" wrote in message news:1049vff$14btl$1@dont-email.me...

    On 7/4/25 9:16 PM, Andrew W wrote:

    It wasn't the military that informed us about Roswell, it was the press.

    Lol! It was the military.

    Don't confuse the means of dissemination with the point of
    origins.

    And the military promptly stopped it and cover it up.

    The military released the "information" and then stopped
    it. Yes.

    It does not pass the Duck Test.

    It's a bogus narrative.


    The truth is that it was a manned craft.
    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JTEM@jtem01@gmail.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Fri Jul 4 22:47:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    On 7/4/25 10:28 PM, Andrew W wrote:

    The truth is that it was a manned craft.

    The truth is that it was disinformation.

    They were either pretending that they didn't know something
    the Russians were doing, or they were inventing some
    "Plausible Deniability" for their spying on the Russians.
    --
    https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andrew W@space@defense.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sat Jul 5 13:12:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    "JTEM" wrote in message news:104a3ou$18smj$2@dont-email.me...

    On 7/4/25 10:28 PM, Andrew W wrote:

    The truth is that it was a manned craft.

    The truth is that it was disinformation.


    The balloon story was the disinfo.



    They were either pretending that they didn't know something
    the Russians were doing, or they were inventing some
    "Plausible Deniability" for their spying on the Russians.



    ET crashes had nothing to do with the Russians. That was more cold war disinfo. Russia, Russia, Russia.
    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JTEM@jtem01@gmail.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Fri Jul 4 23:59:48 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    On 7/4/25 11:12 PM, Andrew W wrote:

    The balloon story was the disinfo.

    The story was disinformation.

    It's not the military's business to inform the public. It's
    not in the military's interests to release information.

    Unless...

    Unless that information serves the agenda of the military.

    ET crashes had nothing to do with the Russians.

    Well there weren't any ET crashes so in that sense you are
    correct...

    Spy tech, regardless of nation of origins, is always a major
    priority. And it's something you need to keep secret. If it's
    their's you don't want them to know that you have it, if it's
    yours you don't want them to know what you're flying, even if
    it's just a test...
    --
    https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andrew W@space@defense.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sat Jul 5 15:01:16 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    "JTEM" wrote in message news:104a7vm$19mca$2@dont-email.me...

    On 7/4/25 11:12 PM, Andrew W wrote:

    The balloon story was the disinfo.

    The story was disinformation.


    That's what I just said.



    It's not the military's business to inform the public. It's
    not in the military's interests to release information.


    We all know that already.



    Unless...

    Unless that information serves the agenda of the military.


    You're not adding anything to the conversation.



    ET crashes had nothing to do with the Russians.

    Well there weren't any ET crashes so in that sense you are
    correct...


    Bodies have been recovered from several sites. One or two were still alive
    and taken to facilities for study.



    Spy tech, regardless of nation of origins, is always a major
    priority. And it's something you need to keep secret. If it's
    their's you don't want them to know that you have it, if it's
    yours you don't want them to know what you're flying, even if
    it's just a test...


    That's small minded. You obviously don't know the half of the full agenda
    and events.
    Governments and secret societies are covering up true ancient human and ET history.
    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JTEM@jtem01@gmail.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sat Jul 5 01:24:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    On 7/5/25 1:01 AM, Andrew W wrote:

    Bodies have been recovered from several sites.

    Like a sunken Russian submarine?

    One or two were still
    alive and taken to facilities for study.

    I dated one. I still have no idea if it was a male or a
    female, or if they even have a difference with them. All
    I know is that they were fun at parties.

    Spy tech, regardless of nation of origins, is always a major
    priority. And it's something you need to keep secret. If it's
    their's you don't want them to know that you have it, if it's
    yours you don't want them to know what you're flying, even if
    it's just a test...


    That's small minded.

    It's reality. It's not always exciting but, hey, them's the
    breaks.

    Governments and secret societies are covering up true ancient human and
    ET history.

    I'm going to gather all the evidence and then threaten to
    expose them unless they cure cancer and get me laid, but
    not in that order.
    --
    https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Malte Runz@nobodys@busine.ss to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sat Jul 5 10:34:37 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 09:58:50 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
    wrote:

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message >news:qbhf6klnb7a6djkojsklqo6iga95ssdfg4@4ax.com...

    On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 13:24:07 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
    wrote:


    (snip)

    Crashed craft retrieval cases have come out hundreds of times. ...

    Now, that's what I call a 'positive claim', and we all know what that >>entails.


