From Newsgroup: alt.law-enforcement

On 7/12/25 12:04, Leroy N. Soetoro wrote:

https://brilliantmaps.com/number-of-unauthorized-illegal-immigrants-by-us- state/

Map by Visual Capitalist based on 2021 data from Pew Research
The map shows the estimated population of unauthorized immigrants in each state of the United States, based on 2021 estimates from the Pew Research Center using data from the U.S. Census Bureau.
Here are some key points:

Total Population: The total number of unauthorized immigrants in the U.S.
is estimated to be 10.5 million.

Highest Populations:
California: 1.9 million
Texas: 1.6 million
Florida: 900,000
New York: 600,000
Moderate Populations:
New Jersey: 450,000
Illinois: 400,000
Arizona: 250,000
Georgia: 350,000
North Carolina: 325,000
Washington: 300,000
Virginia: 275,000
Maryland: 275,000
Colorado: 160,000
Nevada: 190,000

Lower Populations (less than 50,000 in several states):
States like Idaho, Montana, South Dakota, Wyoming, Vermont, Maine, West Virginia, and others have fewer than 5,000 unauthorized immigrants each.
The numbers are now slightly out of date, with estimates from the
Migration Policy Institute, showing even higher estimates.

Search:
State Number of Unauthorized Immigrants State Share of the Total Unauthorized Immigrant Population
United States 11,047,000 100.0%
California 2,739,000 24.8%
Texas 1,739,000 15.7%
New York 835,000 7.6%
Florida 772,000 7.0%
New Jersey 440,000 4.0%
Illinois 425,000 3.8%
Georgia 339,000 3.1%
North Carolina 296,000 2.7%
Arizona 273,000 2.5%
Virginia 251,000 2.3%
Washington 246,000 2.2%
Maryland 225,000 2.0%
Massachusetts 209,000 1.9%
Nevada 168,000 1.5%
Colorado 162,000 1.5%
Pennsylvania 153,000 1.4%
Tennessee 128,000 1.2%
Connecticut 113,000 1.0%
Oregon 108,000 1.0%
Indiana 102,000 0.9%
Michigan 91,000 0.8%
Oklahoma 90,000 0.8%
Utah 89,000 0.8%
Ohio 89,000 0.8%
South Carolina 88,000 0.8%
Minnesota 81,000 0.7%
Wisconsin 70,000 0.6%
Louisiana 70,000 0.6%
Kansas 69,000 0.6%
New Mexico 63,000 0.6%
Alabama 62,000 0.6%
Arkansas 58,000 0.5%
Hawaii 51,000 0.5%
Missouri 50,000 0.5%
Kentucky 46,000 0.4%
Nebraska 42,000 0.4%
Iowa 37,000 0.3%
Idaho 29,000 0.3%
Mississippi 25,000 0.2%
Delaware 24,000 0.2%
Rhode Island 24,000 0.2%
District of Columbia 21,000 0.2%
New Hampshire 11,000 0.1%
Alaska 10,000 0.1%
South Dakota 7,000 0.1%
Wyoming 7,000 0.1%
North Dakota 5,000 0.0%
Maine 5,000 0.0%
West Virginia 4,000 0.0%
Montana 3,000 0.0%
Vermont 3,000 0.0%
For an even more detailed view they break the data down by county as well:

Search:
State County Number of Unauthorized Immigrants County Share of the Total
Unauthorized Immigrant Population
California Los Angeles County, CA 951,000 8.6%
Texas Harris County, TX 481,000 4.4%
Texas Dallas County, TX 293,000 2.7%
Illinois Cook County, IL 257,000 2.3%
California Orange County, CA 236,000 2.1%
New York Queens County, NY 235,000 2.1%
Arizona Maricopa County, AZ 200,000 1.8%
Florida Miami Dade-Monroe Counties, FL 198,000 1.8%
Massachusetts Boston-Cambridge-Quincy,++ MA Metropolitan
NECTA 173,000 1.6%
California San Diego County, CA 169,000 1.5%
Showing 1 to 10 of 273 entries
rC|12345rCa28rC|

WhatrCOs the difference between Unauthorized Immigration and Illegal immigration?

The terms rCLunauthorized immigrationrCY and rCLillegal immigrationrCY are often
used interchangeably, but there are subtle differences in connotation and usage:

Unauthorized Immigration:
This term is more neutral and often preferred in academic, policy, and
media contexts for its less pejorative tone.

