| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 27 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 38:49:09 |
| Calls: | 631 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 1,187 |
| D/L today: |
23 files (29,781K bytes) |
| Messages: | 174,060 |
https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1nr9dud/starmers_digital_id_plan_is_a_recipe_for_state/
oDigital ID is an enormous opportunity for the UK,o Keir Starmer claimed >today, announcing a new Government scheme. oIt will make it tougher to
work illegally in this country, making our borders more secure. And it
will also offer ordinary citizens countless benefits, like being able to >prove your identity to access key services swiftly, rather than hunting >around for an old utility bill.o
Since the premiership of Tony Blair, Labour has been keen to introduce a >comprehensive national database which would bring together control and >administration, allowing the state to track citizensA identities. This
isnAt entirely driven by authoritarian urges, though politiciansA
enthusiasm for telling us what to say online, as well as what to eat,
drink and smoke, betrays a certain owe know whatAs best for youo >disposition.
In an age when private companies can profile each of us every time we
look at their website, itAs frustrating for bureaucrats to work with >ancient, creaking data systems that donAt join up. How much easier it
would be for those running the benefits, tax, education, and healthcare >systems if we could be identified as the same person across all of them. >Civil servants look with envy at the private sector, where people can be >tracked from platform to platform, and even through the real world,
thanks to their willing use of smartphones for almost everything.
For this reason, though recent Conservative governments mostly denied >wanting a national ID card scheme, in practice they were creating a de
facto digital ID system by joining up existing administrative data on >citizens. Our National Insurance number was gradually being attached to
our identity across different Government departments. Some of those,
such as passports and driving licenses, already have biometric data to
link faces to numbers. In a few more years, though we might not have an
ID card, we would have existed as a digitally identifiable individual in
a state database.
In that sense, StarmerAs Labour is merely being upfront about rendering
us all transparent to the state via technology. Where the last
Conservative government planned to outsource biometric ID schemes u for >example, to prove oneAs age u to private companies, Labour will simply
add that to its own scheme.
Initially, these ID cards will be compulsory only for adults starting a
new job. ItAs a politically astute move to link the new cards to making
it harder for illegal immigrants to find work, presenting a conundrum to >many on the political Right who would instinctively oppose a opapers, >pleaseo society. IsnAt it true that the ease of working in the gray
economy is a big pull factor for small boats and other irregular
arrivals? How else can a government identify those who shouldnAt be in
the country, or shouldnAt be working? Inevitably, that also means >identifying those who have every right to be living and working in Britain.
However, as campaign groups have been swift to point out, there are
dangers. For a start, such a comprehensive database is an irresistible >target for hackers. In the week that a chain of nurseries woke to the >nightmare of hackers not only posting the details of children on the
Dark Web, but directly contacting their parents, the potential
consequences of hacking a national ID database should be salient.
Just as importantly, such a system can be used not only to track and
observe individuals but also to intervene in their lives. The Post
Office scandal revealed how fallible technology can devastate the lives
of innocent people, even when introduced with good intentions u by
BlairAs government, incidentally.
A government whose intentions are at odds with its citizensA interests
could not only deny benefits, housing or healthcare to the owrongo
people, but also use their digital identity to otherwise make their
lives difficult. Debanking, travel restrictions, and other exclusions
from public life have already been used by other governments to deter >citizens from stepping out of line. However much you trust StarmerAs >ministry not to misuse the powers that accompany a universal digital ID >system, itAs extremely difficult to take back such powers from other,
future governments.
But given that comparable systems were already sliding in by stealth, >perhaps Starmer has done us a favor. By overtly proposing digital ID
cards, he has painted a target, a focus for popular pushback as well as >campaign groups which have long opposed such schemes. Already, a
petition against them has surpassed a million signatures. Could this be,
as some rival politicians are already suggesting, StarmerAs Poll Tax moment?
