| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 27 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 38:32:39 |
| Calls: | 631 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 1,187 |
| D/L today: |
22 files (29,767K bytes) |
| Messages: | 174,059 |
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:bhc39kpqmfme6dog5r4i5e2gj3vscn99t9@4ax.com...
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:48:34 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
Jenny's dishonest snipping restored at no additional cost.
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>news:emh17k52htbpuj3e0oarll720ov953511t@4ax.com...
https://news.bk.com/blog-posts/burger-king-r-introduces-bbq-brisket-whopper-r---the-first-innovation-from-its-new-whopper-by-you-platform
The 'Whopper by You' idea is, IMO, a good campaign. If customers >>>>are asking for X, it makes sense to offer X on the menu. Even if for >>>>only a specific, limited time.
I may sample the BBQ Brisket Whopper, sans mayo. I won't eat the >>>>whole thing, of course. But I'm confident I can get the Mrs. to
consume the rest.
"'Whopper by You' empowers Guests to help shape the menu at
Burger King by submitting their dream Whopper creations. Whether itAs
a spicy twist, a craveable [sic] remix, a cheese-loaded mashup or >>>>anything in between..."
I'm really excited about a spicy edition. But, as with the BBQ >>>>option, I won't eat it all. But our youngest inherited my "Love of >>>>Spicy Food" gene, so she would be very willing to finish it for me :)
I won't be participating in suggesting ideas. The Royal Perks app >>>>is required. If someone has it, well, you've already given up all
kinds of personal information, so you won't be out much, if anything, >>>>more. I can't see anyone who is thinking about getting the app being >>>>swayed to get it because of being able to offer suggestions.
If your allergic
Outside of your well documented NEED to lie, I do not own
allergic.
to mayo, THEN WHY ORDER THE BBQ BRISKET. EVEN IF YOU ORDER
IT WITHOUT MAYO.
BECAUSE I WANT TO TRY IT, STUPID.
How can someone as stupid as you PROVE you are survive in the
world? Do you have 24/7 home help aides to assist you with your
activities? I'm not asking as a means of insulting you. I really do
want to know how you are able to function while being as stupid as you >>consistently prove yourself to be.
Just get soemthing
What is "soemthing?"
on the menu that doesn't have mayo in the FIRST place and
eliminate the confusion.
Burger King is well known for "Have It Your Way." You can
customize the sandwich ordered in any number of ways. Including not
having certain toppings (Hold the pickles, hold the lettuce, special
orders don't upset us...). But you know this. You are, once again,
feeding your NEED to lie.
Prove me wrong, unless you want to admit I'm right. If you wish
to admit this, you will either run away from the truth, or you will
try to divert from it. It's how you admit the truth that you NEED to
lie without openly admitting it.
[Cue Jenny running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]
how can snipping be considered "dishonest"? especially
if I'm not snipping
my own talking but soemone
else's?
if I'm not snipping
my own talking but soemone
Your LYING via spelling is acknowledged.
else's?
You snip to remove the context of what you are replying to.
And you NEVER point out that you've snipped
On Tue, 2 Sep 2025 14:16:20 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>news:bhc39kpqmfme6dog5r4i5e2gj3vscn99t9@4ax.com...
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:48:34 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
Jenny's dishonest snipping restored at no additional cost.
how can snipping be considered "dishonest"? especially if I'm not >>snipping
my own talking but soemone else's?
Because they have provided proof that you were lying, or wrong, or
both,
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:5thebk5h94drt3padq8q89qtckv29e80kg@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Tue, 2 Sep 2025 14:16:20 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>news:bhc39kpqmfme6dog5r4i5e2gj3vscn99t9@4ax.com...
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:48:34 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
Jenny's dishonest snipping restored at no additional cost.
how can snipping be considered "dishonest"? especially if I'm not >>>snipping
my own talking but soemone else's?
Because they have provided proof that you were lying, or wrong, or
both,
but snipping it doesn't mean they didn't actually SAY it, so it's not >dishonest to snip anything becouse everything is still there in the original >message.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:5thebk5h94drt3padq8q89qtckv29e80kg@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Tue, 2 Sep 2025 14:16:20 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>news:bhc39kpqmfme6dog5r4i5e2gj3vscn99t9@4ax.com...
