• PSA

    From Frank@frank@creon.earth to alt.food.fast-food on Sun Jul 27 06:49:14 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

    If you're going to post a binary, please encode it with yenc, uuencode,
    or some other appropriate armor.

    The webp sent was garbled.

    kthx.
    --
    -Frank Efi!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kenito Benito@Kenito@Benito.naw to alt.food.fast-food on Sun Jul 27 04:13:19 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

    On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 06:49:14 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:

    If you're going to post a binary, please encode it with yenc, uuencode,
    or some other appropriate armor.

    The webp sent was garbled.

    kthx.

    It was sent as yEnc. The image is WebP format, chosen solely to
    mock Jenny's fantasy rule that WebP is forbidden.
    I had no problem downloading and viewing it. But since I uploaded
    it, this may not mean all that much. After all, I should be able to
    decode a binary I posted. It would be really sad if *I* couldn't
    decode something I posted.
    --
    I'll never forget my grandpa's last words.

    "Quit shaking the ladder!"
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Frank@frank@creon.earth to alt.food.fast-food on Mon Jul 28 05:58:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

    On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 04:13:19 -0700, Kenito Benito wrote:

    On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 06:49:14 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:

    If you're going to post a binary, please encode it with yenc, uuencode,
    or some other appropriate armor.

    The webp sent was garbled.

    kthx.

    It was sent as yEnc.

    That's not what I see -- no yEnc header, just the RIFF following
    the post:

    Now what LIE(S) will you offer? I'm honestly excited to learn.
    Enjoy the included image :-D

    [Cue Jenny running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]
    --
    A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk. http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2
    RIFF[...rest of binary file follows...]

    The image is WebP format,

    I see the tag "WEBPVP8X", so I assume that is correct.

    chosen solely to
    mock Jenny's fantasy rule that WebP is forbidden.
    I had no problem downloading and viewing it. But since I uploaded
    it, this may not mean all that much. After all, I should be able to
    decode a binary I posted. It would be really sad if *I* couldn't decode something I posted.

    Well, Pan is a yEnc newsreader, but chokes on the pure binary data.

    I guess ForteAgent can handle that.

    --
    -Frank Efi!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kenito Benito@Kenito@Benito.naw to alt.food.fast-food on Mon Jul 28 01:22:22 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

    On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:58:41 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:

    On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 04:13:19 -0700, Kenito Benito wrote:

    On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 06:49:14 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:

    If you're going to post a binary, please encode it with yenc, uuencode, >>>or some other appropriate armor.

    The webp sent was garbled.

    kthx.

    It was sent as yEnc.

    That's not what I see -- no yEnc header, just the RIFF following
    the post:

    Now what LIE(S) will you offer? I'm honestly excited to learn.
    Enjoy the included image :-D

    [Cue Jenny running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]

    --
    A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk. >http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2
    RIFF[...rest of binary file follows...]


    There was much more to the post.
    I did encode it as yEnc. I can't explain what might have
    happened.

    The image is WebP format,

    I see the tag "WEBPVP8X", so I assume that is correct.

    chosen solely to
    mock Jenny's fantasy rule that WebP is forbidden.
    I had no problem downloading and viewing it. But since I uploaded
    it, this may not mean all that much. After all, I should be able to
    decode a binary I posted. It would be really sad if *I* couldn't decode
    something I posted.

    Well, Pan is a yEnc newsreader, but chokes on the pure binary data.

    I guess ForteAgent can handle that.

    Could be.
    I seriously doubt Jenny's obsolete reader will be able.
    --
    /(bb|[^b]{2})/
    that is the question
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jerry Sauk@jerrysauk@hotmail.com to alt.food.fast-food on Wed Aug 20 14:19:51 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food


    "Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message news:r72c8ktee5v22233n6gf0tmal500ds9lb9@4ax.com...
    On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 06:49:14 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:

    If you're going to post a binary, please encode it with yenc, uuencode,
    or some other appropriate armor.

