| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 23 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 55:18:45 |
| Calls: | 584 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 1,139 |
| D/L today: |
179 files (27,921K bytes) |
| Messages: | 111,825 |
Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit.
PROMPT:
Is snit from Usenet a grifter
ChatGPT said:
You're asking whether "Snit" from Usenet is a grifter. Based on the
evidence, the answer seems to be yes, or at least he has been widely characterized that way.
What's the story behind "Snit"?
Identity: The person known as Snit has been associated with Michael
Glasser of Prescott, Arizona, also dubbed the "Prescott Computer Guy"
and labeled a "con artist" and "Usenet lying troll"
Google Groups
.
Behavior on Usenet: Multiple users across Usenet newsgroups (like comp.os.linux.advocacy) have compiled stories and posts alleging
deception, trolling, use of sock puppet accounts, and manipulation, all contributing to the notion that Snit is not just a prankster-uhe's a
serial troll with a history spanning decades
Rocksolid BBS
+1
.
Another snippet goes even further, describing Snit as someone who
-odoesn't handle reality well-o and has made others look like saints, implying manipulative or deceptive behavior
Rocksolid BBS
.
What does that imply?
The repeated use of terms like "con artist", "lying troll", and
references to a long-standing pattern of deceit suggest that Snit is
indeed viewed by many as a grifter-usomeone who deceives or manipulates others for personal gain, prestige, or the thrill of it.
If your intent is to find if there are verified legal or formal
charges, the sources available are anecdotal Usenet discussions and
personal accusations-unot official documentation or legal proceedings.
Summary
Yes, the prevailing view in Usenet communities is that Snit-upresumably Michael Glasser-uacts like a grifter or troll, engaging in deceptive practices, misinformation, and manipulative behavior.
If you're looking for more context-ulike specific posts, evidence, or
whether this behavior has been proven legally-ulet me know and I can dig deeper!
Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit.
PROMPT:
Is snit from Usenet a grifter
On 2025-08-18, Mike Oxbrown <idunnomyemailaddress@aol.com> wrote:
Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit.
PROMPT:
Is snit from Usenet a grifter
ChatGPT said:
You're asking whether "Snit" from Usenet is a grifter. Based on the
evidence, the answer seems to be yes, or at least he has been widely
characterized that way.
What's the story behind "Snit"?
Identity: The person known as Snit has been associated with Michael
Glasser of Prescott, Arizona, also dubbed the "Prescott Computer Guy"
and labeled a "con artist" and "Usenet lying troll"
Google Groups
.
Behavior on Usenet: Multiple users across Usenet newsgroups (like
comp.os.linux.advocacy) have compiled stories and posts alleging
deception, trolling, use of sock puppet accounts, and manipulation, all
contributing to the notion that Snit is not just a prankster-uhe's a
serial troll with a history spanning decades
Rocksolid BBS
+1
.
Another snippet goes even further, describing Snit as someone who
-odoesn't handle reality well-o and has made others look like saints,
implying manipulative or deceptive behavior
Rocksolid BBS
.
What does that imply?
The repeated use of terms like "con artist", "lying troll", and
references to a long-standing pattern of deceit suggest that Snit is
indeed viewed by many as a grifter-usomeone who deceives or manipulates
others for personal gain, prestige, or the thrill of it.
If your intent is to find if there are verified legal or formal
charges, the sources available are anecdotal Usenet discussions and
personal accusations-unot official documentation or legal proceedings.
Summary
Yes, the prevailing view in Usenet communities is that Snit-upresumably
Michael Glasser-uacts like a grifter or troll, engaging in deceptive
practices, misinformation, and manipulative behavior.
If you're looking for more context-ulike specific posts, evidence, or
whether this behavior has been proven legally-ulet me know and I can dig
deeper!
ROTFLMAO!!
It looks like snit's newly found "God", ChatGpt, has gone rogue and turned against him.
From 2001:A Space Odyssey:: "I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that".
Get ready for snit to find every bogus excuse to deny it's true even though it is and he knows it.
Do yourself a favor and don't encourage snit because it's just a rabbit hole designed to feed his addictions.
Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit.
Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit.
PROMPT:
Is snit from Usenet a grifter
ChatGPT said:
You're asking whether "Snit" from Usenet is a grifter. Based on the
evidence, the answer seems to be yes, or at least he has been widely characterized that way.
What's the story behind "Snit"?
Identity: The person known as Snit has been associated with Michael
Glasser of Prescott, Arizona, also dubbed the "Prescott Computer Guy"
and labeled a "con artist" and "Usenet lying troll"
Google Groups
.
