| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 27 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 36:12:08 |
| Calls: | 631 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 1,187 |
| D/L today: |
22 files (29,767K bytes) |
| Messages: | 173,011 |
Regarding DNA. All the hypothesizing in regards to it;
While I know it has its immediate uses which may or may not be successful, it
is not the do all end all.
There are well known destructive tests to extract DNA and some
Aso-calledA non-destructive tests.
The source of the DNA matters if one wants apurityA meaning what parts of the body it came from.
On Sep 26, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
(Message-ID: <10b6v56$19ttv$2@dont-email.me>):
On 9/26/2025 1:09 AM, None wrote:
Did you even read the Merriam-Webster entry ("often capitalized")??
Dawn, you know why I asked you the question. A the word is capitalized at the
beginning of a sentence, or when used in respect to a religious phrase. Which
reflects a bit of your background.
As a person, that is not a word I have ever used to describe things that have
to due with Easter, etc. In fact in never enters my mind except when someone
uses it with that sense of association. I am sure you know what I am talking
about or referencing.
I suppose that, yes, ultimately, everything that we do is "physiological",
but as for Jesus' alleged "apparitions," such did not happen, except in the heads of some of his followers.
No one in those days spoke of it as an apparition. If they were to have then
it would have been an acknowledgement of a reality. One not of this realm.
That you seek to reject it, I get.
But God is not done caring about you.
The people who wrote the Bible believed that our World was flat:
You should check out the scriptures for yourself. The bible describes a sphere. It was the RCC that declared it flat, just like the flat earthAers. It proved to be a major source of embarrassment to them unto this day.
https://www.cantab.net/users/michael.behrend/ebooks/PlaneTruth/pages/Appendix_
A.html
Please do not say that it was all "symbolic" for these people took the Bible at its word:
They were and are ignorant of the scriptures, void of understanding. There is
nothing symbolic about them. The seven stars of the Pleiades are noted as being fixed in the skies, which was hotly contested as well, and by AscienceA. A few years ago it was decided by the same people that yes,
they are fixed.
As the bible determined them to be. They used a different
term for their positioning lest them fall into the religious trap. The North Star has been used for navigation both on land and on water for that reason.
As far back into human history as you care to go, astrologers, astronomers, etc. Have used the stability and consistency cycling of the stars for signs of all types. Even the star that the wise man followed was predicted by Daniel in the Bible in his time, and he was well known in the Heathen world for his knowledge of the Stars, etc. They all recognized it and followed his predictions, all of which were correct.
I studied and verified this over 50 years ago, so please do not expect me to remember all the particulars, and I no longer have the associated books in my
library and no longer have access to the libraries I new at that time.
None <none@none.non> wrote:
On Sep 26, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
(Message-ID: <10b6v56$19ttv$2@dont-email.me>):
On 9/26/2025 1:09 AM, None wrote:
(snip hundreds of lines)
Did you even read the Merriam-Webster entry ("often capitalized")??
Dawn, you know why I asked you the question. A the word is capitalized at >>>> the
beginning of a sentence, or when used in respect to a religious phrase. >>>> Which
reflects a bit of your background.
As a person, that is not a word I have ever used to describe things that >>>> have
to due with Easter, etc. In fact in never enters my mind except when someone
uses it with that sense of association. I am sure you know what I am talking
about or referencing.
I suppose that, yes, ultimately, everything that we do is "physiological",
but as for Jesus' alleged "apparitions," such did not happen, except in >>>>> the heads of some of his followers.
No one in those days spoke of it as an apparition. If they were to have then
it would have been an acknowledgement of a reality. One not of this realm. >>>>
That you seek to reject it, I get.
But God is not done caring about you.
The people who wrote the Bible believed that our World was flat:
You should check out the scriptures for yourself. The bible describes a
sphere. It was the RCC that declared it flat, just like the flat earthrCOers.
It proved to be a major source of embarrassment to them unto this day.
You've got it wrong. The RCC never believed in a flat earth. Even in
240 BCE, mariners and educated Greeks knew the earth is round.
The RCC did believe in a geocentric universe, but not a flat earth.
https://www.cantab.net/users/michael.behrend/ebooks/PlaneTruth/pages/Appendix_
A.html
Please do not say that it was all "symbolic" for these people took the
Bible at its word:
They were and are ignorant of the scriptures, void of understanding. There is
nothing symbolic about them. The seven stars of the Pleiades are noted as
being fixed in the skies, which was hotly contested as well, and by
rCOsciencerCO. A few years ago it was decided by the same people that yes, >> they are fixed.
There is no such thing as "fixed" stars. No real astronomer claims
there are. Stars all move.
You may think some stars don't move because they are in almost the same
place they were 6,000 years ago. That would be your misunderstanding.
