| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 27 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 36:11:16 |
| Calls: | 631 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 1,187 |
| D/L today: |
22 files (29,767K bytes) |
| Messages: | 173,011 |
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:00:36 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>message >>news:k3m78khtdbieqk6r1081a1n40cu2e4h645@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:33:37 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>message >>>>news:dsko5k92909au1r1qoikvca5lhmrdf4t6d@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:50:29 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>message >>>>>>news:mdi64k5kn0jgeqejbne1migcakguv99l74@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:43:57 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>message >>>>>>>>news:5oor2k5ra94oijbpmi4r74ama2onl0gngo@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 18:05:36 +0000
From: "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.food.fast-food
Subject: Re: Are ready-to-eat snacks "fast food"?
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 16:16:02 -0500
I know you're behind the times, but five days is ridiculous.
Klous, listen to me VERY CAREFULLY for a minute. The Time that >>>>>>>>appears
on
my messge? That's the time that I WROTE THE MESSAGE, NOT THE TIME >>>>>>>>THAT
YOU
READ IT.
It's neither, Jenny.
Yes, it is.
It's neither, Jenny. It's your fuckup.\
No, It isn't. My computer is running just fine. I would know.. I'm >>>>sitting right in front of it. You are NOT.
I don't have to, to be able to tell you your clock was off.
Are you hacking a webcam somehow, peering into my room and looking at my >>computer screen? As well as other thing's? I expect that behavoir from >>kwills, but not you.
AS I already proved, YOUR clock was off.
AS I already proved, YOUR clock was off.
AND I ALREADY EXPLINED TO YOU, THE TIME ON THE MESSAGE IS THE TIME I
WROTE AND SENT THE MESSAGE, NOT THE TIME THAT YOU PERSONALLY READ IT.
AND I ALREADY EXPLINED TO YOU, THE TIME ON THE MESSAGE IS THE TIME I WROTE >AND SENT THE MESSAGE, NOT THE TIME THAT YOU PERSONALLY READ IT.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:da87akl8b1f2stlmpl6oai72gv1qnsmflk@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:00:36 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>message >>>news:k3m78khtdbieqk6r1081a1n40cu2e4h645@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:33:37 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>message >>>>>news:dsko5k92909au1r1qoikvca5lhmrdf4t6d@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:50:29 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>message >>>>>>>news:mdi64k5kn0jgeqejbne1migcakguv99l74@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:43:57 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>message >>>>>>>>>news:5oor2k5ra94oijbpmi4r74ama2onl0gngo@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 18:05:36 +0000Klous, listen to me VERY CAREFULLY for a minute. The Time that >>>>>>>>>appears
From: "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.food.fast-food
Subject: Re: Are ready-to-eat snacks "fast food"?
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 16:16:02 -0500
I know you're behind the times, but five days is ridiculous. >>>>>>>>>
on
my messge? That's the time that I WROTE THE MESSAGE, NOT THE TIME >>>>>>>>>THAT
YOU
READ IT.
It's neither, Jenny.
Yes, it is.
It's neither, Jenny. It's your fuckup.\
No, It isn't. My computer is running just fine. I would know.. I'm >>>>>sitting right in front of it. You are NOT.
I don't have to, to be able to tell you your clock was off.
Are you hacking a webcam somehow, peering into my room and looking at my >>>computer screen? As well as other thing's? I expect that behavoir from >>>kwills, but not you.
AS I already proved, YOUR clock was off.
AND I ALREADY EXPLINED TO YOU, THE TIME ON THE MESSAGE IS THE TIME I WROTE >AND SENT THE MESSAGE, NOT THE TIME THAT YOU PERSONALLY READ IT.
On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 14:11:47 -0500, "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote inThis has been explained to you several times. You are simply
message >>news:da87akl8b1f2stlmpl6oai72gv1qnsmflk@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:00:36 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>message >>>>news:k3m78khtdbieqk6r1081a1n40cu2e4h645@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:33:37 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>message >>>>>>news:dsko5k92909au1r1qoikvca5lhmrdf4t6d@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:50:29 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>in message >>>>>>>>news:mdi64k5kn0jgeqejbne1migcakguv99l74@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:43:57 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>in message
news: 5oor2k5ra94oijbpmi4r74ama2onl0gngo@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 18:05:36 +0000 From: >>>>>>>>>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com>Klous, listen to me VERY CAREFULLY for a minute. The Time that >>>>>>>>>>appears on my messge? That's the time that I WROTE THE MESSAGE, >>>>>>>>>>NOT THE TIME THAT YOU READ IT.