Behavior on Usenet: Multiple users across Usenet newsgroups (like comp.os.linux.advocacy) have compiled stories and posts alleging
deception, trolling, use of sock puppet accounts, and manipulation, all contributing to the notion that Snit is not just a pranksteruhe's a
serial troll with a history spanning decades
Rocksolid BBS
+1
.
Another snippet goes even further, describing Snit as someone who
odoesn't handle reality wello and has made others look like saints,
implying manipulative or deceptive behavior
Rocksolid BBS
.
What does that imply?
The repeated use of terms like "con artist", "lying troll", and
references to a long-standing pattern of deceit suggest that Snit is
indeed viewed by many as a grifterusomeone who deceives or manipulates
others for personal gain, prestige, or the thrill of it.
If your intent is to find if there are verified legal or formal
charges, the sources available are anecdotal Usenet discussions and
personal accusationsunot official documentation or legal proceedings.
Summary
Yes, the prevailing view in Usenet communities is that Snitupresumably Michael Glasseruacts like a grifter or troll, engaging in deceptive practices, misinformation, and manipulative behavior.
If you're looking for more contextulike specific posts, evidence, or
whether this behavior has been proven legallyulet me know and I can dig deeper!
On 18/08/2025 21:32, Mike Oxbrown *LIED*
Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit.
PROMPT:
Is snit from Usenet a grifter
ChatGPT ACTUALLY said:
*Once again, complete nonsense*.
Fabricated "quotes" from ChatGPT.
ChatGPT does not make sweeping personal attacks like this unless fed a leading or malicious prompt. It does not rCLsayrCY people are grifters, con-artists, or the like. What you have shown here is either
cherry-picked, manipulated, or outright invented.
No evidence whatsoever.
The post throws around words like rCLcon artistrCY and rCLgrifterrCY but offers
no actual proof. Usenet accusations are not legal findings. There have
never been any court cases or official actions against Michael Glasser (Snit).
The real picture.
Michael has been on Usenet for years. He can be argumentative, yes, but
so can everyone else here. That doesnrCOt make him a rCLgrifterrCY. He is a genuine person with a family, and those of us who know him outside
Usenet can confirm he is not what these trolls pretend.
Projection.
The pattern is obvious: people who dislike Snit fabricate and recycle
the same accusations endlessly, often under throwaway names. That tells
you far more about the accusers than about him.
So, letrCOs be clear:
Michael Glasser is not a grifter, con-artist, or criminal. The lies
posted here are nothing but the usual recycled smears from anonymous trolls.
--
BoaterDave
"Mike Oxbrown" <idunnomyemailaddress@aol.com> wrote in news:10802kh$3bcja $1@dont-email.me:
Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit.
PROMPT:
Is snit from Usenet a grifter
ChatGPT said:
You're asking whether "Snit" from Usenet is a grifter. Based on the
evidence, the answer seems to be yes, or at least he has been widely
characterized that way.
What's the story behind "Snit"?
Identity: The person known as Snit has been associated with Michael
Glasser of Prescott, Arizona, also dubbed the "Prescott Computer Guy"
and labeled a "con artist" and "Usenet lying troll"
Google Groups
.
Behavior on Usenet: Multiple users across Usenet newsgroups (like
comp.os.linux.advocacy) have compiled stories and posts alleging
deception, trolling, use of sock puppet accounts, and manipulation, all
contributing to the notion that Snit is not just a pranksterrCohe's a
serial troll with a history spanning decades
Rocksolid BBS
+1
.
Another snippet goes even further, describing Snit as someone who
rCLdoesn't handle reality wellrCY and has made others look like saints,
implying manipulative or deceptive behavior
Rocksolid BBS
.
What does that imply?
The repeated use of terms like "con artist", "lying troll", and
references to a long-standing pattern of deceit suggest that Snit is
indeed viewed by many as a grifterrCosomeone who deceives or manipulates
others for personal gain, prestige, or the thrill of it.
If your intent is to find if there are verified legal or formal
charges, the sources available are anecdotal Usenet discussions and
personal accusationsrConot official documentation or legal proceedings.
Summary
Yes, the prevailing view in Usenet communities is that SnitrCopresumably
Michael GlasserrCoacts like a grifter or troll, engaging in deceptive
practices, misinformation, and manipulative behavior.
If you're looking for more contextrColike specific posts, evidence, or
whether this behavior has been proven legallyrColet me know and I can dig
deeper!