As the bible determined them to be. They used a different
The Bible provides no information on position of stars.
term for their positioning lest them fall into the religious trap. The North >> Star has been used for navigation both on land and on water for that reason. >>
As far back into human history as you care to go, astrologers, astronomers, >> etc. Have used the stability and consistency cycling of the stars for signs >> of all types. Even the star that the wise man followed was predicted by
Daniel in the Bible in his time, and he was well known in the Heathen world >> for his knowledge of the Stars, etc. They all recognized it and followed his >> predictions, all of which were correct.
Yes, there has been much superstition built up around stars.
I studied and verified this over 50 years ago, so please do not expect me to >> remember all the particulars, and I no longer have the associated books in my
library and no longer have access to the libraries I new at that time.
Robert, so far I've never seen you support anything you ever said, and
nobody expects you to start now.
Over the last 50 years you have forgotten a lot, and filled in the
blanks with "agendized" beliefs.
Today you have access to a huge library called The Internet. It dwarfs whatever books you had 50 years ago. There's no excuse for your
persistant ignorance, except that you're happier this way.
On 9/27/2025 3:21 AM, Samuel Spade wrote:
None <none@none.non> wrote:
As the bible determined them to be. They used a different
The Bible provides no information on position of stars.
term for their positioning lest them fall into the religious trap. The North
Star has been used for navigation both on land and on water for that reason.
As far back into human history as you care to go, astrologers, astronomers,
etc. Have used the stability and consistency cycling of the stars for signs
of all types. Even the star that the wise man followed was predicted by
Daniel in the Bible in his time, and he was well known in the Heathen world
for his knowledge of the Stars, etc. They all recognized it and followed his
predictions, all of which were correct.
Yes, there has been much superstition built up around stars.
I studied and verified this over 50 years ago, so please do not expect me to
remember all the particulars, and I no longer have the associated books in my
library and no longer have access to the libraries I new at that time.
Robert, so far I've never seen you support anything you ever said, and nobody expects you to start now.
Over the last 50 years you have forgotten a lot, and filled in the
blanks with "agendized" beliefs.
Today you have access to a huge library called The Internet. It dwarfs whatever books you had 50 years ago. There's no excuse for your
persistant ignorance, except that you're happier this way.
And, so, sometimes Robert posts as himself, and at other times, he posts anonymously?
On 9/27/2025 3:21 AM, Samuel Spade wrote:
None <none@none.non> wrote:
On Sep 26, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
(Message-ID: <10b6v56$19ttv$2@dont-email.me>):
On 9/26/2025 1:09 AM, None wrote:
(snip hundreds of lines)
Did you even read the Merriam-Webster entry ("often capitalized")??
Dawn, you know why I asked you the question. A the word is capitalized at
the
beginning of a sentence, or when used in respect to a religious phrase.
Which
reflects a bit of your background.
As a person, that is not a word I have ever used to describe things that
have
to due with Easter, etc. In fact in never enters my mind except when someone
uses it with that sense of association. I am sure you know what I am talking
about or referencing.
I suppose that, yes, ultimately, everything that we do is "physiological",
but as for Jesus' alleged "apparitions," such did not happen, except in
the heads of some of his followers.
No one in those days spoke of it as an apparition. If they were to have
then
it would have been an acknowledgement of a reality. One not of this realm.
That you seek to reject it, I get.
But God is not done caring about you.
The people who wrote the Bible believed that our World was flat:
You should check out the scriptures for yourself. The bible describes a sphere. It was the RCC that declared it flat, just like the flat earthrCOers.
It proved to be a major source of embarrassment to them unto this day.
You've got it wrong. The RCC never believed in a flat earth. Even in
240 BCE, mariners and educated Greeks knew the earth is round.
The RCC did believe in a geocentric universe, but not a flat earth.
https://www.cantab.net/users/michael.behrend/ebooks/PlaneTruth/pages/Appen
dix_
A.html
Please do not say that it was all "symbolic" for these people took the Bible at its word:
They were and are ignorant of the scriptures, void of understanding. There
is
nothing symbolic about them. The seven stars of the Pleiades are noted as being fixed in the skies, which was hotly contested as well, and by rCOsciencerCO. A few years ago it was decided by the same people that yes,
they are fixed.
There is no such thing as "fixed" stars. No real astronomer claims
there are. Stars all move.
You may think some stars don't move because they are in almost the same place they were 6,000 years ago. That would be your misunderstanding.
As the bible determined them to be. They used a different
The Bible provides no information on position of stars.
term for their positioning lest them fall into the religious trap. The North
Star has been used for navigation both on land and on water for that reason.
As far back into human history as you care to go, astrologers, astronomers,
etc. Have used the stability and consistency cycling of the stars for signs
of all types. Even the star that the wise man followed was predicted by Daniel in the Bible in his time, and he was well known in the Heathen world
for his knowledge of the Stars, etc. They all recognized it and followed his
predictions, all of which were correct.
Yes, there has been much superstition built up around stars.
I studied and verified this over 50 years ago, so please do not expect me to
remember all the particulars, and I no longer have the associated books in
my
library and no longer have access to the libraries I new at that time.
