• The celebrity guide to selective outrage

    From Julian@julianlzb87@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun Oct 5 21:18:42 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    Artists were once dangerous to tyrants, their art was truth-telling to power


    In the West, outrage has become performance art. ItrCOs not about real
    causes, but about carefully branded ones that play well in pastel
    Instagram carousels. Climate change? Of course. A vague plea for rCLjusticerCY? Naturally. A curated rCLFree PalestinerCY hashtag? Absolutely. But when it comes to standing with their peers in the Middle East rCo
    singers, actors, writers who are literally jailed or executed for their
    art rCo the voices vanish.

    This isnrCOt about Israel. The point is larger: why do so many Western
    artists reserve their outrage for one convenient villain while ignoring regimes that jail, torture and kill their peers? SyriarCOs Christians and Druze are being ethnically cleansed. Yemen is enduring a famine. The
    Uyghurs in China and Christians in the Congo suffer horrors that make
    Western protest slogans look like parody. But those crises donrCOt trend
    on TikTok. And so our moral guardians stay silent.

    Take Turkey. Pop star Mabel Matia was dragged into court, slapped with a travel ban for a song with LGBTQ themes rCo branded as rCLimmoralityrCY by Erdo-fanrCOs government. Where was Lady Gaga, a self-proclaimed advocate
    for the LGBTQ community, when this happened? Actor Cem Yitzik Fukuzumi,
    known from NetflixrCOs Rise of Empires: Ottoman, faces seven years in
    prison for posting an Instagram story calling for a boycott after
    IstanbulrCOs opposition mayor was arrested. Where were Mark Ruffalo and
    Javier Bardem? These are not rebels with guns rCo they are artists with
    words, punished as if they were criminals.

    Iran is even darker. Musician Mohsen Shekhar was publicly hanged in 2022
    rCo his rCLcrimerCY nothing more than protesting against the regime. Rapper Tomato Saleh was sentenced to death the same year for lyrics critical of
    the authorities, accused of rCLenmity against God.rCY He was spared only
    after global outrage forced the regimerCOs hand. WhererCOs Hollywood when
    this happens?

    These are the true causes that should evoke outrage: a song punished as immoral, a post punished as treason, lyrics punished as blasphemy. In
    the Middle East, art itself can be a death sentence. And yet from
    Hollywood? Silence.

    Contrast that with the U.S. this month. Jimmy Kimmel faced backlash for comments about Charlie KirkrCOs murder. His temporary suspension triggered
    an avalanche of headlines. Disney reportedly lost between $4 and $5
    billion in market value. That was one man, one career, one late-night
    show. Meanwhile, artists across the Middle East arenrCOt just losing jobs
    rCo theyrCOre losing their freedom and their lives. Where was the celebrity chorus for them?

    Mark Ruffalo and Susan Sarandon have plenty of time for press
    conferences about Gaza. Billie Eilish can summon her fans to demand a ceasefire. But for their fellow artists rCo their actual peers rCo who risk prison or the gallows for a song, a lyric, or a post? Not a word.
    Apparently solidarity stops where the headlines end.

    The truth is that many of these artists arenrCOt radicals or rebels at
    all. They are brand managers. Their conscience extends only as far as
    their fanbase and their ticket sales. They pick causes the way others
    pick outfits: whatever flatters them, whatever gets applause, whatever
    comes risk-free. Supporting Gaza? Safe. Supporting Uyghurs? Risky.
    Speaking up for a jailed Iranian rapper? Not worth losing a Spotify stream.

    Artists were once dangerous to tyrants. Solzhenitsyn in the Soviet
    Union, Vaclav Havel in Czechoslovakia rCo their art was truth-telling in
    the face of power. TodayrCOs artists, by contrast, pen open letters to guarantee free PR and social media applause. They confuse hashtags with heroism.

    And so one canrCOt help but wonder: do these celebrities care about
    justice at all? Or is it simply self-interest, attaching themselves to a fashionable cause to stay relevant? As long as the slogan looks good on
    a T-shirt and the cause is safe to support, theyrCOll perform their
    outrage. But when bravery is required rCo when it might cost them
    something rCo they retreat into silence.

    Art is supposed to speak truth to power. TodayrCOs celebrities speak only
    to the algorithm. And for their fellow artists, silence isnrCOt
    neutrality. ItrCOs betrayal.