Newsgroups: alt.food.fast-food Subject: Re: Are ready-to-eat >>>>>>>>>>> snacks "fast food"?
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 16:16:02 -0500
I know you're behind the times, but five days is ridiculous. >>>>>>>>>>
It's neither, Jenny.
Yes, it is.
It's neither, Jenny. It's your fuckup.\
No, It isn't. My computer is running just fine. I would know.. >>>>>>I'm sitting right in front of it. You are NOT.
I don't have to, to be able to tell you your clock was off.
Are you hacking a webcam somehow, peering into my room and looking at >>>>my computer screen? As well as other thing's? I expect that behavoir >>>>from kwills, but not you.
AS I already proved, YOUR clock was off.
AND I ALREADY EXPLINED TO YOU, THE TIME ON THE MESSAGE IS THE TIME I
WROTE AND SENT THE MESSAGE, NOT THE TIME THAT YOU PERSONALLY READ IT.
feeding your NEED to lie. It's very plausible you've been doing so the
entire time.
Since you use Windows Millennium, unless you lied about your
machine's limitations, tell me, and anyone else reading, is the clock
feature kind of messed up in WinMe? It would explain why your time is
off. No, I don't expect you to answer. Not honestly, at least.
[Cue Jenny running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]
On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:33:39 -0700, Kenito Benito wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 14:11:47 -0500, "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com>
wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>message >>>news:da87akl8b1f2stlmpl6oai72gv1qnsmflk@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:00:36 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>message >>>>>news:k3m78khtdbieqk6r1081a1n40cu2e4h645@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:33:37 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>message >>>>>>>news:dsko5k92909au1r1qoikvca5lhmrdf4t6d@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:50:29 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>in message >>>>>>>>>news:mdi64k5kn0jgeqejbne1migcakguv99l74@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:43:57 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>in message
news: >5oor2k5ra94oijbpmi4r74ama2onl0gngo@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 18:05:36 +0000 From: >>>>>>>>>>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com>Klous, listen to me VERY CAREFULLY for a minute. The Time that >>>>>>>>>>>appears on my messge? That's the time that I WROTE THE MESSAGE, >>>>>>>>>>>NOT THE TIME THAT YOU READ IT.
Newsgroups: alt.food.fast-food Subject: Re: Are ready-to-eat >>>>>>>>>>>> snacks "fast food"?
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 16:16:02 -0500
I know you're behind the times, but five days is ridiculous. >>>>>>>>>>>
It's neither, Jenny.
Yes, it is.
It's neither, Jenny. It's your fuckup.\
No, It isn't. My computer is running just fine. I would know.. >>>>>>>I'm sitting right in front of it. You are NOT.
I don't have to, to be able to tell you your clock was off.
Are you hacking a webcam somehow, peering into my room and looking at >>>>>my computer screen? As well as other thing's? I expect that behavoir >>>>>from kwills, but not you.
AS I already proved, YOUR clock was off.
AND I ALREADY EXPLINED TO YOU, THE TIME ON THE MESSAGE IS THE TIME I >>>WROTE AND SENT THE MESSAGE, NOT THE TIME THAT YOU PERSONALLY READ IT.
This has been explained to you several times. You are simply
feeding your NEED to lie. It's very plausible you've been doing so the
entire time.
Since you use Windows Millennium, unless you lied about your
machine's limitations, tell me, and anyone else reading, is the clock
feature kind of messed up in WinMe? It would explain why your time is
off. No, I don't expect you to answer. Not honestly, at least.
[Cue Jenny running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]
WinME? How does someone running _that_ accuse others of running
old equipment?
It makes no sense -- unless Jerry is not self-aware.
When you first whined and cried about WebP, it was due to Klaus
posting a link to a WebP image on a web site, idiot. You claimed at
the time people (you used the plural of people) can't see WebP,
stupid.
