| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 23 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 47:01:30 |
| Calls: | 583 |
| Files: | 1,138 |
| Messages: | 111,072 |
https://standupwireless.com/blog-which-restaurants-accept-ebt-in-california/
With inflation going up so high since January, few people are
bothering with fast food. So the various fast food companies lobbied
to get EBT/SNAP benefits to get money.
The page linked above only shows restaurants in California. But
there are other states that allow it.
What I don't understand is why people would bother. You can spend
$6.00 on a combo at McDonald's, or get proper steak at Ralphs. And it
would be healthier.
There will be a short term jump in EBT sales as people try it
out. But I hope those who get the benefits will come to realize how
it's NOT an economical plan. They'll spend their benefits in the early
part of the month, then have no money left and no food.
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:tsqu6ktolie6cbhcdn90i52bp20rgvn62a@4ax.com...
https://standupwireless.com/blog-which-restaurants-accept-ebt-in-california/ >>
With inflation going up so high since January, few people are
bothering with fast food. So the various fast food companies lobbied
to get EBT/SNAP benefits to get money.
The page linked above only shows restaurants in California. But
there are other states that allow it.
What I don't understand is why people would bother. You can spend
$6.00 on a combo at McDonald's, or get proper steak at Ralphs. And it
would be healthier.
There will be a short term jump in EBT sales as people try it
out. But I hope those who get the benefits will come to realize how
it's NOT an economical plan. They'll spend their benefits in the early
part of the month, then have no money left and no food.
Food is food, so food stamps should be allowed. For some people, it may ne >a NESSECITY to eat fast-food becouse thier only job they can get requires >overtime PLUS the need to run a family, etc...
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:tsqu6ktolie6cbhcdn90i52bp20rgvn62a@4ax.com...
https://standupwireless.com/blog-which-restaurants-accept-ebt-in-california/ >>
With inflation going up so high since January,
few people are
bothering with fast food. So the various fast food companies lobbied
to get EBT/SNAP benefits to get money.
The page linked above only shows restaurants in California. But
there are other states that allow it.
What I don't understand is why people would bother. You can spend
$6.00 on a combo at McDonald's, or get proper steak at Ralphs. And it
would be healthier.
There will be a short term jump in EBT sales as people try it
out. But I hope those who get the benefits will come to realize how
it's NOT an economical plan. They'll spend their benefits in the early
part of the month, then have no money left and no food.
Food is food, so food stamps should be allowed. For some people, it may ne >a NESSECITY
to eat fast-food becouse
thier
only job they can get requires
overtime PLUS the need to run a family, etc...
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:47:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>news:tsqu6ktolie6cbhcdn90i52bp20rgvn62a@4ax.com...
https://standupwireless.com/blog-which-restaurants-accept-ebt-in-california/
With inflation going up so high since January, few people are
bothering with fast food. So the various fast food companies lobbied
to get EBT/SNAP benefits to get money.
The page linked above only shows restaurants in California. But
there are other states that allow it.
What I don't understand is why people would bother. You can spend
$6.00 on a combo at McDonald's, or get proper steak at Ralphs. And it
would be healthier.
There will be a short term jump in EBT sales as people try it
out. But I hope those who get the benefits will come to realize how
it's NOT an economical plan. They'll spend their benefits in the early
part of the month, then have no money left and no food.
Food is food, so food stamps should be allowed. For some people, it may >>ne
a NESSECITY to eat fast-food becouse thier only job they can get requires >>overtime PLUS the need to run a family, etc...
Fast food should NEVER be allowed through EBT.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:i6429k11ruf8cr9ns1onhq0iin79usr3in@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:47:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>news:tsqu6ktolie6cbhcdn90i52bp20rgvn62a@4ax.com...
https://standupwireless.com/blog-which-restaurants-accept-ebt-in-california/
With inflation going up so high since January, few people are
bothering with fast food. So the various fast food companies lobbied
to get EBT/SNAP benefits to get money.
The page linked above only shows restaurants in California. But
there are other states that allow it.
What I don't understand is why people would bother. You can spend
$6.00 on a combo at McDonald's, or get proper steak at Ralphs. And it
would be healthier.
There will be a short term jump in EBT sales as people try it
out. But I hope those who get the benefits will come to realize how
it's NOT an economical plan. They'll spend their benefits in the early >>>> part of the month, then have no money left and no food.