    Sarah Idan (Miss Universe Iraq 2017)
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun Oct 5 16:33:30 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 21:18:42 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    Artists were once dangerous to tyrants, their art was truth-telling to power


    In the West, outrage has become performance art. ItAs not about real
    causes, but about carefully branded ones that play well in pastel
    Instagram carousels. Climate change? Of course. A vague plea for
    ojusticeo? Naturally. A curated oFree Palestineo hashtag? Absolutely.
    But when it comes to standing with their peers in the Middle East u
    singers, actors, writers who are literally jailed or executed for their
    art u the voices vanish.

    It is proven. It is quite literally possible to poopoo anything.

    This isnAt about Israel. The point is larger: why do so many Western
    artists reserve their outrage for one convenient villain while ignoring >regimes that jail, torture and kill their peers? SyriaAs Christians and >Druze are being ethnically cleansed. Yemen is enduring a famine. The
    Uyghurs in China and Christians in the Congo suffer horrors that make >Western protest slogans look like parody. But those crises donAt trend
    on TikTok. And so our moral guardians stay silent.

    If all that is being ignored, how did you find out about it?

    Take Turkey. Pop star Mabel Matia was dragged into court, slapped with a >travel ban for a song with LGBTQ themes u branded as oimmoralityo by >Erdo?anAs government. Where was Lady Gaga, a self-proclaimed advocate
    for the LGBTQ community, when this happened? Actor Cem Yitzik Fukuzumi, >known from NetflixAs Rise of Empires: Ottoman, faces seven years in
    prison for posting an Instagram story calling for a boycott after
    IstanbulAs opposition mayor was arrested. Where were Mark Ruffalo and
    Javier Bardem? These are not rebels with guns u they are artists with
    words, punished as if they were criminals.

    Iran is even darker. Musician Mohsen Shekhar was publicly hanged in 2022
    u his ocrimeo nothing more than protesting against the regime. Rapper
    Tomato Saleh was sentenced to death the same year for lyrics critical of
    the authorities, accused of oenmity against God.o He was spared only
    after global outrage forced the regimeAs hand. WhereAs Hollywood when
    this happens?

    These are the true causes that should evoke outrage: a song punished as >immoral, a post punished as treason, lyrics punished as blasphemy. In
    the Middle East, art itself can be a death sentence. And yet from
    Hollywood? Silence.

    Contrast that with the U.S. this month. Jimmy Kimmel faced backlash for >comments about Charlie KirkAs murder. His temporary suspension triggered
    an avalanche of headlines. Disney reportedly lost between $4 and $5
    billion in market value. That was one man, one career, one late-night
    show. Meanwhile, artists across the Middle East arenAt just losing jobs
    u theyAre losing their freedom and their lives. Where was the celebrity >chorus for them?

    Mark Ruffalo and Susan Sarandon have plenty of time for press
    conferences about Gaza. Billie Eilish can summon her fans to demand a >ceasefire. But for their fellow artists u their actual peers u who risk >prison or the gallows for a song, a lyric, or a post? Not a word.
    Apparently solidarity stops where the headlines end.

    The truth is that many of these artists arenAt radicals or rebels at
    all. They are brand managers. Their conscience extends only as far as
    their fanbase and their ticket sales. They pick causes the way others
    pick outfits: whatever flatters them, whatever gets applause, whatever
    comes risk-free. Supporting Gaza? Safe. Supporting Uyghurs? Risky.
    Speaking up for a jailed Iranian rapper? Not worth losing a Spotify stream.

    Artists were once dangerous to tyrants. Solzhenitsyn in the Soviet
    Union, Vaclav Havel in Czechoslovakia u their art was truth-telling in
    the face of power. TodayAs artists, by contrast, pen open letters to >guarantee free PR and social media applause. They confuse hashtags with >heroism.

    And so one canAt help but wonder: do these celebrities care about
    justice at all? Or is it simply self-interest, attaching themselves to a >fashionable cause to stay relevant? As long as the slogan looks good on
    a T-shirt and the cause is safe to support, theyAll perform their
    outrage. But when bravery is required u when it might cost them
    something u they retreat into silence.

    Art is supposed to speak truth to power. TodayAs celebrities speak only
    to the algorithm. And for their fellow artists, silence isnAt
    neutrality. ItAs betrayal.


