• Without Books

    From Dude@punditster@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sat Oct 11 10:07:09 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    Previously submitted by Julian.

    Without Books We Will Be Barbarians

    It is not the road to serfdom that awaitsrCobut the steep downward slope
    to the status of a peasant in ancient Egypt.

    "He wanted above all . . . to shove a marshmallow on a stick in the
    furnace, while the flapping pigeon-winged books died on the porch and
    lawn of the house. While the books went up in sparkling whirls and blew
    away on a wind turned dark with burning.rCY rCoRay Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451

    ItrCOs hard not to be impressed by Ray BradburyrCOs prescience.

    In his best-known novel, the dystopian classic Fahrenheit 451 (1953), he combined the memory of Nazi book burnings with the experience of Joseph McCarthyrCOs rCLRed ScarerCY to imagine a future America where firemen are employed not to put out fires, but to start them in any home where
    illicit book reading is detected.

    Bradbury naturally assumed that any society where books were generally prohibited would be a totalitarian one. The unnamed city he imagines is
    in many respects an American version of George OrwellrCOs London in 1984.
    What makes it distinctively American is that the authoritarian regime is combined with a hedonistic consumer society very different from the
    austerity of OrwellrCOs dystopia.

    Guy Montag, the fireman central character of Fahrenheit 451, is married
    to mindless Millie, who flees serious thought or conversation with the assistance of sleeping pills, giant flat-screen televisions, and what we
    would now call earbuds...

    https://www.thefp.com/p/niall-ferguson-without-books-we-will-be-barbarians
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dude@punditster@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sat Oct 11 10:08:51 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 10/11/2025 10:07 AM, Dude wrote:
    Previously submitted by Julian.

    Without Books We Will Be Barbarians

    Nobody reads books anymore, or newspapers, mainly because of the cost
    and because of the bulk and environmental issues. Almost everyone is on
    the internet, watches TV or listens to the radio to get news and entertainment.

    We were at Barnes & Noble a week ago and I was amazed at the price of
    the books and periodicals! It's outrageous!

    That said, there's no arguing with the price of public radio and
    broadcast television. Both me and Rita have Kindles and iPads and read
    them all the time. We used to own hundreds of books, stacked all around.

    Now we've got millions of books available in an instant online!

    We must have read over 5,000 online books in the last five years, almost
    all of them for free - classics, dictionaries and libraries of digital
    data and music from all over the planet.

    From now on, if I read any books it will be free.

    It is not the road to serfdom that awaitsrCobut the steep downward slope
    to the status of a peasant in ancient Egypt.

    "He wanted above all . . . to shove a marshmallow on a stick in the
    furnace, while the flapping pigeon-winged books died on the porch and
    lawn of the house. While the books went up in sparkling whirls and blew
    away on a wind turned dark with burning.rCY rCoRay Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451

    ItrCOs hard not to be impressed by Ray BradburyrCOs prescience.

    In his best-known novel, the dystopian classic Fahrenheit 451 (1953), he combined the memory of Nazi book burnings with the experience of Joseph McCarthyrCOs rCLRed ScarerCY to imagine a future America where firemen are employed not to put out fires, but to start them in any home where
    illicit book reading is detected.

    Bradbury naturally assumed that any society where books were generally prohibited would be a totalitarian one. The unnamed city he imagines is
    in many respects an American version of George OrwellrCOs London in 1984. What makes it distinctively American is that the authoritarian regime is combined with a hedonistic consumer society very different from the austerity of OrwellrCOs dystopia.

    Guy Montag, the fireman central character of Fahrenheit 451, is married
    to mindless Millie, who flees serious thought or conversation with the assistance of sleeping pills, giant flat-screen televisions, and what we would now call earbuds...

    https://www.thefp.com/p/niall-ferguson-without-books-we-will-be-barbarians

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tara@tsm@fastmail.ca to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sat Oct 11 17:39:55 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Oct 11, 2025 at 1:07:09rC>PM EDT, "Dude" <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    Previously submitted by Julian.