Food is food, so food stamps should be allowed. For some people, it may >>>ne
a NESSECITY to eat fast-food becouse thier only job they can get requires >>>overtime PLUS the need to run a family, etc...
Fast food should NEVER be allowed through EBT.
Why not?
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:i6429k11ruf8cr9ns1onhq0iin79usr3in@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:47:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>news:tsqu6ktolie6cbhcdn90i52bp20rgvn62a@4ax.com...
https://standupwireless.com/blog-which-restaurants-accept-ebt-in-california/
With inflation going up so high since January, few people are
bothering with fast food. So the various fast food companies lobbied
to get EBT/SNAP benefits to get money.
The page linked above only shows restaurants in California. But
there are other states that allow it.
What I don't understand is why people would bother. You can spend
$6.00 on a combo at McDonald's, or get proper steak at Ralphs. And it
would be healthier.
There will be a short term jump in EBT sales as people try it
out. But I hope those who get the benefits will come to realize how
it's NOT an economical plan. They'll spend their benefits in the early >>>> part of the month, then have no money left and no food.
Food is food, so food stamps should be allowed. For some people, it may >>>ne
a NESSECITY to eat fast-food becouse thier only job they can get requires >>>overtime PLUS the need to run a family, etc...
Fast food should NEVER be allowed through EBT.
Why not?
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 14:30:34 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >>news:i6429k11ruf8cr9ns1onhq0iin79usr3in@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:47:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>>news:tsqu6ktolie6cbhcdn90i52bp20rgvn62a@4ax.com...
https://standupwireless.com/blog-which-restaurants-accept-ebt-in-california/
With inflation going up so high since January, few people are
bothering with fast food. So the various fast food companies lobbied >>>>> to get EBT/SNAP benefits to get money.
The page linked above only shows restaurants in California. But
there are other states that allow it.
What I don't understand is why people would bother. You can spend >>>>> $6.00 on a combo at McDonald's, or get proper steak at Ralphs. And it >>>>> would be healthier.
There will be a short term jump in EBT sales as people try it
out. But I hope those who get the benefits will come to realize how
it's NOT an economical plan. They'll spend their benefits in the early >>>>> part of the month, then have no money left and no food.
Food is food, so food stamps should be allowed. For some people, it may >>>>ne
a NESSECITY to eat fast-food becouse thier only job they can get requires >>>>overtime PLUS the need to run a family, etc...
Fast food should NEVER be allowed through EBT.
Why not?
Because there are healthier alternatives available *and* it's cheaper
to make food at home than it is to buy it as fast food.
Fast food is a luxury. EBT should not pay for luxuries.
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:47:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>news:tsqu6ktolie6cbhcdn90i52bp20rgvn62a@4ax.com...
https://standupwireless.com/blog-which-restaurants-accept-ebt-in-california/
With inflation going up so high since January,
Note that Jenny doesn't dispute that inflation has, and is, going up
since January, when Trump took office.
They can buy microwave meals, canned meals (canned pasta is
supposed to taste good), and such, for MUCH less.
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 14:30:34 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>message >>news:i6429k11ruf8cr9ns1onhq0iin79usr3in@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:47:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>>news:tsqu6ktolie6cbhcdn90i52bp20rgvn62a@4ax.com...
https://standupwireless.com/blog-which-restaurants-accept-ebt-in-california/
With inflation going up so high since January, few people are
bothering with fast food. So the various fast food companies lobbied >>>>> to get EBT/SNAP benefits to get money.
The page linked above only shows restaurants in California. But
there are other states that allow it.
What I don't understand is why people would bother. You can spend >>>>> $6.00 on a combo at McDonald's, or get proper steak at Ralphs. And it >>>>> would be healthier.
There will be a short term jump in EBT sales as people try it
out. But I hope those who get the benefits will come to realize how
it's NOT an economical plan. They'll spend their benefits in the early >>>>> part of the month, then have no money left and no food.
Food is food, so food stamps should be allowed. For some people, it may >>>>ne
a NESSECITY to eat fast-food becouse thier only job they can get >>>>requires
overtime PLUS the need to run a family, etc...
Fast food should NEVER be allowed through EBT.
Why not?
Because there are healthier alternatives available
*and* it's cheaper to make food at home than it is to buy it as fast food.
Fast food is a luxury.