    Only mainstream media followers and 'authority' followers have never heard >of that. Normies.

    Of course I've heard the claims made before. Do you think you're the
    only kook on the internet?


    ... Upgrade your
    sources.

    Name one.


    Of course you don't know any except the mainstream info suppressing ones.

    I can't possibly know what /your/ sources are. Von DΣniken? Alex
    Jones? Random Dude on Rumor Mill? Why don't you want to tell me?


    And no, don't wiggle your way out the usual way, suggesting
    I'm too lazy to find one myself.


    You are lazy, two minute Google result believer.

    Wiggle wiggle wiggle.


    Also, this is not about what my
    sources have to say, it's all about /your/ sources.


    But your sources are lying/suppressing crap. That's the real issue.

    You're the one making the claim, therefore you provide the evidence.
    This can't be a new concept to you.


    So, do you have an 'upgraded source' that provides evidence for the >>retrieval of a crashed craft created by an alien race?


    I have plenty ...

    So you say, but are unable to provide any. I call your bluff... again.

    ... but you will never search for yourself and switch. ...

    I can find hundreds, if not thousands, of people saying the same shit
    you do, all claiming to have the evidence. Grainy images of out of
    focus gray blobs, un-named specialists and insiders spilling the
    beans, ancient wisdom, inter stellar revelations, anecdotal evidence
    of abductions, and of course, 'They are hiding the truth from us'.

    Understand that I'm interested in learning what /you/ have found and
    where you found it.


    ... You're not
    interested.

    Of course I'm interested. I ask you for an answer every time. What
    evidence have /you/ seen?


    My sole point is to expose you as a liar, and every time you fail to >>provide a source for your claims my point is proven.


    No, ...

    Yes. Did you, or didn't you, provide a source? You didn't. Instead you
    evaded my questions exactly the way I predicted you would.

    (snip the wiggle wiggle wiggle.)
    --
    Malte Runz
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Malte Runz@nobodys@busine.ss to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sat Jul 5 10:39:50 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 15:01:16 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
    wrote:

    (snip)

    Bodies have been recovered from several sites. One or two were still alive >and taken to facilities for study.

    Damn, you're gullible. In one way it's amusing, but when you think
    about it, it is also scary that a grown man can say these things with
    a straight face.

    (snip)
    --
    Malte Runz
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JTEM@jtem01@gmail.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sat Jul 5 04:48:52 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    On 7/5/25 4:39 AM, Malte Runz wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 15:01:16 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
    wrote:

    (snip)

    Bodies have been recovered from several sites. One or two were still alive >> and taken to facilities for study.

    Damn, you're gullible. In one way it's amusing, but when you think
    about it, it is also scary that a grown man can say these things with
    a straight face.

    At face value, it's easy to believe.

    Remember that fake UFO "Whistleblower" who testified before
    congress? He made claims.

    Problem is, he wasn't a whistleblower. Everything he said in
    public and to the media, like in interviews, was approved in
    advance by the Pentagon. So he never ever divulged any secrets.

    Oh. It's a crime to make government secrets public, yes, but
    it's not a crime to lie. So if you reveal classified information
    you can and likely will go to prison. But if you lie and say
    "There's bodies" then you won't. Because you haven't revealed
    a secret. You haven't made classified information public.
    --
    https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bob Casanova@nospam@buzz.off to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sat Jul 5 09:02:35 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    On Sat, 05 Jul 2025 10:34:37 +0200, the following appeared
    in sci.skeptic, posted by Malte Runz <nobodys@busine.ss>:

    On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 09:58:50 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
    wrote:

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message >>news:qbhf6klnb7a6djkojsklqo6iga95ssdfg4@4ax.com...

    On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 13:24:07 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
    wrote:


    (snip)

    Crashed craft retrieval cases have come out hundreds of times. ...

    Now, that's what I call a 'positive claim', and we all know what that >>>entails.


    Only mainstream media followers and 'authority' followers have never heard >>of that. Normies.

    Of course I've heard the claims made before. Do you think you're the
    only kook on the internet?


    ... Upgrade your
    sources.

    Name one.


    Of course you don't know any except the mainstream info suppressing ones.

    I can't possibly know what /your/ sources are. Von DΣniken? Alex
    Jones? Random Dude on Rumor Mill? Why don't you want to tell me?


    And no, don't wiggle your way out the usual way, suggesting
    I'm too lazy to find one myself.


    You are lazy, two minute Google result believer.

