| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 23 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 47:01:28 |
| Calls: | 583 |
| Files: | 1,138 |
| Messages: | 111,072 |
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 14:11:25 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>message >>news:5aaq5k95c5e7mc3cifj3iqens2fplfrpjj@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 01:02:52 -0700, Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw>
wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 12:52:39 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude >>>><klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
Jenny seems to enjoy messing with various settings. He screwed >>>>>>>>> up
his copy of Windows Live Mail. He couldn't use attributions at >>>>>>>>> all.
I
was able to PROVE it attributes correctly by default.
He screwed up Outlook Express in regards to attributions as >>>>>>>>> well.
Unless he's doing it intentionally, which would explain why he >>>>>>>>> refuses
to correct the issue.
And I LREADY
What is "LREADY?"
EXPLAINED to you that the problem is on YOUR end,
You LIED about it. Prove me wrong, unless you want to admit I'm >>>>>>> right.
The fact that the issue is ONLY on your machine prove's the problem is >>>>>>on
your end. Either your computer is too old to properly access the >>>>>>internet,
or you have it set up incorrectly. Or possibly both.
The problem is yours, Jenny.
He knows. Since everyone who has commented, except Jenny, has >>>>pointed out the issue, it's NOT just on my end. But Jenny NEEDS to
lie, and NEEDS to have his lying proved.
Jenny seems to enjoy changing the default settings of his >>>>programs. This results in the mess we see in his posts. And he knows >>>>this.
Sadly, he is too stupid to restore the settings. You may recall >>>>when he BEGGED me to tell him what to change back with Live Mail. When >>>>I pointed out that I don't know what he changed, so I can't help him, >>>>he "ran away" from the matter.
I like how he lies and claims our computers are "old" but he uses
Outlook Express to tell us.
Outlook express was a perfectly powerful program in the 90's and it still >>is
today.
ROFLMAO
Wrong, as you almost always are.
Using Outlook Express in today's digital landscape comes with
significant drawbacks, primarily due to it being an outdated and
unsupported software. Microsoft officially discontinued support for
Outlook Express years ago, which means it no longer receives crucial
updates, patches, or security fixes.
Here's a breakdown of the key drawbacks:
1. Critical Security Vulnerabilities:
Cybercriminals actively seek out and exploit
weaknesses in unsupported software.
Known Exploits: Many vulnerabilities in Outlook Express are
well-documented and widely known. This makes it an easy target for
attackers who can use these known exploits to gain unauthorized access
to your system, steal sensitive data,
Outdated Protocols: It may not fully support modern, more secure email protocols and encryption standards,
Operating System Incompatibility: Outlook Express was bundled with
older versions of Windows (like Windows XP). It's not designed to run
on modern operating systems (Windows 10, 11, or macOS)
Modern Email Service Incompatibility:
Feature Limitations:
3. Performance and Reliability:
Instability and Crashes:
Data Loss Risk: Older software can be more susceptible to data
corruption,
Manual Backup: Unlike modern clients with automatic backup options,
Outlook Express often requires manual backup,
4. Lack of Support and Resources:
No Microsoft Support:
Limited Community Help:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 11:55:36 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 13:04:24 -0500, Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> >>wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 14:28:07 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude >>><klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
The fact that the issue is ONLY on your machine prove's the problem >>>>>>>is on
your end. Either your computer is too old to properly access the >>>>>>>internet,
or you have it set up incorrectly. Or possibly both.
The problem is yours, Jenny.
You have no way of knowing that klous, you are not sitting in front of >>>>>my
computer OR kwill's computer.
Of course we do. You're using outdated software that you never learned >>>>how to use properly in the first place.
It's obvious.
It's funny how EVERYONE who has commented expresses the same
issue with Jenny's posts. So either everyone has the exact same issue, >>>that only affects posts from Jenny, or Jenny messed up the settings on >>>his machine or program.
Which is the more plausible option?
Occam's razor
We don't even need that. It's obvious the problem is on Jenny's
end.
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 14:28:07 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
The fact that the issue is ONLY on your machine prove's the problem is >>>>>on
your end. Either your computer is too old to properly access the >>>>>internet,
or you have it set up incorrectly. Or possibly both.