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 13:42:16 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 14:30:34 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>message >>>news:i6429k11ruf8cr9ns1onhq0iin79usr3in@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:47:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>>>news:tsqu6ktolie6cbhcdn90i52bp20rgvn62a@4ax.com...
https://standupwireless.com/blog-which-restaurants-accept-ebt-in-california/
With inflation going up so high since January, few people are
bothering with fast food. So the various fast food companies lobbied >>>>>> to get EBT/SNAP benefits to get money.
The page linked above only shows restaurants in California. But >>>>>> there are other states that allow it.
What I don't understand is why people would bother. You can spend >>>>>> $6.00 on a combo at McDonald's, or get proper steak at Ralphs. And it >>>>>> would be healthier.
There will be a short term jump in EBT sales as people try it
out. But I hope those who get the benefits will come to realize how >>>>>> it's NOT an economical plan. They'll spend their benefits in the
early
part of the month, then have no money left and no food.
Food is food, so food stamps should be allowed. For some people, it >>>>>may
ne
a NESSECITY to eat fast-food becouse thier only job they can get >>>>>requires
overtime PLUS the need to run a family, etc...
Fast food should NEVER be allowed through EBT.
Why not?
Because there are healthier alternatives available *and* it's cheaper
to make food at home than it is to buy it as fast food.
Fast food is a luxury. EBT should not pay for luxuries.
I would be fine with a max limit each month or two. Say, $25.00
can be spent on fast food each month or every two months. Any amount
above that, the person has to pay out of pocket.
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 14:30:34 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>message >>news:i6429k11ruf8cr9ns1onhq0iin79usr3in@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:47:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>>news:tsqu6ktolie6cbhcdn90i52bp20rgvn62a@4ax.com...
https://standupwireless.com/blog-which-restaurants-accept-ebt-in-california/
With inflation going up so high since January, few people are
bothering with fast food. So the various fast food companies lobbied >>>>> to get EBT/SNAP benefits to get money.
The page linked above only shows restaurants in California. But
there are other states that allow it.
What I don't understand is why people would bother. You can spend >>>>> $6.00 on a combo at McDonald's, or get proper steak at Ralphs. And it >>>>> would be healthier.
There will be a short term jump in EBT sales as people try it
out. But I hope those who get the benefits will come to realize how
it's NOT an economical plan. They'll spend their benefits in the early >>>>> part of the month, then have no money left and no food.
Food is food, so food stamps should be allowed. For some people, it may >>>>ne
a NESSECITY to eat fast-food becouse thier only job they can get >>>>requires
overtime PLUS the need to run a family, etc...
Fast food should NEVER be allowed through EBT.
Why not?
Because it's cheaper and healthier to prepare food at home.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:0bruakpa7tahu0539desbdu5tqoim782a4@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 14:30:34 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>message >>>news:i6429k11ruf8cr9ns1onhq0iin79usr3in@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:47:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>>>news:tsqu6ktolie6cbhcdn90i52bp20rgvn62a@4ax.com...
https://standupwireless.com/blog-which-restaurants-accept-ebt-in-california/
With inflation going up so high since January, few people are
bothering with fast food. So the various fast food companies lobbied >>>>>> to get EBT/SNAP benefits to get money.
The page linked above only shows restaurants in California. But >>>>>> there are other states that allow it.
What I don't understand is why people would bother. You can spend >>>>>> $6.00 on a combo at McDonald's, or get proper steak at Ralphs. And it >>>>>> would be healthier.
There will be a short term jump in EBT sales as people try it
out. But I hope those who get the benefits will come to realize how >>>>>> it's NOT an economical plan. They'll spend their benefits in the early >>>>>> part of the month, then have no money left and no food.
Food is food, so food stamps should be allowed. For some people, it may >>>>>ne
a NESSECITY to eat fast-food becouse thier only job they can get >>>>>requires
overtime PLUS the need to run a family, etc...
Fast food should NEVER be allowed through EBT.
Why not?
Because there are healthier alternatives available
In case you haven't noticed klous, we don't live in russia or any
communist country. The government has NO RIGHT to tell people WHAT to eat.
If they want, they can tell us what is healthy, but they can't make the >actual decision what to eat.
*and* it's cheaper to make food at home than it is to buy it as fast food.
That's debatable,
becouse your forgetting about the cost involved with
preparing the food.
Many people can't aford the time, therefore the
convience of fast-food is nessecary.
AGAIN, the US government has NO RIGHT to tell people what to eat.