Robert, so far I've never seen you support anything you ever said, and nobody expects you to start now.
Over the last 50 years you have forgotten a lot, and filled in the
blanks with "agendized" beliefs.
Today you have access to a huge library called The Internet. It dwarfs whatever books you had 50 years ago. There's no excuse for your
persistant ignorance, except that you're happier this way.
And, so, sometimes Robert posts as himself, and at other times, he posts anonymously?
On Sep 27, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
(Message-ID: <10ba60m$2377i$1@dont-email.me>):
On 9/27/2025 3:21 AM, Samuel Spade wrote:
None <none@none.non> wrote:
On Sep 26, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
(Message-ID: <10b6v56$19ttv$2@dont-email.me>):
On 9/26/2025 1:09 AM, None wrote:
(snip hundreds of lines)
Did you even read the Merriam-Webster entry ("often capitalized")?? >>>>>>Dawn, you know why I asked you the question. A the word is capitalized at
the
beginning of a sentence, or when used in respect to a religious phrase. >>>>>> Which
reflects a bit of your background.
As a person, that is not a word I have ever used to describe things that >>>>>> have
to due with Easter, etc. In fact in never enters my mind except when >>>>>> someone
uses it with that sense of association. I am sure you know what I am >>>>>> talking
about or referencing.
I suppose that, yes, ultimately, everything that we do is
"physiological",
but as for Jesus' alleged "apparitions," such did not happen, except in >>>>>>> the heads of some of his followers.
No one in those days spoke of it as an apparition. If they were to have >>>>>> then
it would have been an acknowledgement of a reality. One not of this >>>>>> realm.
That you seek to reject it, I get.
But God is not done caring about you.
The people who wrote the Bible believed that our World was flat:
You should check out the scriptures for yourself. The bible describes a >>>> sphere. It was the RCC that declared it flat, just like the flat
earthrCOers.
It proved to be a major source of embarrassment to them unto this day.
You've got it wrong. The RCC never believed in a flat earth. Even in
240 BCE, mariners and educated Greeks knew the earth is round.
The RCC did believe in a geocentric universe, but not a flat earth.
https://www.cantab.net/users/michael.behrend/ebooks/PlaneTruth/pages/Appen
dix_
A.html
Please do not say that it was all "symbolic" for these people took the >>>>> Bible at its word:
They were and are ignorant of the scriptures, void of understanding. There >>>> is
nothing symbolic about them. The seven stars of the Pleiades are noted as >>>> being fixed in the skies, which was hotly contested as well, and by
rCOsciencerCO. A few years ago it was decided by the same people that yes, >>>> they are fixed.
There is no such thing as "fixed" stars. No real astronomer claims
there are. Stars all move.
You may think some stars don't move because they are in almost the same
place they were 6,000 years ago. That would be your misunderstanding.
As the bible determined them to be. They used a different
The Bible provides no information on position of stars.
term for their positioning lest them fall into the religious trap. The >>>> North
Star has been used for navigation both on land and on water for that
reason.
As far back into human history as you care to go, astrologers, astronomers,
etc. Have used the stability and consistency cycling of the stars for signs
of all types. Even the star that the wise man followed was predicted by >>>> Daniel in the Bible in his time, and he was well known in the Heathen world
for his knowledge of the Stars, etc. They all recognized it and followed >>>> his
predictions, all of which were correct.
Yes, there has been much superstition built up around stars.
I studied and verified this over 50 years ago, so please do not expect me >>>> to
remember all the particulars, and I no longer have the associated books in >>>> my
library and no longer have access to the libraries I new at that time.
Robert, so far I've never seen you support anything you ever said, and
nobody expects you to start now.
Over the last 50 years you have forgotten a lot, and filled in the
blanks with "agendized" beliefs.
Today you have access to a huge library called The Internet. It dwarfs
whatever books you had 50 years ago. There's no excuse for your
persistant ignorance, except that you're happier this way.
And, so, sometimes Robert posts as himself, and at other times, he posts
anonymously?
It depends on the NG, I have defaults that I use, and so I know my origin. Roberts, Doc and None, or No One.. Although others have and commonly use the last two in particular. So not everyone that uses those Nyms are not me.
The Web is always in a state of flux, and info disappears, the internet is just that, a network. Info has no proof of origin as a rule, other that the point of origin, there is a whole lot of agendas, and all it it can disappear on a moments notice as availability is not always going to be available without restrictions.
SS is an imitator and a troll. And of course it is a fictitious nym.
On Sep 27, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
(Message-ID: <10ba60m$2377i$1@dont-email.me>):
On 9/27/2025 3:21 AM, Samuel Spade wrote:
None <none@none.non> wrote:
On Sep 26, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
(Message-ID: <10b6v56$19ttv$2@dont-email.me>):
On 9/26/2025 1:09 AM, None wrote:
(snip hundreds of lines)
Did you even read the Merriam-Webster entry ("often
capitalized")??
