1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. alt.comp.os.windows-11

  • Windows 11 is operationally inefficient.

    From Nomen Nescio@nobody@dizum.com to alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.privacy.anon-server on Wed Oct 1 01:28:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    If you are already "Windows fluent" it's okay.

    If you're a noob or functionally incompetent, you're going to have
    problems.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Hank Rogers@Hank@nospam.invalid to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.privacy.anon-server on Tue Sep 30 20:02:06 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    Nomen Nescio wrote on 9/30/2025 6:28 PM:
    If you are already "Windows fluent" it's okay.

    If you're a noob or functionally incompetent, you're going to have
    problems.


    Sorry you're having problems.
    Maybe what you need is linux.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.privacy.anon-server on Tue Sep 30 21:06:35 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 9/30/2025 7:28 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote:

    If you are already "Windows fluent" it's okay.

    If you're a noob or functionally incompetent, you're going to have
    problems.


    As if that's changed since previous versions?
    --
    Joel W. Crump
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Tue Sep 30 21:56:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On Tue, 9/30/2025 7:28 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote:
    If you are already "Windows fluent" it's okay.

    If you're a noob or functionally incompetent, you're going to have
    problems.


    Drop the alt.privacy.anon-server when replying.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From anonymous@noreply@mixmin.net to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.privacy.anon-server,misc.phone.mobile.iphone on Wed Oct 1 06:43:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 30 Sep 2025, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> posted some news:3341806bf244e2d2d12c83d970da259d@dizum.com:

    If you are already "Windows fluent" it's okay.

    If you're a noob or functionally incompetent, you're going to have
    problems.

    Windows 11 is Windows 10.5 Vista. It's for visual retards. Said
    retards being the smartphone generation.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nomen Nescio@nobody@dizum.com to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Wed Oct 1 08:58:19 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    In article <3341806bf244e2d2d12c83d970da259d@dizum.com>
    Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:

    If you are already "Windows fluent" it's okay.

    If you're a noob or functionally incompetent, you're going to have
    problems.

    Yawn.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jason H@jason_hindle@yahoo.com to alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Wed Oct 1 20:41:46 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 01/10/2025 00:28, Nomen Nescio wrote:
    If you are already "Windows fluent" it's okay.

    If you're a noob or functionally incompetent, you're going to have
    problems.

    The UI is fine. A new user with a modicum of curiosity can become a
    reasonably advanced user with their own efficient workflows. There is
    decent automation support. For advanced users who like to work in the
    terminal, the monstrosity that is PowerShell can be swerved via WSL.
    --
    --
    A PICKER OF UNCONSIDERED TRIFLES
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Frank Slootweg@this@ddress.is.invalid to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Thu Oct 2 18:15:51 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:
    On Tue, 9/30/2025 7:28 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote:
    If you are already "Windows fluent" it's okay.

    If you're a noob or functionally incompetent, you're going to have problems.


    Drop the alt.privacy.anon-server when replying.

    Yeah, crossposts to that group are counter productive.

    Often they are not really that privacy-only related that the crosspost
    is appropriate [1], so people who filter the group because of the loons
    over there, miss possibly valuable posts.

    [1] AFAICT, the crosspost is hardly ever appropriate, because the posts
    are (also) about privacy at 'best', *not* about 'anon-server's. (Isn't
    there a real/sensible 'privacy' group somewhere?)
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2