Fast food is a luxury.
Your opinion.
In multiple country where peeopl e starving, a grocery
store would be considered is a luxury so what's the difference.
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:f8c39k1v6k0ev15kqk8fqkc07an7rc492u@4ax.com...
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:47:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>news:tsqu6ktolie6cbhcdn90i52bp20rgvn62a@4ax.com...
https://standupwireless.com/blog-which-restaurants-accept-ebt-in-california/
With inflation going up so high since January,
Note that Jenny doesn't dispute that inflation has, and is, going up
since January, when Trump took office.
Of course not. Inflation is NEVER zero, irregarldess what president is >there.
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:tt20bkt6p8f3j217m1ejk0in8ep2gch59i@4ax.com...
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 14:30:34 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
Fast food should NEVER be allowed through EBT.
Why not?
Because it's cheaper and healthier to prepare food at home.
I don't follow your logic. It's unsound.
Here is an example of SOUND logicL
EBT is for food, fast-food is food. Therefore EBT is for fast-food.
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:f8c39k1v6k0ev15kqk8fqkc07an7rc492u@4ax.com...
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:47:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>news:tsqu6ktolie6cbhcdn90i52bp20rgvn62a@4ax.com...
https://standupwireless.com/blog-which-restaurants-accept-ebt-in-california/
With inflation going up so high since January,
Note that Jenny doesn't dispute that inflation has, and is, going up
since January, when Trump took office.
Of course not. Inflation is NEVER zero, irregarldess what president is >there.
few people are
bothering with fast food. So the various fast food companies lobbied
to get EBT/SNAP benefits to get money.
The page linked above only shows restaurants in California. But
there are other states that allow it.
What I don't understand is why people would bother. You can spend
$6.00 on a combo at McDonald's, or get proper steak at Ralphs. And it
would be healthier.
There will be a short term jump in EBT sales as people try it
out. But I hope those who get the benefits will come to realize how
it's NOT an economical plan. They'll spend their benefits in the early >>>> part of the month, then have no money left and no food.
Food is food, so food stamps should be allowed. For some people, it may ne >>>a NESSECITY
What is "NESSECITY?"
to eat fast-food becouse
What is "becouse?"
thier
What is "thier?"
only job they can get requires
overtime PLUS the need to run a family, etc...
They can buy microwave meals, canned meals (canned pasta is
supposed to taste good), and such, for MUCH less. And, unless you lied >>before about how long one must wait, it will be MUCH faster than going
to a fast food restaurant.
If they are getting overtime, they probably have enough money
that SNAP benefits aren't going to be approved. Depending on location,
of course. Someone in Calistoga won't have the same cost of living as >>someone in metro LA. So they will be better able to forgo SNAP
payments.
What do you propose should happen when the people use of all
their benefits for the month during the first week or two, then have >>nothing left? No SNAP, no food, just empty pantries.
Would you have them dumpster dive behind Ralph's, hoping to find
a misshaped apple or pear that was judged too ugly to sell?
[Cue Jenny running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]
Not Really.
Inflation during the bidon
presidency
has affected grocery
store's
just as bad as Fast-food.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:0bruakpa7tahu0539desbdu5tqoim782a4@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 14:30:34 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>message >>>news:i6429k11ruf8cr9ns1onhq0iin79usr3in@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:47:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>>>news:tsqu6ktolie6cbhcdn90i52bp20rgvn62a@4ax.com...
https://standupwireless.com/blog-which-restaurants-accept-ebt-in-california/
With inflation going up so high since January, few people are
bothering with fast food. So the various fast food companies lobbied >>>>>> to get EBT/SNAP benefits to get money.
The page linked above only shows restaurants in California. But >>>>>> there are other states that allow it.
What I don't understand is why people would bother. You can spend >>>>>> $6.00 on a combo at McDonald's, or get proper steak at Ralphs. And it >>>>>> would be healthier.
There will be a short term jump in EBT sales as people try it
out. But I hope those who get the benefits will come to realize how >>>>>> it's NOT an economical plan. They'll spend their benefits in the early >>>>>> part of the month, then have no money left and no food.
Food is food, so food stamps should be allowed. For some people, it may >>>>>ne
a NESSECITY to eat fast-food becouse thier only job they can get >>>>>requires
overtime PLUS the need to run a family, etc...
Fast food should NEVER be allowed through EBT.
Why not?