    The webp sent was garbled.

    kthx.

    It was sent as yEnc. The image is WebP format, chosen solely to
    mock Jenny's fantasy rule that WebP is forbidden.

    And it appeared garbled and unseeable, which is EXACTLY why I banned it in
    the first place.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jerry Sauk@jerrysauk@hotmail.com to alt.food.fast-food on Wed Aug 20 14:18:48 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food


    "Frank" <frank@creon.earth> wrote in message news:KZjhQ.7078$v9ff.834@fx42.iad...
    If you're going to post a binary, please encode it with yenc, uuencode,
    or some other appropriate armor.

    The webp sent was garbled.


    Having a little bit of trouble there, kwillsy? Don't you know how to send a binary file in a usenet message? On that alledged modern, advanced machine that DOESN'T run Outlook express? (Which BTW has no trouble at all sending binary file's) I'd help you out, but I don't have time to give you internet lesson's.

    Except one: THIS IS NOT A BINARY NEWSGROUP YOU MORON.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jerry Sauk@jerrysauk@hotmail.com to alt.food.fast-food on Wed Aug 20 14:21:17 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food


    "Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message news:5oce8kp9e1i8eie0chbp3h8ist9kjt8mtp@4ax.com...
    On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:58:41 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:

    On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 04:13:19 -0700, Kenito Benito wrote:

    On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 06:49:14 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:

    If you're going to post a binary, please encode it with yenc, uuencode, >>>>or some other appropriate armor.

    The webp sent was garbled.

    kthx.

    It was sent as yEnc.

    That's not what I see -- no yEnc header, just the RIFF following
    the post:

    Now what LIE(S) will you offer? I'm honestly excited to learn.
    Enjoy the included image :-D

    [Cue Jenny running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]

    --
    A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk. >>http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2
    RIFF[...rest of binary file follows...]


    There was much more to the post.
    I did encode it as yEnc. I can't explain what might have
    happened.

    I can explain it. You need to use APPROVED machines, and APPROVED format's.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jerry Sauk@jerrysauk@hotmail.com to alt.food.fast-food on Wed Aug 20 14:20:24 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food


    "Frank" <frank@creon.earth> wrote in message news:lkEhQ.54393$PvV.8985@fx45.iad...
    On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 04:13:19 -0700, Kenito Benito wrote:

    On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 06:49:14 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:

    If you're going to post a binary, please encode it with yenc, uuencode, >>>or some other appropriate armor.

    The webp sent was garbled.

    kthx.

    It was sent as yEnc.

    That's not what I see -- no yEnc header, just the RIFF following
    the post:


    Oh puh-leez you really thinks kwills understands all that?


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From KlausSchadenfreude@klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com to alt.food.fast-food on Wed Aug 20 13:25:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

    On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 14:19:51 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
    <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:


    "Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:r72c8ktee5v22233n6gf0tmal500ds9lb9@4ax.com...
    On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 06:49:14 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:

    If you're going to post a binary, please encode it with yenc, uuencode, >>>or some other appropriate armor.

    The webp sent was garbled.

    kthx.

    It was sent as yEnc. The image is WebP format, chosen solely to
    mock Jenny's fantasy rule that WebP is forbidden.

    And it appeared garbled and unseeable, which is EXACTLY why I banned it in >the first place.


    You are the only one who *CLAIMS* not to be able to see this 14 year
    old format. You're probably lying.

    At any rate, you never banned it.



    --
    NOTICE TO JENNY: please try to post fast food reviews and comments in the future instead of just repeating your lies over and over.