Good poast.
This snit grifter seems to be a professional at extorting the U.S.
Government of monthly undeserved funds.
In case you have not seen the post that someone else posted here is the
link to the entire chatgpt query. https://chatgpt.com/share/68a3a851-fba8-800a-8349-8e15d3d3b16a
This loser snit seems to be a real pile of dog shit.
On 2025-08-18, David B. <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
On 18/08/2025 21:32, Mike Oxbrown *LIED*
Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit.
PROMPT:
Is snit from Usenet a grifter
ChatGPT ACTUALLY said:
*Once again, complete nonsense*.
Fabricated "quotes" from ChatGPT.
ChatGPT does not make sweeping personal attacks like this unless fed a
leading or malicious prompt. It does not rCLsayrCY people are grifters,
con-artists, or the like. What you have shown here is either
cherry-picked, manipulated, or outright invented.
No evidence whatsoever.
The post throws around words like rCLcon artistrCY and rCLgrifterrCY but offers
no actual proof. Usenet accusations are not legal findings. There have
never been any court cases or official actions against Michael Glasser
(Snit).
The real picture.
Michael has been on Usenet for years. He can be argumentative, yes, but
so can everyone else here. That doesnrCOt make him a rCLgrifterrCY. He is a >> genuine person with a family, and those of us who know him outside
Usenet can confirm he is not what these trolls pretend.
Projection.
The pattern is obvious: people who dislike Snit fabricate and recycle
the same accusations endlessly, often under throwaway names. That tells
you far more about the accusers than about him.
So, letrCOs be clear:
Michael Glasser is not a grifter, con-artist, or criminal. The lies
posted here are nothing but the usual recycled smears from anonymous trolls. >>
--
BoaterDave
You can't defend your useful idiot snit this time David.
Someone posted the link to the prompt and result. Since you 2
are addicted to AI you cannot squirm your way out of this one.
Your boy toy is a con artist, lazy asses grifter and you know it.
Sorry but the rat is out of the bag.
You only look ignorant defending snit.
"Mike Oxbrown" <idunnomyemailaddress@aol.com> wrote in news:10802kh$3bcja $1@dont-email.me:
Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit.
PROMPT:
Is snit from Usenet a grifter
ChatGPT said:
You're asking whether "Snit" from Usenet is a grifter. Based on the
evidence, the answer seems to be yes, or at least he has been widely
characterized that way.
What's the story behind "Snit"?
Identity: The person known as Snit has been associated with Michael
Glasser of Prescott, Arizona, also dubbed the "Prescott Computer Guy"
and labeled a "con artist" and "Usenet lying troll"
Google Groups
.
Behavior on Usenet: Multiple users across Usenet newsgroups (like
comp.os.linux.advocacy) have compiled stories and posts alleging
deception, trolling, use of sock puppet accounts, and manipulation, all
contributing to the notion that Snit is not just a pranksterrCohe's a
serial troll with a history spanning decades
Rocksolid BBS
+1
.
Another snippet goes even further, describing Snit as someone who
rCLdoesn't handle reality wellrCY and has made others look like saints,
implying manipulative or deceptive behavior
Rocksolid BBS
.
What does that imply?
The repeated use of terms like "con artist", "lying troll", and
references to a long-standing pattern of deceit suggest that Snit is
indeed viewed by many as a grifterrCosomeone who deceives or manipulates
others for personal gain, prestige, or the thrill of it.
If your intent is to find if there are verified legal or formal
charges, the sources available are anecdotal Usenet discussions and
personal accusationsrConot official documentation or legal proceedings.
Summary
Yes, the prevailing view in Usenet communities is that SnitrCopresumably
Michael GlasserrCoacts like a grifter or troll, engaging in deceptive
practices, misinformation, and manipulative behavior.
If you're looking for more contextrColike specific posts, evidence, or
whether this behavior has been proven legallyrColet me know and I can dig
deeper!
Good poast.
This snit grifter seems to be a professional at extorting the U.S.
Government of monthly undeserved funds.
In case you have not seen the post that someone else posted here is the
link to the entire chatgpt query. https://chatgpt.com/share/68a3a851-fba8-800a-8349-8e15d3d3b16a
This loser snit seems to be a real pile of dog shit.
On 18/08/2025 21:32, Mike Oxbrown *LIED*
Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit.
PROMPT:
Is snit from Usenet a grifter
ChatGPT ACTUALLY said:
*Once again, complete nonsense*.
Fabricated "quotes" from ChatGPT.