    Without Books We Will Be Barbarians

    It is not the road to serfdom that awaitsrCobut the steep downward slope
    to the status of a peasant in ancient Egypt.

    "He wanted above all . . . to shove a marshmallow on a stick in the
    furnace, while the flapping pigeon-winged books died on the porch and
    lawn of the house. While the books went up in sparkling whirls and blew
    away on a wind turned dark with burning.rCY rCoRay Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451

    ItrCOs hard not to be impressed by Ray BradburyrCOs prescience.

    In his best-known novel, the dystopian classic Fahrenheit 451 (1953), he combined the memory of Nazi book burnings with the experience of Joseph McCarthyrCOs rCLRed ScarerCY to imagine a future America where firemen are employed not to put out fires, but to start them in any home where
    illicit book reading is detected.

    Bradbury naturally assumed that any society where books were generally prohibited would be a totalitarian one. The unnamed city he imagines is
    in many respects an American version of George OrwellrCOs London in 1984. What makes it distinctively American is that the authoritarian regime is combined with a hedonistic consumer society very different from the
    austerity of OrwellrCOs dystopia.

    Guy Montag, the fireman central character of Fahrenheit 451, is married
    to mindless Millie, who flees serious thought or conversation with the assistance of sleeping pills, giant flat-screen televisions, and what we would now call earbuds...

    https://www.thefp.com/p/niall-ferguson-without-books-we-will-be-barbarians

    Were we barbarians before the printing press? We spoke and told stories to
    each other. Or scratched them on cave walls.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dude@punditster@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sat Oct 11 12:37:47 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 10/11/2025 10:39 AM, Tara wrote:
    On Oct 11, 2025 at 1:07:09rC>PM EDT, "Dude" <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    Previously submitted by Julian.

    Without Books We Will Be Barbarians

    It is not the road to serfdom that awaitsrCobut the steep downward slope
    to the status of a peasant in ancient Egypt.

    "He wanted above all . . . to shove a marshmallow on a stick in the
    furnace, while the flapping pigeon-winged books died on the porch and
    lawn of the house. While the books went up in sparkling whirls and blew
    away on a wind turned dark with burning.rCY rCoRay Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451 >>
    ItrCOs hard not to be impressed by Ray BradburyrCOs prescience.

    In his best-known novel, the dystopian classic Fahrenheit 451 (1953), he
    combined the memory of Nazi book burnings with the experience of Joseph
    McCarthyrCOs rCLRed ScarerCY to imagine a future America where firemen are >> employed not to put out fires, but to start them in any home where
    illicit book reading is detected.

    Bradbury naturally assumed that any society where books were generally
    prohibited would be a totalitarian one. The unnamed city he imagines is
    in many respects an American version of George OrwellrCOs London in 1984.
    What makes it distinctively American is that the authoritarian regime is
    combined with a hedonistic consumer society very different from the
    austerity of OrwellrCOs dystopia.

    Guy Montag, the fireman central character of Fahrenheit 451, is married
    to mindless Millie, who flees serious thought or conversation with the
    assistance of sleeping pills, giant flat-screen televisions, and what we
    would now call earbuds...

    https://www.thefp.com/p/niall-ferguson-without-books-we-will-be-barbarians

    Were we barbarians before the printing press? We spoke and told stories to each other. Or scratched them on cave walls.

    History was written in symbols: the mythic totem.

    A totem pole is a tall, carved wooden pillar created by Indigenous
    peoples of the Pacific Northwest coast of North America to represent
    family lineage, stories, clan symbols, or significant events and people.

    Before that, in stone, in the form of edifice architecture.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From dart200@user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sat Oct 11 23:52:49 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 10/11/25 10:07 AM, Dude wrote:
    Previously submitted by Julian.

    Without Books We Will Be Barbarians

    It is not the road to serfdom that awaitsrCobut the steep downward slope
    to the status of a peasant in ancient Egypt.