    "I currently deny, and deny that I always did, have a need to lie."
    Jenny, lying again.
    Message-ID: <WfCdnaNz7olXf-L1nZ2dnZfqn_cAAAAA@supernews.com> http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From KlausSchadenfreude@klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com to alt.food.fast-food on Wed Aug 20 13:26:05 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

    On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 14:18:48 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
    <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:


    "Frank" <frank@creon.earth> wrote in message >news:KZjhQ.7078$v9ff.834@fx42.iad...
    If you're going to post a binary, please encode it with yenc, uuencode,
    or some other appropriate armor.

    The webp sent was garbled.


    Having a little bit of trouble there, kwillsy? Don't you know how to send a >binary file in a usenet message? On that alledged modern, advanced machine >that DOESN'T run Outlook express? (Which BTW has no trouble at all sending >binary file's) I'd help you out, but I don't have time to give you internet >lesson's.

    Except one: THIS IS NOT A BINARY NEWSGROUP YOU MORON.


    Nobody is sending binaries, you fat freakish liar.



    --
    NOTICE TO JENNY: please try to post fast food reviews and comments in the future instead of just repeating your lies over and over.


    "I currently deny, and deny that I always did, have a need to lie."
    Jenny, lying again.
    Message-ID: <WfCdnaNz7olXf-L1nZ2dnZfqn_cAAAAA@supernews.com> http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kenito Benito@Kenito@Benito.naw to alt.food.fast-food on Sun Aug 24 03:18:20 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

    On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 14:18:48 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
    <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:


    "Frank" <frank@creon.earth> wrote in message >news:KZjhQ.7078$v9ff.834@fx42.iad...
    If you're going to post a binary, please encode it with yenc, uuencode,
    or some other appropriate armor.

    The webp sent was garbled.


    Having a little bit of trouble there, kwillsy?

    Who is "kwillsy?" When, outside of your NEED to lie, has Frank
    ever used the nym? Post the MID and/or archive link to just one post,
    one is all I ask, where he's used the nym you assign him.
    If you're simply feeding your NEED to lie, and you are, and wish
    to admit this, you will either run away from the request, or add lies
    to attempt to divert from it.

    Don't you know how to send a
    binary file in a usenet message?

    I don't recall Frank ever sending one, under any nym. But you
    will prove your position that he has. Unless you want to admit you
    really do have a mental illness that forces you to lie. To admit this
    TRUTH, you will either run away from the request, or attempt to divert
    from it.

    On that alledged modern, advanced machine
    that DOESN'T run Outlook express? (Which BTW has no trouble at all sending >binary file's)

    What does your NEED to lie force you to LIE and claim file owns?

    I'd help you out, but I don't have time to give you internet
    lesson's.

    What does your NEED to lie force you to LIE and claim lesson
    owns?
    And what makes you think Frank needs a lesson?


    Except one: THIS IS NOT A BINARY NEWSGROUP YOU MORON.

    It is most fortunate that Frank didn't post a binary, STUPID.
    Since you claim your lying is not the result of a need, please
    explain why you are LYING and claiming Frank posted that which you
    KNOW he did not. I really want to know your motivation. But I don't
    expect you to offer it. If you don't run away from the truth I've
    posted, you will attempt to divert from it. Probably by further
    proving you really do NEED to lie.

    [Cue Jenny running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]
    --
    A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk. http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kenito Benito@Kenito@Benito.naw to alt.food.fast-food on Sun Aug 24 03:19:20 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

    On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 14:19:51 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
    <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:


    "Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:r72c8ktee5v22233n6gf0tmal500ds9lb9@4ax.com...
    On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 06:49:14 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:

    If you're going to post a binary, please encode it with yenc, uuencode, >>>or some other appropriate armor.

    The webp sent was garbled.

    kthx.

    It was sent as yEnc. The image is WebP format, chosen solely to
    mock Jenny's fantasy rule that WebP is forbidden.

    And it appeared garbled and unseeable, which is EXACTLY why I banned it in >the first place.