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:48:34 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
Jenny's dishonest snipping restored at no additional cost.
how can snipping be considered "dishonest"? especially if I'm not >>>snipping
my own talking but soemone else's?
Because they have provided proof that you were lying, or wrong, or
both,
but snipping it doesn't mean they didn't actually SAY it, so it's not >dishonest to snip anything becouse everything is still there in the original >message. There's no rule that say people MUST rely on qoutes instead of the >original message.
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:rirfbk1225380qfcmnnkspoi6nncvcdosf@4ax.com...
On Tue, 2 Sep 2025 14:16:20 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>news:bhc39kpqmfme6dog5r4i5e2gj3vscn99t9@4ax.com...
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:48:34 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
Jenny's dishonest snipping restored at no additional cost.
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>>>news:emh17k52htbpuj3e0oarll720ov953511t@4ax.com...
https://news.bk.com/blog-posts/burger-king-r-introduces-bbq-brisket-whopper-r---the-first-innovation-from-its-new-whopper-by-you-platform
The 'Whopper by You' idea is, IMO, a good campaign. If customers >>>>>>are asking for X, it makes sense to offer X on the menu. Even if for >>>>>>only a specific, limited time.
I may sample the BBQ Brisket Whopper, sans mayo. I won't eat the >>>>>>whole thing, of course. But I'm confident I can get the Mrs. to >>>>>>consume the rest.
"'Whopper by You' empowers Guests to help shape the menu at >>>>>>Burger King by submitting their dream Whopper creations. Whether itAs >>>>>>a spicy twist, a craveable [sic] remix, a cheese-loaded mashup or >>>>>>anything in between..."
I'm really excited about a spicy edition. But, as with the BBQ >>>>>>option, I won't eat it all. But our youngest inherited my "Love of >>>>>>Spicy Food" gene, so she would be very willing to finish it for me :) >>>>>> I won't be participating in suggesting ideas. The Royal Perks app >>>>>>is required. If someone has it, well, you've already given up all >>>>>>kinds of personal information, so you won't be out much, if anything, >>>>>>more. I can't see anyone who is thinking about getting the app being >>>>>>swayed to get it because of being able to offer suggestions.
If your allergic
Outside of your well documented NEED to lie, I do not own >>>>allergic.
Jenny?
to mayo, THEN WHY ORDER THE BBQ BRISKET. EVEN IF YOU ORDER
IT WITHOUT MAYO.
BECAUSE I WANT TO TRY IT, STUPID.
How can someone as stupid as you PROVE you are survive in the >>>>world? Do you have 24/7 home help aides to assist you with your >>>>activities? I'm not asking as a means of insulting you. I really do >>>>want to know how you are able to function while being as stupid as you >>>>consistently prove yourself to be.
Jenny?
Just get soemthing
What is "soemthing?"
Jenny?
on the menu that doesn't have mayo in the FIRST place and
eliminate the confusion.
Burger King is well known for "Have It Your Way." You can >>>>customize the sandwich ordered in any number of ways. Including not >>>>having certain toppings (Hold the pickles, hold the lettuce, special >>>>orders don't upset us...). But you know this. You are, once again, >>>>feeding your NEED to lie.
Note Jenny is admitting, by default, that he was feeding his NEED to
lie.
Prove me wrong, unless you want to admit I'm right. If you wish
to admit this, you will either run away from the truth, or you will
try to divert from it. It's how you admit the truth that you NEED to >>>>lie without openly admitting it.
Note that Jenny ran away from the truth, thereby admitting he really
does have a mental illness that makes him NEED to lie.
[Cue Jenny running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]
Way to do EXACTLY as I stated you would.
how can snipping be considered "dishonest"? especially
Your LYING via grammar is acknowledged.
if I'm not snipping
my own talking but soemone
Your LYING via spelling is acknowledged.
First of all, that is FALSE.
I snip to remove excessive qoute's
that
aren't relevant to the discussion and are just cousing
headache's.
EVERYOBDY
should do that.
and
NO, I only snip thing's
that are IRRELEVANT to the CURRENT discussion,
meaning there's no way I could "change the context".
This allows you to feed your
NEED to lie. The one you've admitted, by default, is caused by your
mental illness.
You are, of course, free to present any and all evidence you have
that your dishonesty is motivated by anything other than a mental
illness. But you won't because you can't.
Of course not.