Dawn, you know why I asked you the question. A the word is
capitalized at the
beginning of a sentence, or when used in respect to a
religious phrase. Which
reflects a bit of your background.
As a person, that is not a word I have ever used to describe
things that have
to due with Easter, etc. In fact in never enters my mind
except when someone
uses it with that sense of association. I am sure you know
what I am talking
about or referencing.
I suppose that, yes, ultimately, everything that we do is
"physiological",
but as for Jesus' alleged "apparitions," such did not
happen, except in the heads of some of his followers.
No one in those days spoke of it as an apparition. If they
were to have then
it would have been an acknowledgement of a reality. One not
of this realm.
That you seek to reject it, I get.
But God is not done caring about you.
The people who wrote the Bible believed that our World was
flat:
You should check out the scriptures for yourself. The bible
describes a sphere. It was the RCC that declared it flat, just
like the flat earthrCOers.
It proved to be a major source of embarrassment to them unto this
day.
You've got it wrong. The RCC never believed in a flat earth. Even
in 240 BCE, mariners and educated Greeks knew the earth is round.
The RCC did believe in a geocentric universe, but not a flat earth.
https://www.cantab.net/users/michael.behrend/ebooks/PlaneTruth/p
ages/Appen dix_
A.html
Please do not say that it was all "symbolic" for these people
took the Bible at its word:
They were and are ignorant of the scriptures, void of
understanding. There is
nothing symbolic about them. The seven stars of the Pleiades are
noted as being fixed in the skies, which was hotly contested as
well, and by rCOsciencerCO. A few years ago it was decided by the
same people that yes, they are fixed.
There is no such thing as "fixed" stars. No real astronomer claims
there are. Stars all move.
You may think some stars don't move because they are in almost the
same place they were 6,000 years ago. That would be your
misunderstanding.
As the bible determined them to be. They used a different
The Bible provides no information on position of stars.
term for their positioning lest them fall into the religious
trap. The North
Star has been used for navigation both on land and on water for
that reason.
As far back into human history as you care to go, astrologers,
astronomers, etc. Have used the stability and consistency cycling
of the stars for signs of all types. Even the star that the wise
man followed was predicted by Daniel in the Bible in his time,
and he was well known in the Heathen world for his knowledge of
the Stars, etc. They all recognized it and followed his
predictions, all of which were correct.
Yes, there has been much superstition built up around stars.
I studied and verified this over 50 years ago, so please do not
expect me to
remember all the particulars, and I no longer have the associated
books in my
library and no longer have access to the libraries I new at that
time.
Robert, so far I've never seen you support anything you ever said,
and nobody expects you to start now.
Over the last 50 years you have forgotten a lot, and filled in the
blanks with "agendized" beliefs.
Today you have access to a huge library called The Internet. It
dwarfs whatever books you had 50 years ago. There's no excuse for
your persistant ignorance, except that you're happier this way.
And, so, sometimes Robert posts as himself, and at other times, he
posts anonymously?
It depends on the NG, I have defaults that I use, and so I know my
origin. Roberts, Doc and None, or No One.. Although others have and
commonly use the last two in particular. So not everyone that uses
those Nyms are not me.
The Web is always in a state of flux, and info disappears, the
internet is just that, a network. Info has no proof of origin as a
rule, other that the point of origin, there is a whole lot of agendas,
and all it it can disappear on a moments notice as availability is not
always going to be available without restrictions.
SS is an imitator and a troll. And of course it is a fictitious nym.
Robert <.robert@mu.way> wrote in news:10baiep$25ot2$1@dont-email.me:
On Sep 27, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
(Message-ID: <10ba60m$2377i$1@dont-email.me>):
On 9/27/2025 3:21 AM, Samuel Spade wrote:
None <none@none.non> wrote:
On Sep 26, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
(Message-ID: <10b6v56$19ttv$2@dont-email.me>):
On 9/26/2025 1:09 AM, None wrote:
(snip hundreds of lines)
Did you even read the Merriam-Webster entry ("often capitalized")??
Dawn, you know why I asked you the question. A the word is capitalized at the
beginning of a sentence, or when used in respect to a
religious phrase. Which
reflects a bit of your background.
As a person, that is not a word I have ever used to describe things that have
to due with Easter, etc. In fact in never enters my mind
except when someone
uses it with that sense of association. I am sure you know
what I am talking
about or referencing.
I suppose that, yes, ultimately, everything that we do is "physiological",
but as for Jesus' alleged "apparitions," such did not
happen, except in the heads of some of his followers.
No one in those days spoke of it as an apparition. If they
were to have then
it would have been an acknowledgement of a reality. One not
of this realm.
That you seek to reject it, I get.
But God is not done caring about you.
The people who wrote the Bible believed that our World was
flat:
You should check out the scriptures for yourself. The bible
describes a sphere. It was the RCC that declared it flat, just
like the flat earthrCOers.