The problem is yours, Jenny.
You have no way of knowing that klous, you are not sitting in front of my >>>computer OR kwill's computer.
Of course we do. You're using outdated software that you never learned
how to use properly in the first place.
It's obvious.
And he BEGGED me to tell him what to restore.
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:50:29 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>message >>news:mdi64k5kn0jgeqejbne1migcakguv99l74@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:43:57 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>message >>>>news:5oor2k5ra94oijbpmi4r74ama2onl0gngo@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 18:05:36 +0000
From: "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.food.fast-food
Subject: Re: Are ready-to-eat snacks "fast food"?
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 16:16:02 -0500
I know you're behind the times, but five days is ridiculous.
Klous, listen to me VERY CAREFULLY for a minute. The Time that appears >>>>on
my messge? That's the time that I WROTE THE MESSAGE, NOT THE TIME THAT >>>>YOU
READ IT.
It's neither, Jenny.
Yes, it is.
It's neither, Jenny. It's your fuckup.\
It's outdated. It can't even decode yEnc files.
Feature Limitations:
It has all the features I needed and need to post to usenet.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:dsko5k92909au1r1qoikvca5lhmrdf4t6d@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:50:29 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>message >>>news:mdi64k5kn0jgeqejbne1migcakguv99l74@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:43:57 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>message >>>>>news:5oor2k5ra94oijbpmi4r74ama2onl0gngo@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 18:05:36 +0000
From: "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.food.fast-food
Subject: Re: Are ready-to-eat snacks "fast food"?
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 16:16:02 -0500
I know you're behind the times, but five days is ridiculous.
Klous, listen to me VERY CAREFULLY for a minute. The Time that appears >>>>>on
my messge? That's the time that I WROTE THE MESSAGE, NOT THE TIME THAT >>>>>YOU
READ IT.
It's neither, Jenny.
Yes, it is.
It's neither, Jenny. It's your fuckup.\
No, It isn't. My computer is running just fine. I would know.. I'm >sitting right in front of it. You are NOT.
YOU are the one experiencing/reporting the problem's. That means, the >problem is on YOUR end.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
message
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:50:29 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>message >>>news:mdi64k5kn0jgeqejbne1migcakguv99l74@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:43:57 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>message
news: 5oor2k5ra94oijbpmi4r74ama2onl0gngo@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 18:05:36 +0000 From: "Jerry
Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.food.fast-food Subject: Re: Are ready-to-eat snacks >>>>>> "fast food"?
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 16:16:02 -0500
I know you're behind the times, but five days is ridiculous.
Klous, listen to me VERY CAREFULLY for a minute. The Time that >>>>>appears on my messge? That's the time that I WROTE THE MESSAGE, NOT >>>>>THE TIME THAT YOU READ IT.
It's neither, Jenny.
Yes, it is.
It's neither, Jenny. It's your fuckup.\
No, It isn't. My computer is running just fine. I would know.. I'm
sitting right in front of it. You are NOT.
YOU are the one experiencing/reporting the problem's. That means, the problem is on YOUR end.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:dsko5k92909au1r1qoikvca5lhmrdf4t6d@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:50:29 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>message >>>news:mdi64k5kn0jgeqejbne1migcakguv99l74@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:43:57 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>message >>>>>news:5oor2k5ra94oijbpmi4r74ama2onl0gngo@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 18:05:36 +0000
From: "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.food.fast-food
Subject: Re: Are ready-to-eat snacks "fast food"?
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 16:16:02 -0500
I know you're behind the times, but five days is ridiculous.
Klous, listen to me VERY CAREFULLY for a minute. The Time that appears >>>>>on
my messge? That's the time that I WROTE THE MESSAGE, NOT THE TIME THAT >>>>>YOU
READ IT.
It's neither, Jenny.
Yes, it is.
It's neither, Jenny. It's your fuckup.\
No, It isn't. My computer is running just fine. I would know.. I'm >sitting right in front of it. You are NOT.
YOU are the one experiencing/reporting the problem's.
That means, the
problem is on YOUR end.
Outlook express was a perfectly powerful program in the 90's and it still >>>isROFLMAO
today.
Wrong, as you almost always are.