Because there are healthier alternatives available
In case you haven't noticed klous,
we don't live in russia
or any
communist country. The government has NO RIGHT to tell people WHAT to eat.
If they want, they can tell us what is healthy, but they can't make the >actual decision what to eat.
*and* it's cheaper to make food at home than it is to buy it as fast food.
That's debatable,
becouse
your forgetting
about the cost involved with
preparing the food. Many people can't aford the time, therefore the >convience of fast-food is nessecary. AGAIN, the US government has NO RIGHT >to tell people what to eat.
Fast food is a luxury.
Your opinion.
In multiple country where peeopl
e starving, a grocery
store would be considered is a luxury so what's the difference.
On Sat, 30 Aug 2025 14:22:00 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >>news:0bruakpa7tahu0539desbdu5tqoim782a4@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 14:30:34 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>message >>>>news:i6429k11ruf8cr9ns1onhq0iin79usr3in@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:47:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>>>>news:tsqu6ktolie6cbhcdn90i52bp20rgvn62a@4ax.com...
https://standupwireless.com/blog-which-restaurants-accept-ebt-in-california/
With inflation going up so high since January, few people are >>>>>>> bothering with fast food. So the various fast food companies lobbied >>>>>>> to get EBT/SNAP benefits to get money.
The page linked above only shows restaurants in California. But >>>>>>> there are other states that allow it.
What I don't understand is why people would bother. You can spend >>>>>>> $6.00 on a combo at McDonald's, or get proper steak at Ralphs. And it >>>>>>> would be healthier.
There will be a short term jump in EBT sales as people try it >>>>>>> out. But I hope those who get the benefits will come to realize how >>>>>>> it's NOT an economical plan. They'll spend their benefits in the early >>>>>>> part of the month, then have no money left and no food.
Food is food, so food stamps should be allowed. For some people, it may >>>>>>ne
a NESSECITY to eat fast-food becouse thier only job they can get >>>>>>requires
overtime PLUS the need to run a family, etc...
Fast food should NEVER be allowed through EBT.
Why not?
Because there are healthier alternatives available
In case you haven't noticed klous, we don't live in russia or any >>communist country. The government has NO RIGHT to tell people WHAT to eat.
Yes, they do, if taxpayers are paying for it. Then we can tell you
exactly what you cannot use the money for-- alcohol, cigarettes, junk
food, fast food-- unless you want to spend your own money on it.
Fast food is a luxury item.
If they want, they can tell us what is healthy, but they can't make the >>actual decision what to eat.
Nobody said they were. Why not learn to read before replying?
*and* it's cheaper to make food at home than it is to buy it as fast food. >>That's debatable,
No, it's not. You can make claims to the contrary, but that's not
debate. That's just you lying.
becouse your forgetting about the cost involved with
preparing the food.
It costs money to prepare fast food too.
Many people can't aford the time, therefore the
convience of fast-food is nessecary.
Yes, they can afford the time.
AGAIN, the US government has NO RIGHT to tell people what to eat.
AGAIN< they're not learn to read.
Fast food is a luxury.
Your opinion.
FACT. Indisputable fact.
In multiple country where peeopl e starving, a grocery
store would be considered is a luxury so what's the difference.
Because this isn't a country where people are starving. And fast food
would be a luxury there as well.
When they send food aid to starving countries, do they send Big Macs
and Whoppers? No, they send flour, rice, beans, and staples.
LUXURY:
(1) a condition of abundance or great ease and comfort : sumptuous >environment
(2a) something adding to pleasure or comfort but not absolutely
necessary, "fast food is one of life's luxuries"
(2b) an indulgence in something that provides pleasure, satisfaction,
or ease, "had the luxury of choosing from seven or eight different
fast food vendors"
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:su20bkd2142r2gduc5ed8ihi026410cu04@4ax.com...
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 13:42:16 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 14:30:34 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>message >>>>news:i6429k11ruf8cr9ns1onhq0iin79usr3in@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:47:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>>>>news:tsqu6ktolie6cbhcdn90i52bp20rgvn62a@4ax.com...
https://standupwireless.com/blog-which-restaurants-accept-ebt-in-california/
With inflation going up so high since January, few people are >>>>>>> bothering with fast food. So the various fast food companies lobbied >>>>>>> to get EBT/SNAP benefits to get money.
The page linked above only shows restaurants in California. But >>>>>>> there are other states that allow it.