Michael Ejercito wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1nr9dud/starmers_digital_id_plan_is_a_recipe_for_state/
rCLDigital ID is an enormous opportunity for the UK,rCY Keir Starmer claimed >> today, announcing a new Government scheme. rCLIt will make it tougher to
work illegally in this country, making our borders more secure. And it
will also offer ordinary citizens countless benefits, like being able to
prove your identity to access key services swiftly, rather than hunting
around for an old utility bill.rCY
Since the premiership of Tony Blair, Labour has been keen to introduce a
comprehensive national database which would bring together control and
administration, allowing the state to track citizensrCO identities. This
isnrCOt entirely driven by authoritarian urges, though politiciansrCO
enthusiasm for telling us what to say online, as well as what to eat,
drink and smoke, betrays a certain rCLwe know whatrCOs best for yourCY
disposition.
In an age when private companies can profile each of us every time we
look at their website, itrCOs frustrating for bureaucrats to work with
ancient, creaking data systems that donrCOt join up. How much easier it
would be for those running the benefits, tax, education, and healthcare
systems if we could be identified as the same person across all of them.
Civil servants look with envy at the private sector, where people can be
tracked from platform to platform, and even through the real world,
thanks to their willing use of smartphones for almost everything.
For this reason, though recent Conservative governments mostly denied
wanting a national ID card scheme, in practice they were creating a de
facto digital ID system by joining up existing administrative data on
citizens. Our National Insurance number was gradually being attached to
our identity across different Government departments. Some of those,
such as passports and driving licenses, already have biometric data to
link faces to numbers. In a few more years, though we might not have an
ID card, we would have existed as a digitally identifiable individual in
a state database.
In that sense, StarmerrCOs Labour is merely being upfront about rendering
us all transparent to the state via technology. Where the last
Conservative government planned to outsource biometric ID schemes rCo for
example, to prove onerCOs age rCo to private companies, Labour will simply >> add that to its own scheme.
Initially, these ID cards will be compulsory only for adults starting a
new job. ItrCOs a politically astute move to link the new cards to making
it harder for illegal immigrants to find work, presenting a conundrum to
many on the political Right who would instinctively oppose a rCLpapers,
pleaserCY society. IsnrCOt it true that the ease of working in the gray
economy is a big pull factor for small boats and other irregular
arrivals? How else can a government identify those who shouldnrCOt be in
the country, or shouldnrCOt be working? Inevitably, that also means
identifying those who have every right to be living and working in Britain. >>
However, as campaign groups have been swift to point out, there are
dangers. For a start, such a comprehensive database is an irresistible
target for hackers. In the week that a chain of nurseries woke to the
nightmare of hackers not only posting the details of children on the
Dark Web, but directly contacting their parents, the potential
consequences of hacking a national ID database should be salient.
Just as importantly, such a system can be used not only to track and
observe individuals but also to intervene in their lives. The Post
Office scandal revealed how fallible technology can devastate the lives
of innocent people, even when introduced with good intentions rCo by
BlairrCOs government, incidentally.
A government whose intentions are at odds with its citizensrCO interests
could not only deny benefits, housing or healthcare to the rCYwrongrCY
people, but also use their digital identity to otherwise make their
lives difficult. Debanking, travel restrictions, and other exclusions
from public life have already been used by other governments to deter
citizens from stepping out of line. However much you trust StarmerrCOs
ministry not to misuse the powers that accompany a universal digital ID
system, itrCOs extremely difficult to take back such powers from other,
future governments.
But given that comparable systems were already sliding in by stealth,
perhaps Starmer has done us a favor. By overtly proposing digital ID
cards, he has painted a target, a focus for popular pushback as well as
campaign groups which have long opposed such schemes. Already, a
petition against them has surpassed a million signatures. Could this be,
as some rival politicians are already suggesting, StarmerrCOs Poll Tax moment?
In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).
Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
"convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
longer effective.
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry ( https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
So how are you ?
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1nr9dud/starmers_digital_id_plan_is_a_recipe_for_state/
oDigital ID is an enormous opportunity for the UK,o Keir Starmer claimed >>> today, announcing a new Government scheme. oIt will make it tougher to
work illegally in this country, making our borders more secure. And it
will also offer ordinary citizens countless benefits, like being able to >>> prove your identity to access key services swiftly, rather than hunting
around for an old utility bill.o
Since the premiership of Tony Blair, Labour has been keen to introduce a >>> comprehensive national database which would bring together control and
administration, allowing the state to track citizensA identities. This
isnAt entirely driven by authoritarian urges, though politiciansA
enthusiasm for telling us what to say online, as well as what to eat,
drink and smoke, betrays a certain owe know whatAs best for youo
disposition.