Using Outlook Express in today's digital landscape comes with
significant drawbacks, primarily due to it being an outdated and
unsupported software. Microsoft officially discontinued support for
Outlook Express years ago, which means it no longer receives crucial
updates, patches, or security fixes.
Here's a breakdown of the key drawbacks:
1. Critical Security Vulnerabilities:
Security drawback's? We're talknig about USENET here.
Cybercriminals actively seek out and exploit
weaknesses in unsupported software.
Well after 25+ year's they haven't gotten me yet.
Known Exploits: Many vulnerabilities in Outlook Express are
well-documented and widely known. This makes it an easy target for
attackers who can use these known exploits to gain unauthorized access
to your system, steal sensitive data,
I don't have sensitive data on my machine.
Outdated Protocols: It may not fully support modern, more secure email
protocols and encryption standards,
Again, this is USENET.
Operating System Incompatibility: Outlook Express was bundled with
older versions of Windows (like Windows XP). It's not designed to run
on modern operating systems (Windows 10, 11, or macOS)
Not an Issue, I'm not running windows 10, 11 or mac OS>
Modern Email Service Incompatibility:
Again, this is USENET.
Feature Limitations:
It has all the features I needed and need to post to usenet.
3. Performance and Reliability:
Instability and Crashes:
Never crashed on my well-maintained computer, not even once. NEXT
Data Loss Risk: Older software can be more susceptible to data
corruption,
It's usenet. If this was to happen, I just need to re-download the >message's
fromt
eh
server.
Manual Backup: Unlike modern clients with automatic backup options,
Outlook Express often requires manual backup,
Anybody whose not a fucking retard can do a manual backup.
4. Lack of Support and Resources:
It has an actual help file. Unlike modern software that you have to access >the web or use useless AI help.
No Microsoft Support:
That's actually a benefit.
Limited Community Help:
I would be the one PROVIDING the help to the community, becosue I am an >expert in this software.
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:40:46 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
Feature Limitations:
It has all the features I needed and need to post to usenet.
Then why do you complain about WebP photos?
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:6oei7ktt46gl158oala477j52tc3iojceo@4ax.com...
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 14:28:07 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
The fact that the issue is ONLY on your machine prove's the problem is >>>>>>on
your end. Either your computer is too old to properly access the >>>>>>internet,
or you have it set up incorrectly. Or possibly both.
The problem is yours, Jenny.
You have no way of knowing that klous, you are not sitting in front of my >>>>computer OR kwill's computer.
Of course we do. You're using outdated software that you never learned >>>how to use properly in the first place.
It's obvious.
It's funny how EVERYONE who has commented expresses the same
issue with Jenny's posts. So either everyone has the exact same issue,
that only affects posts from Jenny, or Jenny messed up the settings on
his machine or program.
Which is the more plausible option?
The problem is on Jenny's end. But he really is too stupid to
know what he screwed up. And he BEGGED me to tell him what to restore.
When I pointed out there is no way for me to know what he changed,
meaning I can't even offer hints, he ran away from the matter. Well,
until he fed his NEED to LIE and claimed I didn't answer him.
NO, I asked you to tell me what the fuck you were blathering on about.
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:gcvj7ktge3ik2uetja5etrndhppbobdhe7@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 11:55:36 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 13:04:24 -0500, Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> >>>wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 14:28:07 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude >>>><klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
The fact that the issue is ONLY on your machine prove's the problem >>>>>>>>is on
your end. Either your computer is too old to properly access the >>>>>>>>internet,
or you have it set up incorrectly. Or possibly both.
The problem is yours, Jenny.
You have no way of knowing that klous, you are not sitting in front of >>>>>>my
computer OR kwill's computer.
Of course we do. You're using outdated software that you never learned >>>>>how to use properly in the first place.
It's obvious.
It's funny how EVERYONE who has commented expresses the same
issue with Jenny's posts. So either everyone has the exact same issue, >>>>that only affects posts from Jenny, or Jenny messed up the settings on >>>>his machine or program.
Which is the more plausible option?
Occam's razor
We don't even need that. It's obvious the problem is on Jenny's
end. But his NEED to lie is such that he MUST claim everyone who has >>commented all have the exact same problem, that only occurs with
Jenny's posts.