    "He wanted above all . . . to shove a marshmallow on a stick in the
    furnace, while the flapping pigeon-winged books died on the porch and
    lawn of the house. While the books went up in sparkling whirls and blew
    away on a wind turned dark with burning.rCY rCoRay Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451

    ItrCOs hard not to be impressed by Ray BradburyrCOs prescience.

    In his best-known novel, the dystopian classic Fahrenheit 451 (1953), he combined the memory of Nazi book burnings with the experience of Joseph McCarthyrCOs rCLRed ScarerCY to imagine a future America where firemen are employed not to put out fires, but to start them in any home where
    illicit book reading is detected.

    Bradbury naturally assumed that any society where books were generally prohibited would be a totalitarian one. The unnamed city he imagines is
    in many respects an American version of George OrwellrCOs London in 1984. What makes it distinctively American is that the authoritarian regime is combined with a hedonistic consumer society very different from the austerity of OrwellrCOs dystopia.

    Guy Montag, the fireman central character of Fahrenheit 451, is married
    to mindless Millie, who flees serious thought or conversation with the assistance of sleeping pills, giant flat-screen televisions, and what we would now call earbuds...

    https://www.thefp.com/p/niall-ferguson-without-books-we-will-be-barbarians

    i mean on the flipside a lot of books are total horseshit and probably convincing people of ideals/expectations that are negative for society.

    even "factual" non fiction books ... it's quite easy to spin a load of complete horseshit based on a couple false premises stated early in the
    book that aren't that so obviously false. case&point modern pop-science
    one things like string theory of whatever tf

    this is true for all information mediums

    the real question is what the fuck kinda information am i getting fed
    here???
    --
    hi, i'm nick! let's end war EfOa

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun Oct 12 11:03:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 23:52:49 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    On 10/11/25 10:07 AM, Dude wrote:
    Previously submitted by Julian.

    Without Books We Will Be Barbarians

    It is not the road to serfdom that awaitsubut the steep downward slope
    to the status of a peasant in ancient Egypt.

    "He wanted above all . . . to shove a marshmallow on a stick in the
    furnace, while the flapping pigeon-winged books died on the porch and
    lawn of the house. While the books went up in sparkling whirls and blew
    away on a wind turned dark with burning.o uRay Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451

    ItAs hard not to be impressed by Ray BradburyAs prescience.

    In his best-known novel, the dystopian classic Fahrenheit 451 (1953), he
    combined the memory of Nazi book burnings with the experience of Joseph
    McCarthyAs oRed Scareo to imagine a future America where firemen are
    employed not to put out fires, but to start them in any home where
    illicit book reading is detected.

    Bradbury naturally assumed that any society where books were generally
    prohibited would be a totalitarian one. The unnamed city he imagines is
    in many respects an American version of George OrwellAs London in 1984.
    What makes it distinctively American is that the authoritarian regime is
    combined with a hedonistic consumer society very different from the
    austerity of OrwellAs dystopia.

    Guy Montag, the fireman central character of Fahrenheit 451, is married
    to mindless Millie, who flees serious thought or conversation with the
    assistance of sleeping pills, giant flat-screen televisions, and what we
    would now call earbuds...

    https://www.thefp.com/p/niall-ferguson-without-books-we-will-be-barbarians

    i mean on the flipside a lot of books are total horseshit and probably >convincing people of ideals/expectations that are negative for society.

    Libraries are full of books that should never have been published.
    Novels are not an attempt to provide information.

    even "factual" non fiction books ... it's quite easy to spin a load of >complete horseshit based on a couple false premises stated early in the
    book that aren't that so obviously false. case&point modern pop-science
    one things like string theory of whatever tf

    this is true for all information mediums

    the real question is what the fuck kinda information am i getting fed >here???

    Whatever your level of appreciation is, there is somebody who wants to
    get paid for feeding it.

    Isaac Azimov said that we should respect people's appreciation of art
    no matter how kitschy. At least they are appreciating something.

