• death by MRI

    From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to alt.obituaries on Sun Jul 20 20:48:29 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.obituaries

    Sounds like a horror movie plot.

    Early news reports were terrible. I couldn't understand how this man
    ended up in the scanning room while the MRI machine was in operation by accident. Aren't these rooms locked during tests?

    But the wife, undergoing the scan, requested that her husband help get
    her off the table, so the technician summoned him into the room. He
    entered during the scan. The man was wearing a heavy chain around his
    neck for weight training.

    The accident occurred Wednesday 7/16/2025; he died Thursday.

    Man dies after heavy weight-training chain around neck pulls him into
    MRI machine
    AP
    Updated 2:12 PM CDT, July 19, 2025 https://apnews.com/article/mri-machine-long-island-chain-necklace-4126620d358e3d6b73d145d32ab72852
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From INVALID_SEE_SIG@INVALID_SEE_SIG@example.com.invalid (J.D. Baldwin) to alt.obituaries on Tue Jul 22 14:32:44 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.obituaries


    In the previous article, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
    Early news reports were terrible. I couldn't understand how this man
    ended up in the scanning room while the MRI machine was in operation
    by accident. Aren't these rooms locked during tests?

    It seems pretty clear that the MRI operator intentionally turned on
    the magnet knowing that this guy would be working with his chain
    nearby. I hope he is arrested and brought to justice.
    --
    _+_ From the catapult of |If anyone objects to any statement I make, I am _|70|___:)=}- J.D. Baldwin |quite prepared not only to retract it, but also
    \ / baldwin@panix.com|to deny under oath that I ever made it.-T. Lehrer ***~~~~---------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to alt.obituaries on Tue Jul 22 18:28:22 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.obituaries

    J.D. Baldwin <news@baldwin.users.panix.com> wrote:
    Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    Early news reports were terrible. I couldn't understand how this man
    ended up in the scanning room while the MRI machine was in operation
    by accident. Aren't these rooms locked during tests?

    It seems pretty clear that the MRI operator intentionally turned on
    the magnet knowing that this guy would be working with his chain
    nearby. I hope he is arrested and brought to justice.

    If you hadn't cut the quote, I wouldn't have needed to repeat what
    news reports stated.

    The victim wasn't a workman but the patient's husband. The technician
    had already seen the man wearing the chain for muscle-building purposes
    and had commented on how heavy it was.

    The scan was already in progress. The patient requested her husband. The husband was the victim. The technician called the husband into the room.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From INVALID_SEE_SIG@INVALID_SEE_SIG@example.com.invalid (J.D. Baldwin) to alt.obituaries on Tue Jul 22 19:48:34 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.obituaries


    In the previous article, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote,
    quoting me:
    Early news reports were terrible. I couldn't understand how this man >>ended up in the scanning room while the MRI machine was in operation
    by accident. Aren't these rooms locked during tests?

    It seems pretty clear that the MRI operator intentionally turned on
    the magnet knowing that this guy would be working with his chain
    nearby. I hope he is arrested and brought to justice.

    If you hadn't cut the quote, I wouldn't have needed to repeat what
    news reports stated.

    What can I say ...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXYndNL4Mu8
    --
    _+_ From the catapult of |If anyone objects to any statement I make, I am _|70|___:)=}- J.D. Baldwin |quite prepared not only to retract it, but also
    \ / baldwin@panix.com|to deny under oath that I ever made it.-T. Lehrer ***~~~~---------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From gazelle@gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) to alt.obituaries on Tue Jul 22 21:02:47 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.obituaries

    In article <105opuh$5rb$1@reader1.panix.com>,
    J.D. Baldwin <news@baldwin.users.panix.com> wrote:
    ...
    If you hadn't cut the quote, I wouldn't have needed to repeat what
    news reports stated.

    What can I say ...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXYndNL4Mu8

    Good one! I must say I didn't expect that.

    But, yeah, it does look to me like you're pretty eager (*) to inject criminality into what is plainly a tragedy. Assuming this is just an
    accident, I seriously doubt any charges will be filed. The tech will
    almost certainly never work this sort of job again; if he isn't fired, I'd imagine he'd voluntarily leave and find some other way to make a living.

    Absent any indication of some sort of intent, I can't imagine charges being even considered. Now, that all said, this might make a kewl plot for some
    TV crime show, if it did actually turn out that the tech and the patient
    were secretly lovers and that they hoped to run away together once hubby
    was out of the picture...

    (*) Both here and in the e-bike/chain case.
    --
    The plural of "anecdote" is _not_ "data".
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to alt.obituaries on Tue Jul 22 22:40:26 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.obituaries

    Kenny McCormack <gazelle@shell.xmission.com> wrote:
    J.D. Baldwin <news@baldwin.users.panix.com> wrote:

    ...

    If you hadn't cut the quote, I wouldn't have needed to repeat what
    news reports stated.

    What can I say ...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXYndNL4Mu8

    Good one! I must say I didn't expect that.

    But, yeah, it does look to me like you're pretty eager (*) to inject >criminality into what is plainly a tragedy.

    In two threads in a row

    In a single-car accident, the tree clearly committed an intentional
    homicide.

    Assuming this is just an accident, I seriously doubt any charges will
    be filed. The tech will almost certainly never work this sort of job
    again; if he isn't fired, I'd imagine he'd voluntarily leave and find
    some other way to make a living.

    Absent any indication of some sort of intent, I can't imagine charges being >even considered. Now, that all said, this might make a kewl plot for some
    TV crime show, if it did actually turn out that the tech and the patient
    were secretly lovers and that they hoped to run away together once hubby
    was out of the picture...

    (*) Both here and in the e-bike/chain case.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2