The simple reality is, Jenny played around with the settings. And
he screwed up his machine's clock. And his reader's ability to do >>attributions.
Yet you can't tell me what the problem is.! <funny>
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:ejei7k1fa1c6fjekbhujtuqtne356qofjo@4ax.com...
The problem is yours, Jenny.
He knows. Since everyone who has commented, except Jenny, has >>>>>pointed out the issue, it's NOT just on my end. But Jenny NEEDS to >>>>>lie, and NEEDS to have his lying proved.
Jenny seems to enjoy changing the default settings of his >>>>>programs. This results in the mess we see in his posts. And he knows >>>>>this.
Sadly, he is too stupid to restore the settings. You may recall >>>>>when he BEGGED me to tell him what to change back with Live Mail. When >>>>>I pointed out that I don't know what he changed, so I can't help him, >>>>>he "ran away" from the matter.
I like how he lies and claims our computers are "old" but he uses
Outlook Express to tell us.
Outlook express was a perfectly powerful program in the 90's
It was acceptable. OE was only intended to be an E-mail client.
It was able to handle Usenet, which is why many used it.
and it still is
today.
It's outdated. It can't even decode yEnc files. Though with the >>extreme decline in binary group use, this isn't as big an issue as it
was in the mid 2000's.
Microsoft ceased supporting it a very long time ago. It's now >>vulnerable to all kinds of hacks and malware. No one with an once of >>concern for security will use it now.
Kwills,
how many yEnc files has been posted to alt.fast-food in the last 20
year's?
a+o~q.eG^↔oZ4+L2fu> /||Qu]>+♂♠=j@#+|er§*4bvpeo++w!"-XM+!C
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:40:46 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
Outlook express was a perfectly powerful program in the 90's and it >>>>stillROFLMAO
is
today.
Wrong, as you almost always are.
Using Outlook Express in today's digital landscape comes with
significant drawbacks, primarily due to it being an outdated and
unsupported software. Microsoft officially discontinued support for
Outlook Express years ago, which means it no longer receives crucial
updates, patches, or security fixes.
Here's a breakdown of the key drawbacks:
1. Critical Security Vulnerabilities:
Security drawback's? We're talknig about USENET here.
We're talking about Microsoft Outlook Express here!
While Usenet isn't as active as it was back in the 90s, it's
still active. And your machine is vulnerable to those who know how to
exploit the problems.
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:40:46 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
Feature Limitations:
It has all the features I needed and need to post to usenet.
Then why do you complain about WebP photos?
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:33:37 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote innews:dsko5k92909au1r1qoikvca5lhmrdf4t6d@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
message
5oor2k5ra94oijbpmi4r74ama2onl0gngo@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:50:29 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>message >>>>news:mdi64k5kn0jgeqejbne1migcakguv99l74@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:43:57 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>message
news:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 18:05:36 +0000 From: "Jerry
Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.food.fast-food Subject: Re: Are ready-to-eat snacks >>>>>>> "fast food"?
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 16:16:02 -0500
I know you're behind the times, but five days is ridiculous.
Klous, listen to me VERY CAREFULLY for a minute. The Time that >>>>>>appears on my messge? That's the time that I WROTE THE MESSAGE, NOT >>>>>>THE TIME THAT YOU READ IT.
It's neither, Jenny.
Yes, it is.
It's neither, Jenny. It's your fuckup.\
No, It isn't. My computer is running just fine. I would know.. I'm
sitting right in front of it. You are NOT.
YOU are the one experiencing/reporting the problem's. That means, the
problem is on YOUR end.
Wrong again, Poindexter.
For your last post:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 18:50:50 +0000
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:33:37 -0500
Your clock is off by several minutes.
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 12:17:54 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:40:46 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
Feature Limitations:
It has all the features I needed and need to post to usenet.
Then why do you complain about WebP photos?
Good catch.
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:33:37 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>message >>news:dsko5k92909au1r1qoikvca5lhmrdf4t6d@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:50:29 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>message >>>>news:mdi64k5kn0jgeqejbne1migcakguv99l74@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:43:57 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>message >>>>>>news:5oor2k5ra94oijbpmi4r74ama2onl0gngo@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 18:05:36 +0000
From: "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.food.fast-food
Subject: Re: Are ready-to-eat snacks "fast food"?