    Right, an ability to see beauty in this world is not to be scorned.
    Without that the ugliness can become difficult to bear for some of us.

    For me the best stuff is social commentary. Novels can be a telling
    depiction of what is. Often writers decide to take that to a
    fantasy/sci-fi setting to avoid sounding preachy or cutting a little
    too close to the bone. Although some writers, like Charles Dickens,
    can pull off the telling depiction without hiding it. In that case it
    is almost necessary to describe your characters with utmost sympathy
    for the human that they are no matter how vile. Like shakespeare.
    Macbeth asks the witches what the future holds, and trembles to hear,
    then thinks, that isn't so bad, how can birnam wood move to dunsinane
    hill? All may yet be well. Macbeth is human, he fears, he trembles,
    he seeks reassurance.

    The rule seems to be that if you can effectively show instead of tell,
    you aren't being preachy. That doesn't mean that, if you show
    something that violates what a person wants to believe, they will
    listen to you at all. Vile actors must fall victim to their own
    natural impulses. What vile actor wants to hear that?

    On the other hand, does the ancient idea of the greek tragedy lead us
    astray? Don't good things happen to bad people? Didn't the gangsters
    of 100 years ago learn to stop murdering each other? Or at least, do
    it so extremely well as to not get caught? Where is Jimmy Hoffa?
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dude@punditster@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun Oct 12 10:35:11 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 10/11/2025 11:52 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 10/11/25 10:07 AM, Dude wrote:
    Previously submitted by Julian.

    Without Books We Will Be Barbarians

    It is not the road to serfdom that awaitsrCobut the steep downward slope
    to the status of a peasant in ancient Egypt.

    "He wanted above all . . . to shove a marshmallow on a stick in the
    furnace, while the flapping pigeon-winged books died on the porch and
    lawn of the house. While the books went up in sparkling whirls and
    blew away on a wind turned dark with burning.rCY rCoRay Bradbury,
    Fahrenheit 451

    ItrCOs hard not to be impressed by Ray BradburyrCOs prescience.

    In his best-known novel, the dystopian classic Fahrenheit 451 (1953),
    he combined the memory of Nazi book burnings with the experience of
    Joseph McCarthyrCOs rCLRed ScarerCY to imagine a future America where
    firemen are employed not to put out fires, but to start them in any
    home where illicit book reading is detected.

    Bradbury naturally assumed that any society where books were generally
    prohibited would be a totalitarian one. The unnamed city he imagines
    is in many respects an American version of George OrwellrCOs London in
    1984. What makes it distinctively American is that the authoritarian
    regime is combined with a hedonistic consumer society very different
    from the austerity of OrwellrCOs dystopia.

    Guy Montag, the fireman central character of Fahrenheit 451, is
    married to mindless Millie, who flees serious thought or conversation
    with the assistance of sleeping pills, giant flat-screen televisions,
    and what we would now call earbuds...

    https://www.thefp.com/p/niall-ferguson-without-books-we-will-be-
    barbarians

    i mean on the flipside a lot of books are total horseshit and probably convincing people of ideals/expectations that are negative for society.

    even "factual" non fiction books ... it's quite easy to spin a load of complete horseshit based on a couple false premises stated early in the
    book that aren't that so obviously false. case&point modern pop-science
    one things like string theory of whatever tf

    this is true for all information mediums

    Blockchain.
    the real question is what the fuck kinda information am i getting fed
    here???

    The real question is, why are you painting with such a large brush?

    There's no information here, just opinions. These are not real people,
    Nick.

    So, I already told you, there's nobody here and the Ned explained all
    about the troll, so good luck getting anybody to talk to you. Keep up
    the good work!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun Oct 12 14:09:17 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Sun, 12 Oct 2025 10:35:11 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 10/11/2025 11:52 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 10/11/25 10:07 AM, Dude wrote:
    Previously submitted by Julian.

    Without Books We Will Be Barbarians

    It is not the road to serfdom that awaitsubut the steep downward slope
    to the status of a peasant in ancient Egypt.