On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 14:11:47 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
AND I ALREADY EXPLINED TO YOU, THE TIME ON THE MESSAGE IS THE TIME I WROTE >>AND SENT THE MESSAGE, NOT THE TIME THAT YOU PERSONALLY READ IT.
This has been explained to you several times.
How, in 2025, can anyone NOT have the ability to view WebP files?
Such a person would have to have some serious intellectual limitations
not to have their browser(s) updated to view "ancient" standards.
None of that has anything to do with the time the article was
read, it has to do with the time it was POSTED.
You can set your computer to sync its time from a network time clock.
Why don't you do that, Perfessor?
Jenny whined and cried about not being able to view WebP images.
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message news:47plak9jova385v7v3ti2a4lg9je7lisja@4ax.com...
When you first whined and cried about WebP, it was due to Klaus
posting a link to a WebP image on a web site, idiot. You claimed at
the time people (you used the plural of people) can't see WebP,
stupid.
Of course. I was reffering to multiple other people, not nessecary
myself. As leader of this newsgroup, it is my responsibility that
content posted here is accesible to EVERYBODY.
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:47plak9jova385v7v3ti2a4lg9je7lisja@4ax.com...
When you first whined and cried about WebP, it was due to Klaus
posting a link to a WebP image on a web site, idiot. You claimed at
the time people (you used the plural of people) can't see WebP,
stupid.
Of course. I was reffering to multiple other people, not nessecary myself. >As leader of this newsgroup,
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:jlolakd9pb4rkuaqjqlhce0n74bbsbqgc8@4ax.com...
How, in 2025, can anyone NOT have the ability to view WebP files?
Such a person would have to have some serious intellectual limitations
not to have their browser(s) updated to view "ancient" standards.
First of all, I never said that anyone doesn't have the ability to view WebP >content. When I originally made that rule, many year's ago,
there were
million's of reader's of this newsgroup, as thier are today,
and many of
them at that time DIDNT have the ability. Fast forward to today, and WebP >has proven to be an unnesecary format so there is no need to change the >rule.
The only reason it exists is becouse of business interest's, none of
which apply to fast-food, AND SINCE THIS IS NOT A BINARY NEWSGROUP it >doesn't even matter.
The matter is settled. The ban still stands.
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:jlolakd9pb4rkuaqjqlhce0n74bbsbqgc8@4ax.com...
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 13:59:23 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>news:h2m78kdq872brmcv24o0gu0ck569fgirhp@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:40:46 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
Feature Limitations:
It has all the features I needed and need to post to usenet.
Then why do you complain about WebP photos?
I never said it was becouse
What is "becouse?" You've PROVED you KNOW the proper spelling of >>because, so this is nothing more than you presenting more absolute
PROOF that you have a mental illness that makes you actually NEED to
lie.
*I* couldn't access them. There are many other
user's
What does your deep NEED to lie force you to LIE and claim user
owns?
that don't have that ability, or just for whatever reason don't want
to use google's shit.
How, in 2025, can anyone NOT have the ability to view WebP files?
Such a person would have to have some serious intellectual limitations
not to have their browser(s) updated to view "ancient" standards.
Oh and BTW since this isn't a binarie's
What is "binarie" and what does your deep NEED to lie force you
to LIE and claim it owns?
newsgroup, it really isn't a issue
what Outlook express's
What does your deep NEED to lie force you to LIE and claim
"Outlook express [sic]" owns?
alledged limitation's
What does your deep NEED to lie force you to LIE and claim
limitation owns?
are when it comes to WebP
Your initial whining and crying was about a link Klaus posted.
But you know this. You're just feeding your serious NEED to lie. Prove
me wrong, unless you want to admit I'm right.
First of all, I never said that anyone doesn't have the ability to view WebP >content.
When I originally made that rule,
many year's
ago, there were
million's
of reader's
of this newsgroup, as thier are
today,
and many of
them at that time DIDNT have the ability. Fast forward to today, and WebP >has proven to be an unnesecary format so there is no need to change the >rule.
The only reason it exists is becouse
of business interest's,
none of
which apply to fast-food, AND SINCE THIS IS NOT A BINARY NEWSGROUP it >doesn't even matter.