    Wiggle wiggle wiggle.


    Also, this is not about what my
    sources have to say, it's all about /your/ sources.


    But your sources are lying/suppressing crap. That's the real issue.

    You're the one making the claim, therefore you provide the evidence.
    This can't be a new concept to you.


    So, do you have an 'upgraded source' that provides evidence for the >>>retrieval of a crashed craft created by an alien race?


    I have plenty ...

    So you say, but are unable to provide any. I call your bluff... again.

    ... but you will never search for yourself and switch. ...

    I can find hundreds, if not thousands, of people saying the same shit
    you do, all claiming to have the evidence. Grainy images of out of
    focus gray blobs, un-named specialists and insiders spilling the
    beans, ancient wisdom, inter stellar revelations, anecdotal evidence
    of abductions, and of course, 'They are hiding the truth from us'.

    Understand that I'm interested in learning what /you/ have found and
    where you found it.


    ... You're not
    interested.

    Of course I'm interested. I ask you for an answer every time. What
    evidence have /you/ seen?


    My sole point is to expose you as a liar, and every time you fail to >>>provide a source for your claims my point is proven.


    No, ...

    Yes. Did you, or didn't you, provide a source? You didn't. Instead you
    evaded my questions exactly the way I predicted you would.

    (snip the wiggle wiggle wiggle.)

    It's not very nice to make fun of the cognitively
    "challenged". But I admit it can be fun... ;-)

    --

    Bob C.

    "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
    the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
    'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

    - Isaac Asimov
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andrew W@space@defense.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sun Jul 6 08:52:17 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message news:qtoh6k5jba6e9n536p5c9ko8bo19gkqn6e@4ax.com...

    On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 15:01:16 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
    wrote:

    (snip)

    Bodies have been recovered from several sites. One or two were still alive >>and taken to facilities for study.

    Damn, you're gullible. In one way it's amusing, but when you think
    about it, it is also scary that a grown man can say these things with
    a straight face.


    But you somehow know the truth despite no research on the subject?
    It's you who's gullible in believing the public cover up.
    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andrew W@space@defense.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sun Jul 6 09:22:06 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message news:mjnh6khvpsqq2871njjta0rta6fq0jsihb@4ax.com...

    On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 09:58:50 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
    wrote:

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message >>news:qbhf6klnb7a6djkojsklqo6iga95ssdfg4@4ax.com...

    On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 13:24:07 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
    wrote:


    (snip)

    Crashed craft retrieval cases have come out hundreds of times. ...

    Now, that's what I call a 'positive claim', and we all know what that >>>entails.


    Only mainstream media followers and 'authority' followers have never heard >>of that. Normies.

    Of course I've heard the claims made before. Do you think you're the
    only kook on the internet?


    If you call me a kook then you also have to call air force pilots, senior military officials and investigators etc. kooks too.
    It's far more likely that you're just an ignorant arrogant smartass troll reacting from your emotions.



    ... Upgrade your
    sources.

    Name one.


    Of course you don't know any except the mainstream info suppressing ones.

    I can't possibly know what /your/ sources are.


    You don't have any proper sources so you're always on the lookout for some. That's obvious.



    Von Däniken? Alex
    Jones? Random Dude on Rumor Mill?


    They're all far smarter than you. Why can't you find/see the real truth instead of just troll?



    Why don't you want to tell me?


    Because you're just a dumb jerk who only follows and believes mainstream
    slop.



    And no, don't wiggle your way out the usual way, suggesting
    I'm too lazy to find one myself.


    You are lazy, two minute Google result believer.

    Wiggle wiggle wiggle.


    You can't face the truth.



    Also, this is not about what my
    sources have to say, it's all about /your/ sources.


    But your sources are lying/suppressing crap. That's the real issue.

    You're the one making the claim, therefore you provide the evidence.
    This can't be a new concept to you.


    No I'm just passing on 'claims' by investigators and official witnesses.
    You obviously live in a very small world.



    So, do you have an 'upgraded source' that provides evidence for the >>>retrieval of a crashed craft created by an alien race?


    I have plenty ...

    So you say, but are unable to provide any. I call your bluff... again.


    So you want me to waste more time on the likes of you? Why?



    ... but you will never search for yourself and switch. ...

    I can find hundreds, if not thousands, of people saying the same shit
    you do,


    Military officials talk shit? Ok smarty.



    all claiming to have the evidence. Grainy images of out of
    focus gray blobs, un-named specialists and insiders spilling the
    beans, ancient wisdom, inter stellar revelations, anecdotal evidence
    of abductions, and of course, 'They are hiding the truth from us'.