It emphasizes the lack of legal authorization to reside in a country
rather than labeling the individual as rCLillegal.rCY

rCLUnauthorizedrCY can cover various situations, including individuals who entered a country legally but overstayed their visas, as well as those who crossed borders without inspection.

Illegal Immigration:
This term is more direct but can carry negative connotations and be seen
as stigmatizing.

It is often used in political discourse to emphasize the violation of immigration laws.

rCLIllegalrCY focuses on the legal status of the act of entering or residing in a country without permission.

It can refer to both unlawful entry and overstaying a visa, but the term
can imply criminality, which some consider inappropriate for describing
civil immigration violations.

In summary, while both terms refer to individuals residing in a country without legal permission, rCLunauthorized immigrationrCY is generally seen as a more neutral and respectful way to describe the situation, avoiding the potentially negative connotations of rCLillegal immigration.rCY

What impact does unauthorized immigration have on the economy?
The impact of unauthorized immigration on the economy is a complex and multifaceted issue, with both positive and negative effects.

HererCOs a detailed look at some of the key aspects:

Positive Impacts:
Labor Market Contributions:
Filling Labor Gaps: Unauthorized immigrants often take low-wage, low-skill jobs that are less attractive to native workers, such as in agriculture, construction, and service industries. This helps fill essential roles in
the economy.

Wage Depressions: By accepting lower wages, unauthorized immigrants can
help keep the costs of goods and services lower for consumers.

Economic Growth:
Consumer Spending: Unauthorized immigrants contribute to the economy by spending their earnings on housing, food, and other goods and services,
thus stimulating demand and supporting jobs.

Entrepreneurship: Some unauthorized immigrants start their own businesses, creating jobs and contributing to economic dynamism.

Tax Contributions:
Taxes Paid: Unauthorized immigrants often pay taxes, including sales
taxes, property taxes (directly or through rent), and payroll taxes. In
many cases, they contribute to Social Security and Medicare through
payroll deductions, despite being ineligible to receive these benefits.

Negative Impacts:
Wage Competition:
Wage Suppression: The presence of unauthorized immigrants in the labor
market can contribute to wage suppression for low-skilled native workers,
as they often accept lower wages and work under more flexible conditions.

Public Services and Resources:
Education and Healthcare: Unauthorized immigrantsrCO children often attend public schools, and they may use emergency medical services. These
services can strain local budgets, particularly in areas with high concentrations of unauthorized immigrants.

Social Services: While unauthorized immigrants are generally ineligible
for most federal public benefits, they may still access certain local services, which can create financial pressures on local governments.

Fiscal Impact:
Cost of Services: The cost of providing public education, healthcare, and other services to unauthorized immigrants can sometimes exceed the taxes
they contribute, creating fiscal challenges for some states and
localities.

Mixed or Context-Dependent Impacts:
Innovation and Productivity:
Unauthorized immigrants can contribute to economic innovation and productivity, particularly if they bring unique skills or entrepreneurial spirit. However, the extent of this impact can vary widely depending on
the industry and region.

Long-Term Economic Effects:
Over time, the children of unauthorized immigrants, who may become
citizens, can contribute significantly to the economy through higher educational attainment and increased economic participation. This long-
term perspective can mitigate some of the short-term fiscal and social
costs.

What are the arguments for and against allowing illegal immigrants a path
to citizenship?
The debate over whether to provide a path to citizenship for illegal (unauthorized) immigrants involves a range of economic, social, and
political arguments.

Here are the key points on both sides of the issue:
Arguments For Allowing a Path to Citizenship:
Economic Benefits:
Increased Tax Revenues: Legalizing unauthorized immigrants can lead to
higher tax revenues as they move into higher-paying jobs and fully participate in the formal economy.

Economic Growth: Legal status can enable immigrants to invest more in
their education and skills, contributing more significantly to economic growth and productivity.

Social Integration:
Community Stability: Legalization can foster greater social stability and integration, as immigrants are more likely to invest in their communities
and form stronger social bonds.

Public Safety: Legalization can improve public safety, as immigrants are
more likely to report crimes and cooperate with law enforcement without
fear of deportation.

Moral and Humanitarian Considerations:
Human Rights: Providing a path to citizenship recognizes the human rights
and dignity of individuals who have built lives and families in the
country.

Fairness: Many unauthorized immigrants have lived in the country for
years, contributing to society and the economy. Offering them a path to citizenship acknowledges their contributions.