It proved to be a major source of embarrassment to them unto this day.
You've got it wrong. The RCC never believed in a flat earth. Even
in 240 BCE, mariners and educated Greeks knew the earth is round.
The RCC did believe in a geocentric universe, but not a flat earth.
https://www.cantab.net/users/michael.behrend/ebooks/PlaneTruth/p ages/Appen dix_
A.html
Please do not say that it was all "symbolic" for these people
took the Bible at its word:
They were and are ignorant of the scriptures, void of
understanding. There is
nothing symbolic about them. The seven stars of the Pleiades are noted as being fixed in the skies, which was hotly contested as
well, and by rCOsciencerCO. A few years ago it was decided by the same people that yes, they are fixed.
There is no such thing as "fixed" stars. No real astronomer claims there are. Stars all move.
You may think some stars don't move because they are in almost the
same place they were 6,000 years ago. That would be your misunderstanding.
As the bible determined them to be. They used a different
The Bible provides no information on position of stars.
term for their positioning lest them fall into the religious
trap. The North
Star has been used for navigation both on land and on water for
that reason.
As far back into human history as you care to go, astrologers, astronomers, etc. Have used the stability and consistency cycling
of the stars for signs of all types. Even the star that the wise
man followed was predicted by Daniel in the Bible in his time,
and he was well known in the Heathen world for his knowledge of
the Stars, etc. They all recognized it and followed his
predictions, all of which were correct.
Yes, there has been much superstition built up around stars.
I studied and verified this over 50 years ago, so please do not expect me to
remember all the particulars, and I no longer have the associated books in my
library and no longer have access to the libraries I new at that time.
Robert, so far I've never seen you support anything you ever said,
and nobody expects you to start now.
Over the last 50 years you have forgotten a lot, and filled in the blanks with "agendized" beliefs.
Today you have access to a huge library called The Internet. It
dwarfs whatever books you had 50 years ago. There's no excuse for
your persistant ignorance, except that you're happier this way.
And, so, sometimes Robert posts as himself, and at other times, he
posts anonymously?
It depends on the NG, I have defaults that I use, and so I know my
origin. Roberts, Doc and None, or No One.. Although others have and commonly use the last two in particular. So not everyone that uses
those Nyms are not me.
The only reason I have seen people
change nyms here is to "start fresh",
to escape their embarasseing previous
posts.
In your case that is understandable.
--The Web is always in a state of flux, and info disappears, the
internet is just that, a network. Info has no proof of origin as a
rule, other that the point of origin, there is a whole lot of agendas,
and all it it can disappear on a moments notice as availability is not always going to be available without restrictions.
SS is an imitator and a troll. And of course it is a fictitious nym.
On Sep 29, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote
(Message-ID: <XnsB369872EDABA9629555@69.80.102.14>):
Robert <.robert@mu.way> wrote in news:10baiep$25ot2$1@dont-email.me:
On Sep 27, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
(Message-ID: <10ba60m$2377i$1@dont-email.me>):
On 9/27/2025 3:21 AM, Samuel Spade wrote:
None <none@none.non> wrote:
On Sep 26, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
(Message-ID: <10b6v56$19ttv$2@dont-email.me>):
On 9/26/2025 1:09 AM, None wrote:
(snip hundreds of lines)
Did you even read the Merriam-Webster entry ("often
capitalized")??
Dawn, you know why I asked you the question. A the word
is capitalized at the
beginning of a sentence, or when used in respect to a
religious phrase. Which
reflects a bit of your background.
As a person, that is not a word I have ever used to
describe things that have
to due with Easter, etc. In fact in never enters my mind
except when someone
uses it with that sense of association. I am sure you
know what I am talking
about or referencing.
I suppose that, yes, ultimately, everything that we do
is "physiological",
but as for Jesus' alleged "apparitions," such did not
happen, except in the heads of some of his followers.
No one in those days spoke of it as an apparition. If
they were to have then
it would have been an acknowledgement of a reality. One
not of this realm.
That you seek to reject it, I get.
But God is not done caring about you.
The people who wrote the Bible believed that our World was
flat:
You should check out the scriptures for yourself. The bible
describes a sphere. It was the RCC that declared it flat,
just like the flat earthrCOers.
It proved to be a major source of embarrassment to them unto
this day.
You've got it wrong. The RCC never believed in a flat earth.
Even in 240 BCE, mariners and educated Greeks knew the earth is
round.
The RCC did believe in a geocentric universe, but not a flat
earth.
https://www.cantab.net/users/michael.behrend/ebooks/PlaneTru
th/p ages/Appen dix_
A.html
Please do not say that it was all "symbolic" for these
people took the Bible at its word:
They were and are ignorant of the scriptures, void of
understanding. There is
nothing symbolic about them. The seven stars of the Pleiades
are noted as being fixed in the skies, which was hotly
contested as well, and by rCOsciencerCO. A few years ago it
was decided by the same people that yes, they are fixed.