    "He wanted above all . . . to shove a marshmallow on a stick in the
    furnace, while the flapping pigeon-winged books died on the porch and
    lawn of the house. While the books went up in sparkling whirls and
    blew away on a wind turned dark with burning.o uRay Bradbury,
    Fahrenheit 451

    ItAs hard not to be impressed by Ray BradburyAs prescience.

    In his best-known novel, the dystopian classic Fahrenheit 451 (1953),
    he combined the memory of Nazi book burnings with the experience of
    Joseph McCarthyAs oRed Scareo to imagine a future America where
    firemen are employed not to put out fires, but to start them in any
    home where illicit book reading is detected.

    Bradbury naturally assumed that any society where books were generally
    prohibited would be a totalitarian one. The unnamed city he imagines
    is in many respects an American version of George OrwellAs London in
    1984. What makes it distinctively American is that the authoritarian
    regime is combined with a hedonistic consumer society very different
    from the austerity of OrwellAs dystopia.

    Guy Montag, the fireman central character of Fahrenheit 451, is
    married to mindless Millie, who flees serious thought or conversation
    with the assistance of sleeping pills, giant flat-screen televisions,
    and what we would now call earbuds...

    https://www.thefp.com/p/niall-ferguson-without-books-we-will-be-
    barbarians

    i mean on the flipside a lot of books are total horseshit and probably
    convincing people of ideals/expectations that are negative for society.

    even "factual" non fiction books ... it's quite easy to spin a load of
    complete horseshit based on a couple false premises stated early in the
    book that aren't that so obviously false. case&point modern pop-science
    one things like string theory of whatever tf

    this is true for all information mediums

    Blockchain.
    the real question is what the fuck kinda information am i getting fed
    here???

    The real question is, why are you painting with such a large brush?

    There's no information here, just opinions. These are not real people,
    Nick.

    So, I already told you, there's nobody here and the Ned explained all
    about the troll, so good luck getting anybody to talk to you. Keep up
    the good work!

    It is not that there is nobody here. It is that we are so damned
    ornery and opinionated and fuck you anyway... I mean, aren't you?
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dude@punditster@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun Oct 12 12:14:42 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 10/12/2025 11:09 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Oct 2025 10:35:11 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 10/11/2025 11:52 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 10/11/25 10:07 AM, Dude wrote:
    Previously submitted by Julian.

    Without Books We Will Be Barbarians

    It is not the road to serfdom that awaitsrCobut the steep downward slope >>>> to the status of a peasant in ancient Egypt.

    "He wanted above all . . . to shove a marshmallow on a stick in the
    furnace, while the flapping pigeon-winged books died on the porch and
    lawn of the house. While the books went up in sparkling whirls and
    blew away on a wind turned dark with burning.rCY rCoRay Bradbury,
    Fahrenheit 451

    ItrCOs hard not to be impressed by Ray BradburyrCOs prescience.

    In his best-known novel, the dystopian classic Fahrenheit 451 (1953),
    he combined the memory of Nazi book burnings with the experience of
    Joseph McCarthyrCOs rCLRed ScarerCY to imagine a future America where
    firemen are employed not to put out fires, but to start them in any
    home where illicit book reading is detected.

    Bradbury naturally assumed that any society where books were generally >>>> prohibited would be a totalitarian one. The unnamed city he imagines
    is in many respects an American version of George OrwellrCOs London in >>>> 1984. What makes it distinctively American is that the authoritarian
    regime is combined with a hedonistic consumer society very different
    from the austerity of OrwellrCOs dystopia.