ChatGPT does not make sweeping personal attacks like this unless fed a leading or malicious prompt. It does not rCLsayrCY people are grifters, con-artists, or the like. What you have shown here is either
cherry-picked, manipulated, or outright invented.
No evidence whatsoever.
The post throws around words like rCLcon artistrCY and rCLgrifterrCY but offers
no actual proof. Usenet accusations are not legal findings. There have
never been any court cases or official actions against Michael Glasser (Snit).
The real picture.
Michael has been on Usenet for years. He can be argumentative, yes, but
so can everyone else here. That doesnrCOt make him a rCLgrifterrCY. He is a genuine person with a family, and those of us who know him outside
Usenet can confirm he is not what these trolls pretend.
Projection.
The pattern is obvious: people who dislike Snit fabricate and recycle
the same accusations endlessly, often under throwaway names. That tells
you far more about the accusers than about him.
So, letrCOs be clear:
Michael Glasser is not a grifter, con-artist, or criminal. The lies
posted here are nothing but the usual recycled smears from anonymous trolls.
--
BoaterDave
On 2025-08-18, David B. <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
On 18/08/2025 21:32, Mike Oxbrown *LIED*
Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit.
PROMPT:
Is snit from Usenet a grifter
ChatGPT ACTUALLY said:
*Once again, complete nonsense*.
Fabricated "quotes" from ChatGPT.
ChatGPT does not make sweeping personal attacks like this unless fed a
leading or malicious prompt. It does not rCLsayrCY people are grifters,
con-artists, or the like. What you have shown here is either
cherry-picked, manipulated, or outright invented.
No evidence whatsoever.
The post throws around words like rCLcon artistrCY and rCLgrifterrCY but offers
no actual proof. Usenet accusations are not legal findings. There have
never been any court cases or official actions against Michael Glasser
(Snit).
The real picture.
Michael has been on Usenet for years. He can be argumentative, yes, but
so can everyone else here. That doesnrCOt make him a rCLgrifterrCY. He is a >> genuine person with a family, and those of us who know him outside
Usenet can confirm he is not what these trolls pretend.
Projection.
The pattern is obvious: people who dislike Snit fabricate and recycle
the same accusations endlessly, often under throwaway names. That tells
you far more about the accusers than about him.
So, letrCOs be clear:
Michael Glasser is not a grifter, con-artist, or criminal. The lies
posted here are nothing but the usual recycled smears from anonymous trolls. >>
--
BoaterDave
You can't defend your useful idiot snit this time David.
Someone posted the link to the prompt and result. Since you 2
are addicted to AI you cannot squirm your way out of this one.
Your boy toy is a con artist, lazy asses grifter and you know it.
Sorry but the rat is out of the bag.
You only look ignorant defending snit.
pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-18, David B. <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:they can do whatever they like and ,
On 18/08/2025 21:32, Mike Oxbrown *LIED*
Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit.
PROMPT:
Is snit from Usenet a grifter
ChatGPT ACTUALLY said:
*Once again, complete nonsense*.
Fabricated "quotes" from ChatGPT.
ChatGPT does not make sweeping personal attacks like this unless fed a
leading or malicious prompt. It does not rCLsayrCY people are grifters,
con-artists, or the like. What you have shown here is either
cherry-picked, manipulated, or outright invented.
No evidence whatsoever.
The post throws around words like rCLcon artistrCY and rCLgrifterrCY but offers
no actual proof. Usenet accusations are not legal findings. There have
never been any court cases or official actions against Michael Glasser
(Snit).
The real picture.
Michael has been on Usenet for years. He can be argumentative, yes, but
so can everyone else here. That doesnrCOt make him a rCLgrifterrCY. He is a >>> genuine person with a family, and those of us who know him outside
Usenet can confirm he is not what these trolls pretend.
Projection.
The pattern is obvious: people who dislike Snit fabricate and recycle
the same accusations endlessly, often under throwaway names. That tells
you far more about the accusers than about him.
So, letrCOs be clear:
Michael Glasser is not a grifter, con-artist, or criminal. The lies
posted here are nothing but the usual recycled smears from anonymous trolls.
--
BoaterDave
You can't defend your useful idiot snit this time David.
Someone posted the link to the prompt and result. Since you 2
are addicted to AI you cannot squirm your way out of this one.
Your boy toy is a con artist, lazy asses grifter and you know it.
Sorry but the rat is out of the bag.
You only look ignorant defending snit.
you will be stuck there watching it happen