    Sarah Idan (Miss Universe Iraq 2017)
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tara@tsm@fastmail.ca to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun Oct 5 20:52:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Oct 5, 2025 at 4:18:42rC>PM EDT, "Julian" <julianlzb87@gmail.com> wrote:

    Artists were once dangerous to tyrants, their art was truth-telling to power


    In the West, outrage has become performance art. ItrCOs not about real causes, but about carefully branded ones that play well in pastel
    Instagram carousels. Climate change? Of course. A vague plea for rCLjusticerCY? Naturally. A curated rCLFree PalestinerCY hashtag? Absolutely. But when it comes to standing with their peers in the Middle East rCo singers, actors, writers who are literally jailed or executed for their
    art rCo the voices vanish.

    This isnrCOt about Israel. The point is larger: why do so many Western artists reserve their outrage for one convenient villain while ignoring regimes that jail, torture and kill their peers? SyriarCOs Christians and Druze are being ethnically cleansed. Yemen is enduring a famine. The
    Uyghurs in China and Christians in the Congo suffer horrors that make
    Western protest slogans look like parody. But those crises donrCOt trend
    on TikTok. And so our moral guardians stay silent.

    Take Turkey. Pop star Mabel Matia was dragged into court, slapped with a travel ban for a song with LGBTQ themes rCo branded as rCLimmoralityrCY by Erdo-fanrCOs government. Where was Lady Gaga, a self-proclaimed advocate
    for the LGBTQ community, when this happened? Actor Cem Yitzik Fukuzumi,
    known from NetflixrCOs Rise of Empires: Ottoman, faces seven years in
    prison for posting an Instagram story calling for a boycott after IstanbulrCOs opposition mayor was arrested. Where were Mark Ruffalo and Javier Bardem? These are not rebels with guns rCo they are artists with words, punished as if they were criminals.

    Iran is even darker. Musician Mohsen Shekhar was publicly hanged in 2022
    rCo his rCLcrimerCY nothing more than protesting against the regime. Rapper Tomato Saleh was sentenced to death the same year for lyrics critical of
    the authorities, accused of rCLenmity against God.rCY He was spared only after global outrage forced the regimerCOs hand. WhererCOs Hollywood when this happens?

    These are the true causes that should evoke outrage: a song punished as immoral, a post punished as treason, lyrics punished as blasphemy. In
    the Middle East, art itself can be a death sentence. And yet from
    Hollywood? Silence.

    Contrast that with the U.S. this month. Jimmy Kimmel faced backlash for comments about Charlie KirkrCOs murder. His temporary suspension triggered
    an avalanche of headlines. Disney reportedly lost between $4 and $5
    billion in market value. That was one man, one career, one late-night
    show. Meanwhile, artists across the Middle East arenrCOt just losing jobs
    rCo theyrCOre losing their freedom and their lives. Where was the celebrity chorus for them?

    Mark Ruffalo and Susan Sarandon have plenty of time for press
    conferences about Gaza. Billie Eilish can summon her fans to demand a ceasefire. But for their fellow artists rCo their actual peers rCo who risk prison or the gallows for a song, a lyric, or a post? Not a word.
    Apparently solidarity stops where the headlines end.

    The truth is that many of these artists arenrCOt radicals or rebels at
    all. They are brand managers. Their conscience extends only as far as
    their fanbase and their ticket sales. They pick causes the way others
    pick outfits: whatever flatters them, whatever gets applause, whatever
    comes risk-free. Supporting Gaza? Safe. Supporting Uyghurs? Risky.
    Speaking up for a jailed Iranian rapper? Not worth losing a Spotify stream.

    Artists were once dangerous to tyrants. Solzhenitsyn in the Soviet
    Union, Vaclav Havel in Czechoslovakia rCo their art was truth-telling in
    the face of power. TodayrCOs artists, by contrast, pen open letters to guarantee free PR and social media applause. They confuse hashtags with heroism.

    And so one canrCOt help but wonder: do these celebrities care about
    justice at all? Or is it simply self-interest, attaching themselves to a fashionable cause to stay relevant? As long as the slogan looks good on
    a T-shirt and the cause is safe to support, theyrCOll perform their
    outrage. But when bravery is required rCo when it might cost them
    something rCo they retreat into silence.

    Art is supposed to speak truth to power. TodayrCOs celebrities speak only
    to the algorithm. And for their fellow artists, silence isnrCOt
    neutrality. ItrCOs betrayal.