The matter is settled. The ban still stands.
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:47plak9jova385v7v3ti2a4lg9je7lisja@4ax.com...
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:03:58 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>news:q5i98kdk8f7js0e090m40b5a4f8b53gn67@4ax.com...
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 12:17:54 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:40:46 -0500, "Jerry Sauk" >>>>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
Feature Limitations:
It has all the features I needed and need to post to usenet.
Then why do you complain about WebP photos?
Good catch.
Since Jenny is using Win XP, Vista, 7 or 8 (I don't want to >>>>entertain the idea he's still on 95), WebP may be too advanced for his >>>>machine. If he has a separate GPU, it can't handle the encoding of
WebP images. Using the CPU alone would be so difficult for a legacy >>>>machine as to be safely called impossible.
This isn't a binaries group, moron.
When you first whined and cried about WebP, it was due to Klaus >>posting a link to a WebP image on a web site, idiot. You claimed at
the time people (you used the plural of people) can't see WebP,
stupid.
As of the time I write this, you are the only one to claim to be >>unable to view a WebP file hosted on a web site, dullard. Your browser
must be seriously out of date, simple minded one. But since you're
using Windows XP, Vista, 7 or 8, unless you LIE and are using 10 or
11, you probably can't see them, intellectually devoid. You MIGHT be
able to 8. Hold on, simpleton. Let me check...
Yes, Windows 8 can view WebP files, dummy. At least with MS Edge >>and/or Chrome, fool. So we can now KNOW you're using Windows XP, Vista
or 7, unless you lied, which is very possible, moron.
[Cue Jenny running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]
Of course. I was reffering to multiple other people, not nessecary myself. >As leader of this newsgroup,
it is my responsibility that content posted
here is accesible to EVERYBODY.
"Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote in >news:2Pqcna8FWpTmD0z1nZ2dnZfqnPQAAAAA@supernews.com:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message
news:47plak9jova385v7v3ti2a4lg9je7lisja@4ax.com...
When you first whined and cried about WebP, it was due to Klaus
posting a link to a WebP image on a web site, idiot. You claimed at
the time people (you used the plural of people) can't see WebP,
stupid.
Of course. I was reffering to multiple other people, not nessecary
myself. As leader of this newsgroup, it is my responsibility that
content posted here is accesible to EVERYBODY.
Who are you leading? To where and for what purpose?
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:7da2ckl8cim0i8eh9uprbmmrv7ph45vh8v@4ax.com...
On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 14:11:47 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>news:da87akl8b1f2stlmpl6oai72gv1qnsmflk@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:00:36 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>message >>>>>news:k3m78khtdbieqk6r1081a1n40cu2e4h645@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:33:37 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>message >>>>>>>news:dsko5k92909au1r1qoikvca5lhmrdf4t6d@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:50:29 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>message >>>>>>>>>news:mdi64k5kn0jgeqejbne1migcakguv99l74@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:43:57 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>message >>>>>>>>>>>news:5oor2k5ra94oijbpmi4r74ama2onl0gngo@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 18:05:36 +0000Klous, listen to me VERY CAREFULLY for a minute. The Time that >>>>>>>>>>>appears
From: "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.food.fast-food
Subject: Re: Are ready-to-eat snacks "fast food"?
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 16:16:02 -0500
I know you're behind the times, but five days is ridiculous. >>>>>>>>>>>
on
my messge? That's the time that I WROTE THE MESSAGE, NOT THE TIME >>>>>>>>>>>THAT
YOU
READ IT.
It's neither, Jenny.
Yes, it is.
It's neither, Jenny. It's your fuckup.\
No, It isn't. My computer is running just fine. I would know.. I'm >>>>>>>sitting right in front of it. You are NOT.
I don't have to, to be able to tell you your clock was off.
Are you hacking a webcam somehow, peering into my room and looking at my >>>>>computer screen? As well as other thing's? I expect that behavoir from >>>>>kwills, but not you.
AS I already proved, YOUR clock was off.
AND I ALREADY EXPLINED TO YOU, THE TIME ON THE MESSAGE IS THE TIME I WROTE >>>AND SENT THE MESSAGE, NOT THE TIME THAT YOU PERSONALLY READ IT.