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 16:16:02 -0500
I know you're behind the times, but five days is ridiculous.
Klous, listen to me VERY CAREFULLY for a minute. The Time that >>>>>>appears
on
my messge? That's the time that I WROTE THE MESSAGE, NOT THE TIME THAT >>>>>>YOU
READ IT.
It's neither, Jenny.
Yes, it is.
It's neither, Jenny. It's your fuckup.\
No, It isn't. My computer is running just fine. I would know.. I'm >>sitting right in front of it. You are NOT.
I don't have to, to be able to tell you your clock was off.
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:41:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>news:6oei7ktt46gl158oala477j52tc3iojceo@4ax.com...
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 14:28:07 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
The fact that the issue is ONLY on your machine prove's the problem >>>>>>>is
on
your end. Either your computer is too old to properly access the >>>>>>>internet,
or you have it set up incorrectly. Or possibly both.
The problem is yours, Jenny.
You have no way of knowing that klous, you are not sitting in front of >>>>>my
computer OR kwill's computer.
Of course we do. You're using outdated software that you never learned >>>>how to use properly in the first place.
It's obvious.
It's funny how EVERYONE who has commented expresses the same
issue with Jenny's posts. So either everyone has the exact same issue, >>>that only affects posts from Jenny, or Jenny messed up the settings on >>>his machine or program.
Which is the more plausible option?
Jenny?
The problem is on Jenny's end. But he really is too stupid to
know what he screwed up. And he BEGGED me to tell him what to restore. >>>When I pointed out there is no way for me to know what he changed, >>>meaning I can't even offer hints, he ran away from the matter. Well, >>>until he fed his NEED to LIE and claimed I didn't answer him.
NO, I asked you to tell me what the fuck you were blathering on about.
NO, You BEGGED me to tell you what to restore.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:h2m78kdq872brmcv24o0gu0ck569fgirhp@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:40:46 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
Feature Limitations:
It has all the features I needed and need to post to usenet.
Then why do you complain about WebP photos?
I never said it was becouse *I* couldn't access them. There are many other >user's that don't have that ability, or just for whatever reason don't want >to use google's shit.
Oh and BTW since this isn't a binarie's newsgroup, it really isn't a issue >what Outlook express's alledged limitation's are when it comes to WebP
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:k3m78khtdbieqk6r1081a1n40cu2e4h645@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:33:37 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>message >>>news:dsko5k92909au1r1qoikvca5lhmrdf4t6d@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:50:29 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>message >>>>>news:mdi64k5kn0jgeqejbne1migcakguv99l74@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:43:57 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>message >>>>>>>news:5oor2k5ra94oijbpmi4r74ama2onl0gngo@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 18:05:36 +0000
From: "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.food.fast-food
Subject: Re: Are ready-to-eat snacks "fast food"?
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 16:16:02 -0500
I know you're behind the times, but five days is ridiculous.
Klous, listen to me VERY CAREFULLY for a minute. The Time that >>>>>>>appears
on
my messge? That's the time that I WROTE THE MESSAGE, NOT THE TIME THAT >>>>>>>YOU
READ IT.
It's neither, Jenny.
Yes, it is.
It's neither, Jenny. It's your fuckup.\
No, It isn't. My computer is running just fine. I would know.. I'm >>>sitting right in front of it. You are NOT.
I don't have to, to be able to tell you your clock was off.
Are you hacking a webcam somehow, peering into my room and looking at my >computer screen? As well as other thing's? I expect that behavoir from >kwills, but not you.
"Frank" <frank@creon.earth> wrote in message >news:DqTgQ.88705$QtA1.71444@fx16.iad...
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:33:37 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote innews:dsko5k92909au1r1qoikvca5lhmrdf4t6d@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
message
5oor2k5ra94oijbpmi4r74ama2onl0gngo@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:50:29 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>message >>>>>news:mdi64k5kn0jgeqejbne1migcakguv99l74@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:43:57 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>message
news:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 18:05:36 +0000 From: "Jerry >>>>>>>> Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.food.fast-food Subject: Re: Are ready-to-eat snacks >>>>>>>> "fast food"?
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 16:16:02 -0500
I know you're behind the times, but five days is ridiculous.
