• if capitalism can't manage digital abundance???

    From dart200@user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Mon Oct 13 23:07:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    where the cost of copying is so negligible we have to actively spend
    effort to prevent people from copying it,

    then how the fuck is it ever gunna manage physical abundance???

    tech bro capitalists make me Efn+EfyeEfiAEfni when they talk about the possibility of general abundance in any system of capitalism
    --
    hi, i'm an anti-capitalist! let's end war EfOa

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Julian@julianlzb87@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Tue Oct 14 15:20:19 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 14/10/2025 07:07, dart200 wrote:
    where the cost of copying is so negligible we have to actively spend
    effort to prevent people from copying it,

    then how the fuck is it ever gunna manage physical abundance???
    I wouldn't worry about it if I were you.

    rCLIf you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to the thing itself, but to your estimate of it; and this you have the power to revoke at any moment.rCY


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Tue Oct 14 10:42:05 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 15:20:19 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 14/10/2025 07:07, dart200 wrote:
    where the cost of copying is so negligible we have to actively spend
    effort to prevent people from copying it,

    then how the fuck is it ever gunna manage physical abundance???
    I wouldn't worry about it if I were you.

    oIf you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to the >thing itself, but to your estimate of it; and this you have the power to >revoke at any moment.o

    Correct estimate is not considered.
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From dart200@user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Tue Oct 14 09:31:30 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 10/14/25 7:20 AM, Julian wrote:
    On 14/10/2025 07:07, dart200 wrote:
    where the cost of copying is so negligible we have to actively spend
    effort to prevent people from copying it,

    then how the fuck is it ever gunna manage physical abundance???
    I wouldn't worry about it if I were you.

    rCLIf you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to the thing itself, but to your estimate of it; and this you have the power to revoke at any moment.rCY



    freaking boomers never worrying about stupid the world is
    --
    hi, i'm nick! let's end war EfOa

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Julian@julianlzb87@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Tue Oct 14 17:47:14 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 14/10/2025 17:31, dart200 wrote:
    On 10/14/25 7:20 AM, Julian wrote:
    On 14/10/2025 07:07, dart200 wrote:
    where the cost of copying is so negligible we have to actively spend
    effort to prevent people from copying it,

    then how the fuck is it ever gunna manage physical abundance???
    I wouldn't worry about it if I were you.

    rCLIf you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to
    the thing itself, but to your estimate of it; and this you have the
    power to revoke at any moment.rCY



    freaking boomers never worrying about stupid the world is

    Of course. If it was clever I might have to work for a living.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From dart200@user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Tue Oct 14 10:54:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 10/14/25 9:47 AM, Julian wrote:
    On 14/10/2025 17:31, dart200 wrote:
    On 10/14/25 7:20 AM, Julian wrote:
    On 14/10/2025 07:07, dart200 wrote:
    where the cost of copying is so negligible we have to actively spend
    effort to prevent people from copying it,

    then how the fuck is it ever gunna manage physical abundance???
    I wouldn't worry about it if I were you.

    rCLIf you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to
    the thing itself, but to your estimate of it; and this you have the
    power to revoke at any moment.rCY



    freaking boomers never worrying about stupid the world is

    Of course. If it was clever I might have to work for a living.

    some people don't mind if the world burns so long as they don't have to
    do the work
    --
    hi, i'm nick! let's end war EfOa

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Julian@julianlzb87@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Tue Oct 14 19:48:17 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 14/10/2025 18:54, dart200 wrote:
    On 10/14/25 9:47 AM, Julian wrote:
    On 14/10/2025 17:31, dart200 wrote:
    On 10/14/25 7:20 AM, Julian wrote:
    On 14/10/2025 07:07, dart200 wrote:
    where the cost of copying is so negligible we have to actively
    spend effort to prevent people from copying it,

    then how the fuck is it ever gunna manage physical abundance???
    I wouldn't worry about it if I were you.

    rCLIf you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to >>>> the thing itself, but to your estimate of it; and this you have the
    power to revoke at any moment.rCY



    freaking boomers never worrying about stupid the world is

    Of course. If it was clever I might have to work for a living.

    some people don't mind if the world burns so long as they don't have to
    do the work
    rCLI donrCOt care if my lettuce has DDT on it, just as long as itrCOs crisp.rCY --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Tue Oct 14 14:59:46 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 19:48:17 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 14/10/2025 18:54, dart200 wrote:
    On 10/14/25 9:47 AM, Julian wrote:
    On 14/10/2025 17:31, dart200 wrote:
    On 10/14/25 7:20 AM, Julian wrote:
    On 14/10/2025 07:07, dart200 wrote:
    where the cost of copying is so negligible we have to actively
    spend effort to prevent people from copying it,

    then how the fuck is it ever gunna manage physical abundance???
    I wouldn't worry about it if I were you.

    oIf you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to >>>>> the thing itself, but to your estimate of it; and this you have the >>>>> power to revoke at any moment.o



    freaking boomers never worrying about stupid the world is

    Of course. If it was clever I might have to work for a living.

    some people don't mind if the world burns so long as they don't have to
    do the work
    oI donAt care if my lettuce has DDT on it, just as long as itAs crisp.o

    DDT doesn't make lettuce crisp. It does do other nasties though.
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2