    You can't see anything posted in yEnc. To you it will ALWAYS look
    garbled. This is just one of the MANY limitations of the Windows Me
    computer you claim you use. I still hold that it's possible you LIED
    and are using WIN10 or 11.
    You lack the authority to ban or permit anything. You can
    continue to feed your very real NEED to lie, but the truth will not
    change because of it. Prove me wrong, unless you wish to admit I'm
    right.

    [Cue Jenny running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]
    --
    A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk. http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kenito Benito@Kenito@Benito.naw to alt.food.fast-food on Sun Aug 24 03:20:50 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

    On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 13:25:33 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 14:19:51 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
    <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

    "Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>news:r72c8ktee5v22233n6gf0tmal500ds9lb9@4ax.com...
    On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 06:49:14 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:

    If you're going to post a binary, please encode it with yenc, uuencode, >>>>or some other appropriate armor.

    The webp sent was garbled.

    kthx.

    It was sent as yEnc. The image is WebP format, chosen solely to
    mock Jenny's fantasy rule that WebP is forbidden.

    And it appeared garbled and unseeable, which is EXACTLY why I banned it in >>the first place.

    You are the only one who *CLAIMS* not to be able to see this 14 year
    old format. You're probably lying.


    This may be an instance of his actually being honest. If he's
    using Windows Millennium, the most recent version of Windows he's
    permitted for himself since he can't view WebP format under any
    circumstances (recall his first complaint was in regards to your
    linking to one on a web site), it would appear garbled.
    Add that I sent it in yEnc encoding and Jenny doesn't stand much
    of a chance. Microsoft has always refused to allow the decoding of
    yEnc. Since MS didn't develop the compression method, it refuses to
    ever allow its decoding to be a native part of the Windows
    architecture. There were, and maybe still are, third party
    applications to enable the viewing of yEnc files in Outlook Express.
    But most people simply left OE for Thunderbird, which has the look and
    feel of OE, while being able to do all the neat things the superior
    readers can do. Like decode yEnc.

    At any rate, you never banned it.

    He can't ban anything. He lacks the authority to do so. His LIE
    that he did ban WebP only serves to further feed his NEED to lie.
    Jenny is free to prove me wrong, if I am.
    --
    Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kenito Benito@Kenito@Benito.naw to alt.food.fast-food on Sun Aug 24 03:22:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

    On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 14:21:17 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
    <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

    RIFF[...rest of binary file follows...]

    There was much more to the post.
    I did encode it as yEnc. I can't explain what might have
    happened.

    I can explain it.

    Yet you don't. You LIE. Odd that.

    You need to use APPROVED machines, and APPROVED format's.

    What does your very real NEED to lie force you to LIE and claim
    format owns?
    My machine is far superior to your. Though with you running a
    Windows Me machine, unless you LIED about not being able to view WebP
    files, saying it's superior to yours isn't saying much. Heck, the
    ability to view WebP files was included as standard with Windows 7.
    And it's been included with every version since.
    Do keep in mind, your initial whine and cry about not being able
    to view WebP files was in regards to Klaus linking to one that was
    hosted on a web site and NOT posted to the group (this is why I can
    KNOW you're using a Windows Me machine, or you lied).
    As you KNOW, but MUST LIE about, yEnc is an approved format for
    posting binaries to Usenet. And has been since sometime in the early
    2000's. I know Agent added the ability to encode and decode yEnc in
    March of 2002.
    Maybe you should get a proper reader. Something actually designed
    for Usenet. You use an outdated and insecure E-mail client that can
    read and post Usenet articles. But that was never it's intended
    purpose. It was a nice feature 30 years ago, but pointless now.
    The only people voluntarily using Outlook Express now are those
    who are simply too stupid to learn how to use a proper reader. And if
    one is too stupid to be able to use Thunderbird, which operates almost
    exactly like Outlook Express, you KNOW that person is seriously
    stupid.