    Sarah Idan (Miss Universe Iraq 2017)

    Bows
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun Oct 5 17:40:21 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Sun, 05 Oct 2025 16:33:30 -0400, Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 21:18:42 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    Artists were once dangerous to tyrants, their art was truth-telling to power >>

    In the West, outrage has become performance art. ItAs not about real >>causes, but about carefully branded ones that play well in pastel >>Instagram carousels. Climate change? Of course. A vague plea for >>ojusticeo? Naturally. A curated oFree Palestineo hashtag? Absolutely.
    But when it comes to standing with their peers in the Middle East u >>singers, actors, writers who are literally jailed or executed for their >>art u the voices vanish.

    It is proven. It is quite literally possible to poopoo anything.

    Because the state of mind and the bravery of a cause's adherents has
    nothing to do with the validity of the cause.


    This isnAt about Israel. The point is larger: why do so many Western >>artists reserve their outrage for one convenient villain while ignoring >>regimes that jail, torture and kill their peers? SyriaAs Christians and >>Druze are being ethnically cleansed. Yemen is enduring a famine. The >>Uyghurs in China and Christians in the Congo suffer horrors that make >>Western protest slogans look like parody. But those crises donAt trend
    on TikTok. And so our moral guardians stay silent.

    If all that is being ignored, how did you find out about it?

    Take Turkey. Pop star Mabel Matia was dragged into court, slapped with a >>travel ban for a song with LGBTQ themes u branded as oimmoralityo by >>Erdo?anAs government. Where was Lady Gaga, a self-proclaimed advocate
    for the LGBTQ community, when this happened? Actor Cem Yitzik Fukuzumi, >>known from NetflixAs Rise of Empires: Ottoman, faces seven years in
    prison for posting an Instagram story calling for a boycott after >>IstanbulAs opposition mayor was arrested. Where were Mark Ruffalo and >>Javier Bardem? These are not rebels with guns u they are artists with >>words, punished as if they were criminals.

    Iran is even darker. Musician Mohsen Shekhar was publicly hanged in 2022
    u his ocrimeo nothing more than protesting against the regime. Rapper >>Tomato Saleh was sentenced to death the same year for lyrics critical of >>the authorities, accused of oenmity against God.o He was spared only
    after global outrage forced the regimeAs hand. WhereAs Hollywood when
    this happens?

    These are the true causes that should evoke outrage: a song punished as >>immoral, a post punished as treason, lyrics punished as blasphemy. In
    the Middle East, art itself can be a death sentence. And yet from >>Hollywood? Silence.

    Contrast that with the U.S. this month. Jimmy Kimmel faced backlash for >>comments about Charlie KirkAs murder. His temporary suspension triggered >>an avalanche of headlines. Disney reportedly lost between $4 and $5 >>billion in market value. That was one man, one career, one late-night >>show. Meanwhile, artists across the Middle East arenAt just losing jobs
    u theyAre losing their freedom and their lives. Where was the celebrity >>chorus for them?

    Mark Ruffalo and Susan Sarandon have plenty of time for press
    conferences about Gaza. Billie Eilish can summon her fans to demand a >>ceasefire. But for their fellow artists u their actual peers u who risk >>prison or the gallows for a song, a lyric, or a post? Not a word. >>Apparently solidarity stops where the headlines end.

    The truth is that many of these artists arenAt radicals or rebels at
    all. They are brand managers. Their conscience extends only as far as >>their fanbase and their ticket sales. They pick causes the way others
    pick outfits: whatever flatters them, whatever gets applause, whatever >>comes risk-free. Supporting Gaza? Safe. Supporting Uyghurs? Risky. >>Speaking up for a jailed Iranian rapper? Not worth losing a Spotify stream. >>
    Artists were once dangerous to tyrants. Solzhenitsyn in the Soviet
    Union, Vaclav Havel in Czechoslovakia u their art was truth-telling in
    the face of power. TodayAs artists, by contrast, pen open letters to >>guarantee free PR and social media applause. They confuse hashtags with >>heroism.

    And so one canAt help but wonder: do these celebrities care about
    justice at all? Or is it simply self-interest, attaching themselves to a >>fashionable cause to stay relevant? As long as the slogan looks good on
    a T-shirt and the cause is safe to support, theyAll perform their
    outrage. But when bravery is required u when it might cost them
    something u they retreat into silence.

    Art is supposed to speak truth to power. TodayAs celebrities speak only
    to the algorithm. And for their fellow artists, silence isnAt
    neutrality. ItAs betrayal.


    Sarah Idan (Miss Universe Iraq 2017)
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2