In an age when private companies can profile each of us every time we
look at their website, itAs frustrating for bureaucrats to work with
ancient, creaking data systems that donAt join up. How much easier it
would be for those running the benefits, tax, education, and healthcare
systems if we could be identified as the same person across all of them. >>> Civil servants look with envy at the private sector, where people can be >>> tracked from platform to platform, and even through the real world,
thanks to their willing use of smartphones for almost everything.
For this reason, though recent Conservative governments mostly denied
wanting a national ID card scheme, in practice they were creating a de
facto digital ID system by joining up existing administrative data on
citizens. Our National Insurance number was gradually being attached to
our identity across different Government departments. Some of those,
such as passports and driving licenses, already have biometric data to
link faces to numbers. In a few more years, though we might not have an
ID card, we would have existed as a digitally identifiable individual in >>> a state database.
In that sense, StarmerAs Labour is merely being upfront about rendering
us all transparent to the state via technology. Where the last
Conservative government planned to outsource biometric ID schemes u for
example, to prove oneAs age u to private companies, Labour will simply
add that to its own scheme.
Initially, these ID cards will be compulsory only for adults starting a
new job. ItAs a politically astute move to link the new cards to making
it harder for illegal immigrants to find work, presenting a conundrum to >>> many on the political Right who would instinctively oppose a opapers,
pleaseo society. IsnAt it true that the ease of working in the gray
economy is a big pull factor for small boats and other irregular
arrivals? How else can a government identify those who shouldnAt be in
the country, or shouldnAt be working? Inevitably, that also means
identifying those who have every right to be living and working in Britain. >>>
However, as campaign groups have been swift to point out, there are
dangers. For a start, such a comprehensive database is an irresistible
target for hackers. In the week that a chain of nurseries woke to the
nightmare of hackers not only posting the details of children on the
Dark Web, but directly contacting their parents, the potential
consequences of hacking a national ID database should be salient.
Just as importantly, such a system can be used not only to track and
observe individuals but also to intervene in their lives. The Post
Office scandal revealed how fallible technology can devastate the lives
of innocent people, even when introduced with good intentions u by
BlairAs government, incidentally.
A government whose intentions are at odds with its citizensA interests
could not only deny benefits, housing or healthcare to the owrongo
people, but also use their digital identity to otherwise make their
lives difficult. Debanking, travel restrictions, and other exclusions >>>from public life have already been used by other governments to deter
citizens from stepping out of line. However much you trust StarmerAs
ministry not to misuse the powers that accompany a universal digital ID
system, itAs extremely difficult to take back such powers from other,
future governments.
But given that comparable systems were already sliding in by stealth,
perhaps Starmer has done us a favor. By overtly proposing digital ID
cards, he has painted a target, a focus for popular pushback as well as
campaign groups which have long opposed such schemes. Already, a
petition against them has surpassed a million signatures. Could this be, >>> as some rival politicians are already suggesting, StarmerAs Poll Tax moment?
In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).
Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
"convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
longer effective.
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ >> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
So how are you ?
I am wonderfully hungry!
Michael Ejercito wrote:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1nr9dud/starmers_digital_id_plan_is_a_recipe_for_state/
rCLDigital ID is an enormous opportunity for the UK,rCY Keir Starmer claimed
today, announcing a new Government scheme. rCLIt will make it tougher to >>>> work illegally in this country, making our borders more secure. And it >>>> will also offer ordinary citizens countless benefits, like being able to >>>> prove your identity to access key services swiftly, rather than hunting >>>> around for an old utility bill.rCY
Since the premiership of Tony Blair, Labour has been keen to introduce a >>>> comprehensive national database which would bring together control and >>>> administration, allowing the state to track citizensrCO identities. This >>>> isnrCOt entirely driven by authoritarian urges, though politiciansrCO
enthusiasm for telling us what to say online, as well as what to eat,
drink and smoke, betrays a certain rCLwe know whatrCOs best for yourCY >>>> disposition.