Klous, listen to me VERY CAREFULLY for a minute. The Time that >>>>>>>appears on my messge? That's the time that I WROTE THE MESSAGE, NOT >>>>>>>THE TIME THAT YOU READ IT.
It's neither, Jenny.
Yes, it is.
It's neither, Jenny. It's your fuckup.\
No, It isn't. My computer is running just fine. I would know.. I'm
sitting right in front of it. You are NOT.
YOU are the one experiencing/reporting the problem's. That means, the
problem is on YOUR end.
Wrong again, Poindexter.
For your last post:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 18:50:50 +0000
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:33:37 -0500
Your clock is off by several minutes.
And I ALREADY EXPLIANED that the time on the message's is the time I POSTED >the message, NOT THE CURRECT TIME AKA THE TIME YOU READ THE MESSAGE.
It is EXPECETED to be a delay in between, becouse you read the messages, >minutes or HOURS AND DAYS after I posted them!
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:h2m78kdq872brmcv24o0gu0ck569fgirhp@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:40:46 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
Feature Limitations:
It has all the features I needed and need to post to usenet.
Then why do you complain about WebP photos?
I never said it was becouse
*I* couldn't access them. There are many other
user's
that don't have that ability, or just for whatever reason don't want
to use google's shit.
Oh and BTW since this isn't a binarie's
newsgroup, it really isn't a issue
what Outlook express's
alledged limitation's
are when it comes to WebP
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:k3m78khtdbieqk6r1081a1n40cu2e4h645@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:33:37 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>message >>>news:dsko5k92909au1r1qoikvca5lhmrdf4t6d@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:50:29 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>message >>>>>news:mdi64k5kn0jgeqejbne1migcakguv99l74@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:43:57 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>message >>>>>>>news:5oor2k5ra94oijbpmi4r74ama2onl0gngo@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 18:05:36 +0000
From: "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.food.fast-food
Subject: Re: Are ready-to-eat snacks "fast food"?
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 16:16:02 -0500
I know you're behind the times, but five days is ridiculous.
Klous, listen to me VERY CAREFULLY for a minute. The Time that >>>>>>>appears
on
my messge? That's the time that I WROTE THE MESSAGE, NOT THE TIME THAT >>>>>>>YOU
READ IT.
It's neither, Jenny.
Yes, it is.
It's neither, Jenny. It's your fuckup.\
No, It isn't. My computer is running just fine. I would know.. I'm >>>sitting right in front of it. You are NOT.
I don't have to, to be able to tell you your clock was off.
Are you hacking a webcam somehow, peering into my room and looking at my >computer screen? As well as other thing's?
I expect that behavoir from
kwills,
but not you.
"Frank" <frank@creon.earth> wrote in message >news:DqTgQ.88705$QtA1.71444@fx16.iad...
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:33:37 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote innews:dsko5k92909au1r1qoikvca5lhmrdf4t6d@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
message
5oor2k5ra94oijbpmi4r74ama2onl0gngo@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:50:29 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>message >>>>>news:mdi64k5kn0jgeqejbne1migcakguv99l74@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:43:57 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>message
news:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 18:05:36 +0000 From: "Jerry >>>>>>>> Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.food.fast-food Subject: Re: Are ready-to-eat snacks >>>>>>>> "fast food"?
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 16:16:02 -0500
I know you're behind the times, but five days is ridiculous.
Klous, listen to me VERY CAREFULLY for a minute. The Time that >>>>>>>appears on my messge? That's the time that I WROTE THE MESSAGE, NOT >>>>>>>THE TIME THAT YOU READ IT.
It's neither, Jenny.
Yes, it is.
It's neither, Jenny. It's your fuckup.\
No, It isn't. My computer is running just fine. I would know.. I'm
sitting right in front of it. You are NOT.
YOU are the one experiencing/reporting the problem's. That means, the
problem is on YOUR end.
Wrong again, Poindexter.
For your last post:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 18:50:50 +0000
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:33:37 -0500
Your clock is off by several minutes.
And I ALREADY EXPLIANED that the time on the message's
is the time I POSTED
the message, NOT THE CURRECT
TIME AKA THE TIME YOU READ THE MESSAGE.