    So you still don't know why the military and governments hide things from
    the population? Are you dumb?
    They put strict laws in place. Find out why and then come back.



    Understand that I'm interested in learning what /you/ have found and
    where you found it.


    Yes you're obsessed about that. I get it. Your emotions just can't handle 'claims'. Get therapy.



    ... You're not
    interested.

    Of course I'm interested. I ask you for an answer every time. What
    evidence have /you/ seen?


    I've seen a few craft, in one case a cluster of them go across the sky. That was before satellite clusters.



    My sole point is to expose you as a liar, and every time you fail to >>>provide a source for your claims my point is proven.


    No, ...

    Yes. Did you, or didn't you, provide a source?


    Why do I have to? You'll just jerk off like always.



    You didn't. Instead you
    evaded my questions exactly the way I predicted you would.


    You're not a courtroom prosecutor so quit acting like one.
    A.a is so full of crap head stooges. It's a mental asylum.
    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From pursent100@pursent100@gmail.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sat Jul 5 16:50:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    jojo wrote:
    Andrew W wrote:
    "Malte Runz"  wrote in message
    news:qtoh6k5jba6e9n536p5c9ko8bo19gkqn6e@4ax.com...

    On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 15:01:16 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
    wrote:

    (snip)

    Bodies have been recovered from several sites. One or two were still
    alive
    and taken to facilities for study.

    Damn, you're gullible. In one way it's amusing, but when you think
    about it, it is also scary that a grown man can say these things with
    a straight face.


    But you somehow know the truth despite no research on the subject?
    It's you who's gullible in believing the public cover up.



    i want the alien thing to be real, but if fleshy versions came here and
    were kidnapped by us, we would be gazaed by now.

    aliens will never come here
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jojo@f00@0f0.00f to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sat Jul 5 23:41:00 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    Andrew W wrote:
    "Malte Runz"  wrote in message news:qtoh6k5jba6e9n536p5c9ko8bo19gkqn6e@4ax.com...

    On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 15:01:16 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
    wrote:

    (snip)

    Bodies have been recovered from several sites. One or two were
    still alive
    and taken to facilities for study.

    Damn, you're gullible. In one way it's amusing, but when you think
    about it, it is also scary that a grown man can say these
    things with
    a straight face.


    But you somehow know the truth despite no research on the subject?
    It's you who's gullible in believing the public cover up.



    i want the alien thing to be real, but if fleshy versions came
    here and were kidnapped by us, we would be gazaed by now.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From pursent100@pursent100@gmail.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sat Jul 5 17:04:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    jojo wrote:
    % wrote:
    jojo wrote:
    Andrew W wrote:
    "Malte Runz"  wrote in message
    news:qtoh6k5jba6e9n536p5c9ko8bo19gkqn6e@4ax.com...

    On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 15:01:16 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
    wrote:

    (snip)

    Bodies have been recovered from several sites. One or two were
    still alive
    and taken to facilities for study.

    Damn, you're gullible. In one way it's amusing, but when you think
    about it, it is also scary that a grown man can say these things with >>>>> a straight face.


    But you somehow know the truth despite no research on the subject?
    It's you who's gullible in believing the public cover up.



    i want the alien thing to be real, but if fleshy versions came here
    and were kidnapped by us, we would be gazaed by now.

    aliens will never come here

    they will definitely come, its a perfect world, planet has all the best parameters, from size to distance to composition to biology.

    they have nothing to say to stinky smelly murderous humans
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jojo@f00@0f0.00f to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sat Jul 5 23:55:09 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    % wrote:
    jojo wrote:
    Andrew W wrote:
    "Malte Runz"  wrote in message
    news:qtoh6k5jba6e9n536p5c9ko8bo19gkqn6e@4ax.com...

    On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 15:01:16 +1000, "Andrew W"
    <space@defense.com>
    wrote:

    (snip)

    Bodies have been recovered from several sites. One or two
    were still alive
    and taken to facilities for study.

    Damn, you're gullible. In one way it's amusing, but when you
    think
    about it, it is also scary that a grown man can say these
    things with
    a straight face.