This has been explained to you several times. You are simply
feeding your NEED to lie. It's very plausible you've been doing so the >>entire time.
Since you use Windows Millennium, unless you lied about your
machine's limitations, tell me, and anyone else reading, is the clock >>feature kind of messed up in WinMe? It would explain why your time is
off. No, I don't expect you to answer. Not honestly, at least.
Kwills,
the time on this message you just sent it Sep 9, 11:47PM
The current time is, Sep 22, 1:12PM.
Therefore, your PC's clock is off by 13 day's.
FIX THE TIME ON YOUR CLOCK.
</sarcasm>
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:6h15ck91i16uvh4423sif7c394hq5uj7ed@4ax.com...
Jenny whined and cried about not being able to view WebP images.
No I didn't.
On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 13:08:02 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>news:jlolakd9pb4rkuaqjqlhce0n74bbsbqgc8@4ax.com...
How, in 2025, can anyone NOT have the ability to view WebP files?
Such a person would have to have some serious intellectual limitations
not to have their browser(s) updated to view "ancient" standards.
First of all, I never said that anyone doesn't have the ability to view >>WebP
content. When I originally made that rule, many year's ago,
You never made the rule.
there were
million's of reader's of this newsgroup, as thier are today,
Prove it
and many of
them at that time DIDNT have the ability. Fast forward to today, and WebP >>has proven to be an unnesecary format so there is no need to change the >>rule.
There is no rule
"Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote in news:2Pqcna8FWpTmD0z1nZ2dnZfqnPQAAAAA@supernews.com:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message
news:47plak9jova385v7v3ti2a4lg9je7lisja@4ax.com...
When you first whined and cried about WebP, it was due to Klaus
posting a link to a WebP image on a web site, idiot. You claimed at
the time people (you used the plural of people) can't see WebP,
stupid.
Of course. I was reffering to multiple other people, not nessecary
myself. As leader of this newsgroup, it is my responsibility that
content posted here is accesible to EVERYBODY.
Who are you leading? To where and for what purpose?
"Scott Oaf - (I'm really Chudnozzle)" <ChadLuzer@zoho.com> wrote in message >news:XnsB3629A668AC27CowardlyChadRunsAway@62.164.182.27...
"Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:2Pqcna8FWpTmD0z1nZ2dnZfqnPQAAAAA@supernews.com:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message
news:47plak9jova385v7v3ti2a4lg9je7lisja@4ax.com...
When you first whined and cried about WebP, it was due to Klaus
posting a link to a WebP image on a web site, idiot. You claimed at
the time people (you used the plural of people) can't see WebP,
stupid.
Of course. I was reffering to multiple other people, not nessecary
myself. As leader of this newsgroup, it is my responsibility that
content posted here is accesible to EVERYBODY.
Who are you leading? To where and for what purpose?
The people of this newsgroup, obiousvly, for the purpose of keeping this >newsgroup relevant.
Unlike the majority of other newsgroup's that have de-volved into spam.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:el93dkdads9kg1t9j7d83d3nm6cnp85rnk@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 13:08:02 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>news:jlolakd9pb4rkuaqjqlhce0n74bbsbqgc8@4ax.com...
How, in 2025, can anyone NOT have the ability to view WebP files?
Such a person would have to have some serious intellectual limitations >>>> not to have their browser(s) updated to view "ancient" standards.
First of all, I never said that anyone doesn't have the ability to view >>>WebP
content. When I originally made that rule, many year's ago,
You never made the rule.
there were
million's of reader's of this newsgroup, as thier are today,
Prove it
and many of
them at that time DIDNT have the ability. Fast forward to today, and WebP >>>has proven to be an unnesecary format so there is no need to change the >>>rule.
There is no rule
Factually incorrect. I have made the rule, and posted it MANY time's.
"Scott Oaf - (I'm really Chudnozzle)" <ChadLuzer@zoho.com> wrote in message >news:XnsB3629A668AC27CowardlyChadRunsAway@62.164.182.27...
"Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:2Pqcna8FWpTmD0z1nZ2dnZfqnPQAAAAA@supernews.com:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message
news:47plak9jova385v7v3ti2a4lg9je7lisja@4ax.com...