In an age when private companies can profile each of us every time we
look at their website, itrCOs frustrating for bureaucrats to work with >>>> ancient, creaking data systems that donrCOt join up. How much easier it >>>> would be for those running the benefits, tax, education, and healthcare >>>> systems if we could be identified as the same person across all of them. >>>> Civil servants look with envy at the private sector, where people can be >>>> tracked from platform to platform, and even through the real world,
thanks to their willing use of smartphones for almost everything.
For this reason, though recent Conservative governments mostly denied
wanting a national ID card scheme, in practice they were creating a de >>>> facto digital ID system by joining up existing administrative data on
citizens. Our National Insurance number was gradually being attached to >>>> our identity across different Government departments. Some of those,
such as passports and driving licenses, already have biometric data to >>>> link faces to numbers. In a few more years, though we might not have an >>>> ID card, we would have existed as a digitally identifiable individual in >>>> a state database.
In that sense, StarmerrCOs Labour is merely being upfront about rendering >>>> us all transparent to the state via technology. Where the last
Conservative government planned to outsource biometric ID schemes rCo for >>>> example, to prove onerCOs age rCo to private companies, Labour will simply >>>> add that to its own scheme.
Initially, these ID cards will be compulsory only for adults starting a >>>> new job. ItrCOs a politically astute move to link the new cards to making >>>> it harder for illegal immigrants to find work, presenting a conundrum to >>>> many on the political Right who would instinctively oppose a rCLpapers, >>>> pleaserCY society. IsnrCOt it true that the ease of working in the gray >>>> economy is a big pull factor for small boats and other irregular
arrivals? How else can a government identify those who shouldnrCOt be in >>>> the country, or shouldnrCOt be working? Inevitably, that also means
identifying those who have every right to be living and working in Britain.
However, as campaign groups have been swift to point out, there are
dangers. For a start, such a comprehensive database is an irresistible >>>> target for hackers. In the week that a chain of nurseries woke to the
nightmare of hackers not only posting the details of children on the
Dark Web, but directly contacting their parents, the potential
consequences of hacking a national ID database should be salient.
Just as importantly, such a system can be used not only to track and
observe individuals but also to intervene in their lives. The Post
Office scandal revealed how fallible technology can devastate the lives >>>> of innocent people, even when introduced with good intentions rCo by
BlairrCOs government, incidentally.
A government whose intentions are at odds with its citizensrCO interests >>>> could not only deny benefits, housing or healthcare to the rCYwrongrCY >>>> people, but also use their digital identity to otherwise make their
lives difficult. Debanking, travel restrictions, and other exclusions
from public life have already been used by other governments to deter >>>> citizens from stepping out of line. However much you trust StarmerrCOs >>>> ministry not to misuse the powers that accompany a universal digital ID >>>> system, itrCOs extremely difficult to take back such powers from other, >>>> future governments.
But given that comparable systems were already sliding in by stealth,
perhaps Starmer has done us a favor. By overtly proposing digital ID
cards, he has painted a target, a focus for popular pushback as well as >>>> campaign groups which have long opposed such schemes. Already, a
petition against them has surpassed a million signatures. Could this be, >>>> as some rival politicians are already suggesting, StarmerrCOs Poll Tax moment?
In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).
Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
"convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
longer effective.
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ >>> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
So how are you ?
I am wonderfully hungry!
While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
Laus DEO !
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1nr9dud/starmers_digital_id_plan_is_a_recipe_for_state/
oDigital ID is an enormous opportunity for the UK,o Keir Starmer claimed >>>>> today, announcing a new Government scheme. oIt will make it tougher to >>>>> work illegally in this country, making our borders more secure. And it >>>>> will also offer ordinary citizens countless benefits, like being able to >>>>> prove your identity to access key services swiftly, rather than hunting >>>>> around for an old utility bill.o
Since the premiership of Tony Blair, Labour has been keen to introduce a >>>>> comprehensive national database which would bring together control and >>>>> administration, allowing the state to track citizensA identities. This >>>>> isnAt entirely driven by authoritarian urges, though politiciansA
enthusiasm for telling us what to say online, as well as what to eat, >>>>> drink and smoke, betrays a certain owe know whatAs best for youo
disposition.