There is no such thing as "fixed" stars. No real astronomer
claims there are. Stars all move.
You may think some stars don't move because they are in almost
the same place they were 6,000 years ago. That would be your
misunderstanding.
As the bible determined them to be. They used a different
The Bible provides no information on position of stars.
term for their positioning lest them fall into the religious
trap. The North
Star has been used for navigation both on land and on water
for that reason.
As far back into human history as you care to go,
astrologers, astronomers, etc. Have used the stability and
consistency cycling of the stars for signs of all types. Even
the star that the wise man followed was predicted by Daniel
in the Bible in his time, and he was well known in the
Heathen world for his knowledge of the Stars, etc. They all
recognized it and followed his predictions, all of which were
correct.
Yes, there has been much superstition built up around stars.
I studied and verified this over 50 years ago, so please do
not expect me to
remember all the particulars, and I no longer have the
associated books in my
library and no longer have access to the libraries I new at
that time.
Robert, so far I've never seen you support anything you ever
said, and nobody expects you to start now.
Over the last 50 years you have forgotten a lot, and filled in
the blanks with "agendized" beliefs.
Today you have access to a huge library called The Internet. It
dwarfs whatever books you had 50 years ago. There's no excuse
for your persistant ignorance, except that you're happier this
way.
And, so, sometimes Robert posts as himself, and at other times,
he posts anonymously?
It depends on the NG, I have defaults that I use, and so I know my
origin. Roberts, Doc and None, or No One.. Although others have and
commonly use the last two in particular. So not everyone that uses
those Nyms are not me.
The only reason I have seen people
change nyms here is to "start fresh",
to escape their embarasseing previous
posts.
I have used them both for years, you forgot that too?
In your case that is understandable.
The Web is always in a state of flux, and info disappears, the
internet is just that, a network. Info has no proof of origin as a
rule, other that the point of origin, there is a whole lot of
agendas, and all it it can disappear on a moments notice as
availability is not always going to be available without
restrictions.
SS is an imitator and a troll. And of course it is a fictitious
nym.
Robert <.robert@mu.way> wrote in news:10bhhv7$3tkv2$8@dont-email.me:
On Sep 29, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote
(Message-ID: <XnsB369872EDABA9629555@69.80.102.14>):
Robert <.robert@mu.way> wrote in news:10baiep$25ot2$1@dont-email.me:
On Sep 27, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
(Message-ID: <10ba60m$2377i$1@dont-email.me>):
On 9/27/2025 3:21 AM, Samuel Spade wrote:
None <none@none.non> wrote:
On Sep 26, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
(Message-ID: <10b6v56$19ttv$2@dont-email.me>):
On 9/26/2025 1:09 AM, None wrote:
(snip hundreds of lines)
Did you even read the Merriam-Webster entry ("often capitalized")??
Dawn, you know why I asked you the question. A the word
is capitalized at the
beginning of a sentence, or when used in respect to a religious phrase. Which
reflects a bit of your background.
As a person, that is not a word I have ever used to
describe things that have
to due with Easter, etc. In fact in never enters my mind except when someone
uses it with that sense of association. I am sure you
know what I am talking
about or referencing.
I suppose that, yes, ultimately, everything that we do
is "physiological",
but as for Jesus' alleged "apparitions," such did not happen, except in the heads of some of his followers.
No one in those days spoke of it as an apparition. If
they were to have then
it would have been an acknowledgement of a reality. One
not of this realm.
That you seek to reject it, I get.
But God is not done caring about you.
The people who wrote the Bible believed that our World was flat:
You should check out the scriptures for yourself. The bible describes a sphere. It was the RCC that declared it flat,
just like the flat earthrCOers.
It proved to be a major source of embarrassment to them unto
this day.
You've got it wrong. The RCC never believed in a flat earth.
Even in 240 BCE, mariners and educated Greeks knew the earth is round.
The RCC did believe in a geocentric universe, but not a flat
earth.
https://www.cantab.net/users/michael.behrend/ebooks/PlaneTru th/p ages/Appen dix_
A.html
Please do not say that it was all "symbolic" for these
people took the Bible at its word:
They were and are ignorant of the scriptures, void of understanding. There is
nothing symbolic about them. The seven stars of the Pleiades
are noted as being fixed in the skies, which was hotly
contested as well, and by rCOsciencerCO. A few years ago it
was decided by the same people that yes, they are fixed.
There is no such thing as "fixed" stars. No real astronomer
claims there are. Stars all move.
You may think some stars don't move because they are in almost
the same place they were 6,000 years ago. That would be your misunderstanding.
As the bible determined them to be. They used a different
The Bible provides no information on position of stars.
term for their positioning lest them fall into the religious trap. The North
Star has been used for navigation both on land and on water
for that reason.