    [Cue Jenny running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]
    --
    A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk. http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From KlausSchadenfreude@klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com to alt.food.fast-food on Sun Aug 24 05:42:49 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

    On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 03:20:50 -0700, Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 13:25:33 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude ><klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 14:19:51 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
    <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

    "Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>news:r72c8ktee5v22233n6gf0tmal500ds9lb9@4ax.com...
    On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 06:49:14 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:

    If you're going to post a binary, please encode it with yenc, uuencode, >>>>>or some other appropriate armor.

    The webp sent was garbled.

    kthx.

    It was sent as yEnc. The image is WebP format, chosen solely to
    mock Jenny's fantasy rule that WebP is forbidden.

    And it appeared garbled and unseeable, which is EXACTLY why I banned it in >>>the first place.

    You are the only one who *CLAIMS* not to be able to see this 14 year
    old format. You're probably lying.


    This may be an instance of his actually being honest. If he's
    using Windows Millennium, the most recent version of Windows he's
    permitted for himself since he can't view WebP format under any
    circumstances (recall his first complaint was in regards to your
    linking to one on a web site), it would appear garbled.
    Add that I sent it in yEnc encoding and Jenny doesn't stand much
    of a chance. Microsoft has always refused to allow the decoding of
    yEnc. Since MS didn't develop the compression method, it refuses to
    ever allow its decoding to be a native part of the Windows
    architecture. There were, and maybe still are, third party
    applications to enable the viewing of yEnc files in Outlook Express.
    But most people simply left OE for Thunderbird, which has the look and
    feel of OE, while being able to do all the neat things the superior
    readers can do. Like decode yEnc.

    GEMINI says:

    Users on Windows ME cannot directly view WebP images without
    additional software.

    Many older web browsers that still function on Windows ME may not
    support WebP. However, some browsers might have a plugin available
    that allows for WebP viewing, although this is unlikely given the age
    of the OS. Jenny is unlikely to know how to choose, install, setup, or
    use the appropriate plugin, however.

    Nobody is harmed by Jenny being unable to view webp files,so it's not
    a problem.



    --
    NOTICE TO JENNY: please try to post fast food reviews and comments in the future instead of just repeating your lies over and over.


    "I currently deny, and deny that I always did, have a need to lie."
    Jenny, lying again.
    Message-ID: <WfCdnaNz7olXf-L1nZ2dnZfqn_cAAAAA@supernews.com> http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kenito Benito@Kenito@Benito.naw to alt.food.fast-food on Mon Aug 25 04:56:00 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.food.fast-food

    On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 05:42:49 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

    [...]

    This may be an instance of his actually being honest. If he's
    using Windows Millennium, the most recent version of Windows he's
    permitted for himself since he can't view WebP format under any >>circumstances (recall his first complaint was in regards to your
    linking to one on a web site), it would appear garbled.
    Add that I sent it in yEnc encoding and Jenny doesn't stand much
    of a chance. Microsoft has always refused to allow the decoding of
    yEnc. Since MS didn't develop the compression method, it refuses to
    ever allow its decoding to be a native part of the Windows
    architecture. There were, and maybe still are, third party
    applications to enable the viewing of yEnc files in Outlook Express.
    But most people simply left OE for Thunderbird, which has the look and
    feel of OE, while being able to do all the neat things the superior
    readers can do. Like decode yEnc.

    GEMINI says:

    Users on Windows ME cannot directly view WebP images without
    additional software.

    Many older web browsers that still function on Windows ME may not
    support WebP. However, some browsers might have a plugin available
    that allows for WebP viewing, although this is unlikely given the age
    of the OS. Jenny is unlikely to know how to choose, install, setup, or
    use the appropriate plugin, however.

    Nobody is harmed by Jenny being unable to view webp files,so it's not
    a problem.

    Poor Jenny. He has to either admit he's too stupid to do what is
    necessary to view WebP files, or admit he lied about not being able to
    view them. Either way, it's not real good for him.
    --
    Avelo bahtalo!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2