It is EXPECETED to be a delay in between, becouse
you read the messages,
minutes or HOURS AND DAYS after I posted them!
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:coh98kl45u9psclsu3nssalb50hq95ng63@4ax.com...
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:40:46 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
Outlook express was a perfectly powerful program in the 90's and it >>>>>stillROFLMAO
is
today.
Wrong, as you almost always are.
Using Outlook Express in today's digital landscape comes with
significant drawbacks, primarily due to it being an outdated and
unsupported software. Microsoft officially discontinued support for
Outlook Express years ago, which means it no longer receives crucial
updates, patches, or security fixes.
Here's a breakdown of the key drawbacks:
1. Critical Security Vulnerabilities:
Security drawback's? We're talknig about USENET here.
We're talking about Microsoft Outlook Express here!
While Usenet isn't as active as it was back in the 90s, it's
still active. And your machine is vulnerable to those who know how to >>exploit the problems.
FWIW, I lack the requisite knowledge to take over your machine
via the vulnerabilities. But that doesn't mean there isn't someone on >>Usenet who can. And you could come across those who can.
Cybercriminals actively seek out and exploit
weaknesses in unsupported software.
Well after 25+ year's they haven't gotten me yet.
Are you 100% certain? For all you know, when you're not actively
using your machine, it could be doing all sorts of nasty stuff.
Known Exploits: Many vulnerabilities in Outlook Express are
well-documented and widely known. This makes it an easy target for
attackers who can use these known exploits to gain unauthorized access >>>> to your system, steal sensitive data,
I don't have sensitive data on my machine.
Not anymore, anyway :)
Outdated Protocols: It may not fully support modern, more secure email >>>> protocols and encryption standards,
Again, this is USENET.
Again, Outlook Express is an E-MAIL client that can read and post
to Usenet.
Operating System Incompatibility: Outlook Express was bundled with
older versions of Windows (like Windows XP). It's not designed to run
on modern operating systems (Windows 10, 11, or macOS)
Not an Issue, I'm not running windows 10, 11 or mac OS>
You're using Windows XP, Vista or 8? Support for each ended a
LONG time ago. You can't even get an up-to-date antivirus for them.
Someone could be using your machine to do all kinds of things.
While not as efficient as a modern machine, beggars can't be choosers.
I don't know if any firewalls are still supported for legacy OSes, but
if so, make certain you get and use the most recent one possible. If
you're already making use of one, then this is a moot point.
Modern Email Service Incompatibility:
Again, this is USENET.
Ibid.
Feature Limitations:
It has all the features I needed and need to post to usenet.
Yet you can't format proper attributions. Odd.
3. Performance and Reliability:
Instability and Crashes:
Never crashed on my well-maintained computer, not even once. NEXT
I recall you being absent for a few months because, according to
you, your computer crashed and you lost all data. Was that another
instance of you feeding your NEED to lie, or is the claim above the
one feeding your NEED to lie? I'll accept either answer, though you
will surely run away from the truth you HATE.
Data Loss Risk: Older software can be more susceptible to data
corruption,
It's usenet. If this was to happen, I just need to re-download the >>>message's
What does your NEED to lie make you claim message owns?
fromt
What is, "fromt?"
eh
"Take off, eh!"
-- Doug McKenzie
server.
Inefficient, but it would work.
Manual Backup: Unlike modern clients with automatic backup options,
Outlook Express often requires manual backup,
Anybody whose not a fucking retard can do a manual backup.
So you can't do a manual backup. Got it.
4. Lack of Support and Resources:
It has an actual help file. Unlike modern software that you have to access >>>the web or use useless AI help.
Help files are NOT support and/or resources.
No Microsoft Support:
That's actually a benefit.
How so? If you don't like Microsoft, why not use a Mac? Or a
Linux Distro?
Limited Community Help:
I would be the one PROVIDING the help to the community, becosue I am an >>>expert in this software.
But you aren't. You PROVE above you lack basic understanding of
the application. You claim the help file equates to support and/or >>resources.
If you are an expert, explain why you whined and cried for me to
tell you what settings to restore to allow you to quote correctly. And
why you ran away from the matter when I pointed out I don't know what
you changed, so I can't know what you need to restore.