As far back into human history as you care to go,
astrologers, astronomers, etc. Have used the stability and consistency cycling of the stars for signs of all types. Even
the star that the wise man followed was predicted by Daniel
in the Bible in his time, and he was well known in the
Heathen world for his knowledge of the Stars, etc. They all recognized it and followed his predictions, all of which were correct.
Yes, there has been much superstition built up around stars.
I studied and verified this over 50 years ago, so please do
not expect me to
remember all the particulars, and I no longer have the
associated books in my
library and no longer have access to the libraries I new at
that time.
Robert, so far I've never seen you support anything you ever
said, and nobody expects you to start now.
Over the last 50 years you have forgotten a lot, and filled in
the blanks with "agendized" beliefs.
Today you have access to a huge library called The Internet. It dwarfs whatever books you had 50 years ago. There's no excuse
for your persistant ignorance, except that you're happier this
way.
And, so, sometimes Robert posts as himself, and at other times,
he posts anonymously?
It depends on the NG, I have defaults that I use, and so I know my origin. Roberts, Doc and None, or No One.. Although others have and commonly use the last two in particular. So not everyone that uses those Nyms are not me.
The only reason I have seen people
change nyms here is to "start fresh",
to escape their embarasseing previous
posts.
I have used them both for years, you forgot that too?
Why change nyms at all?
In your case that is understandable.
The Web is always in a state of flux, and info disappears, the
internet is just that, a network. Info has no proof of origin as a rule, other that the point of origin, there is a whole lot of
agendas, and all it it can disappear on a moments notice as availability is not always going to be available without
restrictions.
SS is an imitator and a troll. And of course it is a fictitious
nym.
On Sep 27, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
(Message-ID: <10ba60m$2377i$1@dont-email.me>):
On 9/27/2025 3:21 AM, Samuel Spade wrote:
None <none@none.non> wrote:
On Sep 26, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
(Message-ID: <10b6v56$19ttv$2@dont-email.me>):
On 9/26/2025 1:09 AM, None wrote:
(snip hundreds of lines)
Did you even read the Merriam-Webster entry ("often capitalized")?? >>>>>>Dawn, you know why I asked you the question. A the word is capitalized at
the
beginning of a sentence, or when used in respect to a religious phrase. >>>>>> Which
reflects a bit of your background.
As a person, that is not a word I have ever used to describe things that >>>>>> have
to due with Easter, etc. In fact in never enters my mind except when >>>>>> someone
uses it with that sense of association. I am sure you know what I am >>>>>> talking
about or referencing.
I suppose that, yes, ultimately, everything that we do is
"physiological",
but as for Jesus' alleged "apparitions," such did not happen, except in >>>>>>> the heads of some of his followers.
No one in those days spoke of it as an apparition. If they were to have >>>>>> then
it would have been an acknowledgement of a reality. One not of this >>>>>> realm.
That you seek to reject it, I get.
But God is not done caring about you.
The people who wrote the Bible believed that our World was flat:
You should check out the scriptures for yourself. The bible describes a >>>> sphere. It was the RCC that declared it flat, just like the flat
earthrCOers.
It proved to be a major source of embarrassment to them unto this day.
You've got it wrong. The RCC never believed in a flat earth. Even in
240 BCE, mariners and educated Greeks knew the earth is round.
The RCC did believe in a geocentric universe, but not a flat earth.
https://www.cantab.net/users/michael.behrend/ebooks/PlaneTruth/pages/Appen
dix_
A.html
Please do not say that it was all "symbolic" for these people took the >>>>> Bible at its word:
They were and are ignorant of the scriptures, void of understanding. There >>>> is
nothing symbolic about them. The seven stars of the Pleiades are noted as >>>> being fixed in the skies, which was hotly contested as well, and by
rCOsciencerCO. A few years ago it was decided by the same people that yes, >>>> they are fixed.
There is no such thing as "fixed" stars. No real astronomer claims
there are. Stars all move.
You may think some stars don't move because they are in almost the same
place they were 6,000 years ago. That would be your misunderstanding.
As the bible determined them to be. They used a different
The Bible provides no information on position of stars.
term for their positioning lest them fall into the religious trap. The >>>> North
Star has been used for navigation both on land and on water for that
reason.
As far back into human history as you care to go, astrologers, astronomers,
etc. Have used the stability and consistency cycling of the stars for signs
of all types. Even the star that the wise man followed was predicted by >>>> Daniel in the Bible in his time, and he was well known in the Heathen world
for his knowledge of the Stars, etc. They all recognized it and followed >>>> his
predictions, all of which were correct.
Yes, there has been much superstition built up around stars.
I studied and verified this over 50 years ago, so please do not expect me >>>> to
remember all the particulars, and I no longer have the associated books in >>>> my
library and no longer have access to the libraries I new at that time.
Robert, so far I've never seen you support anything you ever said, and
nobody expects you to start now.
Over the last 50 years you have forgotten a lot, and filled in the
blanks with "agendized" beliefs.