Political and Social Cohesion:
Reducing Division: Creating a path to citizenship can reduce social and political tensions related to immigration by addressing the issue in a comprehensive and humane manner.

Consistency with National Values: Many argue that offering a path to citizenship is in line with the values of fairness and opportunity that underpin democratic societies.

Arguments Against Allowing a Path to Citizenship:
Rule of Law:
Legal Precedents: Opponents argue that providing a path to citizenship for those who entered or stayed in the country illegally undermines the rule
of law and sets a precedent for future violations.

Deterrent Effect: There is concern that legalization may encourage more illegal immigration in the future if people believe that they will
eventually be granted legal status.

Economic Concerns:
Labor Market Impact: Critics argue that legalizing unauthorized immigrants could lead to increased competition for jobs, potentially depressing wages for low-skilled native workers.

Public Resources: There are concerns about the strain on public resources, such as education, healthcare, and social services, particularly in states with large immigrant populations.

Security Issues:
Vetting Challenges: Ensuring that all individuals eligible for citizenship are thoroughly vetted for criminal or security risks can be challenging
and resource-intensive.

Border Control: Critics argue that focusing on legalization without adequately addressing border security and enforcement can exacerbate
illegal immigration problems.

Cultural and Social Integration:
Assimilation Concerns: Some opponents worry that large-scale legalization
may hinder cultural assimilation and create isolated communities rather
than integrated ones.

National Identity: There is concern that rapid changes in demographics and cultural norms may affect national identity and social cohesion.

What are arguments for and against allowing more legal immigration to the United States?

Here are the key arguments on both sides of the issue:

Arguments For Allowing More Legal Immigration:
Economic Growth:
Labor Market Needs: Increasing legal immigration can help fill labor shortages in various sectors, from high-tech industries requiring
specialized skills to agriculture and construction needing low-skilled
labor.

Entrepreneurship and Innovation: Immigrants are often highly
entrepreneurial, starting businesses at higher rates than native-born citizens, which can spur innovation, create jobs, and stimulate economic growth.

Demographic Benefits:
Aging Population: The U.S. population is aging, and increased immigration
can help offset demographic declines, supporting the workforce and contributing to the sustainability of social security and other public programs.

Population Growth: Legal immigration can help sustain population growth, which is essential for maintaining economic dynamism and a vibrant
consumer base.

Cultural Enrichment:
Diversity and Innovation: Immigrants bring diverse perspectives, skills,
and cultural practices that can enrich American society, foster
creativity, and promote cultural exchange.

Global Competitiveness: Embracing a diverse workforce can enhance the U.S.rCOs competitiveness in a globalized economy, attracting top talent from around the world.

Humanitarian and Moral Considerations:
Refugees and Asylum Seekers: Expanding legal immigration can provide
refuge to those fleeing persecution and violence, aligning with
humanitarian principles and international obligations.

Family Reunification: Increasing legal immigration can facilitate family reunification, promoting social stability and well-being for immigrant families.

Arguments Against Allowing More Legal Immigration:
Economic Concerns:
Wage Suppression: Critics argue that increasing legal immigration, particularly of low-skilled workers, can lead to wage suppression and job competition for native-born workers, especially in low-wage sectors.

Resource Strain: There are concerns that higher levels of immigration
might strain public resources, such as healthcare, education, and social services, particularly in areas with high immigrant populations.

Security and Enforcement:
Border Control: Opponents argue that increasing legal immigration might
make it more challenging to enforce immigration laws and secure borders effectively.

National Security: Ensuring thorough vetting of a larger number of
immigrants could be resource-intensive and might pose security risks if
not adequately managed.

Cultural and Social Integration:
Assimilation Challenges: There are concerns that large-scale immigration could make it harder for new immigrants to assimilate, potentially leading
to cultural fragmentation and social tensions.

National Identity: Some fear that a rapid influx of immigrants could alter the national identity and social fabric of the country, creating divisions and resistance among native populations.

Political and Social Cohesion:
Public Opinion: Increasing legal immigration might face opposition from segments of the population who believe that current levels are sufficient
or too high, potentially leading to political and social divisions.

Policy Implementation: Managing higher levels of immigration requires
robust infrastructure and policy frameworks to ensure successful
integration and support services, which can be challenging to implement effectively.

What do you think does the US have the right amount of immigration?

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2