What I don't understand is why people would bother. You can spend >>>>>>> $6.00 on a combo at McDonald's, or get proper steak at Ralphs. And it >>>>>>> would be healthier.
There will be a short term jump in EBT sales as people try it >>>>>>> out. But I hope those who get the benefits will come to realize how >>>>>>> it's NOT an economical plan. They'll spend their benefits in the >>>>>>> early
part of the month, then have no money left and no food.
Food is food, so food stamps should be allowed. For some people, it >>>>>>may
ne
a NESSECITY to eat fast-food becouse thier only job they can get >>>>>>requires
overtime PLUS the need to run a family, etc...
Fast food should NEVER be allowed through EBT.
Why not?
Because there are healthier alternatives available *and* it's cheaper
to make food at home than it is to buy it as fast food.
Fast food is a luxury. EBT should not pay for luxuries.
I would be fine with a max limit each month or two. Say, $25.00
can be spent on fast food each month or every two months. Any amount
above that, the person has to pay out of pocket.
Yes, it would be far more economical to buy the ingredients and
cook at home. Frequently healthier, too. And frozen hamburgers, like
White Castle, can be bought and microwaved, or cooked in a traditional >>oven, at home. But the occasional treat shouldn't be denied outright.
Before Trump took office, fast food was a good choice for cheap
food. Not really healthy, but it could fill a person for little money, >>keeping hunger pangs at bay. And there were enough nutrients to
sustain life. Now, the nutrition is much the same, but it's really >>expensive.
Some states are banning junk food purchases with EBT. People can
use their own money if they want it. A really good, IMO, commentary on >>people's melt downs can be seen here: >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0NE5k5r9Vk
Kwills,
if your so anti-fast food then why the hell are you posting in this
group anyway?
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:tt20bkt6p8f3j217m1ejk0in8ep2gch59i@4ax.com...
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 14:30:34 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>message >>>news:i6429k11ruf8cr9ns1onhq0iin79usr3in@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:47:14 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>>>news:tsqu6ktolie6cbhcdn90i52bp20rgvn62a@4ax.com...
https://standupwireless.com/blog-which-restaurants-accept-ebt-in-california/
With inflation going up so high since January, few people are
bothering with fast food. So the various fast food companies lobbied >>>>>> to get EBT/SNAP benefits to get money.
The page linked above only shows restaurants in California. But >>>>>> there are other states that allow it.
What I don't understand is why people would bother. You can spend >>>>>> $6.00 on a combo at McDonald's, or get proper steak at Ralphs. And it >>>>>> would be healthier.
There will be a short term jump in EBT sales as people try it
out. But I hope those who get the benefits will come to realize how >>>>>> it's NOT an economical plan. They'll spend their benefits in the early >>>>>> part of the month, then have no money left and no food.
Food is food, so food stamps should be allowed. For some people, it may >>>>>ne
a NESSECITY to eat fast-food becouse thier only job they can get >>>>>requires
overtime PLUS the need to run a family, etc...
Fast food should NEVER be allowed through EBT.
Why not?
Because it's cheaper and healthier to prepare food at home. A
person could make burgers at home for less than the cost of one at
some fast food restaurants.
In LA, the Quarter Pounder with cheese is $8.99 + tax. That is
for ONE sandwich. If I were to make four (from one pound of ground
beef) at home, they would come to around $4.49 a piece. And that's
using national brands. Using store brands would be even cheaper.
I'm actually surprised you don't go this route. You could eat
even more for less. Allowing you to eat even more for that $120/day >>($40/visit) you bragged about spending on fast food.
Or was that another lie?
[Cue Jenny running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]
I don't follow your logic. It's unsound.
Here is an example of SOUND logicL
EBT is for food, fast-food is food. Therefore EBT is for fast-food.
Fast food should NEVER be allowed through EBT.
Why not?
Because it's cheaper and healthier to prepare food at home.
I don't follow your logic. It's unsound.
TRANSLATION" Jenny is too stupid to understand"
Why not?
I would be fine with a max limit each month or two.
Kwills, if your so anti-fast food then
You replied to ME.
In case you haven't noticed klous...
Why not learn to read before replying?
Only that they cannot use
SNAP benefits for junk food and/or fast food.
Your LYING via spelling and grammar is acknowledged.
I don't follow your logic.
TRANSLATION" Jenny is too stupid to understand"