    But you somehow know the truth despite no research on the
    subject?
    It's you who's gullible in believing the public cover up.



    i want the alien thing to be real, but if fleshy versions came
    here and were kidnapped by us, we would be gazaed by now.

    aliens will never come here

    they will definitely come, its a perfect world, planet has all
    the best parameters, from size to distance to composition to biology.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jojo@f00@0f0.00f to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sun Jul 6 00:19:31 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    % wrote:
    jojo wrote:
    % wrote:
    jojo wrote:
    Andrew W wrote:
    "Malte Runz"  wrote in message
    news:qtoh6k5jba6e9n536p5c9ko8bo19gkqn6e@4ax.com...

    On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 15:01:16 +1000, "Andrew W"
    <space@defense.com>
    wrote:

    (snip)

    Bodies have been recovered from several sites. One or two
    were still alive
    and taken to facilities for study.

    Damn, you're gullible. In one way it's amusing, but when
    you think
    about it, it is also scary that a grown man can say these
    things with
    a straight face.


    But you somehow know the truth despite no research on the
    subject?
    It's you who's gullible in believing the public cover up.



    i want the alien thing to be real, but if fleshy versions
    came here and were kidnapped by us, we would be gazaed by now.

    aliens will never come here

    they will definitely come, its a perfect world, planet has all
    the best parameters, from size to distance to composition to
    biology.

    they have nothing to say to stinky smelly murderous humans

    its not about the humans, but the ecosystem, its like visiting
    the rainforest or antarctica.

    they wat to see... like say if we found out there are octopus
    like creatures on europa, definitely go there to observe.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andrew W@space@defense.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sun Jul 6 10:54:02 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    "jojo" wrote in message news:3252dd78-7eaa-f1e5-bf0a-fe55b3c0033f@shinku.aoyagi.konjou...

    Andrew W wrote:
    "Malte Runz" wrote in message
    news:qtoh6k5jba6e9n536p5c9ko8bo19gkqn6e@4ax.com...

    On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 15:01:16 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
    wrote:

    (snip)

    Bodies have been recovered from several sites. One or two were still
    alive
    and taken to facilities for study.

    Damn, you're gullible. In one way it's amusing, but when you think
    about it, it is also scary that a grown man can say these things with
    a straight face.


    But you somehow know the truth despite no research on the subject?
    It's you who's gullible in believing the public cover up.



    i want the alien thing to be real, but if fleshy versions came here and
    were kidnapped by us,

    People kidnap aliens?



    we would be gazaed by now.


    Gazed like a zombie?
    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andrew W@space@defense.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sun Jul 6 10:55:06 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    "%" wrote in message news:GIycnWps9P_1J_T1nZ2dnZfqn_cAAAAA@giganews.com...

    jojo wrote:
    Andrew W wrote:
    "Malte Runz" wrote in message
    news:qtoh6k5jba6e9n536p5c9ko8bo19gkqn6e@4ax.com...

    On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 15:01:16 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
    wrote:

    (snip)

    Bodies have been recovered from several sites. One or two were still >>>>> alive
    and taken to facilities for study.

    Damn, you're gullible. In one way it's amusing, but when you think
    about it, it is also scary that a grown man can say these things with
    a straight face.


    But you somehow know the truth despite no research on the subject?
    It's you who's gullible in believing the public cover up.



    i want the alien thing to be real, but if fleshy versions came here and
    were kidnapped by us, we would be gazaed by now.


    aliens will never come here


    That's what governments tell us. Why do you believe them?
    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andrew W@space@defense.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sun Jul 6 10:56:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    "%" wrote in message news:fPWdnWbDkr0AIPT1nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com...

    jojo wrote:
    % wrote:
    jojo wrote:
    Andrew W wrote:
    "Malte Runz" wrote in message
    news:qtoh6k5jba6e9n536p5c9ko8bo19gkqn6e@4ax.com...

    On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 15:01:16 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
    wrote:

    (snip)

    Bodies have been recovered from several sites. One or two were still >>>>>>> alive
    and taken to facilities for study.

    Damn, you're gullible. In one way it's amusing, but when you think >>>>>> about it, it is also scary that a grown man can say these things with >>>>>> a straight face.


    But you somehow know the truth despite no research on the subject?
    It's you who's gullible in believing the public cover up.



    i want the alien thing to be real, but if fleshy versions came here and >>>> were kidnapped by us, we would be gazaed by now.

    aliens will never come here

    they will definitely come, its a perfect world, planet has all the best
    parameters, from size to distance to composition to biology.

    they have nothing to say to stinky smelly murderous humans


    How many ordinary people are murderous etc? Not many.
    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jojo@f00@0f0.00f to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sun Jul 6 01:38:59 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    Andrew W wrote:
    "jojo"  wrote in message news:3252dd78-7eaa-f1e5-bf0a-fe55b3c0033f@shinku.aoyagi.konjou...