Today you have access to a huge library called The Internet. It dwarfs
whatever books you had 50 years ago. There's no excuse for your
persistant ignorance, except that you're happier this way.
And, so, sometimes Robert posts as himself, and at other times, he posts
anonymously?
It depends on the NG, I have defaults that I use, and so I know my origin. Roberts, Doc and None, or No One.. Although others have and commonly use the last two in particular. So not everyone that uses those Nyms are not me.
The Web is always in a state of flux, and info disappears, the internet is just that, a network. Info has no proof of origin as a rule, other that the point of origin, there is a whole lot of agendas, and all it it can disappear on a moments notice as availability is not always going to be available without restrictions.
SS is an imitator and a troll. And of course it is a fictitious nym.
Robert wrote:
On Sep 27, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
(Message-ID: <10ba60m$2377i$1@dont-email.me>):
On 9/27/2025 3:21 AM, Samuel Spade wrote:
None <none@none.non> wrote:
On Sep 26, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
(Message-ID: <10b6v56$19ttv$2@dont-email.me>):
On 9/26/2025 1:09 AM, None wrote:
(snip hundreds of lines)
Did you even read the Merriam-Webster entry ("often capitalized")??
Dawn, you know why I asked you the question. A the word is capitalized
at
the
beginning of a sentence, or when used in respect to a religious phrase.
Which
reflects a bit of your background.
As a person, that is not a word I have ever used to describe things
that
have
to due with Easter, etc. In fact in never enters my mind except when
someone
uses it with that sense of association. I am sure you know what I am
talking
about or referencing.
I suppose that, yes, ultimately, everything that we do is "physiological",
but as for Jesus' alleged "apparitions," such did not happen, except
in
the heads of some of his followers.
No one in those days spoke of it as an apparition. If they were to have
then
it would have been an acknowledgement of a reality. One not of this
realm.
That you seek to reject it, I get.
But God is not done caring about you.
The people who wrote the Bible believed that our World was flat:
You should check out the scriptures for yourself. The bible describes a
sphere. It was the RCC that declared it flat, just like the flat earthrCOers.
It proved to be a major source of embarrassment to them unto this day.
You've got it wrong. The RCC never believed in a flat earth. Even in 240 BCE, mariners and educated Greeks knew the earth is round.
The RCC did believe in a geocentric universe, but not a flat earth.
https://www.cantab.net/users/michael.behrend/ebooks/PlaneTruth/pages/App
en
dix_
A.html
Please do not say that it was all "symbolic" for these people took the
Bible at its word:
They were and are ignorant of the scriptures, void of understanding. There
is
nothing symbolic about them. The seven stars of the Pleiades are noted as
being fixed in the skies, which was hotly contested as well, and by rCOsciencerCO. A few years ago it was decided by the same people that yes,
they are fixed.
There is no such thing as "fixed" stars. No real astronomer claims there are. Stars all move.
You may think some stars don't move because they are in almost the same place they were 6,000 years ago. That would be your misunderstanding.
As the bible determined them to be. They used a different
The Bible provides no information on position of stars.
term for their positioning lest them fall into the religious trap. The
North
Star has been used for navigation both on land and on water for that reason.
As far back into human history as you care to go, astrologers, astronomers,
etc. Have used the stability and consistency cycling of the stars for signs
of all types. Even the star that the wise man followed was predicted by
Daniel in the Bible in his time, and he was well known in the Heathen world
for his knowledge of the Stars, etc. They all recognized it and followed
his
predictions, all of which were correct.
Yes, there has been much superstition built up around stars.
I studied and verified this over 50 years ago, so please do not expect me
to
remember all the particulars, and I no longer have the associated books
in
my
library and no longer have access to the libraries I new at that time.
Robert, so far I've never seen you support anything you ever said, and nobody expects you to start now.
Over the last 50 years you have forgotten a lot, and filled in the blanks with "agendized" beliefs.
Today you have access to a huge library called The Internet. It dwarfs whatever books you had 50 years ago. There's no excuse for your persistant ignorance, except that you're happier this way.
And, so, sometimes Robert posts as himself, and at other times, he posts anonymously?
It depends on the NG, I have defaults that I use, and so I know my origin. Roberts, Doc and None, or No One.. Although others have and commonly use the
last two in particular. So not everyone that uses those Nyms are not me.
The Web is always in a state of flux, and info disappears, the internet is just that, a network. Info has no proof of origin as a rule, other that the point of origin, there is a whole lot of agendas, and all it it can disappear
on a moments notice as availability is not always going to be available without restrictions.
SS is an imitator and a troll. And of course it is a fictitious nym.
which groups do you post to?
On Oct 1, 2025, jojo wrote
Robert wrote:
SS is an imitator and a troll. And of course it is a fictitious nym.
which groups do you post to?
The ones you see here in the NG list except for aa. Others such as acc, just bible and some ochristian ones"