In an age when private companies can profile each of us every time we >>>>> look at their website, itAs frustrating for bureaucrats to work with >>>>> ancient, creaking data systems that donAt join up. How much easier it >>>>> would be for those running the benefits, tax, education, and healthcare >>>>> systems if we could be identified as the same person across all of them. >>>>> Civil servants look with envy at the private sector, where people can be >>>>> tracked from platform to platform, and even through the real world,
thanks to their willing use of smartphones for almost everything.
For this reason, though recent Conservative governments mostly denied >>>>> wanting a national ID card scheme, in practice they were creating a de >>>>> facto digital ID system by joining up existing administrative data on >>>>> citizens. Our National Insurance number was gradually being attached to >>>>> our identity across different Government departments. Some of those, >>>>> such as passports and driving licenses, already have biometric data to >>>>> link faces to numbers. In a few more years, though we might not have an >>>>> ID card, we would have existed as a digitally identifiable individual in >>>>> a state database.
In that sense, StarmerAs Labour is merely being upfront about rendering >>>>> us all transparent to the state via technology. Where the last
Conservative government planned to outsource biometric ID schemes u for >>>>> example, to prove oneAs age u to private companies, Labour will simply >>>>> add that to its own scheme.
Initially, these ID cards will be compulsory only for adults starting a >>>>> new job. ItAs a politically astute move to link the new cards to making >>>>> it harder for illegal immigrants to find work, presenting a conundrum to >>>>> many on the political Right who would instinctively oppose a opapers, >>>>> pleaseo society. IsnAt it true that the ease of working in the gray
economy is a big pull factor for small boats and other irregular
arrivals? How else can a government identify those who shouldnAt be in >>>>> the country, or shouldnAt be working? Inevitably, that also means
identifying those who have every right to be living and working in Britain.
However, as campaign groups have been swift to point out, there are
dangers. For a start, such a comprehensive database is an irresistible >>>>> target for hackers. In the week that a chain of nurseries woke to the >>>>> nightmare of hackers not only posting the details of children on the >>>>> Dark Web, but directly contacting their parents, the potential
consequences of hacking a national ID database should be salient.
Just as importantly, such a system can be used not only to track and >>>>> observe individuals but also to intervene in their lives. The Post
Office scandal revealed how fallible technology can devastate the lives >>>>> of innocent people, even when introduced with good intentions u by
BlairAs government, incidentally.
A government whose intentions are at odds with its citizensA interests >>>>> could not only deny benefits, housing or healthcare to the owrongo
people, but also use their digital identity to otherwise make their
lives difficult. Debanking, travel restrictions, and other exclusions >>>> >from public life have already been used by other governments to deter >>>>> citizens from stepping out of line. However much you trust StarmerAs >>>>> ministry not to misuse the powers that accompany a universal digital ID >>>>> system, itAs extremely difficult to take back such powers from other, >>>>> future governments.
But given that comparable systems were already sliding in by stealth, >>>>> perhaps Starmer has done us a favor. By overtly proposing digital ID >>>>> cards, he has painted a target, a focus for popular pushback as well as >>>>> campaign groups which have long opposed such schemes. Already, a
petition against them has surpassed a million signatures. Could this be, >>>>> as some rival politicians are already suggesting, StarmerAs Poll Tax moment?
In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's >>>> secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps >>>> us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).
Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given >>>> moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
"convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
longer effective.
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
So how are you ?
I am wonderfully hungry!
While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
Laus DEO !
Thank you for noting that I have no COVID.
ReplyPermalinkOn Sat, 27 Sep 2025 19:41:47 +0100, Ron 'I'm not some fucking jew'There you go again, pretending that I am some sort of illegal alien!
Worry about what's going on in your own Asiatic shithole, theThe gook heard on the news about the shit piling into Europe on an
Flippines!
almost daily basis. He's probably figuring that he can sneak into the
UK before ICE grabs him here.