    Andrew W wrote:
    "Malte Runz"  wrote in message
    news:qtoh6k5jba6e9n536p5c9ko8bo19gkqn6e@4ax.com...

    On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 15:01:16 +1000, "Andrew W"
    <space@defense.com>
    wrote:

    (snip)

    Bodies have been recovered from several sites. One or two
    were still alive
    and taken to facilities for study.

    Damn, you're gullible. In one way it's amusing, but when you
    think
    about it, it is also scary that a grown man can say these
    things with
    a straight face.


    But you somehow know the truth despite no research on the
    subject?
    It's you who's gullible in believing the public cover up.



    i want the alien thing to be real, but if fleshy versions came
    here and were kidnapped by us,

    People kidnap aliens?


    well i mean, taken into facilities?


    we would be gazaed by now.


    Gazed like a zombie?


    no i meant gaza'ed. but yeah a zombie wasteland.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mitchell Holman@noemail@aol.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sun Jul 6 01:53:15 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
    news:104cc34$m4lp$1@dont-email.me:



    If you call me a kook then you also have to call air force pilots,
    senior military officials and investigators etc. kooks too.


    So evidence from government officials is trustworthy.



    So you still don't know why the military and governments hide things
    from the population? Are you dumb?


    So evidence from government officials is NOT trustworthy.





    Now do you see why so few people take
    your posts seriously?



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JTEM@jtem01@gmail.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sat Jul 5 23:51:35 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    On 7/5/25 9:53 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:

    So evidence from government officials is trustworthy.

    That's not an argument.

    It's fallacious. In fact, Google a list of "Fallacious Arguments,"
    you'll find one that matches...

    Truth is that there is no reason to believe government sources,
    but we know this NOT from their source but by evaluating what
    they are claiming.

    The narratives do not survive scrutiny.
    --
    https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From pursent100@pursent100@gmail.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sat Jul 5 21:03:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    jojo wrote:
    Andrew W wrote:
    "jojo"  wrote in message
    news:3252dd78-7eaa-f1e5-bf0a-fe55b3c0033f@shinku.aoyagi.konjou...

    Andrew W wrote:
    "Malte Runz"  wrote in message
    news:qtoh6k5jba6e9n536p5c9ko8bo19gkqn6e@4ax.com...

    On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 15:01:16 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
    wrote:

    (snip)

    Bodies have been recovered from several sites. One or two were
    still alive
    and taken to facilities for study.

    Damn, you're gullible. In one way it's amusing, but when you think
    about it, it is also scary that a grown man can say these things with >>>>> a straight face.


    But you somehow know the truth despite no research on the subject?
    It's you who's gullible in believing the public cover up.



    i want the alien thing to be real, but if fleshy versions came here
    and were kidnapped by us,

    People kidnap aliens?


    well i mean, taken into facilities?


    we would be gazaed by now.


    Gazed like a zombie?


    no i meant gaza'ed. but yeah a zombie wasteland.

    who cares
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From pursent100@pursent100@gmail.com to sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports on Sat Jul 5 21:04:39 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.paranormal

    jojo wrote:
    % wrote:
    jojo wrote:
    % wrote:
    jojo wrote:
    Andrew W wrote:
    "Malte Runz"  wrote in message
    news:qtoh6k5jba6e9n536p5c9ko8bo19gkqn6e@4ax.com...

    On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 15:01:16 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> >>>>>>> wrote:

    (snip)

    Bodies have been recovered from several sites. One or two were >>>>>>>> still alive
    and taken to facilities for study.

    Damn, you're gullible. In one way it's amusing, but when you think >>>>>>> about it, it is also scary that a grown man can say these things >>>>>>> with
    a straight face.


    But you somehow know the truth despite no research on the subject? >>>>>> It's you who's gullible in believing the public cover up.



    i want the alien thing to be real, but if fleshy versions came here >>>>> and were kidnapped by us, we would be gazaed by now.

    aliens will never come here

    they will definitely come, its a perfect world, planet has all the
    best parameters, from size to distance to composition to biology.

    they have nothing to say to stinky smelly murderous humans

    its not about the humans, but the ecosystem, its like visiting the rainforest or antarctica.

    they wat to see... like say if we found out there are octopus like
    creatures on europa, definitely go there to observe.

    after we all kill ourselves maybe they'll come here
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2