Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 23 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 50:10:42 |
Calls: | 583 |
Files: | 1,138 |
Messages: | 111,309 |
I never claimed cat food could be considered fast-food.
So then you know that only humans eat fast food?
Is THIS what you're claiming now?
Of course not.
What I'm doing is DEFINING fast-food. And fast-food is NOT
defined, as cat food.
Above you make it clear you're back to claiming cat food is fast
food.
Where you lying when you claimed cat food is intended for human consumption, making it fast food, or when you claimed it is not
intended for human consumption? Don't waste time with avoidance.
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:040c7kdafmkcboh4j5280tssmj310k8jvm@4ax.com...
I never claimed cat food could be considered fast-food.
So then you know that only humans eat fast food?
Is THIS what you're claiming now?
Of course not.
What I'm doing is DEFINING fast-food. And fast-food is NOT
defined, as cat food.
Above you make it clear you're back to claiming cat food is fast
food.
No, I didn't say that or claim that.
YOU are having problem's
understanding
me.
Where you lying when you claimed cat food is intended for human
consumption, making it fast food, or when you claimed it is not
intended for human consumption? Don't waste time with avoidance.
Answer the question I asked of you.
Unless answering honestly is still impossible for you.
I would be delighted to directly answer your question. NO, I was not lying, >becouse
I never claimed cat food is intended for human consumption.