• Re: The Rise And Fall Of Unix

    From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@ldo@nz.invalid to alt.folklore.computers on Sat Jul 5 01:15:25 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.folklore.computers

    On Fri, 04 Jul 2025 19:50:03 -0400, Bud Frede wrote:

    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:

    The common Linux kernel shared across just about all distros supports
    common standard filesystems. This is one reason why “distro-hopping” is >> a common thing among Linux users, while any attempt to pull such an
    equivalent stunt between BSD variants is going to be fraught with
    pitfalls.

    How many of the people who would be "distro-hopping" re-use existing filesystems rather than re-installing completely from scratch?

    Consider that an OS install can fit in, say, less than 100GB, whereas hard drives (and even SSDs) come in multi-terabyte sizes these days.

    So it is easy enough to allocate multiple partitions for OS installs, and
    use all the rest as a common /home area for user files. That way, you can switch OSes and still have access to the same user files, without having
    to copy stuff back and forth.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Theo@theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk to alt.folklore.computers on Sat Jul 5 11:08:15 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.folklore.computers

    Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> wrote:
    How many of the people who would be "distro-hopping" re-use existing filesystems rather than re-installing completely from scratch?

    I understand that you see a problem here, but I'm not sure that I do.

    It's simply things like formatting a USB stick/HDD to the native UFS and then finding nothing else will read it. You can obviously format as FAT/etc but it's not so good as a filesystem especially for storing programs on, and especially not for booting the OS from.

    Back in the day, hard drives never moved between machines so it didn't
    matter. Nowadays they're on USB and do, regularly.

    Theo
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2