And why did you screw up OE's settings to start with, if you're
an expert? No genuine expert would mess up the default settings in a
way that results in a negative. If they were to change something,
experts would document the alteration to ensure they can be restored
if necessary. Someone who doesn't have a clue, but NEEDS to lie and
claim to be an expert, will mess with the default settings and not
have a clue what s/he has done. So, basically, you.
[Cue Jenny running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]
And anybody care's?
I'm sure these hackers have moved on to biger and
better thing's
like hacking cellphone's.
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:q5i98kdk8f7js0e090m40b5a4f8b53gn67@4ax.com...
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 12:17:54 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:40:46 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
Feature Limitations:
It has all the features I needed and need to post to usenet.
Then why do you complain about WebP photos?
Good catch.
Since Jenny is using Win XP, Vista, 7 or 8 (I don't want to
entertain the idea he's still on 95), WebP may be too advanced for his >>machine. If he has a separate GPU, it can't handle the encoding of
WebP images. Using the CPU alone would be so difficult for a legacy
machine as to be safely called impossible.
This isn't a binaries group, moron.
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:g7i98k5es8idq2rofho3mr1lae22rr2fa8@4ax.com...
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:41:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>news:6oei7ktt46gl158oala477j52tc3iojceo@4ax.com...
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 14:28:07 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
The fact that the issue is ONLY on your machine prove's the problem >>>>>>>>is
on
your end. Either your computer is too old to properly access the >>>>>>>>internet,
or you have it set up incorrectly. Or possibly both.
The problem is yours, Jenny.
You have no way of knowing that klous, you are not sitting in front of >>>>>>my
computer OR kwill's computer.
Of course we do. You're using outdated software that you never learned >>>>>how to use properly in the first place.
It's obvious.
It's funny how EVERYONE who has commented expresses the same
issue with Jenny's posts. So either everyone has the exact same issue, >>>>that only affects posts from Jenny, or Jenny messed up the settings on >>>>his machine or program.
Which is the more plausible option?
Jenny?
The problem is on Jenny's end. But he really is too stupid to
know what he screwed up. And he BEGGED me to tell him what to restore. >>>>When I pointed out there is no way for me to know what he changed, >>>>meaning I can't even offer hints, he ran away from the matter. Well, >>>>until he fed his NEED to LIE and claimed I didn't answer him.
NO, I asked you to tell me what the fuck you were blathering on about.
NO, You BEGGED me to tell you what to restore.
But prove your claim true. If you wish to admit you fed your NEED
to lie, again, you will either run away from the challenge, or attempt
to divert from it. We will have to wait to see how you will admit, by >>default, the truth.
no, I "begged" you to try to make some sense.
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 13:59:23 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >>news:h2m78kdq872brmcv24o0gu0ck569fgirhp@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:40:46 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
Feature Limitations:
It has all the features I needed and need to post to usenet.
Then why do you complain about WebP photos?
I never said it was becouse *I* couldn't access them. There are many other >>user's that don't have that ability, or just for whatever reason don't want >>to use google's shit.
You don't have to use "Google's shit," you moron. And there is nobody >complaining about a format introduced FOURTEEN years ago.
Only you.
Try getting a job and getting a newer computer.
Oh and BTW since this isn't a binarie's newsgroup, it really isn't a issue >>what Outlook express's alledged limitation's are when it comes to WebP
Then why are you crying like a little school girl about it?
It's neither, Jenny. It's your fuckup.\
No, It isn't. My computer is running just fine. I would know.. I'm >>>>sitting right in front of it. You are NOT.
I don't have to, to be able to tell you your clock was off.
Are you hacking a webcam somehow, peering into my room and looking at my >>computer screen? As well as other thing's? I expect that behavoir from >>kwills, but not you.
AS I already proved, YOUR clock was off.
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 18:50:50 +0000
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:33:37 -0500
Your clock is off by several minutes.
And I ALREADY EXPLIANED that the time on the message's is the time I POSTED >>the message, NOT THE CURRECT TIME AKA THE TIME YOU READ THE MESSAGE.
It is EXPECETED to be a delay in between, becouse you read the messages, >>minutes or HOURS AND DAYS after I posted them!
You're lying. Again. This has been explained to you.