When you first whined and cried about WebP, it was due to Klaus
posting a link to a WebP image on a web site, idiot. You claimed at
the time people (you used the plural of people) can't see WebP,
stupid.
Of course. I was reffering to multiple other people, not nessecary
myself. As leader of this newsgroup, it is my responsibility that
content posted here is accesible to EVERYBODY.
Who are you leading? To where and for what purpose?
The people of this newsgroup,
obiousvly,
for the purpose of keeping this
newsgroup relevant.
Unlike the majority of other newsgroup's
that have de-volved into spam.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:el93dkdads9kg1t9j7d83d3nm6cnp85rnk@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 13:08:02 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>news:jlolakd9pb4rkuaqjqlhce0n74bbsbqgc8@4ax.com...
How, in 2025, can anyone NOT have the ability to view WebP files?
Such a person would have to have some serious intellectual limitations >>>> not to have their browser(s) updated to view "ancient" standards.
First of all, I never said that anyone doesn't have the ability to view >>>WebP
content. When I originally made that rule, many year's ago,
You never made the rule.
there were
million's of reader's of this newsgroup, as thier are today,
Prove it
and many of
them at that time DIDNT have the ability. Fast forward to today, and WebP >>>has proven to be an unnesecary format so there is no need to change the >>>rule.
There is no rule
Factually incorrect.
I have made the rule, and posted it MANY time's.
On Thu, 9 Oct 2025 15:53:44 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
message >>news:el93dkdads9kg1t9j7d83d3nm6cnp85rnk@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksu >>cking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 13:08:02 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>>news:jlolakd9pb4rkuaqjqlhce0n74bbsbqgc8@4ax.com...
How, in 2025, can anyone NOT have the ability to view WebP
files?
Such a person would have to have some serious intellectual
limitations not to have their browser(s) updated to view "ancient"
standards.
First of all, I never said that anyone doesn't have the ability to
view WebP
content. When I originally made that rule, many year's ago,
You never made the rule.
there were
million's of reader's of this newsgroup, as thier are today,
Prove it
and many of
them at that time DIDNT have the ability. Fast forward to today,
and WebP has proven to be an unnesecary format so there is no need
to change the rule.
There is no rule
Factually incorrect. I have made the rule, and posted it MANY time's.
There is no rule. You know you are lying when you think you make rules
here.
KlausSchadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >news:29fgek5rusf2f3gcmi1mfku0ie9sh1r88f@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck >ing.dwarf.com:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2025 15:53:44 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>message >>>news:el93dkdads9kg1t9j7d83d3nm6cnp85rnk@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksu >>>cking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 13:08:02 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>>>news:jlolakd9pb4rkuaqjqlhce0n74bbsbqgc8@4ax.com...
How, in 2025, can anyone NOT have the ability to view WebP
files?
Such a person would have to have some serious intellectual
limitations not to have their browser(s) updated to view "ancient" >>>>>> standards.
First of all, I never said that anyone doesn't have the ability to >>>>>view WebP
content. When I originally made that rule, many year's ago,
You never made the rule.
there were
million's of reader's of this newsgroup, as thier are today,
Prove it
and many of
them at that time DIDNT have the ability. Fast forward to today,
and WebP has proven to be an unnesecary format so there is no need
to change the rule.
There is no rule
Factually incorrect. I have made the rule, and posted it MANY time's.
There is no rule. You know you are lying when you think you make rules
here.
When was the vote for Jenny to get elected leader and the proof she won?
KlausSchadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >news:29fgek5rusf2f3gcmi1mfku0ie9sh1r88f@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck >ing.dwarf.com:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2025 15:53:44 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>message >>>news:el93dkdads9kg1t9j7d83d3nm6cnp85rnk@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksu >>>cking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 13:08:02 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>>>news:jlolakd9pb4rkuaqjqlhce0n74bbsbqgc8@4ax.com...
How, in 2025, can anyone NOT have the ability to view WebP
files?
Such a person would have to have some serious intellectual
limitations not to have their browser(s) updated to view "ancient" >>>>>> standards.