    Guy Montag, the fireman central character of Fahrenheit 451, is
    married to mindless Millie, who flees serious thought or conversation
    with the assistance of sleeping pills, giant flat-screen televisions,
    and what we would now call earbuds...

    https://www.thefp.com/p/niall-ferguson-without-books-we-will-be-
    barbarians

    i mean on the flipside a lot of books are total horseshit and probably
    convincing people of ideals/expectations that are negative for society.

    even "factual" non fiction books ... it's quite easy to spin a load of
    complete horseshit based on a couple false premises stated early in the
    book that aren't that so obviously false. case&point modern pop-science
    one things like string theory of whatever tf

    this is true for all information mediums

    Blockchain.
    the real question is what the fuck kinda information am i getting fed
    here???

    The real question is, why are you painting with such a large brush?

    There's no information here, just opinions. These are not real people,
    Nick.

    So, I already told you, there's nobody here and the Ned explained all
    about the troll, so good luck getting anybody to talk to you. Keep up
    the good work!

    It is not that there is nobody here. It is that we are so damned
    ornery and opinionated and fuck you anyway...

    Good work!

    You may be saving this group. It would be a shame if something were to
    happen to it.

    Key words: Free speech, contribute

    I mean, aren't you?

    Speak for yourself, but I'm tired of being lonely, ornery and mean!




    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From dart200@user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun Oct 12 13:03:39 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 10/12/25 10:35 AM, Dude wrote:
    On 10/11/2025 11:52 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 10/11/25 10:07 AM, Dude wrote:
    Previously submitted by Julian.

    Without Books We Will Be Barbarians

    It is not the road to serfdom that awaitsrCobut the steep downward
    slope to the status of a peasant in ancient Egypt.

    "He wanted above all . . . to shove a marshmallow on a stick in the
    furnace, while the flapping pigeon-winged books died on the porch and
    lawn of the house. While the books went up in sparkling whirls and
    blew away on a wind turned dark with burning.rCY rCoRay Bradbury,
    Fahrenheit 451

    ItrCOs hard not to be impressed by Ray BradburyrCOs prescience.

    In his best-known novel, the dystopian classic Fahrenheit 451 (1953),
    he combined the memory of Nazi book burnings with the experience of
    Joseph McCarthyrCOs rCLRed ScarerCY to imagine a future America where
    firemen are employed not to put out fires, but to start them in any
    home where illicit book reading is detected.

    Bradbury naturally assumed that any society where books were
    generally prohibited would be a totalitarian one. The unnamed city he
    imagines is in many respects an American version of George OrwellrCOs
    London in 1984. What makes it distinctively American is that the
    authoritarian regime is combined with a hedonistic consumer society
    very different from the austerity of OrwellrCOs dystopia.

    Guy Montag, the fireman central character of Fahrenheit 451, is
    married to mindless Millie, who flees serious thought or conversation
    with the assistance of sleeping pills, giant flat-screen televisions,
    and what we would now call earbuds...

    https://www.thefp.com/p/niall-ferguson-without-books-we-will-be-
    barbarians

    i mean on the flipside a lot of books are total horseshit and probably
    convincing people of ideals/expectations that are negative for society.

    even "factual" non fiction books ... it's quite easy to spin a load of
    complete horseshit based on a couple false premises stated early in
    the book that aren't that so obviously false. case&point modern pop-
    science one things like string theory of whatever tf

    this is true for all information mediums

    Blockchain.
    the real question is what the fuck kinda information am i getting fed
    here???

    The real question is, why are you painting with such a large brush?

    There's no information here, just opinions. These are not real people,
    Nick.

    that's just like ur opinion dude...

    one that's that incorrect because opinions are still a form of
    information, regardless of whether they are truthful or not


    So, I already told you, there's nobody here and the Ned explained all
    about the troll, so good luck getting anybody to talk to you. Keep up
    the good work!

    i missed the troll aspect, not sure what ned was going off about.

    tbh, beside blatant spammers, i'm not even sure trolls exist really,

    everything you say, disingenuous or otherwise, leaks info about ur real perspectives on things whether you like it or not.

    you can't not be genuine to some degree, even if it's just that you
    genuinely allow urself to be outwardly disingenuous about topics in
    certain times/places...
    --
    hi, i'm a countertroll! let's end war EfOa

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2