First of all, I never said that anyone doesn't have the ability to >>>>>view WebP
content. When I originally made that rule, many year's ago,
You never made the rule.
there were
million's of reader's of this newsgroup, as thier are today,
Prove it
and many of
them at that time DIDNT have the ability. Fast forward to today,
and WebP has proven to be an unnesecary format so there is no need
to change the rule.
There is no rule
Factually incorrect. I have made the rule, and posted it MANY time's.
There is no rule. You know you are lying when you think you make rules
here.
When was the vote for Jenny to get elected leader and the proof she won?
On 10 Oct 2025 10:35:26 GMT, "Scott Oaf - (I'm really Chudnozzle)" <ChadLuzer@zoho.com> wrote:
KlausSchadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>news:29fgek5rusf2f3gcmi1mfku0ie9sh1r88f@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksu
ck ing.dwarf.com:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2025 15:53:44 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>message >>>>news:el93dkdads9kg1t9j7d83d3nm6cnp85rnk@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cock >>>>su cking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 13:08:02 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>>>>news:jlolakd9pb4rkuaqjqlhce0n74bbsbqgc8@4ax.com...
How, in 2025, can anyone NOT have the ability to view WebP
files?
Such a person would have to have some serious intellectual
limitations not to have their browser(s) updated to view
"ancient" standards.
First of all, I never said that anyone doesn't have the ability to >>>>>>view WebP
content. When I originally made that rule, many year's ago,
You never made the rule.
there were
million's of reader's of this newsgroup, as thier are today,
Prove it
and many of
them at that time DIDNT have the ability. Fast forward to today, >>>>>>and WebP has proven to be an unnesecary format so there is no need >>>>>>to change the rule.
There is no rule
Factually incorrect. I have made the rule, and posted it MANY
time's.
There is no rule. You know you are lying when you think you make
rules here.
When was the vote for Jenny to get elected leader and the proof she
won?
There wasn't a vote for Jenny. We did have a vote once and Klaus
was elected leader. It was purely symbolic, since there is no leader.
There is no rule. You know you are lying when you think you make
rules here.
When was the vote for Jenny to get elected leader and the proof she
won?
There wasn't a vote for Jenny. We did have a vote once and Klaus
was elected leader. It was purely symbolic, since there is no leader.
I believe I was here at the time and voted for Klous. Maybwe that's why
my vote didn't get counted for Klaus.
Damn you, Saukweasel.
PS: Has anyone seen the JennyKillFile recently?
On 11 Oct 2025 14:04:36 GMT, Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net>
wrote:
[...]
There is no rule. You know you are lying when you think you make
rules here.
When was the vote for Jenny to get elected leader and the proof she >>>>won?
There wasn't a vote for Jenny. We did have a vote once and Klaus
was elected leader. It was purely symbolic, since there is no leader.
I believe I was here at the time and voted for Klous. Maybwe that's why
my vote didn't get counted for Klaus.
The vote from Klaus was unanimous. Your vote was included in that
total.
What I always found humorous is that no one, not one person,
voted for Jenny. He didn't even vote for himself, proving even Jenny
knows he isn't the leader (there isn't one, so he can't be).
On Sun, 12 Oct 2025 05:40:25 -0700, Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw>
wrote:
On 11 Oct 2025 14:04:36 GMT, Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net>
wrote:
[...]
There is no rule. You know you are lying when you think you make
rules here.
When was the vote for Jenny to get elected leader and the proof she >>>>>won?
There wasn't a vote for Jenny. We did have a vote once and Klaus
was elected leader. It was purely symbolic, since there is no leader.
I believe I was here at the time and voted for Klous. Maybwe that's why >>>my vote didn't get counted for Klaus.
The vote from Klaus was unanimous. Your vote was included in that >>total.
What I always found humorous is that no one, not one person,
voted for Jenny. He didn't even vote for himself, proving even Jenny
knows he isn't the leader (there isn't one, so he can't be).
It's sad that he couldn't even win a symbolic vote. Not even the "five >ex-vice presidents of the leadership committee," or the 'majority" he
claims accepted him. LOL
Factually incorrect. I have made the rule, and posted it MANY time's.
Yet you ALWAYS divert the conversations to feed your NEED to lie.
ALWAYS!
Note Jenny ran away for the truth he HATES.
